scholarly journals Penegakan Peraturan Gubernur Bali Nomor 10 Tahun 2021 dalam Tatanan Kehidupan Era Baru

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 580-583
Author(s):  
I Putu Aris Sedana Putra ◽  
Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi ◽  
Luh Putu Suryani
Keyword(s):  
Health Workers ◽  
Communicable Disease ◽  
Disease Outbreaks ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Health Condition ◽  
Public Health Emergencies ◽  
Presidential Decree ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right ◽  
Research Type

The emergence of the Covid-19 pandemic has claimed many lives and has an impact on all aspects of the state, the Indonesian Government issued Presidential Decree No. 11 of 2020 concerning Public Health Emergencies as a serious warning of health threats. Dishonesty in conveying information on patients suspected of being infected with COVID-19 is categorized as hindering the prevention of outbreaks that can threaten the lives of people around them, including the health workers who handle them. The act of obstructing the handling of the epidemic can be punished. The purposes of this study are to analyze the legal regulation of health protocols in the new life order and the sanctions for people who do not heed the Governor's Regulation No. 10 Year 2021 in Bali. This research method uses a normative legal research type with a statutory concept approach. Data collection techniques were carried out by examining existing library materials. The legal sources used are divided into two, namely primary and secondary legal sources which are then processed and analyzed systematically. The conclusion from the results of the research that has been carried out is that the application of strict sanctions to actions that hinder the prevention of epidemics is punishable by law number 4 of 1984 concerning Communicable Disease Outbreaks article 14 paragraphs (1) and (2). The government seeks to protect health workers as the vanguard of handling the threat of COVID-19 in a preventive and repressive manner. For this reason, it is necessary to disclose one's own health information by disclosing his health condition honestly to health workers to get the right treatment.

scholarly journals ASPEK HUKUM PELAKSANAAN VAKSINASI COVID-19 DI INDONESIA

2021 ◽  
pp. 1263
Author(s):  
Stephanie PD ◽  
Enjelina S ◽  
Angelica MF ◽  
Imelda Martinelli
Keyword(s):  
Disease Outbreaks ◽  
World Health ◽  
Disease Spread ◽  
Infectious Disease Outbreaks ◽  
The People ◽  
The World ◽  
Presidential Decree ◽  
The Government ◽  
Health Organization ◽  
The Right

The World Health Organization (WHO) defines the 2019-nCoV type of corona virus as a pandemic of a new type of disease spread throughout the world, this is not only a public health case, but will touch every sector. The COVID-19 (cov-19) pandemic has resulted in an emergency for the healthy condition of the Indonesian people, so President Joko Widodo has issued Presidential Decree No. 11/2020. In "procuring vaccines and implementing vaccinations for the prevention of the COVID-19 pandemic" President Joko Widodo stipulates Presidential Decree No. 14/2021. In choosing health facilities and infrastructure independently & responsibly, every human being has the right to choose according to his wishes, due to the pandemic conditions that concern the interests of the people and the state, so giving vaccinations is actually voluntary because emergency conditions can be forced. Although there is already a legal umbrella for Law No. 4/1984: "Infectious Disease Outbreaks" and Law No. 6/2018: "Health Quarantine", many in the field agree and vice versa on the implementation of vaccination in the community. The purpose of the study is to understand the nature of the administration of the corona vaccine according to the laws and regulations adopted and the factors that occur in society. Using a normative method with a qualitative approach. Giving vaccines to the community is forced. limited availability of vaccines; there are those who support there are those who are antipathy from the community regarding the implementation of vaccination; uneven distribution. The reason for the community's refusal to receive the Covid-19 vaccine is due to different trusts, this is supported by the lack of communication channels as well as the delivery of information that is not well targeted, the data on the type of vaccine is limited in information, the availability of the Covid-19 vaccine, as well as safe conditions. The government should fully support the Nusantara vaccine and the Merah Putih vaccine developed by Indonesian researchers. World Health Organizatioan (WHO) mendefinisikan Virus corona jenis Virus 2019-nCoV sebagai pandemi jenis penyebaran penyakit baru keseluruh dunia, hal ini bukan hanya kasus kesehatan masyarakat, tapi akan menyentuh setiap sektor. Pandemi covid-19(cov-19) mengakibatkan kedaruratan kondisi sehat khalayak Indonesia, sehingga Presiden Joko Widodo menetapkan KeppresNo.11/2020. Dalam “pengadaan vaksin dan pelaksanaan vaksinasi untuk penanggulangan pandemi covid-19” Presiden Joko widodo menetapkan Perpres No.14/2021. Dalam memilih sarana juga prasarana kesehatan secara mandiri & bertangggungjawab tiap manusia punya hak memilih sesuai dengan keinginannya, berhubung kondisi pandemi yang menyangkut kepentingan rakyat dan negara lebih diutamakan, jadi pemberian vaksinasi yang sebenaranya bersifat volunteer karena kondisi darurat bisa bersifat dipaksakan. Meskipun sudah ada payung hukum UU No.4/1984:”Wabah Penyakit Menular” serta UU No.6/2018:“Kekarantinaan Kesehatan”, tapi dilapangan banyak yang setuju dan sebaliknya pada pelaksanaan vaksinasi dimasyarakat. Tujuan penelitian untuk memahami sifat dari pemberian vaksin corona menurut peraturan perundangan yang dianut dan faktor- faktor yang terjadi di masyarakat.  Memakai metode normatif dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Pemberian vaksin kepada masyarakat bersifat memaksa. keterbatasan ketersedian vaksin; ada yang mendukung ada yang antipati dari masyarakat terkait pelaksanaan vaksinasi; penyaluran yang tidak merata. Alasan penolakan masyarakat dalam menerima vaksin Covid-19 dikarenakan adanya trust yang berbeda,  hal ini didukung kurangnya alur komunikasi juga cara penyampaian informasi yang kurang tepat sasaran, data jenis vaksin terbatas informasinya, ketersediaan vaksinCov-19, juga syarat aman. Pemerintah selayaknya mendukung penuh vaksin Nusantara dan vaksin Merah Putih  yang dikembangkan para peneliti Indonesia.

