scholarly journals Analisis Pengaruh Perubahan Penghasilan Tidak Kena Pajak Terhadap Realisasi Penerimaan Pajak di Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Pratama Watampone

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 202-211
Author(s):  
Syahrul HM ◽  
Abdul Rahim
Keyword(s):  
Income Tax ◽  
Quantitative Methods ◽  
Good News ◽  
Tax Revenue ◽  
Analysis Tool ◽  
Elasticity Analysis ◽  
Taxable Income ◽  
Ministry Of Finance ◽  
Taxation Problem

This research discusses the taxation problem in Kab. Bone, namely the problem of Non-Taxable Income (PTKP). The non-taxable income is the income limit is determined by the Ministry of Finance that has been approved by the People's Representative Council. PTKP is responsible for the number of people who are not taxable as a result of reduced income tax services, so this research will be carried out using Quantitative methods using an elasticity analysis tool to measure the sensitivity of its effect. The results of the study show that the Non-Taxable Income (PTKP), which is related to tax receipts from the Office of tax revenue, considering the data obtained from the pratama Watampone has shown that the proceeds at the time of tax (PPh 21), will ask in terms of community welfare, this is good news that the increase in PTKP gives the participation of small people not titled to tax. And it turns out the results of the analysis say that the PTKP is not too significant.

scholarly journals PENGARUH PERUBAHAN PENGHASILAN TIDAK KENA PAJAK (PTKP) TERHADAP PENERIMAAN PAJAK PENGHASILAN ORANG PRIBADI PADA KANTOR PELAYANAN PAJAK PRATAMA ARGAMAKMUR

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun Fitriano ◽  
Febri Dwi Rimbawati
Keyword(s):  
Linear Regression ◽  
Income Tax ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Personal Income ◽  
Coefficient Of Determination ◽  
Tax Revenue ◽  
Simple Linear Regression ◽  
Personal Income Tax ◽  
Taxable Income ◽  
Income Tax Revenue

The purpose of this study is to determine the influence of Non-Taxable Income (PTKP) on Personal Income Tax Acceptance at Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Pratama Argamakmur. PTKP is a certain amount of income that is not taxable which can reduce the amount of personal income tax revenue. The method used in this research is to use data collection method of documentation and analysis method used is descriptive quantitative. The analysis in this study uses a simple linear regression formula and coefficient of determination with the help of SPSS application. And to prove the effect of Non-Taxable Income (PTKP) on Personal Income Tax Acceptance then used hypothesis test (t test).The results of the simple linear regression data data of Y = 9461924484.969 - 1054.200 (X) and data analysis using the determination coefficient is 0.106 with the contribution of the variable non-taxable income (X) to the receipt of personal income tax is 10.6%, while the rest is influenced by other variables not examined in this study. From the results of the data processing, the value of t-count is -2,010 and the value of t-table is 1.305. if the two values are compared, then the t count is -2.010 ≤ t table 1.305 which means that the Non-Taxable Income has a significant negative effect on the Personal Income Tax Revenue.

Tax Administration versus Tax Rates: Evidence from Corporate Taxation in Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 111 (12) ◽  
pp. 3827-3871
Author(s):  
M. Chatib Basri ◽  
Mayara Felix ◽  
Rema Hanna ◽  
Benjamin A. Olken
Keyword(s):  
Developing Countries ◽  
Income Tax ◽  
Corporate Taxation ◽  
Corporate Income Tax ◽  
Tax Revenue ◽  
Tax Administration ◽  
Tax Rates ◽  
Taxable Income ◽  
Elasticity Of Taxable Income ◽  
Percentage Points

We compare two approaches to increasing tax revenue: tax administration and tax rates. We show that when Indonesia moved top regional firms into “medium taxpayer offices,” with high staff-to-taxpayer ratios, tax revenue more than doubled. Examining nonlinear changes to corporate income tax rates, we estimate an elasticity of taxable income of 0.579. Combining these estimates, improved tax administration is equivalent to raising top rates on all firms by 8 percentage points. On net, improved tax administration can have significant returns for developing countries. (JEL H25, H26, K34, O17)

scholarly journals ANALISIS PERUBAHAN TARIF PENGHASILAN TIDAK KENA PAJAK (PTKP) TAHUN 2015 DAN TAHUN 2016 TERHADAP PENERIMAAN PAJAK PENGHASILAN (PPH) PASAL 21 DI KANTOR PELAYANAN PAJAK PRATAMA BITUNG

