scholarly journals FAKTOR-FAKTOR PENGHAMBAT IMPLEMENTASI KEBIJAKAN BUREAUCRATIC TRIMMING DI PEMERINTAHAN KOTA BUKITTINGGI

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Elvira Mulya Nalien
Keyword(s):  
Local Governments ◽  
Central Government ◽  
City Government ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
Purposive Sampling ◽  
External Data ◽  
Inhibiting Factors ◽  
State Apparatus ◽  
Bureaucratic Reforms

Abstract The decision of the central government is unanimous, namely the Bureaucratic Trimming policy and must be immediately implemented by ministries / agencies as well as local governments. Although several K/Ls have completed implementing the simplification, it is not necessarily the case for local governments, including the Bukittinggi City Government. The dualism of directives and regulations from the Ministry of Empowerment of State Apparatus and Bureaucratic Reforms and the Ministry of Home Affairs hampered the implementation of this policy. So the purpose of this paper is to find out the inhibiting factors of the implementation of the Bureaucratic Trimming policy, especially in the Bukittinggi City Government. This is a qualitative research with data collection methods by means of in-depth interviews, non-participatory observation and review of related internal and external data sources. Determination of informants by means of purposive sampling. The findings where in the Communication Dimension, there are differences in the direction of the Minister of Empowerment of State Apparatus and Bureaucratic Reforms and the Minister of Home Affairs regarding the completion of the equalization of positions. The Resource Dimension, not all structural positions can be transferred to functional positions and the availability of several suitable functional positions. Furthermore, the loss of career patterns such as employee transfers and the fact that the simplification of the bureaucracy actually burdens the Bukittinggi City Budget. The dimensions of the Bureaucratic Structure, the finding of procedural confusion in terms of the focus of Bureaucratic Trimming, between prioritizing equalization of positions to functional or prioritizing simplifying structure. Finally, the Disposition Dimension, the Bukittinggi City Government fully complies with the central government's instructions by submitting a proposal for equalization of positions to functional in April 2021 to the Ministry of Home Affairs. However, with the issuance of Permenpan No. 17 of 2021, the city government of Bukittinggi is still waiting for further directions considering the guidance and supervision of the implementation of regional government is under the Ministry of Home Affairs.   Keywords: Bureaucratic Trimming, Inhibiting Factors, Policy Implementation   Abstrak           Keputusan pemerintah pusat telah bulat yaitu kebijakan Penyederhanaan Birokrasi (Bureaucratic Trimming) dan harus segera dilaksanakan oleh kementerian/lembaga maupun pemerintah daerah. Meskipun beberapa K/L sudah rampung melaksanakan penyederhanaan dimaksud namun belum tentu bagi pemerintah daerah termasuk salah satunya Pemerintah Kota Bukittinggi. Adanya dualisme arahan maupun regulasi dari Kemenpan dan Kemendagri membuat implementasi kebijakan ini terhambat. Maka tujuan dari tulisan ini adalah untuk mengetahui faktor-faktor penghambat daripada implementasi kebijakan Bureaucratic Trimming khususnya di Pemerintah Kota Bukittinggi. Merupakan penelitian kualitatif dengan metode pengumpulan data dengan cara wawancara mendalam, observasi non partisipatif dan penelaahan sumber data internal maupun eksternal yang terkait. Penentuan informan dengan cara Purposive Sampling. Hasil temuan dimana pada Dimensi Komunikasi, terdapatnya perbedaan arahan Menpan RB dan Mendagri terkait penyelesaian penyetaraan jabatan Dimensi Sumber Daya, tidak semua jabatan struktural dapat dialihkan ke jabatan fungsional serta belum tersedianya beberapa jabatan fungsional yang cocok. Selanjutnya hilangnya pola karier seperti mutasi pegawai dan fakta bahwa penyederhanaan birokrasi justru membebankan APBD Kota Bukittinggi. Dimensi Struktur Birokrasi, ditemukannya kerancuan prosedur dalam hal fokus Bureaucratic Trimming, antara mengutamakan melakukan penyetaraan jabatan ke fungsional atau mendahulukan melaksanakan penyerderhanaan struktur. Terakhir Dimensi Disposisi, Pemerintah Kota Bukittinggi sepenuhnya mematuhi instruksi pemerintah pusat dengan telah menyampaikan pengusulan penyetaraan jabatan ke fungsional pada Bulan April 2021 ke Kemendagri. Namun dengan terbitnya Permenpan No. 17 Tahun 2021, pemkot Bukittinggi masih menunggu arahan lebih lanjut mengingat pembinaan dan pengawasan penyelenggaraan pemerintahan daerah adalah dibawah Kemendagri.   Kata Kunci: Bureaucratic Trimming, Faktor Penghambat, Implementasi Kebijakan

