scholarly journals EFEK MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM SOLVING DAN MOTIVASI TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR FISIKA SISWA SMA

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grace Dennys Hutabarat ◽  
Sahyar ,
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
Cluster Sampling ◽  
High Learning ◽  
Random Cluster ◽  
The Difference

The Objectives of this research are (1) find out the difference oflearning outcomes Physic by Problem solving and Expository (2) differenceof students the learning outcomes with high learning motivation comparedlow learning motivation, (3) interaction between motivation and learningoutcomes of Problem solving and Expository. This study is a quasiexperimentresearchwith2x2factorialdesigns.Thepopulationin this studyis 320 students from eight classes of grade X at SMA N 1 Sidamanik, NorthSumatra. The samples of this research were two classes, consisted of 75students determined by random cluster sampling. Data were analyzed usingtwo ways ANAVA at significant level of 0.05. Research shows that (1)students learning outcomes of problem solving class is better then expositoryclass. (2) students learning outcomes with high learning motivation is better then low learning motivation (3) interaction of motivation and learningoutcomes is available in the problem solving and expository.

The Effect of Jigsaw Methode and Motivation on Students’ of Learning Outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-30
Author(s):  
Yunita Yunita ◽  
Hidayat Hidayat ◽  
Harun Sitompul
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
Learning Approaches ◽  
High Learning ◽  
Average Value ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Low Motivation

This study aims to: (1) investigate the effect of Jigsaw cooperative learning on students learning outcomes; (2) find the difference in learning outcomes between high and low learning motivation and (3) find the interaction between learning approaches and learning motivation towards learning outcomes. The population of the study is students of grade IVa, IVb, IVc at SD Kasih Ibu Patumbak and the sample in this study is grade IVa with 35 students and grade IVb with 35 students. The results show that: (1) the average student learning outcomes of jigsaw cooperative learning is 28.40 while conventional is 24.14. Thus, students learning outcomes that get cooperative learning of jigsaw type are higher than conventional learning, (2) Students who have high motivation get an average value = 30.74, while low motivation is 22.72. Thus, it can be concluded that there are differences in student learning outcomes having high learning motivation and low learning motivation, and (3) students learning outcomes  taught by jigsaw cooperative learning are high learning motivation groups (32.94), and low learning motivation groups (24.58), while students taught with conventional learning are high learning motivation groups (28.40 ), and low motivation groups (20,95). Thus, there is no interaction between learning approaches and learning motivation towards learning outcomes.

scholarly journals THE INFLUENCE OF LEARNING MOTIVATION ON THE IMPROVEMENT OF LEARNING ENGLISH CLASS V STUDENTS OF SDN SUKAHARJA 1 TELUKJAMBE TIMUR KARAWANG

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-49
Author(s):  
Tarpan Suparman
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
Fifth Grade ◽  
Average Score ◽  
High Learning ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
High Motivation ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Low Motivation

