scholarly journals Studi komparasi learning cycle 5E dan learning together dikombinasi dengan drill and practice terhadap prestasi belajar kimia ditinjau dari keterampilan proses siswa

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 104-113
Author(s):  
Mita Fujiyanti ◽  
Endang Susilowati ◽  
Sulistyo Saputro

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan prestasi belajar antara siswa yang diberikan model pembelajaran Learning Cycle 5E dan Learning Together dikombinasikan dengan Drill and Practice;  siswa yang memiliki keterampilan proses tinggi dan keterampilan proses rendah; serta interaksi antara pembelajaran Learning Cycle 5E dan Learning Together dikombinasi dengan Drill and Practice dengan keterampilan proses siswa terhadap prestasi belajar siswa pada materi pokok hidrolisis garam. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif dengan metode eksperimen. Sampel penelitian terdiri dari dua kelas siswa (XI MIA 1 dan XI MIA 3) yang ditentukan dengan menggunakan teknik cluster random sampling. Data diperoleh melalui tes tertulis, angket, observasi. Hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa: (1) siswa yang diberikan penerapan model pembelajaran Learning Cycle 5E memiliki prestasi belajar yang lebih baik dibandingkan siswa yang diberikan penerapan model pembelajaran Learning Together yang dikombinasikan dengan Drill and Practice; (2) siswa yang memiliki keterampilan proses tinggi memiliki prestasi belajar yang lebih baik dibandingkan siswa yang memiliki keterampilan proses rendah; dan (3) terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran Learning Cycle 5E dan Learning Together yang dikombinasikan dengan Drill and Practice dengan keterampilan proses siswa. Comparison Study of Learning Cycle 5E and Learning Together Combined With Drill and Practice on Student Achievement in Hydrolysis of Salt Viewed from Process Skill AbstractThe aim of this study were to know differences student’s achievement between Learning Cycle 5E models and Learning Together in combination with Drill and Practice; student’s achievement between higher process skill and lower process skill; and interaction between Learning Cycle 5E and Learning Together in combination with Drill and Practice models with process skill towards student’s achievement. This research is a quantitative research with experimental method. The sample consists of 2 class which taken by cluster random sampling technique. The techniques of collecting data using documentation, test, questionnaire, and observation. Based on result of the research can be concluded that: (1) student’s achievement of chemistry learning use Learning Cycle 5E better than Learning Together in combination with Drill and Practice models; (2) student’s achievement higher process skill better than lower process skill; and (3) there was an interaction between Learning Cycle 5E and Learning Together in combination with Drill and Practice models with process skill towards student’s achievement.

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 85
Author(s):  
Anggoro Yugo Pamungkas ◽  
Sugiman Sugiman ◽  
Nining Setyaningsih

This study aims to (1) analyze Discovery Learning Setting Think Pair Share on mathematics learning achievement, (2) analyze the level of students 'reasoning towards mathematics learning achievement, and (3) determine the interaction of Discovery Learning Setting Think Pair Share and the level of students' reasoning on mathematics learning achievement. This type of research uses quantitative research with a quasi-experimental design. All grade VIII students of State Junior High School 1 Sambi were the population of this study. The sample in this study consisted of two classes, 31 experimental  and 32 control students, with a sampling technique using cluster random sampling. Data collection techniques using documentation, tests, and questionnaires. The data analysis technique used the ANOVA technique. Two ways with different cells. The results of the study with a significance level of 5% are (1) there is a good effect using Discovery Learning Setting Think Pair Share on students 'mathematics learning achievement, (2) there is a good effect of reasoning on students' mathematics learning achievement, and (3) there is no interaction between Discovery Learning. Think Pair Share setting and students' reasoning. Therefore, it is concluded that mathematics learning achievement can be influenced by Discovery Learning Setting Think Pair Share and reasoning. Keywords: Discovery learning setting think pair share; mathematics learning outcomes; reasoning. AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk (1) menganalisis Discovery Learning Setting Think Pair Share terhadap prestasi belajar matematika, (2) menganalisis tingkat penalaran siswa terhadap prestasi belajar matematika, dan (3) mengetahui interaksi Discovery Learning Setting Think Pair Share dan tingkat penalaran siswa terhadap prestasi belajar matematika. Jenis penelitian menggunakan penelitian kuantitatif dengan desain quasi experiment. Seluruh siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 1 Sambi menjadi populasi penelitian ini. Sampel dalam penelitian ini terdiri dari dua kelas dengan 31 siswa eksperimen dan 32 siswa kontrol, dan pengambilan teknik sampling menggunakan cluster random sampling. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan metode dokumentasi, tes dan angket. Teknik analisis data menggunakan teknik ANAVA dua jalan dengan sel tak sama. Hasil penelitian dengan tingkat signifikansi 5% adalah (1) ada pengaruh baik menggunakan Discovery Learning Setting Think Pair Share terhadap prestasi belajar matematika siswa, (2) ada pengaruh baik penalaran terhadap prestasi belajar matematika siswa, dan (3) tidak ada interaksi antara Discovery Learning Setting Think Pair Share dan penalaran siswa. Oleh karena itu, disimpulkan bahwa prestasi belajar matematika dapat dipengaruhi oleh Discovery Learning Setting Think Pair Share dan penalaran. Kata Kunci: Discovery learning setting think pair share; penalaran; prestasi belajar matematika.


