scholarly journals Perbandingan Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 5E Dengan Model Tradisional Dalam Menigkatkan Kognitif Siswa

Author(s):  
Ryzal Perdana

This study aims to 1) Know students' initial cognitive abilities in acid-base material, 2) Know students' cognitive enhancements in acid-base material, 3) Know the effectiveness of learning 5E Learning cycle in improving students' cognitive on acid-base material. Learning Cycle 5E learning model consists of 5 phases, namely Engagment phase, exploration, explaination, elaboration, and evaluation. Traditional learning models follow learning that is commonly used by teachers in everyday learning. This research is an experimental study with the number of samples in the experimental class using 30E learning cycle learning models as many as 30 students and control classes using traditional learning models of 30 students. The population in this study were all students of class XI SMA N 1 Pekalongan, Lampung. The sample in this study were students of Pekalongan 1 Public High School class XI IPA1 and XI IPA4 who had the same cognitive abilities. This study uses a quasi-experimental method with Non Equivalent (Pretest and Posttest) Control Group Design. The effectiveness of the 5E Learning Cycle learning model was measured based on the increase in students' cognitive abilities significantly. The results showed that the Learning Cycle 5E learning model was better at improving students' cognitive compared to Traditional methods. This can be seen from the average gain score of students' cognitive abilities for Traditional learning models and the 5E Learning Cycle Learning Model 0.53 and 0.65 respectively.

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anis Fita Yuliana ◽  
Tita Tanjung Sari ◽  
Ach. Puniman

Factors that can affect the learning outcomes of IVB graders include: 1) teachers still use traditional learning methods (lectures) where students only pay attention, listen, and record material so that students have difficulty in understanding the subject matter delivered by the teacher; 2) lack of teacher creativity in using varied learning models; 3) the teacher also lacks the opportunity for students to express their opinions so that it impacts on students' skills, especially in discussions. The purpose of this study was to determine the use of inquiry learning models in integrated thematic learning and to determine the effect of the use of inquiry learning models on students' discussion skills on integrated thematic learning in class IVB MIN 2 Sumenep. This study uses a quasi experimental design design with the form of nonequivalent control group design. The sample in this study consisted of two classes, namely class IVA and class IVB. Class IVA as many as 24 students as the control class and class IVB as many as 24 students as the experimental class. The treatment applied to the experimental class was the inquiry learning model. The syntax or steps of inquiry used in researchers are 1) presenting questions or problems; 2) make a hypothesis; 3) design an experiment; 4) conducting experiments to obtain information; 5) collecting and analyzing data; 6) make conclusions. The results showed that 1) The use of inquiry learning models in the experimental class was more effective than the direct learning model in the control class; 2) inquiry learning model influences students' discussion skills. This is evidenced by the results of the t-test 2 Free Samples (Independent Samples t-Test). Where in the t-test 2 Independent Samples t-Test in the "Equal variances assumed" section, the sig (2-tailed) value of 0.002 <0.05 means that Ho is rejected, Ha is accepted.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 398-413
Author(s):  
Ulvi Atika Suri ◽  
Eko Retno Mulyaningrum

ABTRACTThe development of the 21st century skills requires educators to prepare students for global economic competition by having special skills, one of which is problem solving. Achievement of the 21st skills century is done by improving the teaching profession, one of which is through lesson study for learning community. The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is an influence on the application of the auditory intellectually repetition (AIR) learning model through lesson study for learning community on the problem solving abilities of students. This study uses a quasi experimental design method through the randomized posttest-only control group design using matched subjects. The study was conducted at Semarang 11 Public High School in the 2018/2019 school year. Based on the research, the results of statistical tests on the problem solving ability variable have a significance value (2-tailed) of 0.000 <0.05 so that it can be concluded that there are significant differences in students' problem solving abilities between the experimental class and the control class. The experimental class scored better than the control class, with the acquisition of the experimental class number of 76.96 and the control class of 65.94. Based on these results it can be concluded that the application of auditory intellectually repetition (AIR) learning models through lesson study for learning community can improve students' problem solving abilitiesKeywords: Auditory Intellectually Repetition (AIR) Learning Model, Lesson Study for Learning Community, Problem Solving 


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 13-19
Author(s):  
Neneng Maryani ◽  
Karin Nurseptiani