scholarly journals KERJASAMA SISTER CITY PEMERINTAH KOTA BANDUNG (INDONESIA) DAN PEMERINTAH KOTA PETALING JAYA (MALAYSIA) DALAM MENINGKATKAN INDUSTRI EKONOMI KREATIF BANDUNG TAHUN 2012-2016

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (01) ◽  
pp. 94-107
Author(s):  
Mariane Olivia Delanova ◽  
Meizania Vania Utami Effendi ◽  
Yuswari Octonain Djemat
Keyword(s):  
Local Government ◽  
Foreign Relations ◽  
Local Governments ◽  
Central Government ◽  
City Government ◽  
Creative Economy ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
The Government ◽  
Data Collection Technique

In accordance with Law no.37 of 1999 on foreign relations and law no.32 of 2004 on regional government further strengthen the position of local government to conduct an external relationship in an effort to build its own region. The purpose of this study is to describe more deeply about the cooperation of sister city Bandung city government in improving the creative economy industry in Bandung City and Petaling Jaya City, Malaysia with the program "Little Bandung" owned by the government of Bandung. In order to face the existence of ASEAN Economic Community (MEA). This study uses the approach of liberalism, the concept of creative economy, sister city, paradiplomasi and the theory of international cooperation. So as to illustrate the process of foreign cooperation implemented by the Government of Bandung. This research is descriptive and data collection technique through interview and literature study. In this study it can be concluded that with the existence of law no.37 of 1999 on foreign relations and law no.32 of 2004 on local government, a benchmark on each local government to build and develop its own region through an outside relationship Country in the form of cooperation among local governments apart from the central government.

OPTIMALISASI PERAN PEMDA DALAM MENGATASI KENDALA PELAKSANAAN KONSERVASI KEANEKARAGAMAN HAYATI DI DAERAH (STUDI KASUS PROVINSI BENGKULU)

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Antung Deddy Radiansyah
Keyword(s):  
Local Government ◽  
Biodiversity Conservation ◽  
Local Governments ◽  
Central Government ◽  
Wild Plants ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
Conservation Areas ◽  
Conservation Area ◽  
Conservation Policies

Gaps in biodiversity conservation management within the Conservation Area that are the responsibility of the central government and outside the Conservation Areas or as the Essential Ecosystems Area (EEA) which are the authority of the Regional Government, have caused various spatial conflicts between wildlife /wild plants and land management activities. Several obstacles faced by the Local Government to conduct its authority to manage (EEA), caused the number and area of EEA determined by the Local Government to be still low. At present only 703,000 ha are determined from the 67 million ha indicated by EEA. This study aims to overview biodiversity conservation policies by local governments and company perceptions in implementing conservation policies and formulate strategies for optimizing the role of Local Governments. From the results of this study, there has not been found any legal umbrella for the implementation of Law number 23/ 2014 related to the conservation of important ecosystems in the regions. This regulatory vacuum leaves the local government in a dilemma for continuing various conservation programs. By using a SWOT to the internal strategic environment and external stratetegic environment of the Environment and Forestry Service, Bengkulu Province , as well as using an analysis of company perceptions of the conservation policies regulatary , this study has been formulated a “survival strategy” through collaboration between the Central Government, Local Governments and the Private Sector to optimize the role of Local Government’s to establish EEA in the regions.Keywords: Management gaps, Essential Ecosystems Area (EEA), Conservation Areas, SWOT analysis and perception analysis

scholarly journals Public Policy Analysis on Watershed Governance in Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 6615
Author(s):  
Tri Sulistyaningsih ◽  
Achmad Nurmandi ◽  
Salahudin Salahudin ◽  
Ali Roziqin ◽  
Muhammad Kamil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Local Governments ◽  
Central Government ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Institutional Arrangement ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
Government Regulations ◽  
Institutional Control ◽  
Watershed Governance