The purpose of this study was to determine the difference in high learning outcomes between high and low learning motivation, and the difference in low learning outcomes between high and low learning motivation held in SD Negeri Sukaharja 1, Telukjambe Timur District, Karawang Regency. The method used in this research is the comparative method, which is to compare the learning motivation with the learning outcomes of the fifth grade elementary school students. With observation techniques, questionnaires, literature studies, and documentation studies. The results of testing the first hypothesis show that the average score of high learning outcomes with high motivation is 78.86 with a standard deviation of 6.87 higher than the average score of high learning outcomes with low motivation, namely 71.40 with a standard deviation of 2.51. The results of homogeneity testing of the variance of high learning outcomes between high motivation and low motivation. Fcount of 10.96 while Ftable at a significance level of 0.95 (α = 0.05) is 4.88 and a significance level of 0.99 (α = 0.01) is 10.45. This means that Fcount = 10.96> 4.88 = Ftable (0.95; 7; 5) and Fcount = 10.96> 10.45 = Fcount (0.99; 7; 5)., T-test calculation. with the results of t count of 3,971 greater than t table of 2,228 (α = 0.05) and 3,165 (α = 0.01). Then the test results prove that there are differences in high learning outcomes between high motivation and low motivation. So that one of the efforts to maintain the learning outcomes of the fifth grade students of SDN Sukaharja 1 is the high motivation given and the ability of IQ which is quite high and the willingness to learn independently. The second hypothesis testing shows that the average score of low learning outcomes with high motivation is 61.83 with a standard deviation of 2.86 higher than the average score of low learning outcomes with low motivation, which is 58.83 with a standard deviation of 2.40. The results of the homogeneity test of variance for low learning outcomes between high motivation and low motivation, Fcount of 1.42, while Ftable at a significance level of 0.95 (α = 0.05) is 4.48 and a significance level of 0.99 (α = 0.01) is 8.47. This means that Fcount = 1.42 <4.48 = Ftable (0.95; 6; 6) and Fcount = 1.42 <8.47 = Ftable (0.99; 6; 6). Then the test results prove that there is a difference in low learning outcomes between high motivation and low motivation. So that one of the efforts to improve the learning outcomes of the fifth grade students of SDN Sukaharja 1 is by providing intensive motivation and giving more homework.

scholarly journals The Influence of Scramble Learning Models and Motivation Learning on the Results of Citizension Education Class V SD Students State 101766 Bandar Setia

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 288-304
Author(s):  
Dewi Lestari ◽  
Reh Bungana ◽  
Siman Siman
Keyword(s):  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Student Development ◽  
Learning Process ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
High Learning ◽  
Quasi Experimental

Teachers have a duty to encourage, guide and provide learning facilities to achieve goals. Teachers have a responsibility to see everything that happens in the classroom to help student development. Teachers must be able to carry out their duties properly by first having to understand carefully the matters relating to the teaching and learning process, because the success of the learning process is supported by the ability of the teacher to develop and generate activeness and students in the learning process. The research method used is the Quasi Experiment (Quasi Experimental Method) with the research design as the basis for the implementation of the research is to distinguish the influence of the Inquiry method and the effect of conventional methods on learning outcomes of Citizenship Education in terms of high learning motivation and low learning motivation where the treatment class is class Va student and Vb class. The following is presented sequentially descriptive data regarding: (1) Civics learning outcomes students are taught using scramble learning model, (2) Civics student learning outcomes are taught using the expository model, (3) Civics student learning outcomes have high learning motivation, (4) Civics student learning outcomes have motivation to learn low, (5)Civics learning outcomes of students who have high learning motivation are taught with the Scramble learning model, (6) Civics learning outcomes of students who have low learning motivation are taught with the Scramble learning model, (7) Civics learning outcomes of students who have high learning motivation are taught using the expository learning model, (8) Civics learning outcomes of students who have low learning motivation are taught using the expository learning model.

scholarly journals METODE MENGAJAR DAN MOTIVASI TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR KETERAMPILAN SERVIS FLATTENIS LAPANGAN(STUDI EKSPERIMEN PADA MAHASISWA FIK UNM MAKASSAR)

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Hasbunallah AS ◽  
Ahmad Rum Bismar
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Study ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Teaching Methods ◽  
Design Method ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
High Learning ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Lower Effect ◽  
Academic Year

