scholarly journals Causes of Death After Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis: A Population-Based Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuqian Feng ◽  
Huimin Jin ◽  
Kaibo Guo ◽  
Harpreet S. Wasan ◽  
Shanming Ruan ◽  
...  

Background: Non-cancer causes of death in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) have not received much attention until now. The purpose of the current study is to investigate the non-cancer causes of death in patients with CRC at different periods of latency.Methods: Eligible patients with CRC were included from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, and standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated using the SEER*Stat software 8.3.8.Results: A total of 475,771 patients with CRC were included, of whom 230,841 patients died during the follow-up period. Within 5 years, CRC was the leading cause of death. Over time, non-cancer causes of death account for an increasing proportion. When followed up for more than 10 years, non-cancer deaths accounted for 71.9% of all deaths worldwide. Cardiovascular diseases were the most common causes of non-cancer deaths, accounting for 15.4% of the total mortality. Patients had a significantly higher risk of death from septicemia within the first year after diagnosis compared with the general population (SMR, 3.39; 95% CI, 3.11–3.69). Within 5–10 years after CRC diagnosis, patients had a significantly higher risk of death from diabetes mellitus (SMR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.19–1.36). During the course of more than 10 years, patients with CRC had a significantly higher risk of death from atherosclerosis (SMR 1.47; 95% CI, 1.11–1.9).Conclusions: Although CRC has always been the leading cause of death in patients with CRC, non-cancer causes of death should not be ignored. For patients with cancer, we should not only focus on anti-tumor therapies but also pay attention to the occurrence of other risks to prevent and manage them in advance.

2017 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerd Cecilie Dobloug ◽  
John Svensson ◽  
Ingrid E Lundberg ◽  
Marie Holmqvist

Patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) suffer an increased burden of comorbidities, but data on mortality in recently diagnosed IIM are conflicting. Also, little is known when, if ever, in relation to IIM diagnosis, mortality is increased.MethodsA population-based IIM cohort of patients diagnosed between 2002 and 2011 and general population comparators were identified using healthcare registers. They were linked to the cause of death register for follow-up.Results224 (31%) of the 716 patients with IIM and 870 (12%) of the 7100 general population died during follow-up. This corresponded to a mortality rate of 60/1000 person-years in IIM and 20/1000 person-years in the general population. The cumulative mortality at 1 year after diagnosis was 9% in IIM and 1% in the general population, and increased in both IIM and the general population with time. The overall hazard ratio (HR) 95%CI of death comparing IIM with the general population was 3.7 (3.2 to 4.4). When we stratified on time since diagnosis, we noted an increase in mortality already within the first year of diagnosis compared with the general population, HR 9.6 (95% CI 6.9 to 13.5). This HR then plateaued around 2 after >10 years with the disease, although the estimates were not statistically significant. Malignancies, diseases of the circulatory and respiratory system were common causes of death.ConclusionMortality is increased in patients with contemporary IIM. The increased mortality was noted within a year of diagnosis, which calls for extra vigilance during the first year of IIM diagnosis.


Stanovnistvo ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-106
Author(s):  
Ivan Marinkovic

The structure of the leading causes of death in Serbia has considerably changed in the last half century. Diseases which presented the main threat to the population a few decades ago are now at the level of a statistical error. On the one side are causes which drastically changed their share in total mortality in this time interval, while others have shown stability and persistence among the basic causes of death. Acute infectious diseases "have been replaced" with chronic noninfectious diseases, due to the improvement of general and health conditions. One of the consequences of such changes is increased life expectancy and a larger share of older population which resulted in cardiovascular diseases and tumors to dominate more and more in total mortality. Convergent trends in the structure of the leading causes of death in Serbia from the middle of the 20th century are the reasons why there are considerably fewer diseases and causes with a significant rate in total population mortality at the beginning of the 21st century. During the 1950s, there were five groups of diseases and causes which participated individually with more than 10% of population mortality (infectious diseases, heart and circulatory diseases, respiratory diseases, some perinatal conditions and undefined states) while at the beginning of the new century there were only two such groups (cardiovascular diseases and tumors). Identical trends exist in all European countries, as well as in the rest of the developed world. The leading causes of death in Serbia are cardiovascular diseases. An average of somewhat over 57.000 people died annually in the period from 2007 - 2009, which represents 55.5% of total population mortality. Women are more numerous among the deceased and this difference is increasing due to population feminization. The most frequent cause of death in Serbia, after heart and circulatory diseases, are tumors, which caused 21,415 deaths in 2009. Neoplasms are responsible for one fifth of all deaths. Their number has doubled in three decades, from 9,107 in 1975 to about 20,000 at the beginning of the 21st century, whereby tumors have become the fastest growing cause of death. Least changes in absolute number of deaths in the last half century were marked among violent deaths. Observed by gender, men are in average three times more numerous among violent deaths than women. In the middle of the 20th century in Serbia, one third of the deaths caused by violence were younger than 25 and as many as one half were younger than 35 years old. Only one tenth (11%) of total number of violent deaths were from the age group of 65 or older. At the end of the first decade of the 21st century (2009), the share of population younger than 25 in the total number of violent deaths was decreased four times (and amounted to 8%). At the same time, the rate of those older than 65 or more quadrupled (amounted to 39%).


BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mesnad Alyabsi ◽  
Fouad Sabatin ◽  
Majed Ramadan ◽  
Abdul Rahman Jazieh

Abstract Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most diagnosed cancer among males and third among females in Saudi Arabia, with up to two-third diagnosed at advanced stage. The objective of our study was to estimate CRC survival and determine prognostic factors. Methods Ministry of National Guard- Health Affairs (MNG-HA) registry data was utilized to identify patients diagnosed with CRC between 2009 and 2017. Cases were followed until December 30th, 2017 to assess their one-, three-, and five-year CRC-specific survivals. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess survival from CRC. Results A total of 1012 CRC patients were diagnosed during 2009–2017. Nearly, one-fourth of the patients presented with rectal tumor, 42.89% with left colon and 33.41% of the cases were diagnosed at distant metastasis stage. The overall one-, three-, and five-year survival were 83, 65 and 52.0%, respectively. The five-year survival was 79.85% for localized stage, 63.25% for regional stage and 20.31% for distant metastasis. Multivariate analyses showed that age, diagnosis period, stage, nationality, basis of diagnosis, morphology and location of tumor were associated with survival. Conclusions Findings reveal poor survival compared to Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) population. Diagnoses at late stage and no surgical and/or perioperative chemotherapy were associated with increased risk of death. Population-based screening in this population should be considered.


Rheumatology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (9) ◽  
pp. 2308-2315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zachary S Wallace ◽  
Xiaoqing Fu ◽  
Tyler Harkness ◽  
John H Stone ◽  
Yuqing  Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate causes of death in a contemporary inception cohort of ANCA-associated vasculitis patients, stratifying the analysis according to ANCA type. Methods We identified a consecutive inception cohort of patients newly diagnosed with ANCA-associated vasculitis from 2002 to 2017 in the Partners HealthCare System and determined vital status through the National Death Index. We determined cumulative mortality incidence and standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) compared with the general population. We compared MPO- and PR3-ANCA+ cases using Cox regression models. Results The cohort included 484 patients with a mean diagnosis age of 58 years; 40% were male, 65% were MPO-ANCA+, and 65% had renal involvement. During 3385 person-years (PY) of follow-up, 130 patients died, yielding a mortality rate of 38.4/1000 PY and a SMR of 2.3 (95% CI: 1.9, 2.8). The most common causes of death were cardiovascular disease (CVD; cumulative incidence 7.1%), malignancy (5.9%) and infection (4.1%). The SMR for infection was greatest for both MPO- and PR3-ANCA+ patients (16.4 and 6.5). MPO-ANCA+ patients had an elevated SMR for CVD (3.0), respiratory disease (2.4) and renal disease (4.5). PR3- and MPO-ANCA+ patients had an elevated SMR for malignancy (3.7 and 2.7). Compared with PR3-ANCA+ patients, MPO-ANCA+ patients had a higher risk of CVD death [hazard ratio 5.0 (95% CI: 1.2, 21.2]; P = 0.03]. Conclusion Premature ANCA-associated vasculitis mortality is explained by CVD, infection, malignancy, and renal death. CVD is the most common cause of death, but the largest excess mortality risk in PR3- and MPO-ANCA+ patients is associated with infection. MPO-ANCA+ patients are at higher risk of CVD death than PR3-ANCA+ patients.


Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 1239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abbema ◽  
Vissers ◽  
Vos-Geelen ◽  
Lemmens ◽  
Janssen-Heijnen ◽  
...  