This research is based on field findings, namely low interest in learning Indonesian, lack of teacher initiative to use varied learning models that cause students to become bored in following the learning process in Indonesian subjects. The purpose of this study is to find out the increased interest in learning Indonesian by comparing the RADEC (Read, Answer, Discuss, Explain, and Create) learning models and conventional learning. The research method used was Nonequivalent Control Group Design with a population of 173 students, and two sample classes namely class V as an experimental class totaling 28 students and class VI as a control class totaling 37 students. From the results by statistical data using SPSS version 24.0 for windows after the data are declared normally distributed and come from homogeneous samples through normality and homogeneity tests, it is known that the results of hypothesis testing using the Compare Means test with Independent Samples Test obtained sig = 0,000. Because the significance <0.05, it can be concluded that Ho is rejected, which means "There is a difference in the increase in interest in learning Indonesian by using the RADEC learning model compared to using the conventional model in SD Negeri Sukamaju, Pagerageung District, Tasikmalaya District". The score is in the interval 66.4 -70.1. Based on this, it can be concluded that the implementation of the RADEC learning model is quite successful in increasing interest in learning Indonesian compared to using conventional models. Suggestions that can be recommended based on the findings of this study include expected to be able to develop RADEC learning models that are collaborated with other learning techniques as an innovation to increase learning interest.


2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Putu Deli Januartini ◽  
Ketut Agustini ◽  
I Gede Partha Sindu

 AbstrakTujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui (1) pengaruh signifikan penggunaan model pembelajaran Think Pair Square dan Think Pair Share terhadap hasil belajar siswa, (2) hasil belajar yang lebih baik antara model pembelajaran Think Pair Square  atau  Think Pair Share, (3) motivasi belajar siswa, (4) respon siswa.Jenis penelitian ini adalah eksperimen semu dengan rancangan Post Test Only Control Group Design. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas X. Sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah kelas X1 dengan model Think Pair Square, kelas X3 dengan model Think Pair Share dan X5 dengan model Direct Instruction.Data hasil belajar dianalisis melalui uji prasyarat dengan hasil ketiga kelompok berdistribusi normal dan homogen serta uji hipotesis menggunakan Anova Satu Jalur dengan hasil terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan penggunaan model pembelajaran Think Pair Square, Think Pair Share dan Direct Instruction. Kemudian uji lanjut t-Scheffe dengan hasil terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar penggunaan model pembelajaran Think Pair Square, Think Pair Share dan Direct Instruction. Dilihat dari rata-rata hasil belajar maka disimpulkan model Think Pair Square lebih baik dengan hasil belajar lebih tinggi. Hasil analisis angket Think Pair Square diketahui respon sangat positif dan tingkat motivasi belajar sangat tinggi, Think Pair Share diketahui respon positif dan tingkat motivasi belajar sangat tinggi. Kata kunci:  Think Pair Square, Think Pair Share, Direct Instruction, hasil belajar, motivasi belajar, dan respon siswa. AbstractThe purpose of this study were to determine (1) the significant influence of the application of think pair square and think pair share learning model on student’s learning achievement, (2) better learning achievement between think pair square and think pair share learning model, (3) student’s motivation, (4) the student’s responses.The research was a quasi-experimental design experiment with post test only control group design. The population of study was all the students in grade X. The sample were as X1 class with the application of Think Pair Square learning model, X3 class with the application of Think Pair Share learning model, and X5 class with the application of Direct Instruction learning model.The data was collected by cognitive and psychomotor tests. The student’s learning achievement were analyzed by the prerequisite test with the results of the three groups at normal distribution and homogenous, and the hypothesis tested by One Way Anova which means there is a significant effect on the application of think pair square, think pair share, and direct instruction learning models. Then it was conducted a further test t-Scheffe with the results there are differences in the learning achievement between think pair square, think pair share, and direct instruction learning models. According to the average result we made a conclusion that Think Pair Square was better learning models with higher student’s learning achievement. The questionnaires results shows that Think Pair Square was very high positiveresponse and very high learning motivation, Think Pair Share was high positive response and very high learning motivation. Keywords :   Think Pair Square, Think Pair Share, Direct Instruction, learning achievement, learning motivation, and student response. 