The aim of this experimental study was todetermine the effect of all teaching methods, part, mixed and motivation result learning toward of flat service skill courts tennis. Learning motivation is divided into two parts, namely high andlow.This research was conducted at Faculty of Sport ScienceState University of Macassar,the academic year 2014/2015. Experimental using factorial design method 2x3. The sample consisted of 60 students were divided into 6 groups, each consisting of 10 students. Data analysis technique is a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's test at a significance level of α= 0.05. The results of this study indicate that ( (1) overall teaching methods higher effect of the part teacing methods on learning outcomes flat tennis service skills (2) overall teaching methods lower effect of the part teacing methods on learning outcomes flat tennis service skills, (3) overall teaching methods lower effect of the part teacing methods on learning outcomes flat tennis service skills,(4) there is interaction between the overall teaching methods, part teaching methods and combined teaching methods and learning motivation outcomes flat tennis service skills,(5) overall teaching methods higher effect of the part teacing methods on learning outcomes flat tennis service skillsusing a high learning motivation, (6) overall teaching methods lower effect of the part teacing methods on learning outcomes flat tennis service skillsusing a high learning motivation, (7) part teaching methods lower effect of the combined teacing methods on learning outcomes flat tennis service skillsusing a high learning motivation, (8) overall teaching methods higher effect of the part teacing methods on learning outcomes flat tennis service skillsusing a low learning motivation, (9) overall teaching methods lower effect of the part teacing methods on learning outcomes flat tennis service skillsusing a low learning motivation, (10) part teaching methods lower effect of the combined teacing methods on learning outcomes flat tennis service skillsusing a low learning motivation.

scholarly journals HUBUNGAN MOTIVASI BELAJAR DENGAN HASIL BELAJAR PADA MATA PELAJARAN KIMIA

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 103
Author(s):  
I Putu Budiariawan
Keyword(s):  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Significant Relationship ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
Cluster Sampling ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Chemistry Learning ◽  
Positive Statements ◽  
Academic Year

Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk: (1)mendeskripsikan dan menjelaskan hubungan antara motivasi belajar dengan hasil belajar kimia siswa. (2) mengetahui dan menjelaskan besarnya koefisien korelasi antara motivasi belajar dengan hasil belajar kimia siswa. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas XI MIPA di SMA Negeri 2 Negara tahun pelajaran 2017/2018 dan sampel penelitian berjumlah 72 orang dengan menggunakan teknik cluster sampling. Data dikumpulkan menggunakan instrumen penelitian berupa kuesioner motivasi belajar yang terdiri dari 20 pernyataan positif dan 15 pernyataan negatif dan data hasil belajar siswamenggunakan nilai UAS siswa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa(1) terdapat hubungan yang positif dan signifikan antara motivasi belajar siswa pada pembelajaran kimia dengan hasil belajar kimia siswa. (2) Besarnya koefisien korelasi yang diperoleh yaitu sebesar 0,391, yang berarti r hitung yang diperoleh lebih besar dibandingkan dengan r tabel yang telah ditentukan pada taraf signifikansi 5% yaitu 0,229, sehingga Hipotesis Nol (H0) dalam penelitian ini dapat ditolak.Berdasarkan hasil pemaparan diatas, dapat disimpulkan bahwa terdapat hubungan yang positif dan signifikan antara motivasi belajar pada mata pelajaran kimia dengan hasil belajar kimia siswa. Kata kunci: Hasil Belajar, Motivasi Belajar, Pelajaran Kimia AbstractThis study aims to: (1) describe and explain the relationship between learning motivation and student chemistry learning outcomes. (2) knowing and explaining the magnitude of the correlation coefficient between learning motivation and student chemistry learning outcomes. This study uses a quantitative approach. The population of this study was all students of class XI MIPA in SMA Negeri 2 Negara the academic year 2017/2018 and the study sample amounted to 72 people using the cluster sampling technique. The data were collected using the research instrument in the form of a learning motivation questionnaire consisting of 20 positive statements and 15 negative statements and student learning outcomes data using the student UAS value. The results showed that (1) there was a positive and significant relationship between students' learning motivation in chemistry learning and student chemistry learning outcomes. (2) The magnitude of the correlation coefficient obtained is equal to 0.391, which means that the calculated r is greater than the r table that has been determined at the 5% significance level of 0.229, so the Zero Hypothesis (H0) in this study can be rejected. Based on the results of the explanation above, it can be concluded that there is a positive and significant relationship between motivation to learn on chemistry subjects and student chemistry learning outcomes. Keywords: Chemistry Learning,Learning Outcomes, Learning Motivation