This paper, which is focused on evaluating the policies and institutional control of the Brantas River Basin, East Java, Indonesia, aims to review government regulations on watershed governance in Indonesia. A qualitative approach to content analysis is used to explain and layout government regulations regarding planning, implementation, coordination, monitoring, evaluation, and accountability of the central and local governments in managing the Brantas watershed, East Java, Indonesia. Nvivo 12 Plus software is used to map, analyze, and create data visualization to answer research questions. This study reveals that the management regulations of the Brantas watershed, East Java, Indonesia, are based on a centralized system, which places the central government as an actor who plays an essential role in the formulation, implementation, and accountability of the Brantas watershed management. In contrast, East Java Province’s regional government only plays a role in implementing and evaluating policies. The central government previously formulated the Brantas watershed. This research contributes to strengthening the management and institutional arrangement of the central government and local governments that support the realization of good governance of the Brantas watershed. Future research needs to apply a survey research approach that focuses on evaluating the capacity of the central government and local governments in supporting good management of the Brantas watershed.

scholarly journals RENCANA AKSI NASIONAL BELA NEGARA

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (01) ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Agus Subagyo
Keyword(s):  
Local Governments ◽  
Central Government ◽  
Action Plan ◽  
The State ◽  
Government Agencies ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
Regional Autonomy ◽  
Three Stages ◽  
State Defense ◽  
Government Level

This article aims to explain the 2018-2019 state defense action plan in Presidential Instruction No. 7 of 2018 which mandates all ministries, non-ministerial government agencies, and local governments to take action to defend the country through three stages, namely the stages of socialization, internalization, and movement action. The dilution of the state defense action plan at the central government level has been very active, however, at the level of the reverent regional government it has not yet been felt, especially with the existence of regional autonomy where the central government is not necessarily able to "control" the regional government, so that all this needs attention parties, to see the perspective of the regional government in implementing the state defense action plan.

scholarly journals Struktur Organisasi Kelembagaan Penanaman Modal di Kota Bandung

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 71
Author(s):  
Dewi Gartika
Keyword(s):  
Local Government ◽  
Capital Investment ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Central Government ◽  
Provincial Government ◽  
City Government ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
Local Government Authority ◽  
The City ◽  
Government Authority

In Act No. 23 of 2014 on Regional Government, where there mention of the obligatory functions and affairs of choice, where one obligatory This is an investment, then in Government Regulation No. 38 Year 2007 on the dealings between the central government, provincial government and district / city government, a local government authority is in the field of investment, government Bandung, capital investment is obligatory and one local government authority is placed in the structure organization Bappeda Bandung is in the Investment Sector, is of course contrary to the Law No. 23 Year 2014 and Government Regulation No. 38 of 2007. This paper provides the organizational structure of institu-tional investment in the city of Bandung.Dalam Undang-Undang Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah dise-butkan mengenai urusan wajib dan urusan pilihan, dimana salah satu urusan wajib ini adalah pena-naman modal, kemudian dalam Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 38 Tahun 2007 tentang Pembagian urusan antara pemerintah pusat, pemerintah provinsi, dan pemerintah kabupaten/kota, salah satu kewenangan pemerintah daerah adalah dalam bidang penanaman modal, di pemerintahan Kota Bandung, penanaman modal yang merupakan urusan wajib dan salah satu kewenangan pemerintah daerah ditempatkan dalam struktur organisasi Bappeda Kota Bandung yaitu pada Bidang Pena-naman Modal, ini tentu saja berseberangan dengan UU No. 32 Tahun 2004/UU No. 23 Tahun 2014 dan Peraturan Pemerintah No. 38 Tahun 2007. Artikel ini berisi tentang struktur organisasi kelem-bagaan penanaman modal di Kota Bandung.

scholarly journals JOINT TRAINING MODEL FOR ENHANCING COMPETENCY OF APPARATUS IN PROVINCE GOVERNMENT OF MITRA PRAJA UTAMA

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-117
Author(s):  
Hari Soesanto
Keyword(s):  
Local Government ◽  
Local Governments ◽  
Regional Cooperation ◽  
Training Model ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
Civil State ◽  
Central Java ◽  
State Apparatus ◽  
Joint Training ◽  
Training Institutions

