scholarly journals Theoretical and practical aspects of spatial and industrial development of region in terms of digitalization

Author(s):  
Anna A. Urasova ◽  
Dmitriy A. Balandin

The article considers the problems of spatial development of Russian regions in the digital era. Based on the comprehension of modern scientific and theoretical views on the application of the spatial approach in foreign and domestic practice of regional management and the results of using the methods of strategic and factor analysis, a high level of subjectivity was revealed in determining the priorities of territorial development, ignoring specific features and significant industry factors economic growth. A new formulation of the economic category “spatial and sectoral development of the region” is proposed, which allows concretizing the general distinctive features of the development of the subjects of the Russian Federation. The priority directions of the spatial and sectoral development of the RF regions have been clarified on the basis of an analysis of a wide range of factors that determine existing and new problems in terms of territorial and sectoral criteria. There have been considered the factors impeding building up competitive advantages in the sectoral section of the regional economy, including making decisions on optimizing various kinds of costs for scenario options for their elimination; to intensify an adaptive response to the need to develop targeted strategic documents focused on the creation of innovative industries, the introduction of digital technologies and competencies that contribute to the production of high-tech competitive products in the context of active digitalization of society. There appears an opportunity to create new jobs, improve the qualifications of personnel in order to obtain and apply the required professional knowledge. There have been made the conclusions: spatial and sectoral development based on the modern provisions of the theory of regional economics takes on the functions of digital processing and diagnostics of various kinds of information in the management of territories of a constituent entity of the Russian Federation and becomes the foundation for the development, adoption and implementation of policy documents, which is confirmed by the practice of the regional administration of the Perm region.

Author(s):  
T. B. Timofeeva ◽  
E. A. Ozdoeva

The current Strategy of Innovative Development of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2020 and the Strategy of Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Federation determine the goals, priorities and objectives of the state innovation policy and scientific and technological development of the country. A significant role is given to areas that allow us to obtain scientific and technical results that are the basis for increasing the innovative level of production and consolidating the country's position in the foreign market. Among the priority areas is the aviation industry, namely the sector of aircraft engine construction. The creation of aircraft engines is currently one of the most science-intensive and high-tech tasks of the domestic aircraft industry. However, the analysis of the current state of implementation of programms in this area shows that the problems of their functioning and development are not always solved taking into account a wide range of emerging risks, the negative impact of which can lead to significant financial losses. To develop effective methods for assessing and minimizing risks, it is necessary to first analyze and classify them. In the article, based on the analysis, a system of classification of risks arising during development aircraft engines. The results obtained will allow us to give a preliminary qualitative assessment of the negative events that occur at various stages of the development of aircraft engines.


2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 122-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. A. Baynov

In the current international environment — with fashion on international sanctions, in particular, limiting the possibilities of purchasing high-tech equipment from abroad and dependency of the exchange rate of the ruble against various political provocations — the Russian Federation has faced with the necessity of re-industrialization of the ‘raw’ model of the economy and stimulation of the development of its inner potential. It should be noted that, in accordance with the Plan for promoting import substitution in industry No. 1936-r of 30 September 2014, approved by the order of the Government of the Russian Federation, the Ministry of industry and trade of the Russian Federation has developed and is implementing 22 sectoral plans for import substitution in selected industries of the Russian Federation. In this regard, it is particularly important to study international experience in the field of import substitution policy. The validity and reliability of presented study are achieved by applying a systematic approach and scientific methods of analysis and synthesis, deduction and induction, as well as regulatory, empirical method, etc. As a result of the analysis of international experience, it was possible to identify measures that can improve the efficiency of the state policy of import substitution, including through the use of offset mechanisms in civilian industries and the development of the institution of public procurement, certification, and standardization. In conclusion, the author proposes measures that can improve the policy of import substitution. The practical significance of the article consists in the possibility of applying the results of the study in the elaboration of industrial development programs and further research.


Author(s):  
Y. V. Zhuravlev ◽  
I. V. Kuksova ◽  
E. A. Gubertov ◽  
L. I. Churikov

The main indicators of the innovative development of the Russian Federation are considered on the basis of the data presented in two regulatory documents developed in 2008 and 2011. The indicators cover a wide range of areas of socio-economic development, and their values should be achieved by 2020. However, the targets of macroeconomic indicators laid down in the documents at the current moment of time are seen to be overestimated. The analysis of the main achievements in the field of innovative development of our country over a ten-year period is carried out. For the analysis, a set of statistical data published in various sources was used, as well as the values of target macroeconomic indicators published in the concept and strategy. Based on the assessment of indicators and their deviations, an analysis is made of the success of the innovative development of Russia in various areas - from the development of the high-tech sector to the publication activity of the authors. Based on the results obtained, it was concluded that these or those target values of macroeconomic indicators have been achieved at the current time and an assumption about achieving these values by 2020. In addition, based on the analysis, it was determined which of the three options for innovative development our country is implementing at the present stage. The main reasons that prevented the experts and the Government of the Russian Federation from reaching the main target indicators of the concept and strategy and transferring our country to “innovative tracks” are summarized.