HUBUNGAN MOTIVASI BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR SISWA PADA PELAJARAN TARI DI KELAS X MAN 3 KOTA PADANG

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Pebriza Armayeni ◽  
Yos Sudarman
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Quantitative Research ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Learning Outcome ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
Correlational Research ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Relationship

AbstractThis research aims to explain the correlation of  learning motivation with the students’ learning outcome of the dance art in class X MAN 3 Padang. The problem of research was the difference of students’motivation in the class X MAN 3 Padang which were influenced by the teacher, materials, methods, media, and evaluation of the lesson. This research was quantitative research with correlational  methods. Correlational  research is a study tha measures the relationship between X dan Y variables. The research samples were 25 students of the class X-1 MAN 3 Padang. The instruments of the research were a questionnaire and a testof learning outcomes. The data were collected through interviews and observation as secondary data collection techniques. The results showed that there was a significant correlation between learning motivation and students’ learning outcomes at the dance subject at the MAN 3 Padang. It was proven by rxy value =0.759 which was higher than the rtable. 0.459. Thus,it has shown that the correlation between the two variables was significant. By proving this hypothesis, the learning motivation was demonstrated by attention, understanding diligence and confidence. The students’ learning outcome is improved when they are highly motivated to learn.Keyword: motivation, student learning results, dance lessons

scholarly journals PENGARUH STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF DAN MOTIVASI BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR DETEKSI DINI TUMBUH KEMBANG AUD

2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-27
Author(s):  
Meriyati Meriyati
Keyword(s):  
Early Detection ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Experimental Research ◽  
Instructional Strategy ◽  
Learning Outcome ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
High Learning ◽  
Motivation Level ◽  
Children's Development ◽  
Children’S Development

The objective of this research is to study the effect of instructional strategy of cooperative and learning motivation on the learning outcome in the course of Early Detection of Early Aged Children’s Development. The research conducted conducted at IAIN Raden Intan Lampung as from April through August 2013, selected 40 students randomly as samples. The research employed experimental research with treatment by level 2x2.The findings indicate (1) learning outcomes of the students with cooperative instructional strategy is higher than those who received expository instructional strategy,(2) there is interaction between instructional strategy and learning motivation of the students, (3) learning outcomes of the students with high learning motivation are higher when cooperative instructional strategy is used than when they learn with expository instructional strategy, and (4) learning outcomes of the students with low learning motivation are higher when cooperative instructional strategy is used than when they learn with expository instructional strategy. Result of the research shows that students’ learning outcomes on early detection of development kindergarten could be improved by applying appropriate teaching instructional strategy considering their learning motivation level.

scholarly journals Penerapan Model Pembelajaran ARCS dan Active Learning Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Ditinjau Dari Motivasi Belajar Siswa

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yudhi Hanggara ◽  
Irwan Juniman Zendato
Keyword(s):  
Active Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Normality Test ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Low Motivation