Previous studies showed substantial improvement of survival rates in patients with cancer in the last two decades. However, lower survival rates have been reported for older patients compared to younger patients. In this population-based study, we analyzed treatment patterns and the survival of patients with breast cancer (BC) and colorectal cancer (CRC). Patients with stages I–III BC and CRC and diagnosed between 2003 and 2012 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). Trends in treatment modalities were evaluated with the Cochran-Armitage trend test. Trends in five-year overall survival were calculated with the Cox hazard regression model. The Ederer II method was used to calculate the five-year relative survival. The relative excess risk of death (RER) was estimated using a multivariate generalized linear model. During the study period, 98% of BC patients aged <75 years underwent surgery, whereas for patients ≥75 years, rates were 79.3% in 2003 and 66.7% in 2012 (p < 0.001). Most CRC patients underwent surgery irrespective of age or time period, although patients with rectal cancer aged ≥75 years received less surgery or radiotherapy over the entire study period than younger patients. The administration of adjuvant chemotherapy increased over time for CRC and BC patients, except for BC patients aged ≥75 years. The five-year relative survival improved only in younger BC patients (adjusted RER 0.95–0.96 per year), and was lower for older BC patients (adjusted RER 1.00, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.98–1.02, and RER 1.00; 95% CI 0.98–1.01 per year for 65–74 years and ≥75 years, respectively). For CRC patients, the five-year relative survival improved over time for all ages (adjusted RER on average was 0.95 per year). In conclusion, the observed survival trends in BC and CRC patients suggest advances in cancer treatment, but with striking differences in survival between older and younger patients, particularly for BC patients.


2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 1001-1010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel A. Silver ◽  
Ziv Harel ◽  
Eric McArthur ◽  
Danielle M. Nash ◽  
Rey Acedillo ◽  
...  

Mortality after AKI is high, but the causes of death are not well described. To better understand causes of death in patients after a hospitalization with AKI and to determine patient and hospital factors associated with mortality, we conducted a population-based study of residents in Ontario, Canada, who survived a hospitalization with AKI from 2003 to 2013. Using linked administrative databases, we categorized cause of death in the year after hospital discharge as cardiovascular, cancer, infection-related, or other. We calculated standardized mortality ratios to compare the causes of death in survivors of AKI with those in the general adult population and used Cox proportional hazards modeling to estimate determinants of death. Of the 156,690 patients included, 43,422 (28%) died in the subsequent year. The most common causes of death were cardiovascular disease (28%) and cancer (28%), with respective standardized mortality ratios nearly six-fold (5.81; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 5.70 to 5.92) and eight-fold (7.87; 95% CI, 7.72 to 8.02) higher than those in the general population. The highest standardized mortality ratios were for bladder cancer (18.24; 95% CI, 17.10 to 19.41), gynecologic cancer (16.83; 95% CI, 15.63 to 18.07), and leukemia (14.99; 95% CI, 14.16 to 15.85). Along with older age and nursing home residence, cancer and chemotherapy strongly associated with 1-year mortality. In conclusion, cancer-related death was as common as cardiovascular death in these patients; moreover, cancer-related deaths occurred at substantially higher rates than in the general population. Strategies are needed to care for and counsel patients with cancer who experience AKI.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 37-38
Author(s):  
Monica Else ◽  
Stuart J Blakemore ◽  
Jonathan C Strefford ◽  
Daniel Catovsky