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (04) ◽  
Author(s):  
Megawani Lewa ◽  
Lintje Kalangi ◽  
Winston Pontoh
Keyword(s):  
Income Tax ◽  
Tax Revenue ◽  
Taxable Income ◽  
Research Results ◽  
The People ◽  
Qualitative Descriptive ◽  
Tax Changes ◽  
Descriptive Method ◽  
Income Tax Revenue

Tax is a compulsory payment to every citizen whose counterpart is not direct. In 2016 there is an Increase in the tariff of Non Taxable Revenue (PTKP). The increase of non-taxable income (PTKP) will be enjoyed by the people who work as employees/employees, and the Taxpayer Object Tax (WPOP) workers who have free and / or self-employed jobs because it will lower taxable income tax (PKP) taxpayers. However, the increase in PTKP has the potential to decrease income tax revenue. This study aims to evaluate the effect of PTKP changes on the acceptance of Income Tax Article 21 in KPP Pratama Bitung. The method used is qualitative descriptive method. The research results show that the non-taxable income (PTKP) experienced a 50% increase and this affects income tax revenue PPh) significantly. Expected to be able to do things to increase tax revenue from the income tax side of article 21. One of them is to adjust the limits of PTKP with the lowest salary / income of employees. In addition, the Tax Office of Bitung Pratama is also expected to provide continuous supervision and extension on taxpayers of individuals, bodies and treasurers of government offices concerning the awareness of their obligation to withhold tax on income tax on the employee or employees accordingly at the prevailing rate.Keywords: Non Taxable Income, Income Tax, Changes receipts

scholarly journals Pengaruh Kenaikan Penghasilan Tidak Kena Pajak (PTKP) Dan Jumlah Wajib Pajak Efektif Terhadap Penerimaan PPh Pasal 21

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-49
Author(s):  
Nurul Susanti ◽  
Andi
Keyword(s):  
Income Tax ◽  
Local Population ◽  
Capital City ◽  
Tax Revenue ◽  
Taxable Income ◽  
Income Status ◽  
Working People ◽  
To Come ◽  
Tax Payers ◽  
Income Tax Revenue

This research aims to determine the need for non-taxable income rate to be rised including the number of effective tax-payers on income tax as referred to the Article 21 of the Law No 36 of 2008 has the potential to increase. This study is conducted in KPP Pratama Serang using local population as taxpayers which accept Income Tax (PPh) based on Article 21 or using saturated sample or all population paying income tax (PPh) as respondents in KPP Pratama Serang while taking the period 2014-2016. The method used in this research is fieldwork by visiting the city of Serang as the Capital city of Banten Province to conduct a survey on local population as tax-payers including those working people with non-taxable income status. The results of this study reveal that the number of non-taxable income (PTKP) has a significant effect on the income tax revenue based on the article 21. Additionally, there is a negative beta value, which indicates that the higher rate of non-taxable income adds to an increase in the income tax of Article 21. As noted, the number of effective tax-payers significantly influence the income tax revenue of article 21 and have a positive beta value as well, indicating that the more effective tax-payers have the effect of increasing income tax revenue of the article 21 to come true.

scholarly journals ANALISIS EFEKTIVITAS DAMPAK PENINGKATAN JUMLAH BESARAN PENGHASILAN TIDAK KENA PAJAK TERHADAP PENERIMAAN PAJAK PENGHASILAN ORANG PRIBADI PADA KPP PRATAMA MANADO

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (04) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefi Cristiani Weol ◽  
Grace B. Nangoi ◽  
Anneke Wangkar
Keyword(s):  
Analytical Method ◽  
Income Tax ◽  
Dominant Factor ◽  
Tax Revenue ◽  
Life Changes ◽  
Descriptive Data ◽  
Taxable Income ◽  
Decent Life ◽  
Living Cost ◽  
Income Tax Revenue

Non-Taxable Income is the minimum living cost to be able to live a decent life. Changes Last Non Taxable Income namely No.101/PMK.010/2016,began to apply on January 1,2016 until present. The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of their changes Non-Taxable Income on income tax revenue. The analytical method used is descriptive data. The results showed that PTKP changes have a good impact on the growth of the number of taxpayers in each year, but considered not effective against income tax revenue. This shows that the increase of PTKP is not the dominant factor in influencing income tax revenue.Keywords :Non-Taxable Income, Tax Income (PPh) Article 21

scholarly journals Elasticity and Buoyancy of the Tax System in Pakistan

2004 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faiz Bilquees
Keyword(s):  
Income Tax ◽  
Service Sector ◽  
Sales Tax ◽  
Tax Revenue ◽  
Tax System ◽  
Taxable Income ◽  
Withholding Tax ◽  
Tax Changes ◽  
Withholding Taxes ◽  
Excise Duties