Author(s):  
Isna Rafianti ◽  
Khairida Iskandar ◽  
Lilis Haniyah

Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh rendahnya hasil belajar matematika siswa di Indonesia. Hal ini disebabkan  oleh  beberapa  faktor,  diantaranya  adalah  rendahnya  kemampuan  pemahaman  konsep matematis dan didukung oleh rendahnya disposisi matematis siswa yaitu apresiasi terhadap pembelajaran matematika. Salah satu upaya untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis dan disposisi matematis siswa adalah dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran Search, Solve, Create and Share  (SSCS)  yang  menjadikan  siswa  mandiri,  aktif  dan  fokus  dalam  pembelajaran  matematika. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui peningkatan kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis dan disposisi matematis siswa dengan menggunakan model SSCS dalam pembelajaran matematika. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan desain non-equivalent control group design. Subyek penelitian ini adalah kelas VIII C (eksperimen) dan VIII D (kontrol) semester 2 SMPN 2 Kota Serang. Instrumen yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah soal tes kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis dan skala disposisi matematis. Data hasil penelitian ini dianalisis menggunakan uji normalitas, uji homogenitas, uji perbedaan rata-rata. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran SSCS lebih baik dari siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran konvensional. Disposisi matematis yang menggunakan model pembelajaran SSCS memiliki peningkatan yang lebih rendah atau sama dengan siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran konvensional. Dengan demikian model pembelajaran SSCS bisa diterapkan untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis namun kurang efektif dalam peningkatan disposisi matematis siswa SMP. Kata kunci: Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis, Disposisi Matematis, Model Pembelajaran Search, Solve, Create and Share (SSCS) ABSTRACT This research is motivated by the low mathematics learning result of students in Indonesia. This is caused by several factors, such as the low ability of understanding mathematical concepts and supported by the low mathematical disposition of students is the appreciation of mathematics learning. One of the efforts to improve the students' understanding of mathematical concepts and mathematical dispositions is by using Search, Solve, Create and Share (SSCS) learning model which makes students self-reliant, active and focused in learning mathematics. This study aims to determine the improvement of the ability to comprehend mathematical concepts and mathematical disposition of students by using SSCS model in mathematics learning. This research uses quasi experimental method with non-equivalent control group design. The subjects of this research are class VIII C (experiment) and VIII D (control) semester 2 SMPN 2 Serang City. The instrument used in this research is the ability to comprehend mathematical concepts and mathematical disposition scale. Data of this study were analyzed using normality test, homogeneity test, two-party test, and one-party test. The conclusion of this research is the ability of understanding mathematical concepts of students using SSCS learning model better than students using conventional learning model. While mathematical dispositions using SSCS learning models have a lower or equal increase with students using conventional learning models. Thus the SSCS learning model can be applied to improve the comprehension of mathematical concepts but less effective in improving mathematical disposition of Junior High School students.   Keywords: Ability  to  Understand  Mathematical  Concept,  Mathematical  Disposition,  Search,  Solve, Create and Share Learning Model (SSCS)


2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Choirunniswah Choirunniswah ◽  
Dini Afriansyah ◽  
Titin Veronika

This study aims to determine the effect of Learning Cycle 5E learning model on the mastery ofthe concept of human circulatory system. This research was conducted at State Junior HighSchool 19 Palembang on January 04 until February 19, 2017. The research method used in thisresearch is a quasi experiment with Noquivalent Control Group Design research design.Population in this study all students of class VIII SMP Negeri 19 Palembang consisting of 8classes, amounting to 298 students. Sampling was used by using purvosive sampling technique.The sample of this study class VIII.7 as the experiment amounted to 38 and class VIII.8 as acontrol class amounted to 35 students. In the learning process, experimental class is taught byusing Learning Cycle 5E model and control class is taught with Direct Intruction model. Dataretrieval uses conception master test with open multiple choice form which has been tested forits validity and reliability. The results of this study indicate that the average N-gain of theexperimental class is 0.69 which belongs to the medium category and the average N-gain forthe control class is 0.30 which belongs to the low category. Data analysis using t-test withsignificant level 0,05 obtained tcount = 6,568 while ttabel = 1,669 seen that tcount. Therefore(Ha) accepted and (H0) rejected thus can be concluded that there is a significant influence onLearning Cycle 5E learning model on the mastery of the concept of circulation system ofhuman class VIII SMP Negeri 19 Palembang


BIO-PEDAGOGI ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Hargiono Hargiono ◽  
Maridi Maridi ◽  
Bowo Sugiharto

<p>The purpose of this research is to ascertain the influence of learning cycle 5E models accompanied mind map toward biology learning achievment of VIII grade students at SMP Negeri 5 Karanganyar academic year 2015/2016. This research was quasi experiment research which used posttest only nonequivalent control group design. This research applied learning cycle 5E learning models accompanied mind map in experimental group and direct instruction learning models in control group.  The population of this research was all of VIII grade students at SMP Negeri 5 Karanganyar in academic year 2015/2016.   Sampling techniques used cluster sampling that choosed VIII A, VIII B, and VIII G as experiment group, and VIII H as control group. Data was collected using multiple choice test, observation sheet, and document.  The hypotheses analyzed by anova test. Result of data analysis using one way anova showed that  experiment group with application of learning cycle 5E learning models accompanied mind map has different signification 0.000 with other  experiment groups and F<sub>statistic</sub>with value 7,436 is higher than F<sub>(α</sub>,<sub>df)</sub>with value 2,440.This research concluded that application of learning cycle 5E learning models accompanied mind map has real influential toward student’s biology learning achievement of VIII grade students at SMP Negeri 5 Karanganyar especially cognitive domain.</p><p> </p><p><strong><em>Keywords </em></strong>: learning cycle 5E, mind map,learning achievment<em>.</em></p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 257-266
Author(s):  
Putri Yulia ◽  
Maya Riskayani ◽  
Selvia Erita