* These authors contributed equally Introduction Causes of death and, in particular, deaths due to infection have not been widely studied in randomised trials in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). With long-term follow-up (median 13 years), we were able to examine the cause of death in 600/777 patients in the LRF CLL4 trial. Blood samples taken at randomization from 499 patients were available, allowing us to examine the relationship between deaths due to infection and a large panel of genes which are commonly mutated in CLL. Several gene mutations have been linked to earlier death in the LRF CLL4 trial, including mutations of TP53, NOTCH1, SF3B1, EGR2 and MAPK-ERK (Gonzalez et al, J Clin Oncol 2011; 29:2223-9; Oscier et al, Blood 2013; 121:468-75; Young et al, Leukemia 2017; 31:1547-54; Blakemore et al, Leukemia 2020; 34:1760-4). In this study we aimed to identify gene mutations which were specifically associated with death due to infection. Methods In LRF CLL4 patients were randomized between 1999-2004 to receive chlorambucil or fludarabine, with or without cyclophosphamide. Follow-up continued until September 2016. Causes of death were assessed centrally by the principal investigator. Results In the LRF CLL4 trial 614 of 777 patients (79%) died before the end of follow-up. The cause of death was known in 600 patients. Deaths tended to be multifactorial, but infection was a cause of death in 258 patients (43%). Fatal infections were pneumonia (67%), and/or sepsis (38%) and/or opportunistic infections such as aspergillus (11%). Patients who died of infection were more likely than those who died of other causes to have received more than one line of treatment and to have died in the winter months (Table 1). Mutations of BRAF, FBXW7, NRAS and XPO1 were significantly associated with death due to infection versus other deaths. However, with multiple hypothesis testing, NRAS was the only genetic mutation to survive a false discovery rate (FDR) q-value = 0.05 (odds ratio: 17, P = 0.0004). No other significant differences were found between patients who died of infection versus those whose death did not have an infectious cause. In particular, the rate of deaths due to infection was not influenced by other demographic or laboratory factors, nor by the randomised treatment, the response to treatment, or the size/experience of the CLL treatment centre. In multivariate analysis the factors most significantly associated with death from infection versus all other deaths were mutations of the BRAF, FBXW7, NRAS and XPO1 genes (Table 1). Of the 499 patients in the trial for whom gene mutation data were available, 73 (15%) carried one or more of the four gene mutations BRAF (6%), FBXW7 (2%), NRAS (2%) and XPO1 (6%) (Table 2). Only six of these 73 remained alive. Death was caused by infection in 46/67 assessable patients (69%) who had a mutation of one or more of these four genes versus only 129/333 patients (39%) without any of these mutations (odds ratio: 3.46 [95% C.I. 1.98-6.07] P&lt;0.0001). In order to test the robustness of our results, the same analysis was repeated in the full trial, comparing the patients who died of infection with all the other trial patients, including those who remained alive. The presence of one or more of the four gene mutations BRAF, FBXW7, NRAS and XPO1 was the most significant predictor of death from infection in univariate analysis in this larger dataset (odds ratio: 3.92 [95% C.I. 2.34-6.59] P&lt;0.0001). Patients who died of infection lost on average 2 years 4 months of life compared with the median overall survival of all the other trial patients (6 years 11 months, log-rank P&lt;0.0001). Conclusion Patients in LRF CLL4 were at some risk of death due to infection, irrespective of their demographic characteristics, disease stage and treatment history. Nevertheless, those who had received more lines of treatment were particularly at risk, as were those who carried a BRAF, FBXW7, NRAS or XPO1 mutation. A meta-analysis of datasets from other trials could be important to assess the validity of the link between these gene mutations and deaths from infections in patients with CLL and possibly other leukaemias and lymphomas. Careful management of infection risk, together with prophylaxis against infection, may be important in patients who carry one or more of these mutations. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (30_suppl) ◽  
pp. 254-254
Author(s):  
Robert B. Hines ◽  
Alina Barrett ◽  
Philip Twumasi-Ankrah ◽  
Dominique Broccoli ◽  
Kimberly K. Engelman ◽  
...  

254 Background: We investigated the effect of comorbidity, age, health insurance payer status, and race on the risk of nonadherence with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) treatment guidelines for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. In addition, the prognostic impact of NCCN treatment nonadherence on survival was assessed. Methods: Colon and rectal cancer patients who received primary treatment at Memorial University Medical Center in Savannah, GA from 2003 to 2010 were eligible for this study (final N = 679). Modified Poisson regression was used to obtain risk ratios for the outcome of nonadherence with NCCN treatment guidelines. Hazard ratios (HRs) for the relative risk of CRC-related death were obtained by Cox regression. Results: Guideline-adherent treatment was received by 82.5% of patients. Moderate/severe comorbidity, being uninsured, having rectal cancer, older age, and increasing tumor stage were associated with increased risks of receiving nonadherent treatment. Treatment nonadherence was associated with 4.5 times the risk of CRC-related death (HR, 4.53; 95% CI, 2.56-8.00) in the first year following diagnosis and 2.0 times the risk of death (HR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.20-3.25) in years 2 to 5. The detrimental effect of nonadherence was demonstrated across all levels of comorbidity and age. Conclusions: Although there are medically justifiable reasons to deviate from NCCN treatment guidelines in CRC patients, patients who received nonadherent treatment had much higher risks of CRC-related death, especially in the first year following diagnosis. This study’s results highlight the importance of cancer health services research to drive quality improvement efforts in cancer care for CRC patients. [Table: see text]