scholarly journals Implementasi Pemidanaan terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Illegal Logging di Taman Nasional Waykambas

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 396-400
Author(s):  
Ida Ayu Naradita ◽  
Made Minggu Widyantara ◽  
Ni Made Sukaryati Karma
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Health Workers ◽  
Health Conditions ◽  
Illegal Logging ◽  
Prevention Measures ◽  
Public Health Emergencies ◽  
Criminal Penalty ◽  
Presidential Decree ◽  
Legal Sanctions ◽  
The Government

The Indonesian government issued Presidential Decree No. 11 of 2020 concerning Public Health Emergencies as a serious warning of the threat of Covid-19. The delivery of dishonest information from a patient suspected of being infected with Covid-19 is an action to prevent the response to an outbreak that threatens the lives of people around him, including transmission to health workers who care for him. This study was formulated to figure out the legal sanctions for Covid 19 patients who were dishonest about their health conditions, and to find out the efforts made by the government in providing protection to health workers in handling Covid-19 patients. The research method used in the implementation of this research is normative legal research with an approach to the concept of legislation and the opinions of experts regarding to the law. The results showed that the application of strict sanctions to obstruction of the epidemic prevention measures could result in criminal penalties based on Law No. 4 of 1984 concerning Outbreaks of Infectious Diseases. As for the efforts made by the government to provide protection to health workers from the threat of Covid-19, it is given both preventively and repressively. Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that patients who are not honest about their health conditions who have been infected with Covid-19 can be given a criminal penalty because this action is assumed as the way to prevent the government in overcoming the epidemic of infectious diseases that are currently hitting the community, then the government has also provided protection for health workers who treat patients infected with Covid-19 in a preventive and repressive manner.

scholarly journals Sanksi Hukum Bagi Pasien Tidak Jujur Terinfeksi Corona Virus Disease 2019

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 390-395
Author(s):  
Gede Dana Semara Putra ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
l Made Minggu Widyantara
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Health Workers ◽  
Virus Disease ◽  
Health Conditions ◽  
Prevention Measures ◽  
Public Health Emergencies ◽  
Criminal Penalty ◽  
Presidential Decree ◽  
Legal Sanctions ◽  
The Government

The Indonesian government issued Presidential Decree No. 11 of 2020 concerning Public Health Emergencies as a serious warning of the threat of Covid-19. The delivery of dishonest information from a patient suspected of being infected with Covid-19 is an action to prevent the response to an outbreak that threatens the lives of people around him, including transmission to health workers who care for him. This study was formulated to figure out the legal sanctions for Covid 19 patients who were dishonest about their health conditions, and to find out the efforts made by the government in providing protection to health workers in handling Covid-19 patients. The research method used in the implementation of this research is normative legal research with an approach to the concept of legislation and the opinions of experts regarding to the law. The results showed that the application of strict sanctions to obstruction of the epidemic prevention measures could result in criminal penalties based on Law No. 4 of 1984 concerning Outbreaks of Infectious Diseases. As for the efforts made by the government to provide protection to health workers from the threat of Covid-19, it is given both preventively and repressively. Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that patients who are not honest about their health conditions who have been infected with Covid-19 can be given a criminal penalty because this action is assumed as the way to prevent the government in overcoming the epidemic of infectious diseases that are currently hitting the community, then the government has also provided protection for health workers who treat patients infected with Covid-19 in a preventive and repressive manner.  