This paper examines the elasticity and buoyancy of the tax system for the period 1974-75–2003-04. The elasticity of the total tax revenue both with respect to the total GDP and the non-agricultural GDP base is less than unity. Overall, sales tax takes the lead by way of improving revenues. The high coefficient of income tax inclusive of withholding tax, which is an indirect tax, is high. Excluding the withholding tax leads to a lower coefficient. Sales tax with respect to imports and manufacturing also takes care of loss of revenue due to lowering of tariff and excise duties. However, the sales tax coefficient with respect to the GDP base reflects the inclusion of service sector and utilities in the sales tax net, which has serious implications for the poor. The estimates of buoyancy suggest that tax changes did not lead to significant revenue augmentation. The low buoyancy of income tax exclusive of the withholding taxes implies that imposition of massive withholding taxes coupled with an increase in the taxable income limits is working at cross purposes.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Kesadaran Membayar Pajak, Persepsi Wajib Pajak Dalam Pelaksanaan Sanksi Denda, SPPT, dan Pemeriksaan Pajak Terhadap Keberhasilan Penerimaan Pajak Bumi dan Bangunan Perdesaan dan Perkotaan di Kecamatan Wanasari Kabupaten

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 218-231
Author(s):  
Ibnu Muttaqin
Keyword(s):  
Income Tax ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Multiple Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Tax Revenue ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Taxable Income ◽  
Urban Buildings ◽  
Rural And Urban ◽  
Tax Audit ◽  
Tax Payers

Ibnu Muttaqin 4314500030 Influence of awareness of paying taxes, perception of tax payers in the implementation of financial penalties, SPPT (Tax Payable Notification) and tax audit of the success of land tax revenues and rural and urban buildings in Wanasari District, Brebes Regency. Faculty of Economics and Business, Pancasakti University Tegal 2018. The purpose of this study is to find out whether awareness of paying taxes, the perception of tax payers in the implementation of financial penalties, SPPT (Taxable Income Tax Notification) and tax audit affect both simultaneously and partially on the success of land tax revenue and rural and urban buildings in Wanasari District, Brebes Regency. Population in this research is tax payer of earth and rural and urban building in District Wanasari Brebes Regency in year 2017 as many as 62,065. The sample is calculated using the Slovin formula, so that it gets a sample of 100 respondents. Data collection method uses a questionnaire. The analysis used is multiple linear regression analysis. The test results show that 1) Awareness of paying taxes, tax payer perception in the implementation   of   financial   penalties,   SPPT   (Tax   Notification   Letters)   and   tax   inspection simultaneously affect the success of tax revenue earth and rural and urban buildings in District Wanasari Brebes. 2) Awareness of paying taxes affect the success of tax revenue earth and rural and urban buildings in District Wanasari Brebes District. 3) Tax payer's perception in the implementation of financial penalties, SPPT (Tax Notification Letters) and tax audit have no effect on the success of tax revenue of earth and rural and urban building in Wanasari Sub-district of Brebes Regency.

scholarly journals Pengaruh kepemilikan NPWP terhadap kepatuhan wajib pajak pada Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Pratama Manado

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 57
Author(s):  
Aditya Dama ◽  
David Paul Elia Saerang ◽  
Hendrik Gamaliel
Keyword(s):  
Income Tax ◽  
Regression Coefficient ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Tax Compliance ◽  
Tax Revenue ◽  
Analysis Tool ◽  
Simple Linear Regression ◽  
Statistical Analysis Tool ◽  
Tax Audit ◽  
The City