Author(s):  
A. E. Zaenchkovski ◽  
◽  
E. A. Kirillova ◽  
V. P. Meshalkin ◽  
◽  
...  

The implementation of the fifth technological order and the creation of conditions for the transition to the sixth is possible only on the basis of the production of innovative high-tech products. At the same time, the economies of many Russian regions still have a raw material orientation, which hinders their development. The predominance of mining and low production diversity is typical for the Russian North regions. Clustering can be one of the ways to increase the efficiency of production and economic activities of these regions, increase the stability of their economic systems to adverse impacts, and increase their competitiveness in the long term. The article analyzes the five-year experience of implementing Russian innovative territorial clusters in the context of the main socio-economic indicators of the region, and also provides an assessment of the opportunities for industrial development in the regions of the North of the Russian Federation. The variety of models for the development of innovation-territorial clusters determines the need to take into account the regional features of the development of each cluster localization territories and the use of management and support tools, taking into account the specifics of each specific region. The formation of stable cluster forms of joint activities organization on the territory of this region will be the basis for catalyzing innovation processes in it. The results of innovative activities are interrelated elements of the system at all stages of the value chain will allow the result of a synergistic effect to maximize the total utility level of the region as a whole. The study used methods of comparative and static analysis of socio-economic phenomena, econometric tools.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (29) ◽  
pp. 254-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anzor V. Misakov ◽  
Anzor Kh. Sabanchiev ◽  
Lola D. Sanginova ◽  
Elena N. Danilevskaya ◽  
Musa A. Eskiev

Globalization, accompanied by a continuous increase in competition, complicates the conditions for the development of market relations in the Russian Federation. The priority development territories should have functioned as a tool for industrial and productive reform. These territories and their special economic zones should have become territorial centers of innovative and industrial development. However, it does not happened. The article analyzes some of the main reasons for this situation in Russia.


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Balashova ◽  
Yulia Popova

The modern stage of the world economy is believed to be characterized as a period of the post-industrial development which motive power is science. The biggest success in current terms is reached by the economic subjects which are able either to generate new knowledge and to offer them on the market by using a monopoly rent, or those ones, by having an access to the effectively functioning industrial facility and possessing sufficient amounts of capital, that are able to buy someone elses innovations and integrate them efficiently into their own production processes. The Russian Federation, despite the efforts of the government, first and foremost, in the legislation area fields, does not occupy, unfortunately, its rightful place among the countries with their powerful fundamental and applied science, and also it is not rated among the countries that are at the stage of science-intensive, high-tech industrialization. In view of the available potential, the external conditions of development and the national idea, it is reasonable to consider for the Russian Federation the option of innovative partnership with high-tech or industrially developed countries.


2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (9) ◽  
pp. 1723-1735
Author(s):  
A.Yu. Pronin

Subject. The article investigates the program-targeted planning methodology, which is implemented in the Russian Federation and leading foreign countries, for high-tech industry development. Objectives. The aim is to identify the specifics of program-targeted planning for the development of high-tech industries, to shape programs and plans for innovative development in the Russian Federation and leading foreign countries. Methods. The study employs general scientific methods of systems analysis, including the statistical and logical analysis. Results. I reviewed methods of program-targeted planning, implemented by the world’s leading countries (the Russian Federation, United States of America, France, Great Britain, Netherlands, Norway, Japan, Canada), in the interests of the development of various high-tech sectors of the economy. The study established that the methodology of program-targeted management is an effective tool for resource allocation by various types of economic activities in accordance with national priorities. I developed proposals by priority areas for improving the methodology for program-targeted planning and management in the Russian Federation in modern economic conditions. Conclusions. The findings and presented proposals can be used to improve methods for program-targeted planning to develop high-tech sectors of the economy; to design various long-term programs and plans, reducing the risk of their implementation; to determine the ways and methods of sustainable socio-economic and innovative and technological development of the world's leading economies.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (10(79)) ◽  
pp. 12-18
Author(s):  
G. Bubyreva