This study aims to find out (1) the POGIL learning model effective on mathematical communication skills. (2) conventional learning models are effective against mathematical communication skills. (3) the difference between the POGIL learning model and the conventional model of mathematical communication skills. This research is quasi-experimental research with the research design of The Nonequivalent Posttest Only Control Group Design. The population in this study is all students of grade VII MTS Negeri 02 Kerinci. This study's sample consisted of an experimental class and a control class selected by a random sampling cluster. The research instrument is a test f mathematical communication ability, and the data is analyzed using one-sample t-test statistics and independent t-test samples. This study shows that (1) the POGIL learning model is effective on mathematical communication skills. (2) conventional learning models are ineffective against mathematical communication skills. (3) there is a difference between the POGIL learning model and the conventional model of mathematical communication skills.


Numeracy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-149
Author(s):  
Rianti Rahmalia ◽  
Hajidin Hajidin ◽  
BI. Ansari

Mathematical communication skills of students are still relatively low. One learning model can improve students 'mathematical communication skills and at the same time students' mathematical disposition is the Problem Based Learning (PBL) model. The aim to be achieved is to find out the improvement of students 'mathematical communication skills and mathematical disposition using PBL models in terms of students' initial mathematical level. This research is an experimental research design with pretest posttest control group design. The research population was Grade VII students of SMP 9 Langsa. Students are grouped into two classes namely the experimental class and the control class randomly selected from eight parallel classes. The instrument used was a test of mathematical communication skills and a mathematical disposition questionnaire. Data analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA. The results showed that improving students 'mathematical communication ability and students' mathematical disposition by applying PBL learning models is better than students applying conventional learning models. There is no interaction between the PBL learning model with student level on mathematical communication skills and students' mathematical disposition. Abstrak Kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa masih tergolong rendah. Salah satu model pembelajaran dapat meningkatkan kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa dan sekaligus disposisi matematis siswa adalah model Problem Based Learning (PBL). Tujuan yang ingin dicapai ialah untuk mengetahui peningkatan kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa dan disposisi matematis menggunakan model PBL ditinjau dari kemampuan awal matematis siswa. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen dengan desain pretest postest control group design. Populasi penelitian adalah siswa kelas VII SMP Negeri 9 Langsa. Siswa dikelompokkan menjadi dua kelas yaitu kelas eksperimen dan kelas kontrol yang dipilih secara acak dari delapan kelas paralel. Instrumen yang digunakan tes kemampuan komunikasi matematis dan angket disposisi matematis. Analisis data dilakukan dengan menggunakan anova dua arah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa peningkatan kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa dan disposisi matematis siswa dengan menerapkan model pembelajaran PBL lebih baik dari pada siswa yang menerapkan model pembelajaran konvensional. Tidak terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran PBL dengan level siswa terhadap kemampuan komunikasi matematis dan disposisi matematis siswa. Kata Kunci:  Komunikasi Matematis, Disposisi Matematis, Problem Based Learning  


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 64-69
Author(s):  
Inang Widigdo

This research is motivated by the low mastery of basic movements due to the incorrect way of doing the passing technique. How to teach volleyball games using the lecture method so as to make students less interested so that students become less active during the learning process. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was effectiveness in the problem based learning model on the psychomotor outcomes of volleyball underpassing in class XI students of SMK Negeri 2 Semarang and discovery learning models on psychomotor outcomes of volleyball underpassing in class XI students of SMK Negeri 2 Semarang. The research method used in this research is Quasi Experimental Design (quasi-experimental) with the design used in this study is the Noneequivalent Control Group Design. Data collection techniques using tests. The population in this study were students of class XI SMK N 2 Semarang, with samples of class XI BDP 1 and XI UPW 1 students. The results showed that the hypothesis test was obtained t count (22.669 < 29.556) which means that the problem based learning and discovery learning models are effective in psychomotor results of passing under volleyball in class XI students of SMK N 2 Semarang. The results of the effectiveness of passing down volleyball with a problem based learning model of 83.06. While the results of the effectiveness of passing down volleyball with the discovery learning model of 89.00. Based on the results above, it can be concluded that the discovery learning learning model is more effective than problem based learning exercises for the effectiveness of passing down volleyball in class XI students of SMK N 2 Semarang, because from the data the value of the discovery learning model is greater than problem based learning.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document