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19056-e19056
Author(s):  
Nicole H. Dalal ◽  
Graca Dores ◽  
Rochelle E. Curtis ◽  
Martha S. Linet ◽  
Lindsay M. Morton

e19056 Background: LPL and WM are rare, indolent mature B-cell lymphomas. While recent studies reveal improving survival after LPL/WM, cause-specific mortality has not been comprehensively studied. Methods: We identified 6659 adults with first primary LPL (n = 2866) or WM (n = 3793) within 17 US population-based cancer registries from 2000 to 2015. Patients were followed for vital status (mean follow-up = 5.07 years), and causes of death were determined from death certificates. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) estimated relative risk of death compared to the general population. We estimated cumulative mortality and absolute excess risk (AER) per 10,000 person-years. Results: We observed 2826 deaths overall, of which 43%, 13%, and 42% were due to lymphoma, cancers excluding lymphoma, and non-malignant causes, respectively. There was a 20% higher risk of death due to non-malignant causes compared to the general population (n = 1194, SMR = 1.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1 to 1.2). The most common non-malignant causes included infectious (n = 162, SMR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.5 to 2.1, AER = 21.0), respiratory (n = 131, SMR = 1.2, 95% CI = 1.0 to 1.5, AER = 7.4), and digestive (n = 76, SMR = 1.9, 95% CI = 1.5 to 2.4, AER = 10.7) diseases. Cause-specific mortality varied by time since and age at LPL/WM diagnosis. Risks were highest in the first year after LPL/WM for non-malignant causes (SMR = 1.4, AER = 34.3), particularly infections (SMR = 2.4, AER = 34.4) and non-neoplastic hematologic diseases (SMR = 17.3, AER = 20.7). In contrast, risk of death due to cancers excluding lymphoma increased with time since diagnosis (SMR< 1y = 1.2, SMR≥5y = 1.7; AER< 1y = 15.1, AER≥5y = 60.0). Analyses by age, focused on AERs, showed generally similar risks across age groups (cancers excluding lymphoma: AER< 65= 26, AER65-75= 28, AER≥75= 31; non-malignant causes: AER< 65= 52, AER65-75= 66, AER≥75= 23). Cumulative mortality from non-malignant causes (23.7%) exceeded that from lymphoma (22.9%) beginning 9 years after LPL/WM diagnosis. Conclusions: Using population data, we identified areas to improve survivorship care of LPL/WM patients, particularly for non-malignant causes of death.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16146-e16146
Author(s):  
Sandi Pruitt ◽  
David E. Gerber ◽  
Hong Zhu ◽  
Daniel Heitjan ◽  
Bhumika Maddineni ◽  
...  

e16146 Background: A growing number of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) have survived a previous cancer. Although little is known about their prognosis, this population is frequently excluded from clinical trials. We examined the impact of previous cancer on overall and cancer-specific survival in a population-based cohort of patients diagnosed with incident CRC. Methods: We identified patients aged ≥66 years and diagnosed with CRC between 2005-2015 in linked SEER-Medicare data. For patients with and without previous cancer, we estimated overall survival using Cox regression and cause-specific survival using competing risk regression, separately by CRC stage, while adjusting for numerous covariates and competing risk of death from previous cancer, other causes, or the incident CRC. Results: Of 112,769 CRC patients diagnosed with incident CRC, 15,935 (14.1%) had a previous cancer – most commonly prostate (32.9%) or breast (19.4%) cancer, with many 7505 (47.1%) diagnosed ≤5 years of CRC. For all CRC stages except IV in which there was no significant difference in survival, patients with previous cancer had modestly worse overall survival (hazard ratios from fully adjusted models range from 1.11-1.28 across stages; see Table). This survival disadvantage was driven by deaths due to previous cancer and other causes. Notably, most patients with previous cancer had improved CRC-specific survival. Conclusions: CRC patients who have survived a previous cancer have generally worse overall survival but superior CRC-specific survival. This evidence should be considered concurrently with concerns about trial generalizability, low accrual, and heterogeneity of participants when determining exclusion criteria. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document