2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 32
Author(s):  
Sri Utami ◽  
Lalu Sucipto

Abstrak - Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui keefektifan model pembelajaran Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas VIII SMP Salafiyah Darul Falah Mataram yang berjumlah 153 siswa. Sampel dalam penelitian ini yaitu kelas VIII B dengan jumlah 28 siswa. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian kuantitatif, dengan desain pre-eksperimen (One Group Pretest Postest Design). Teknik pengambilan sampel yaitu menggunakan teknik cluster  random sampling . Teknik analisis data menggunakan uji-t test Sampel Related. Hasil perhitungan uji-t tes Sampel Related  didapatkan  sebesar dan sebesar dengan taraf signifikan . Karena , maka menunjukkan bahwa model pembelajaran Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) efektif terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa.Abstract: This study aims to determine the effectiveness of Teachers Assisted Individualization (TAI) learning model for students' math problem solving skills. The population in this study is the students of grade VIII SMP Salafiyah Darul Falah Mataram, amounting to 153 students. The sample in this research is class VIII B with the number of 28 students. The type of research used is quantitative research, with pre-experiment design (One Group Pretest Postest Design). The sampling technique is using cluster random sampling technique. Technique of data analysis using test-t test Sampel Related. The result of t-test calculation of Sample Related test obtained t_hitung equal to 19,01 and t_table equal to 2,052 with significant level 5%. Because t_hitung≥t_tabel, then show that Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) learning model effective to student's math problem solving ability.


Author(s):  
Dwi Noviana Komsi ◽  
IM Hambali ◽  
M Ramli

Penelitian ini berdasarkan fenomena motivasi belajar siswa yang masuk pada kategori rendah yang dipengaruhi oleh bebrapa faktor seperti; pola asuh orang  tua, konsep diri, serta kontrol diri. Penelitian ini menggunakan rancangan penelitian kuantitatif dengan desain ex-post facto. Sampel dalam penelitian berjumlah 313 siswa yang diambil dari tiga SMA Negeri di Kota Malang (SMA Negeri 4, SMA Negeri 7, SMA Negeri 10) dengan menggunakan  teknik sampel multistage cluster random sampling. Penelitian ini menggunakan analisis data multiple linear /regresi linier berganda. Hasil penelitian ini adalah adanya kontribusi  yang signifikan variabel pola asuh orang tua dan kontrol diri terhadap motivasi belajar. Namun variabel konsep diri tidak berkontribusi secara parsial terhadap motivasi belajar. The contribution of democratic parenting pattern, self-control and self-concept on the students' learning motivationAbstractThis study is based on the phenomenon of student learning motivation that entered in the low category influenced by several factors such as; parenting patterns, self-concept, and self-control. This research uses quantitative research design with ex-post facto design. Samples in the study amounted to 313 students taken from three SMA Negeri in Malang (SMA Negeri 4, SMA Negeri 7, SMA Negeri 10) by using multistage cluster random sampling technique. This study uses multiple linear data analysis / multiple linear regression. The result of this research is the existence of significant contribution of parenting pattern of parents and self control to motivation learn. However, self concept variables do not contribute partially to the motivation to learn.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Tri Na'imah ◽  
Tukiran Tanireja

<p class="IABSTRAK"><strong>Abstract: </strong>This study aims to describe the source of student well-being in Javanese ado­lescents. This research uses quantitative research approach and supported by qualitative. Research location in Banyumas with cluster random sampling technique. Instrument data collection using the scale of student well-being and open source questionaire student well-being and interview guide. Quantitative data analysis using descriptive. The results of the study are: 1) The sources of student well-being are the dimensions of social relations, cognitive, emotional and spiritual. 3) The inhibiting factor of achieving student well-being is if there are problems in the social, cognitive, emotional, physical and spiritual.</p><p class="IKEYWORDS"><strong>Abstrak: </strong>Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan sumber <em>student well-being</em> pada remaja Jawa. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan penelitian kuantitatif dan didukung dengan kualitatif. Lokasi penelitian di Banyumas dengan teknik <em>cluster random sampling</em>. Instrumen pengumpulan data menggunakan skala <em>student well-being</em> dan <em>openquesioner</em> sumber <em>student well-being</em> serta panduan wawancara. Analisis data kuantitatif menggunakan <em>deskriptif</em>. Hasil penelitian adalah: 1) Sumber-sumber <em>student well-being</em> adalah dimensi hubungan sosial, kognitif, emosi dan spiritual. 3) Faktor penghambat tercapainya <em>student well-being</em> adalah jika ada masalah dalam dimensi sosial, kognitif, emosi, fisik dan spiritual.</p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-42
Author(s):  
Fahkur Setiaji ◽  
Suherman Suherman

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of the discovery learning model integrated learning start with a question of mathematical communication skills. This research is a quantitative research with a type of quasi experiment. The sampling technique in this study is the random sampling technique. Data collected through interview observation and test. The data analysis technique used is the uncorrelated t test. Based on the results of research and data processing, it was found that there was an influence of discovery learning integrated learning model start with a question and discovery learning learning model on mathematical communication skills. Furthermore, mathematical communication of students by using the discovery learning model integrated learning start with a question is better than mathematical communication of students using discovery learning learning models.


