scholarly journals Is it appropriate to link ‘old age’ to certain causes of death on the medical certificate of cause of death?

2021 ◽  
pp. fhj.2021-0050
Author(s):  
Vedamurthy Adhiyaman ◽  
Indrajit Chattopadhyay
2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 323-344
Author(s):  
Viorela Diaconu ◽  
Nadine Ouellette ◽  
Robert Bourbeau

AbstractThe U.S. elderly experience shorter lifespans and greater variability in age at death than their Canadian peers. In order to gain insight on the underlying factors responsible for the Canada-U.S. old-age mortality disparities, we propose a cause-of-death analysis. Accordingly, the objective of this paper is to compare levels and trends in cause-specific modal age at death (M) and standard deviation above the mode (SD(M +)) between Canada and the U.S. since the 1970s. We focus on six broad leading causes of death, namely cerebrovascular diseases, heart diseases, and four types of cancers. Country-specific M and SD(M +) estimates for each leading cause of death are calculated from P-spline smooth age-at-death distributions obtained from detailed population and cause-specific mortality data. Our results reveal similar levels and trends in M and SD(M +) for most causes in the two countries, except for breast cancer (females) and lung cancer (males), where differences are the most noticeable. In both of these instances, modal lifespans are shorter in the U.S. than in Canada and U.S. old-age mortality inequalities are greater. These differences are explained in part by the higher stratification along socioeconomic lines in the U.S. than in Canada regarding the adoption of health risk behaviours and access to medical services.


1954 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. H. Daw

Medical and social progress over the past 50 years has resulted in a large increase in the expectation of life, and this, together with a declining birthrate, has caused an increase in the proportion of old persons in the population. In 1901 less than 5% of the population of England and Wales was aged 65 and over; by 1949 the estimated percentage had increased to 11% and must inevitably increase still further in the future. A result of this is that more and more attention is being given to diseases of old age and in fact a new specialized branch of medicine, geriatrics, seems to have arisen. Heart diseases form by far the largest group of causes of death in old age and in 1949 were the certified cause of death in 37% of the deaths in England and Wales at ages 65 and over (Table 1). Even in the age-group 55-59 heart disease was responsible for 24% of all deaths in 1949.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sefer Elezkurtaj ◽  
Selina Greuel ◽  
Jana Ihlow ◽  
Edward Georg Michaelis ◽  
Philip Bischoff ◽  
...  

AbstractInfection by the new corona virus strain SARS-CoV-2 and its related syndrome COVID-19 has been associated with more than two million deaths worldwide. Patients of higher age and with preexisting chronic health conditions are at an increased risk of fatal disease outcome. However, detailed information on causes of death and the contribution of pre-existing health conditions to death yet is missing, which can be reliably established by autopsy only. We performed full body autopsies on 26 patients that had died after SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 at the Charité University Hospital Berlin, Germany, or at associated teaching hospitals. We systematically evaluated causes of death and pre-existing health conditions. Additionally, clinical records and death certificates were evaluated. We report findings on causes of death and comorbidities of 26 decedents that had clinically presented with severe COVID-19. We found that septic shock and multi organ failure was the most common immediate cause of death, often due to suppurative pulmonary infection. Respiratory failure due to diffuse alveolar damage presented as immediate cause of death in fewer cases. Several comorbidities, such as hypertension, ischemic heart disease, and obesity were present in the vast majority of patients. Our findings reveal that causes of death were directly related to COVID-19 in the majority of decedents, while they appear not to be an immediate result of preexisting health conditions and comorbidities. We therefore suggest that the majority of patients had died of COVID-19 with only contributory implications of preexisting health conditions to the mechanism of death.


2003 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brent J. Small ◽  
Laura Fratiglioni ◽  
Eva von Strauss ◽  
Lars Bäckman

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A680-A680
Author(s):  
KiBeom Kwon ◽  
David Woolston ◽  
Alexandre Hirayama ◽  
Damian Green ◽  
David Maloney ◽  
...  

