scholarly journals Exploring respiratory system to improve biological learning motivation: resysmart media application

Biosfer ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-222
Author(s):  
Luthfi Rahayu Ningsih ◽  
R Rusdi ◽  
Mieke Miarsyah

Resysmart is an interactive media on the Respiratory system material, which stands for Smart Respiratory System. This media uses the Adobe Flash CC application. This study aims to measure the effectiveness of Resysmart interactive media in increasing learning motivation. This study used a quasi-experimental method with a non-equivalent control group design. The learning model used was Problem Based Learning. Samples in this study were students of the eleventh grade of social class at SMAN 3 Cibinong, Indonesia, as many as 60 people. The results showed that there was an increase in learning motivation in the experimental class with a pre-test value of 69.20 and a post-test value of 82.00, with a Gain Score of 12.80. N-Gain Score in the experimental class was 0.42, which was classified as moderate, while the control class is 0.08, which was classified as low. After an independent t-test, a significance value of 0.00 <0.05 was obtained, which means there was a significant difference in learning motivation between Resysmart interactive media classes with classes that didn't use Resysmart interactive media. This study concluded that Resysmart interactive learning media effectively increases students' learning motivation. Based on these results, it was expected that this interactive media could be developed in other materials so that students' learning motivation can be maintained and improved.

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
pp. 333
Author(s):  
Dewi Arini ◽  
Agus Sumitra

This study purpose of was to determine the effectiveness of modification play methods in improving numeracy skills in early childhood. The research method used is a quasi-experimental method using a non-equivalent control group design that is using two classes. Data collection techniques in this study used observation, interviews and documentation studies. The data analysis is done by using descriptive data for qualitative data, and using statistics for quantitative data. Based on the normality and homogeneity test, pretest and posttest data are normally distributed and the variance is homogeneous because all the significance is greater than 0.05. The data of this study have a 0.02 2-tailed significance value which means less than 0.05, so the data has a significant difference in the ability to recognize the concept of numbers between experimental classes given the modification method and the control class given the conventional method. The normalized gain test calculation shows that the N-Gain Score for the experimental class of 78.3% belongs to the very effective category. While the N-Gain Score of the control class was 52.9%, included in the less effective category.Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui efektifitas metode bermain sondah modifikasi dalam meningkatkan kemampuan berhitung  pada anak usia dini. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode metode quasi eksperimen dengan menggunakan desain kelompok kontrol non ekuivalen yaitu menggunakan dua kelas. Data pada penelitian ini dikumpulkan dengan teknik observasi, wawancara dan studi dokumentasi. Berdasarkan uji normalitas dan homogenitas, kedua data menunjukkan kenormalan dan variansnya homogen karena semua signifikasinya lebih besar dari 0,05. Data penelitian ini memiliki nilai signifikasi 2-tailed  0,02 yang artinya kurang dari 0.05, maka data tersebut memiliki perbedaan yang  cukup signifikan pada kemampuan minat berrhitung antara kelas eksperimen yang diberi metode sondah modifikasi dan kelas kontrol yang diberi metode konvensional. Perhitungan uji gain ternormalisasi menunjukkan bahwa N-Gain Score untuk kelas eksperimen sebesar 78,3% termasuk ke dalam kategori sangat efektif.  Sementara N-Gain Score kelas control sebesar 52,9% termasuk ke dalam kategori kurang efektif.


e-GIGI ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Retno Puspitaningtiyas ◽  
Michael A. Leman ◽  
Juliatri .

Abstract: Indonesia has a prevalence of oral health problems which is continuously increasing, mostly among children. The two dominating diseases namely dental caries and periodontal disease. Factor that influences both diseases is behavior. Intervention through education with the use of appropriate methods and media can improve children’s knowledge. This study was aimed to compare the effectiveness of dental health education (DHE) using lecture method and simulation game in increasing the knowledge of oral health of children. This was a quasi experimental study with a non-equivalent control group design. Respondents were students of SDN Mantelagheng aged 10-12 years old as many as 56 students obtained by using total sampling method. Respondents were divided into two groups: lecture and simulation game, each of 27 students. The results showed that the DHE in lecture and simulation game groups could significantly increase the children’s knowledge about oral health (p=0.000). The Mann-Whitney test showed a significant difference in effectiveness between the two groups (p=0.000). The average value of the lecture group was 16.52 meanwhile of the simulation group 38.48. Conclusion: Simulation game method was more effective to improve the oral health knowledge of children than the lecture method.Keywords: dental health education, knowledgeAbstrak: Indonesia memiliki prevalensi masalah kesehatan gigi dan mulut yang terus meningkat, dan sebagian besar terjadi pada anak-anak. Dua penyakit yang mendominasi, yaitu karies gigi dan penyakit periodontal. Faktor yang berpengaruh pada kedua penyakit ini yaitu perilaku. Intervensi melalui pendidikan dengan penggunaan metode dan media yang tepat, dapat dilakukan untuk meningkatkan pengetahuan anak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbandingan efektivitas dental health education (DHE) metode ceramah dan permainan simulasi terhadap peningkatan pengetahuan kesehatan gigi dan mulut anak. Jenis penelitian ialah quasi experimental dengan rancangan non equivalent control group. populasi penelitian yaitu siswa SDN Mantelagheng yang berusia 10-12 tahun. Terdapat 56 siswa sebagai responden, diperoleh dengan metode total sampling,dibagi dalam dua kelompok yakni ceramah dan permainan simulasi masing-masing 27 responden. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan DHE pada kelompok ceramah dan permainan simulasi terhadap peningkatan pengetahuan tentang kesehatan gigi dan mulut masing-masing mendapatkan p=0,000. Hasil uji Mann-Whitney menunjukkan perbandingan bermakna antara efektivitas kedua kelompok (p=0,000), dengan nilai rerata kelompok ceramah 16,52 dan kelompok permainan simulasi 38,48. Simpulan: Metode permainan simulasi lebih efektif terhadap peningkatan pengetahuan kesehatan gigi dan mulut anak dibandingkan dengan metode ceramah.Kata kunci: dental health education, pengetahuan