Abstrak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) Perbedaan hasil belajar matematika siswa yang diberikan perlakuan model pembelajaran ARCS dengan model pembelajaran Active Learning. (2) Perbedaan hasil belajar matematika siswa yang memiliki motivasi belajar tinggi, sedang dan rendah. (3) Interaksi antara model pembelajaran (ARCS dan Active Learning) dengan motivasi belajar siswa. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian quasi eksperimen dengan desain faktorial 2 x 3. Populasi pada penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas X SMKN 2 Batam tahun pelajaran 2016/2017. Sampel diperoleh kelas X Akutansi-2 sebagai kelas eksperimen-1 dan kelas X Akutansi-4 sebagai kelas eksperimen-2. Instrumen pada penelitian ini adalah tes dan angket Uji prasyarat meliputi uji normalitas dengan metode Lilliefors dan uji Homogenitas dengan metode Bartlett. Pengujian hipotesis pada penelitian ini menggunakan analisis variansi dua jalan dengan sel tak sama. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa: (1) tidak terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar matematika antara siswa yang diberikan perlakuan model pembelajaran ARCS dengan model pembelajaran Active Learning. (2) terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar metematika antara siswa yang memiliki motivasi belajar tinggi dan rendah. (3) tidak terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran dengan motivasi belajar siswa.Kata Kunci: ARCS, Active Learning, motivasi belajar, hasil belajar matematika Abstract. This study aims to determine: (1) The difference in learning outcomes of student who study mathematics using ARCS learning model with Active learning model. (2) The difference in mathematics learning outcomes in student who have hight, medium and low motivation. (3) Interaction between learning model (ARCS and Active Learning) with student learning motivation. This research is quasi-experimental study with factorial design 2 x 3. The population in this research is all of students class X SMKN 2 Batam with academic year 2016/2017. The Sample in this research from class X accountant-2 is used as sampling for 1st experiment and class X accountant-4 for 2nd experiment. Instrument of research are mathematics achievement test and questionnaire student motivation. The test requirement is normality test using Lilliefors method and homogeneity test using Bartlett method. Hypothesis testing in this study uses two-way analisis of variance with defferent cells. Conclusion in this study: (1) there is no difference between student math result between ARCS learning model with Active learning model. (2) there is difference between result of student math between learning high motivation with low motivation. (3) there is no interaction between the learning model with student motivation.Keywords: ARCS, Active Learning, Motivation learning, Study of Math

scholarly journals Influence of Problem Solving Learning Model on Motivation of Learning Scince In Class IV SD Negeri Sukamakmur 1

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-58
Author(s):  
Harmawati ◽  
Yulistina Nur DS ◽  
Dina Vera Yuni
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Quantitative Research ◽  
Model Problem ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Data Collection Technique ◽  
Class Iv ◽  
Science Subject

This study aims to determine the effect of model problem solving with students learning motivation in scince subjectts at SD Sukamakmur 1, TelukJambe Timur district. This research is a quantitative research. The population used in this study were all grade IV studenta of SD Negeri Sukamakmur 1, TelukJambe Timur subdistrict, amounting 80 students. Data collection technique to test the hypothesis is done by calculating the product moment statistics.The results of the validity of the students’ learning motivation questionnaire in natural science subject obtained 27, which were declared valid from 40 items tested. The reability test results an rn value 3,470. Hypothesis testing results, there are significant differences between students’ learning motivation in science subjects with student learning outcomes. It was obtained 84,48 tables in 2,024 with a significance of 0,05 and n=40 indicating that the hypothesis was accepted. From the results of this study it can be concluded that the learning motivation of students in science subjects with learning outcomes has an influence.

scholarly journals Learning Styles, Does it Cause the Differences of Students Achievement?

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 82
Author(s):  
Sarah Mustika Barokah ◽  
Loviniantika Cahyaning Suseno ◽  
Yosepha Kurniawati Deze Say ◽  
Ali Mustadi
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Cluster Sampling ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Random Cluster ◽  
Achievement Data ◽  
Research Population ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Quantitative Statistics ◽  
Thematic Learning

This research aims to examine the difference between the learning achievement of students with learning styles visual, auditory, and kinesthetic in Sub-district Sukun Malang. The type of this research was comparative quantitative. This research population was all 4th-grade students in Sub-district Sukun, which amount to 3250 students, while the technique of sample retrieval used random cluster sampling. Sample of this research amount to 338 of the 4th-grade students from 5 elementary schools in Sub-district Sukun. Data were collected by using learning style questionnaires and documents of students learning achievement. Data analysis of this research used quantitative statistics descriptive and analysis statistics nonparametric using the Kruskal-Wallis Test. The result of this research showed that the amount of significant value is 0.688, higher than 0.05, so it can be concluded that there is no difference in thematic learning achievement between a student who has visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document