BackgroundOur institution has treated over 300 patients with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell immunotherapy (CAR T-cell therapy) since 2013. Phase I and II trials were primarily based on heavily treated patients with B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), aggressive diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and multiple myeloma (MM) who had failed multiple lines of prior chemotherapy and/or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In these relapsed and/or refractory patients, CAR-T therapy resulted in complete remission in 93% of B-ALL, 60% of DLBCL, and ~80% of MM. Our Pathology Group at Fred Hutch have reviewed and diagnosed various patients with interesting relapse or complications as a result of CAR T-cell therapy. Here we present a retrospective review of autopsies from CAR T-cell therapy.MethodsA search for all autopsies conducted on patients from Seattle Cancer Care Alliance/University of Washington Medical Center was performed using the keywords ‘CAR T’ and ‘Chimeric-antigen’. Our inclusion criteria were patients treated with CAR T-cell therapy. Pathology and clinical records were reviewed for cause of death, disease and treatment timelines, microbiology data, cytokine levels, other pathology biopsies, and pertinent laboratory values. Histologic tissues were reviewed.ResultsTwelve autopsies were performed since 2013. Patient characteristics and causes of death are summarized in table 1. The most common cause of death was due to infectious causes (n=6). Two patients (Patients 10 and 11) had cardiovascular related deaths. Six patients (Patients 1, 2, 6, 7, 10, 12) suffered from CRS in their post-infusion course, four of whom (Patients 1, 2, 7, 10) had CRS directly attributed as the cause of death. CRS was further complicated by immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) in 5 patients (Patients 1, 5, 6, 7, and 12). CRS with ICANS was the second most common cause of death in patients treated with CAR T-cells. Three patients (Patients 1, 4, 9) had progression of disease that attributed to cause of death.Abstract 643 Table 1Patient characteristics: age, sex, original diagnosis, CAR target, cause of death, and days post-CAR T-cell infusion at time of deathConclusionsCAR T-cell therapy is a highly effective treatment even for patients who have relapsed and/or refractory disease. Post-therapy complications range in severity and may be fatal in rare instances as in the patients summarized in this study. Infection, CRS with ICANS are the most common causes of death in our single institution study.Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center’s Institutional Review Board, approval number 1837ConsentWritten informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this abstract and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor of this journal.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1950 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 184-192
Author(s):  
HERBERT C. MILLER

An analysis of the significant causes of death in 4117 consecutive births was made; there were 66 fetal deaths and 85 neonatal deaths. A significant cause of death was determined in 51 fetuses and 56 live-born infants. Eighty-five per cent of the live-born infants who weighed over 1000 gm. at birth and had postmortem examinations had causes of death which were considered to be significant. Almost half of the live-born premature infants with birth weights between 1000 and 2500 gm. were considered to have had more than one significant cause of death. The so-called significant causes of death among live-born infants differed from those determined for fetuses dying before birth. Among the former, pathologic conditions in the infants were determined four times more frequently than in those dying before birth and, in the latter, maternal complications of pregnancy and labor were diagnosed as significant causes of death five times more frequently than in infants dying in the neonatal period. Hyaline-like material in the lung was considered to be the most frequent significant cause of death in live-born premature infants; congenital malformation and anoxia resulting from complications of labor were the most frequently determined significant causes of death in live-born full term infants. No differences were found in the significant causes of death in premature and full term fetuses. Anoxia resulting from accidental and unexpected interruption of the blood flow in the placenta and umbilical cord and from dystocia was the most frequently determined significant cause of death in both groups. A plea has been made for the adoption by obstetricians, pathologists and pediatricians of a formal uniform plan of classifying the causes of fetal and neonatal death which would divest current efforts to determine the cause of death of as much vague terminology and arbitrary opinion as possible.


Author(s):  
Alyt Oppewal ◽  
Josje D. Schoufour ◽  
Hanne J.K. van der Maarl ◽  
Heleen M. Evenhuis ◽  
Thessa I.M. Hilgenkamp ◽  
...  