Income tax can be used for various functions of determining policies related to income. Taxpayer compliance is strongly influenced by the ownership of a country's NPWP because if a Taxpayer is not compliant it will cause reduced tax revenue. The object of this research is the Income Taxpayer which is limited to the Corporate Income Taxpayer in the city of Manado. The purpose of this study is to determine whether NPWP ownership has an effect on tax compliance at the Manado Primary Tax Service Office. In conducting this research a statistical analysis tool is used that is simple linear regression analysis and is strengthened by testing the hypothesis that is the t test. The results showed the regression model obtained was Y = 10.895 + 0.299 X. The constant a of 10.895 gives the sense that if the Income Tax Audit is perceived to be constant or equal to zero (0), then the magnitude of Taxpayer Compliance is 10.895 units. Furthermore, the value of b which is a regression coefficient of variable X (NPWP ownership) of 0.299 means that if NPWP ownership has increased by one (1) unit, then the amount of income tax increase has increased or increased by 0.299 units assuming the other variables are fixed or constant. Taxpayers compliance (Y) got contribution from NPWP (X) ownership factor of 6.6%, while the rest was explained by other variables not included in this study. Thus it is known that NPWP ownership has no significant effect on increasing taxpayer compliance.

scholarly journals The Influence of Differences in Income Tax Rules on Income Tax Growth in the Private Tax Taxes and Acceptance of Tax Income in the Office of Jember Pratama Tax Service

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-68
Author(s):  
Mrenda Ayu Setyowati ◽  
Muhaimin Dimyati ◽  
Wiwik Fitrianingsih
Keyword(s):  
Growth Rate ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Data Processing ◽  
Analysis Of Variance ◽  
Income Tax ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Descriptive Statistics ◽  
Analysis Tool ◽  
Taxable Income ◽  
Data Processing Methods

The purpose of this study was to determine the different effects of changes in Non-Taxable Income (PTKP) regulations on the growth rate of the number of Individual Taxpayers (WPOP) and income tax article 21 (PPh 21) in the Jember KPP. The data used in this study are secondary data collected from KPP Pratama Jember period 2008-2018. Data processing methods using Descriptive Statistics, Analysis Of Variance (ANOVA) and Multivariate Analysis Of Variance (MANOVA) with SPSS analysis tool version 20. The results of the study show that there are different effects of changes in Non-Taxable Income (PTKP) significantly impacting the growth rate Personal Taxpayers (WPOP) because the rate of growth is increasing and the level of income tax article 21 (PPh 21) because the amount of revenue is increasing. Keywords: PTKP, WPOP, Income Tax 21.

Assessment of changes in the application of the accounting regulation pbu 18/02 “Аccounting for income tax calculations” since 2020

2020 ◽  
pp. 10-24
Author(s):  
Irina Selezneva ◽  
Irina Selezneva ◽  
Elena Shlyapnikova
Keyword(s):  
Income Tax ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
Accounting Data ◽  
Current Income ◽  
Accounting Regulation ◽  
New Concepts ◽  
Net Profit ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Ministry Of Finance ◽  
Tax Payers

The article assesses the changes made by the Order of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation dated 20.11.2018 No. 236n v PBU 18/02 “Accounting for settlements with the budget for income tax”. The application of the new norms of PBU 18/02 is mandatory for corporate income tax payers with accounting (financial) statements for 2020. The essence of the problem is that the updated PBU 18/02 contains new concepts, new calculations of indicators necessary for reflection in accounting and accounting (financial) statements. The article consists of six parts, beginning with an introduction and ending with conclusions. The introduction substantiates the relevance of the study. At the beginning of the article, the purpose and objectives of the research are defined, as well as the materials, methods and conditions for conducting the research. The results of the study and their discussion are presented below. In the article, the authors highlight the problem of transition from the previously existing norms of PBU 18/02 to the new norms applied from 2020. The main part compares the concepts and indicators used in 2019 and 2020 in accordance with the requirements of PBU 18/02. The article also addresses the issues of evaluating work in progress in accordance with the requirements of regulatory legal acts in the field of accounting and taxation. The procedure for applying the norms of PBU 18/02 is shown on a specific example and the calculation procedures made that justify the occurrence of temporary differences that lead to the recognition of deferred income tax, as well as conditional income tax expense and current income tax on the accounting accounts. For clarity and comparison, the indicators for the application of PBU 18/02 in 2019 and 2020 are presented in the tables. In addition, the tables show the schemes of accounting transactions for accounting calculations with the budget for income tax in two ways to determine the current income tax: based on accounting data and based on tax Declaration data. Having considered a specific example of the procedure for applying the norms of PBU 18/02 in the version up to 2020 and in the current version from 2020, the authors conclude that changes in the procedure for identifying temporary differences do not mean a change in their value and the value of net profit

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document