ABSTRAK Penelitian atau kajian mengenai pelatihan bagi para aparatur sipil negara sudah banyak dilakukan, namun penelitian yang fokus pada pelatihan bagi aparatur yang bertugas pada pemerintah daerah Mitra Praja Utama masih sangat langka. Kajian ini menyajikan skema atau model alternatif peningkatan kompetensi aparatur sipil negara untuk meningkatkan kerjasama antar daerah melalui pelatihan bersama. Ruang lingkup pemerintah daerah yang menjadi kajian adalah pemerintah daerah yang tergabung dalam forum Mitra Praja Utama (MPU). MPU merupakan forum kerjasama dan koordinasi antar pemerintah daerah di Indonesia yang terdiri dari  10 Provinsi yaitu Provinsi Jawa Barat, Provinsi DKI Jakarta, Provinsi Jawa Tengah, Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Provinsi Jawa Timur, Provinsi Bali, Provinsi Lampung, Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat, Provinsi Banten dan Provinsi Nusa Tengggara Timur. Model pelatihan bersama yang disajikan pada kajian ini merupakan suatu alternatif metode yang dapat dipertimbangkan oleh lembaga diklat pemerintah, khususnya pada lembaga diklat pemerintah yang tergabung dalam Mitra Praja Utama dalam rangka peningkatan kerjasama antar daerah untuk berbagai urusan pemerintahan daerah terutama dari aspek kompetensi aparatur.   Kata kunci: pelatihan, mitra praja utama, kompetensi, aparatur sipil negara     ABSTRACT Research or studies on training for the state civil apparatus have been carried out a lot, but research that focuses on training for officers serving in the Mitra Praja Utama regional government is still very rare. This study presents an alternative model for enhancing the competence of civil state apparatus to increase cooperation among regions through joint training. The scope of local government to be studied is the local government who are members of the forum Mitra Praja Utama (MPU). MPU is a forum of cooperation and coordination among local governments in Indonesia consisting of 10 Provinces of West Java Province, DKI Jakarta Province, Central Java Province, Special Province of Yogyakarta, East Java Province, Bali Province, Lampung Province, West Nusa Tenggara Province, Banten Province and East Nusa Tenggara Province. The joint training model presented in this study is an alternative method that can be ascertained by special government training institutions in government training institutions incorporated in Mitra Praja Utama in order to increase inter-regional cooperation for various local government affairs.   Keywords: training, mitra praja utama, competence, civil state apparatus  

scholarly journals PERAN PEMERINTAH DAERAH PADA PENANGANAN COVID-19

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-68
Author(s):  
Diyar Ginanjar Andiraharja
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Local Government ◽  
Health Service ◽  
Local Governments ◽  
Central Government ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
Basic Health ◽  
Public Health Emergencies ◽  
Level Data ◽  
The Law

This study aimed to assess the strategies that have been implemented by the central and regional governments in handling COVID-19. There are ten regulations related to the research objectives that have been reviewed. The method applied is normative legal research. Second level data is used in this study. The literature reviewed is used to solve researchers' questions. From this study it was revealed that the local government was obliged to decide on the policies that had to be taken in handling COVID-19 with normal basic health service conditions. In the situation of the COVID-19 pandemic, the appropriate regulations were enacted not the Law on Regional Government, but the Law on Health Quarantine. The conclusion of this study, in the condition of public health emergencies there is uncertainty at the local government level, because with the decentralization in the field of health causes basic health service standards vary according to the commitment and fiscal capacity of local governments. Strengthening the role of local government is a major factor in overcoming COVID-19. Health services in the regions must be ensured by the central government to conform to the COVID-19 handling standard. With the current state of public health emergencies, it is hoped that the division of roles of the center and the regions will be expected to ensure the safety of citizens.

scholarly journals EKSISTENSI GUBERNUR SEBAGAI WAKIL PEMERINTAH PUSAT DI DAERAH

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahyunir Rauf
Keyword(s):  
Local Government ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Central Government ◽  
National Government ◽  
City Government ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
City Area ◽  
Delegation Of Authority ◽  
The Absolute ◽  
The Government