Electronic Communication in the Paradigm of Interaction of State and Society

2020 ◽  
pp. 11-17
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Communication ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Digital Environment ◽  
Active Involvement ◽  
Communication Law ◽  
State And Society ◽  
Legal Communication ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right

In recent decades, the phenomenon of mass electronic communication has been studied by various sciences. The right also turned out to be included in a similar discourse. Communication in the digital environment is the reason for the interaction of previously distant segments of society. In modern law, the concept of electronic communication remains in a certain sense debatable, it is often identified with legal communication. At the same time, electronic communication has an additional «dimension». The globalization of the information space encourages legal scholars to study electronic communication as the action and interaction of various actors, based on Internet technologies using web services, portals, blogs, websites, social networks. There is a need for re- levant legal regulation of the informational interaction between the authorities and society in the Republic of Belarus, in connection with which a new «field» is opening up for activities in various areas of law. The meaning of electronic communication is constantly expanding and, depending on the specialization, even varies. For an adequate understanding of electronic communication, law must take into account the tools of other humanities. In contact with the digital environment, legal science is called upon to reformat research tasks to explain the new empirical and theoretical experience associated with the transformation of the paradigm of interaction between the state and society in the network structures. The author comprehends these issues in relation to the conditions of development of e-government in the Republic of Belarus and the need for more active involvement of the public in the government.

Collective conflict in the public sector in France

2002 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 688-700
Author(s):  
Marie-Armelle Souriac
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Collective Action ◽  
Collective Bargaining ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Public Enterprises ◽  
Roles And Responsibilities ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Future ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right

The right to strike has been recognised in France, even as a right guaranteed by the Constitution, since 1946. Strikes in the public sector are subject to specific legal regulation, including requirements for minimum notice periods and, in some circumstances, minimum service requirements. This contribution examines these special legal features of public-sector strikes. It is necessary to clarify the respective roles and responsibilities of the management of public enterprises (or administrative authorities) and the government. The article also considers alternative (and new) forms of collective action and agreements. In the future there may well be even greater scope for the regulation of strikes to be covered by collective bargaining.

scholarly journals Sosialisasi Penggunaan Pembersih Tangan (Handsanitizer) yang Efektif dalam Upaya Memenuhi Standar WHO dan Protokol Kesehatan Sesuai dengan UU No. 6 Tahun 2018 tentang Karantina Kesehatan di Muhammadiyah Kramat Jati, Jakarta Timur

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-58
Author(s):  
Marjan Miharja ◽  
Erwin Syahruddin ◽  
Bionda Johan Anggara ◽  
Johan Johan ◽  
Gugus Atmoko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Communicable Disease ◽  
Disease Outbreaks ◽  
Religious Activities ◽  
Public Places ◽  
Hand Sanitizer ◽  
Infectious Disease Outbreaks ◽  
The Government ◽  
Spreading Disease

WHO determined COVID-19 as a pandemic on March 9, 2020, which is the strongest push for this community service program to be carried out. WHO has published guidance on adjusting the MFIs while managing the risk of a spike in case numbers. WHO publishes guidance on adapting to LKMS, while still managing the risk of a re-increase in the number of cases. A series of measures was developed to help provide guidance to countries in adapting public health measures to various contexts and this provides consideration for decision makers. In connection with the policy of controlling infectious disease outbreaks, Indonesia has Law Number 4 of 1984 concerning Communicable Disease Outbreaks, Government Regulation Number 40 of 1991 concerning Management of Contagious Disease Outbreaks, and Regulation of the Minister of Health Number 1501 / Menkes / Per / X / 2010 concerning Certain Types of Infectious Diseases That Can Cause Outbreaks and Countermeasures. Including various policies to deal with the Covid-19 pandemic issued by the government. One of them is the Large-Scale Social Restrictions or PSBB at the end of March. Citing Article 1 paragraph 11 of Law (UU) Number 6 of 2018 concerning Health Quarantine, PSBB is a limitation of certain activities of residents in an area suspected of being infected with a disease and / or contamination in such a way as to prevent the possibility of spreading disease or contamination. The policy covers at least school and work vacations, restrictions on religious activities and restrictions on activities in public places or facilities, including the socialization of washing hands using hand sanitizer which can be done in certain situations where soap and clean water are not available. For the results to be effective, the hand sanitizer used should contain at least 60% alcohol. This step is a necessity in order to prevent Covid-19 from becoming more widespread. The goal to be achieved from the socialization of good and correct hand washing is to understand the procedures, and be able to practice how to wash hands properly and correctly. It is hoped that in this socialization there will be a change in behavior in the community in washing hands as often as possible properly and correctly.

scholarly journals Problematik Kepastian Hukum Darurat Kesehatan Masyarakat Pada Masa Pandemi COVID-19