Author(s):  
Nur Aliyah Nur

The research aimed to find out the effectiveness of describing and drawing picture technique in teaching transactional speaking at the second semester students of English Education Department at State Islamic University of Alauddin Makassar. This research employed quasi-experimental with non-equivalent control group design with pre-test and post-test. The population of this research was the second semester students of English education department at State Islamic University of Alauddin Makassar. The population was selected by using purposive sampling technique to determine the sample for experimental class and control class. The instrument used in this research was test. The test was used in the pre-test and post-test. The data indicated that there was a significant difference between the students’ post-test in the experimental class and post-test in the control class. Based on the findings of the research, the researchers concluded that describing and drawing picture technique was effective in teaching transactional speaking. Therefore, describing and drawing picture technique gave student opportunity to practice transactional speaking in classroom, it also could increase students’ motivation in learning in English since they feel their purpose of learning English so that they could use it and also could achieve it.The research aimed to find out the effectiveness of describing and drawing picture technique in teaching transactional speaking at the second semester students of English Education Department at State Islamic University of Alauddin Makassar. This research employed quasi-experimental with non-equivalent control group design with pre-test and post-test. The population of this research was the second semester students of English education department at State Islamic University of Alauddin Makassar. The population was selected by using purposive sampling technique to determine the sample for experimental class and control class. The instrument used in this research was test. The test was used in the pre-test and post-test. The data indicated that there was a significant difference between the students’ post-test in the experimental class and post-test in the control class. Based on the findings of the research, the researchers concluded that describing and drawing picture technique was effective in teaching transactional speaking. Therefore, describing and drawing picture technique gave student opportunity to practice transactional speaking in classroom, it also could increase students’ motivation in learning in English since they feel their purpose of learning English so that they could use it and also could achieve it.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 144-155
Author(s):  
Yenni Hasnah ◽  
Pirman Ginting ◽  
Selamat Husni Hasibuan

This research aims to analyze the learning model's practice and its effect on increasing student activity and learning outcomes in listening subjects. This study employed quasi-experimental research with a non-equivalent control group design. The data were gained using observation and tests. It is analyzed by reflection and statistical test of SPPS. The results show that the application of the AMETTA learning model effectively develops student learning activities and outcomes. The result of hypothesis testing with sig. (2-tailed) was 0.033 (˂ 0.05) It indicates that Ho is rejected. Thus, there is a significant difference between the average student learning outcomes in the experimental and control classes. In other words, the application of AMETTA learning model has a significant effect on students’ learning outcomes.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 11
Author(s):  
Fauzi Indra Witarsa

This present study was aimed at investigating the influence of cooperative learning withSFAE model on triggering students to speak up when learning social science subject at JuniorHigh School of 2 Lembang. The research employed quasi experimental study with non-equivalent control group design as well as pre- and post- giving treatment at 7H class as theexperimental group, while 7I as the controlled group. The sample of the research was chosenby using purposive sample. One of the data gathering was a closed questionnaire thatinquired students’ willingness to speak up. The data were analyzed quantitatively by using t-test. The study revealed that the results between pre- and post- giving treatment gained by theexperimental group showed significant difference. Whereas, the scores achieved in pre- andpost- the treatment by the controlled group were alike or the scores had no improvement.Consequently, it can be concluded that the use of cooperative learning with student facilitatorand explaining (SFAE) model affected significantly on students’ willingness to speak upwhen learning social science subject. yang berpengaruh terhadap sikap keberanian berbicarasiswa dalam pembelajaran IPS.