The existing legislation determines the education as "an integral and focused process of teaching and upbringing, which represents a socially important value and shall be implemented so as to meet the interests of the individual, the family, the society and the state". However, even in this part, the meaning of the notion ‘socially significant benefit is not specified and allows for a wide range of interpretation [2]. Yet the more inconcrete is the answer to the question – "who and how should determine the interests of the individual, the family and even the state?" The national doctrine of education in the Russian Federation, which determined the goals of teaching and upbringing, the ways to attain them by means of the state policy regulating the field of education, the target achievements of the development of the educational system for the period up to 2025, approved by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of October 4, 2000 #751, was abrogated by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of March 29, 2014 #245 [7]. The new doctrine has not been developed so far. The RAE Academician A.B. Khutorsky believes that the absence of the national doctrine of education presents a threat to national security and a violation of the right of citizens to quality education. Accordingly, the teacher has to solve the problem of achieving the harmony of interests of the individual, the family, the society and the government on their own, which, however, judging by the officially published results, is the task that exceeds the abilities of the participants of the educational process.  The particular concern about the results of the patriotic upbringing served as a basis for the legislative initiative of the RF President V. V. Putin, who introduced the project of an amendment to the Law of RF "About Education of the Russian Federation" to the State Duma in 2020, regarding the quality of patriotic upbringing [3]. Patriotism, considered by the President of RF V. V. Putin as the only possible idea to unite the nation is "THE FEELING OF LOVE OF THE MOTHERLAND" and the readiness for every sacrifice and heroic deed for the sake of the interests of your Motherland. However, the practicing educators experience shortfalls in efficient methodologies of patriotic upbringing, which should let them bring up citizens, loving their Motherland more than themselves. The article is dedicated to solution to this problem based on the Value-sense paradigm of upbringing educational dynasty of the Kurbatovs [15].


Author(s):  
Alexandra Ugryumova ◽  
Mikhail Zamakhovski ◽  
Lyudmila Pautova ◽  
Denis Olgarenko

Scientifically substantiated personnel industry policy contributes to the implementation of an innovative development scenario, provides better results with reduced production costs, which determines the relevance of the studying. The main goal of the work was identified factors and indicators which have regulatory influence on the state and development of the personnel potential of the industry. Diagnostics of the labor potential of land reclamation by federal districts revealed leaders and outsiders of sectoral development. The studying made it possible to justify the steady trend of the shortage of reclamation personnel in comparison with the calculated indicators. Objective and subjective reasons and factors that hinder the effective using of the industry’s personnel potential are distinguished. The concept of industry’s labor potential is clarified. The studying of changes in labor productivity in agriculture has confirmed a twofold increasing in this indicator for the period from 2014 to 2018. Methodological approaches to the indicators of assessing the labor potential of the reclamation industry are substantiated. The groups of socio-economic indicators of the reclamation industry’s effectiveness are identified. The methodology for determining the quantitative characteristics of labor potential on irrigated lands is specified, which is depended on the area of irrigated lands. The labor potential of the reclamation industry in terms of staffing the industry is studied. The main positive and negative trends of the personnel policy and the labor potential’s formation of the agro-industrial complex’s reclamation sector of the Russian Federation are specified, the industry personnel policy is assessed as passive, which does not allow predicting the needs for industry personnel, evaluate staff activities and analyze personnel problems. Highlighted characteristic trends in personnel potential in the federal district and regions of the Russian Federation allow: to develop unified approaches to manage this industry development factor; to develop recommendations to improve the efficiency of advanced training and retraining of personnel in irrigated agriculture. The implementation of the recommendations will contribute to increase the efficiency of the managing the human potential’s process of irrigated agriculture at the level of federal, regional and municipal authorities of the reclamation sector of the agro-industrial complex of Russia.


2020 ◽  
pp. 69-87
Author(s):  
K.S. Teteryatnikov ◽  
S.G. Каmolov ◽  
D.A. Blashkina

The article is meant to analyze current problems and prospects for the development of effective tax policy as part of digital transformation of Russian economy. Introduction of a digital tax and the consequences of the digital tax reforms in the EU, the USA and OECD countries are highlighted. The necessity of qualitative transformation of the tax system of the Russian Federation in response to modern challenges is substantiated, taking into account the changes of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation adopted at the end of July 2020. The authors suggested their own concept of a digital tax and the prospects for its adoption in Russia, and consider it inappropriate to impose taxes on Internet users who do not use the Internet for business. Today, the main focus should be made on creating and testing effective technologies that allow on-line monitoring the tax basis of digital economy entities, taking into account the cross-border movement or use of digital products (goods and services). In addition, it would be extremely important to provide for a potential tax exemption for part of the profits of international ICT companies that are received on the territory of the Russian Federation and reinvested in joint with Russian companies projects in the high-tech for civil purposes area.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document