Author(s):  
ADI SUPRAYITNO

In the Actifity<strong> </strong>The purpose of this study is to describe the effect of th implementation of  based on REE instruction and regular Economical instruction and prior knowledge on Economical communication capabilities and understanding of grade 7 Sunior High School (SMP) students.  The study was carried out through a preliminary survey continuedby an experiment using factorial design with non-equivalent control group of Junior High Schools at Madiun cities.  The samples were choosen by cluster random sampling technique. The data were analyzed by using multivariat nalysis of covariance (MANCOVA) factorial 2 x 2.  This study showed that, for achievement of Economical communication capabilities and understanding, Economical instruction with REE was better than regular Economical instruction, the prior knowledge had a positive effec, and they was no interaction effect between Economical intruction (based on REE and regular) and prior knowledge (high and low).


2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Suratmi Suratmi ◽  
Agustina Sri Purnami

The purpose of this research is to know about students problem solving ability between students who implemented metacognitive strategy and conventional strategy,  to know about students problem solving ability between student who have high perception, medium perception dan low perception in mathematics, and to know about interaction between of strategy and perception. This research is quasy experimental. The population of this research were students of class VIII SMP Negeri 3 Karangreja year 2014/2015. The sample of this research were 2 class which is 63 students with cluster random sampling technique. Data analysis is used descriptive analysis dan two ways Anava or F-test. The result of this research showed that: The problem solving ability of experiment class better than control class  that is ; The problem solving ability of student who have high perception is better than medium and low perception, the problem solving ability of students who have medium perception is equal with low perception  that is , and there is no interaction between of strategy and level of perception in problem solving ability  that is .


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 613
Author(s):  
Meli Sutri Yani ◽  
Wisroni Wisroni

This research was motivated by the successful implementation of the child care and education module in the FDS program in Lolong Belanti Village, Padang City. This study aims to see the description of the implementation of the child care and education module in the FDS program based on aspects of efficiency, effectiveness and responsiveness. This type of research is descriptive quantitative research. The population in this study amounted to 86 KPM. The sampling technique was cluster random sampling, with a total of 43 people. Data collection techniques using a questionnaire. The data analysis technique uses the percentage formula. The results showed that (1) the efficiency of the implementation of the Parenting and Child Education module was obtained at an interval of 93% in the very appropriate category, (2) The effectiveness of the implementation of the Parenting and Child Education module obtained an interval of 93% in the very appropriate category, and (3) the responsiveness of implementation Parenting and Child Education module, obtained 98% interval is in the very category.


2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 70
Author(s):  
Febri Intan Ratmadani ◽  
Ahmad Ahmad

This study aimed to detemine whether Student Facilitator And Explaining cooperative learning model affected students mathematical communication skills. The research design used was Posttest Only Control Design. The population in this study was entire seventh grade students in SMP Negeri 2 Somagede. Sampling was determined using Cluster Random Sampling technique. Two classes of sample were obtained. Class VII B, consistend of 23 students, selected as the experimental class which employed cooperative tipe Student Facilitator And Explaining learning model and class VII D, consisted of 23 students, was as the control class which used direct learning. Research results indicated that mathematical communication skills of students who attended Student Facilitator And Explaining learning was better than that of students who attended direct learning. So it can be interpreted that Student Facilitator And Explaining learning cooperative model affected students mathematical communication skills


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 9
Author(s):  
Utin Desy Susiaty ◽  
Hodiyanto Hodiyanto

<p>The aims of this study is to find out: (1) a better learning model between contextual, realistic or conventional; (2) better learning outcomes between students with high, medium or low interpersonal intelligence; (3) better learning outcomes between students with high, medium or low interpersonal intelligence on each learning model; (4) a better learning model between contextual, realistic or conventional at each level of interpersonal intelligence. This research is using the experimental method. The sampling technique is cluster random sampling. Data collection tools used were questionnaires and tests. The data analysis technique used is the analysis of three-way variance with unequal cells. The results showed that: (1) contextual learning models are better than realistic but provide the same learning outcomes as conventional, while realistic and conventional learning outcomes are equally good; (2) students who have high, medium or low interpersonal intelligence have the same learning outcomes; (3) In each learning model, students with high, medium and low interpersonal intelligence have the same learning outcomes; (4) At each level of interpersonal intelligence, the contextual learning model is better than realistic and conventional.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document