In the Indonesian national government system is recognized the existence of local government, the region consists of provincial, district and municipal areas. The Provincial Region is headed by a Governor, a Regency area headed by a Regent and a City area headed by a Mayor. Based on Law Number 23 Year 2014 on Regional Government placed the Governor in 2 (two) functions, namely; As Head of Region and As Deputy of Central Government in Region. The governor as the representative of the central government in the regions gained the delegation of authority from the government to carry out central government affairs in the regions. As a representative of the central government in the region the governor carries out the absolute affairs and implements the concurrent governmental affairs which are the authority of the central government and conducts the guidance and supervision of the districts / municipalities in carrying out the concurrent affairs which are the authority of the district / city government. In the implementation of central government affairs in the region it is necessary to have central government representatives in the regions and vertical institutions. Prior to the issuance of Law Number 23 Year 2014 in relation to the Governor as the representative of the central government in the regions is regulated in Law Number 32 Year 2004 regarding regional government and followed up by Government Regulation No. 7 of 2008 on Deconcentration and Co-Administration. In Act No. 23 of 2014 on Regional Government it is stated that the representative of central government in the regions is only given to the Governor, while the Regent / Mayor does not get the authority as a representative of the central government in the region. In carrying out the guidance and supervision on the implementation of government affairs which is the authority of the district / city and the task of assistance by the district / city, the President is assisted by the Governor as the representative of the central government.  

scholarly journals Government Cooperation (Study of the Cooperation between the Central and Regional Governments in the Development of Tourism Priority Destinations in Tanjung Kelayang, Bangka Belitung)

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramadhani Berthi
Keyword(s):  
Local Government ◽  
Central Government ◽  
Business Community ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
Tourist Attractions ◽  
Inhibiting Factors ◽  
Tourism Sector ◽  
Community Tourism ◽  
The Status ◽  
Regional Governments

In order to improve and develop the priority sector, namely the tourism sector, 10 (ten) priority destinations are determined in Indonesia, one of them is Tanjung Kelayang Destination in Bangka Belitung. The development of this priority destination, being the domain of authority of the central government and regional governments, it is necessary for Government Cooperation. The results of the study found that the model of cooperation between the central and regional governments in the development of Tanjung Kelayang Destinations was not only developed through government cooperation in the status of KSPN (National Tourism Strategic Area) which was deconcentrated, but also developed through government cooperation in the status of KEK (Creative Economic Zone) in the concept ABCGM (Academics, Business, Community, Government, Media). In each model of cooperation in its implementation there are still some problems, namely the local government is less able to take advantage of the opportunities in proposing activities to the central government through the Deconcentration Fund and DAK (Special Allocation Funds) in the KSPN status, and there are some activities that are not focused and not suitable for the development of KEK Tanjung Kelayang. There are several inhibiting and supporting factors identified and influencing government cooperation, inhibiting factors in the development of Tanjung Kelayang Priority Destinations namely lack of accessibility especially transportation, lack of awareness of community tourism, lack of community creativity while supporting factors are many foreign tourists and there are famous tourist attractions (Laskar Pelangi Island). Thus, the Central and Regional Government Cooperation can conclude that it is still not enough to make the Tanjung Kelayang destination a priority destination in Indonesia.Keywords :Government Cooperation, Tourism Development, Priority Destinations

scholarly journals Paradox Of Legal Politic Of Regional Authonomy After The Enacmnet Of Law Number 23 Year 2014

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rizal Patoni Patoni ◽  
Lalu Kholif Saputra ◽  
Ilham Ilham ◽  
Moh. Tohariadi ◽  
Zuarno Zuarno
Keyword(s):  
Local Governments ◽  
Central Government ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
Regional Autonomy

This study aims to determine the problems of regional autonomy after the enactment of Law No. 23/2014 which describes the paradox of the application of regional autonomy in Indonesia. The method used in this research is a statutory approach. The results of this study indicate that the main characteristic of implementing the principle of regional autonomy is the authority of local governments to manage their household affairs without intervention from the central government. The authority is in the form of independence and freedom possessed by the regional government. The implication of this shift in regional autonomy law politics is the loss of regional independence and freedom to manage their household affairs, in other words, the Regional Government Law currently makes regional heads government (Governors, Regents, Mayors) only as an extension of the central government, without the authority to take Policy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document