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 197
Author(s):  
Hananto Widodo ◽  
Fradhana Putra Disantara
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Public Health Emergencies ◽  
Legal Implications ◽  
Concept Of Health ◽  
Presidential Decree ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Government

This research is normative research. The purpose of this research is to examine the emergency constitutional law related to the concept of health emergencies as referred to in Law No. 6 of 2018 concerning Health Quarantine; and provide comprehensive analysis and formulation related to future emergency law arrangements. The research method used in this research is a statute approach and a conceptual approach; by using primary and secondary legal materials. The results of this study are the legal implications related to the determination of the health emergency status based on Presidential Decree No. 11 of 2020 has created legal uncertainty, because the government has actually issued Government Regulation No. 21 of 2020 first; is not a Government Regulation on procedures for determining and revoking the status of determining health emergencies. On the other hand, the determination of public health emergencies is not synergistic with its implementation. Furthermore, an ideal arrangement is needed in the future related to public health emergencies in order to achieve legal certainty in public health emergencies. For this reason, a harmonization of the state of danger law is needed or the establishment of a danger state law such as the omnibus bill

scholarly journals PENDATAAN PENERIMA ZAKAT KANTOR BAZNAS KABUPATEN PROBOLINGGO BERBASIS ANDROID GIS

JOUTICA ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 287
Author(s):  
Muslim Alamsyah ◽  
Mochammad Firman Arif
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Android Application ◽  
Data Collection Methods ◽  
The Poor ◽  
Presidential Decree ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Collection Methods

Zakat is a number of assets that must be issued by Muslims to be given to groups who have the right to receive, such as the poor and the like, according to those stipulated by sharia. The law of zakat is obligatory for every Muslim who has fulfilled certain conditions. The National Zakat Amil Agency (BAZNAS) is the official body and the only one formed by the government based on RI Presidential Decree No. 8 of 2001 which has duties and functions to collect and distribute zakat, infaq, and alms. The purpose of making this research is to build an android application for GIS zakat assistance map (BAZNAS) in probolinggo district. This study uses data collection methods used in this study through observation, which is collecting data obtained from existing documents or stored records, both in the form of transcript notes, books, newspapers, plunging directly to the location to take pictures, and so on. Output targets of this study are in the form of an application for collecting data on zakat assistance from an Android-based Baznas office and will be published in non-accredited national journals. The application can be used by someone who wants to send donations via Smartphone easily. As well as the results of this application, it can map the locations of recipients of Zakat and Donors according to the coordinates of points of different colors. With the application, it can help channeling Zakat in Probolinggo district. Keywords: Zakat, Baznas, Android, GIS

scholarly journals Ensuring a Balance Between Public and Private Interests in the Implementation of Quarantine Measures

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 317-340
Author(s):  
Yaroslav Lazur ◽  
Tetyana Karabin ◽  
Oleksander Martyniuk ◽  
Oleksandr Bukhanevych ◽  
Oksana Kanienberh-Sandul
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Common Good ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Public Interests ◽  
Fiscal Stimulus ◽  
Private Interests ◽  
Private And Public ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right

Under the influence of the spread of coronavirus infection, the world community has faced difficult challenges that provoke changes in the seemingly already stabilized legal regulation, putting at risk the settlement of human rights and the common good. The study aims to find effective mechanisms for balancing human rights and public interests in the context of their legal regulation. Specifically, this study is focused on the mechanisms of balancing private and public interests in the implementation of quarantine measures in the Covid-19 pandemic. The research methods were both general scientific and special methods, in particular: formal legal, historical and legal, analysis and synthesis. To perform the tasks of the work, the following structure was used: after some initial precisions, there are provided some considerations about the fiscal stimulus measures and about the exercise of the right of derogation; then, the study deals with the problem of lawmaking in a pandemic; and finally it is considered the threats to intellectual property in the sphere of healthcare. The results of the work show that the pandemic has seriously hit the balance between private and public interests. The public interests of the government and society have become a priority, but in many cases, the measures that infringe private interests are disproportionate, untimely and inefficient.

Updating labor legislation in 2020

2020 ◽  
pp. 57-69
Author(s):  
Viktor Arkadyevich Lebedev ◽  
Elena Ivanovna Lebedeva
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Labour Relations ◽  
Labor Legislation ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Government ◽  
Managerial Positions ◽  
The Right ◽  
Compensation Payments ◽  
Made In

The article deals with the issues of further improvement of labor legislation, including a comparative analysis of the amendments made in 2020 to the Labor code of the Russian Federation concerning the establishment of the age limit for filling managerial positions of budgetary universities, scientific and medical organizations. The analysis of the initiatives of the Government of the Russian Federation in the procedure for delegating him the right to make decisions, establishing features of legal regulation of labor relations, taking into account opinion of the Russian trilateral Commission for regulating social-labour relations, including those relating to compensation payments to employees of organizations of the far North and equated localities.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document