Author(s):  
Abdul Aziz Rifa'at

The objective of this study was to find out the significant difference in writing achievement between the 11th grade students SMA Al-Amalul Khair Palembang who were taught by Mind Mapping technique and in that of those who were not. The second objective was to find out the improvement of the 11th grade students’ writing score at SMA Al-Amalul Khair Palembang after they were taught using Mind Mapping technique. The Quasi-experimental method through pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group design was used in this study. The population was all of 11th grade natural science students at SMA Al-Amalul Khair Palembang in academic year 2018/2019. The total number of the population was 52 students in which they were divided into two classes as class 11.1 and 11.2. The sample was taken non-randomly. Class 11.1 was chosen as the experimental group and class 11.2 was chosen as the control group. The total number of the sample in the experimental group was 22 students. The test was administered twice as pretest and posttest. The results of the tests were analyzed by using paired sample t-test and independent sample t-test through SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) program.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 53-62
Author(s):  
Muhammad Zainuddin

This research aims to find out (1) the influence of using the Hypnoteaching method in improving students’ motivation, (2) the influence of using the Hypnoteaching method towards students’ reading achievement and (3) the influence of using the Hypnoteaching method in enhancing students’ motivation and reading achievement. This is quasi-experimental research with the pre-test and post-test control group design. This research was conducted at class XI students in Madrasah Aliyah Negeri Unggul Tenggarong in the period of 2015/2016. The data were collected using tests and non-test. The data were analyzed by using the Multivariate Analyses of Variance (MANOVA) at the significance level of 95 % (p=0.05). The results of this research are as follows. (1) There is an influence of students’ learning motivation after teaching by using the Hypnoteaching method. There is a significant difference in students’ reading achievement after teaching by using the Hypnoteaching method. The Hypnoteaching method affects students’ achievement in reading and student’s learning motivation after getting treatment, the data of Wilks’Lambda have a significance (F-value = 6.963) and sig = 0.02< 0.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 46
Author(s):  
Cherry Acerola Safira ◽  
Neni Hasnunidah ◽  
Darlen Sikumbang

This study aimed to find out the significant effect of Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) learning model, student's academic ability, and the interaction between learning models and academic ability of the students’ argumentation skills. The population was all students of class VIII MTs Negeri 1 Bandar Lampung. The Samples were students of class VIII A and VIII B selected from the population by random cluster sampling technique. This study was quasi-experimental with Pretest Post-test Non Equivalent Control Group Design. The instrument used was argumentation skills test on the material motion systems in humans. The data were statistically analyzed using Ankova test and test Significant Difference (LSD) respectively at 5% significance level. The results showed that the learning ADI model, academic ability, and the interaction between the ADI model and academic abilities significantly influenced argumentation skills with significant value of each were 0,000; 0.007; and 0.038.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 6-18
Author(s):  
Peter Odhiambo Ongang’a ◽  
Washington Adede Ochola ◽  
Judith Odhiambo ◽  
Evans Abenga Basweti

This study focused on determining the influence of SAEP on knowledge gain in secondary school agricultural education among Form Three students in Migori County, Kenya. It zeroed on analysing the differences in knowledge gained in agriculture between two groups, one taking part in SAEP and the other not taking part. It utilised quasi-experimental design, particularly the pre-test and post-test none-equivalent control group design incorporating a sample of 384 forms three agriculture students in Migori County. A test for measuring learning outcomes was used to collect data before and after the programme. Analysis of data was done using SPSS (Version 22). Descriptive statistics were used to present and describe data while inferential statistics were used test hypotheses at α = 0.05. The study established that there was a statistically significant difference in the acquisition of knowledge of specific agriculture content between secondary school agriculture students exposed to SAEP as opposed to the control group.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 456
Author(s):  
Achmad Taher ◽  
Sugeng Utaya ◽  
Syamsul Bachri

<div align="center"><table width="645" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><tbody><tr><td valign="top" width="439"><p><strong>Abstract</strong><strong>:</strong> This study aims to determine the differences in student geography learning outcomes taught with the group investigation model and those taught by conventional methods (discussion). This type of research is a quasi-experimental (quasi experimental). The study design used a pretest - posttest non-equivalent control group design. The data analysis used is the independent sample t-test value of the gain score with the help of the SPSS 16.0 for Windows application. The results showed that there were significant differences in geographic learning outcomes between the experimental class and the control class. The value of geography learning outcomes of students taught with group investigation models is better than the geography learning outcomes of students who are taught using conventional methods (discussion). This is because students who conduct investigations can understand geography learning material on the topic of coastal abrasion better than students who study conventionally.</p><p><strong>Abstrak:<em> </em></strong>Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar geografi siswa yang diajar dengan model <em>group investigation</em> dan yang diajar dengan metode konvensional (diskusi). Jenis penelitian ini merupakan eksperimen semu (<em>quasi experimental)</em>. Rancangan penelitian menggunakan <em>pretest-posttest</em> <em>non-equivalent control group desain</em>. Analisis data yang digunakan adalah uji <em>independent sample t-test</em><em> </em>nilai dari <em>gain score</em> dengan bantuan aplikasi <em>SPSS 16.0 for windows</em>. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya perbedaan hasil belajar geografi yang signifikan antara kelas eksperimen dan kelas kontrol. Nilai hasil belajar geografi siswa yang diajar dengan model <em>group investigation</em> lebih baik dibanding hasil belajar geografi siswa yang diajar dengan metode konvensional (diskusi). Hal ini disebabkan siswa yang melakukan investigasi dapat memahami materi pembelajaran geografi topik abrasi pantai lebih baik dibanding siswa yang belajar secara konvensional.</p></td></tr></tbody></table></div>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document