Abstract We aim to provide insight into the cause-specific mortality of older adults with intellectual disability (ID), with and without Down syndrome (DS), and compare this to the general population. Immediate and primary cause of death were collected through medical files of 1,050 older adults with ID, 5 years after the start of the Healthy Ageing and Intellectual Disabilities (HA-ID) study. During the follow-up period, 207 (19.7%) participants died, of whom 54 (26.1%) had DS. Respiratory failure was the most common immediate cause of death (43.4%), followed by dehydration/malnutrition (20.8%), and cardiovascular diseases (9.4%). In adults with DS, the most common cause was respiratory disease (73.3%), infectious and bacterial diseases (4.4%), and diseases of the digestive system (4.4%). Diseases of the respiratory system also formed the largest group of primary causes of death (32.1%; 80.4% was due to pneumonia), followed by neoplasms (17.6%), and diseases of the circulatory system (8.2%). In adults with DS, the main primary cause was also respiratory diseases (51.1%), followed by dementia (22.2%).


Author(s):  
Ernest K.J. Pauwels

The musical composers in the Romantic Era (1800-1910) strived for compositions that expressed human life, including happiness, harmony and despair. They lived in a period in which freedom of thinking, expression of emotion and inspiration by nature predominate. During this period, intensive trading with other parts of the world brought new microorganisms along, which made infections and epidemics very common. This article serves to address the cause of death and relevant biographic data of a number of well- known Romantic composers. Primarily, this review refers to clinically significant findings using reports that were retrieved from Pubmed, Embase and Google over the 19th, 20th and 21st century till 14th June 2021. Here, this text dwells on diseases and the cause of death of ten composers, namely Mozart, Beethoven, Chopin, Schubert, Schumann, Mendelssohn, Brahms, Liszt, Mahler and Bruckner. It is evident that, in the sight of modern medicine, symptoms and forensic facts are not complete, but witnesses' reports and recent medical research have provided passable and plausible clarity. Although many questions will remain unanswered, it appears that the diseases of these composers and their causes of death have their origins in alcohol abuses, age, epidemics (like tuberculosis) and syphilis.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Chen ◽  
Tian Xia ◽  
Rasika Rampatige ◽  
Hang Li ◽  
Tim Adair ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Accurate data on causes of death are essential for policy makers and public health experts to plan appropriate health policies and interventions to improve population health. Whereas approximately 30% deaths of Shanghai either occur at home or are not medically attended; the recorded cause of death in these cases may be less reliable than for a hospital death. Verbal Autopsy is a practical method that can help determine causes of death in regions where medical records are insufficient or unavailable. In this research, the smart VA tool was adopted to assign the cause of death of home deaths and to validate the accuracy and efficiency of the tool, the results were compared with routine practice to ascertain the value, if any, of incorporating VA into the diagnostic practices of physician in Shanghai certifying the cause of home deaths. Methods This pilot study selected home deaths certified by 16 community health centers from 3 districts represent urban, suburb, and urban-suburb areas in Shanghai, from December 2017 to June 2018. The medical records for all deaths for which a VA was carried out in these 3 districts during same period were carefully evaluated an independent Medical Record Review (MRR) team. Causes of death from both the SmartVA sample and the UCOD from the MRR were transformed to the SmartVA cause list for comparison. The concordance between the initial diagnosis and MRR UCOD and post-VA diagnosis and MRR UCOD was assessed using Chance Corrected Concordance. Results Overall CSMF accuracy improved from 0.93, based on the initial diagnosis, to 0.96 after the application of SmartVA. The misclassification of the initial diagnosis compared to that from the MRR. 86.3% of the initial diagnoses assigned the correct CODs, after the VA investigation, 90.5% of the post-VA diagnosis assigned the correct CODs. Conclusions Although Shanghai has an established and well-functioning CRVS system, SmartVA for Physicians contributed to an improvement in the accuracy of death certification. In addition, SmartVA may be a useful tool for inferring some special causes of death, such as those CODs classified as undetermined.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document