scholarly journals Hormone-related tumors in transsexuals receiving treatment with cross-sex hormones

2008 ◽  
Vol 159 (3) ◽  
pp. 197-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Mueller ◽  
Louis Gooren
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Breast Carcinoma ◽  
Sex Hormones ◽  
Single Case ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Male To Female ◽  
Estrogen Administration

ObjectiveTo assess the risk of development of hormone-related tumors in transsexuals receiving treatment with cross-sex hormones.DesignDescription of cases of transsexuals who have developed a hormone-related malignancy observed in their own clinic or reported in the literature. Recommendations for early diagnosis and prevention are presented.MethodsReview of the literature in PubMed.ResultsIn male-to-female transsexuals receiving estrogen administration, lactotroph adenomas, breast cancer, and prostate cancer have been reported. In female-to-male transsexuals receiving treatment with testosterone, a single case of breast carcinoma and several cases of ovarian cancer have been reported. So far endometrial cancer has not been encountered though it remains a potential malignant development.ConclusionsThere are so far only a few cases of hormone-related cancer in transsexuals. There may be an underreporting. The probability of a hormone-related tumor increases with the duration of exposure to cross-sex hormones and the aging of the population of transsexuals.

scholarly journals Energy balance and cancer: the role of sex hormones

2001 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy J. Key ◽  
Naomi E. Allen ◽  
Pia K. Verkasalo ◽  
Emily Banks
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Energy Balance ◽  
Serum Concentration ◽  
Sex Hormones ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk ◽  
Premenopausal Women ◽  
Epidemiological Studies ◽  
Post Menopausal

Energy balance can affect the risk for hormone-related cancers by altering sex hormone levels. Energy intake and expenditure are difficult to measure in epidemiological studies, but a chronic excess of intake relative to expenditure leads to a high BMI, which can be accurately measured. In premenopausal women obesity has little effect on the serum concentration of oestradiol, but causes an increase in the frequency of anovular menstrual cycles and thus a reduction in progesterone levels; these changes lead to a large increase in the risk for endometrial cancer, but little change, or a small decrease, in the risk for breast cancer. In post-menopausal women oestradiol levels are not regulated by negative feedback, and obesity causes an increase in the serum concentration of bioavailable oestradiol; this factor causes increases in the risk for both endometrial cancer and breast cancer. The development of ovarian cancer appears to be related more strongly to the frequency of ovulation than to direct effects of circulating levels of sex hormones, and BMI is not clearly associated with the risk for ovarian cancer. In men, increasing BMI has little effect on bioavailable androgen levels, and any effect of obesity on prostate cancer risk is small.

Distribution of BRCA1/2 germline and somatic alterations across cancer type.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10590-10590
Author(s):  
Jingde Chen ◽  
Ming Quan ◽  
Zhengqing Yan ◽  
Shiqing Chen ◽  
Mei Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Genomic Dna ◽  
Pancreas Cancer ◽  
Clinical Laboratory ◽  
White Blood Cells ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Tumor Types

10590 Background: PARP inhibitors (e.g. Olaparib or niraparib) have been approved by FDA as a targeted therapy for many tumors harboring germline or somatic BRCA1/2 (g or sBRCA1/2), including ovarian cancer, prostate cancer, breast cancer and pancreases cancer. It is imperative to study the distribution of BRCA1/2 across cancer type. In this study, we aim to assess the landscape of BRCA1/2 alterations in solid tumors and evaluate the feasibility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) tested by next-generation sequence (NGS) as a tool to detect BRCA1/2 alterations. Methods: For tissue specimen, genomic DNA from formalin fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor specimens or fresh tumor tissues was used for sequence analysis. Genomic DNA (gDNA) from white blood cells was extracted using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen). For ctDNA, cell-free DNA libraries were prepared using the KAPA Hyper Prep Kit following the manufacturer’s protocol. The captured libraries were loaded onto a NovaSeq 6000 platform (Illumina) for 100bp paired-end sequencing. The testing was performed in the College of American Pathologists (CAP) and Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) -certified 3D Medicines Library. Results: A total of 27, 835 patients were tested using tumor tissue during Jan. 1th 2017 to June 1th 2020, including 43% (N = 12089) of non-small cell lung cancer, 19% (N = 5357) of colorectal cancer, 8% (N = 2181) of liver cancer, 6% (N = 1621) of gastric cancer, 5% (N = 1479) of biliary tract cancer, 4% (N = 1084) of kidney cancer, 4% (N = 1045) of pancreas cancer, 3% (N = 689) of breast cancer and 2% (N = 599) of ovarian cancer. Across all tumor types, the known or likely deleterious BRCA1/2 alterations were identified in 2147 (7.7%) patients. Ovarian cancer had the highest frequency of BRCA1/2 alteration (23.4%), followed by endometrial cancer (12.7%) and breast cancer (10.6%). BRCA1/2 alteration was found in 8.8% prostate cancer and 4.2% pancreas cancer respectively. Across all tumor types, the known or likely deleterious gBRCA1/2 alterations were identified in 369 (1.3%) patients. Notably, ovarian cancer had the highest frequency of gBRCA1/2 alteration (13.9%), followed by breast cancer (7%), prostate cancer (4.4%) and endometrial cancer (4.1%). No clear hotspot mutations and mutated codons were spread throughout g or sBRCA1/2 mutations. Additionally, among 15699 patients who suffered ctDNA sequencing, any known or likely deleterious sBRCA1/2 alterations were identified in 358 (2%) patients. Similar to the results of tissue sequencing, ovarian cancer had the highest frequency of sBRCA1/2 alteration (16.67%), followed by endometrial cancer (9.68%), prostate cancer (7.18%) and breast cancer (5.58%) in the blood cohort. Conclusions: BRCA1/2 alterations existed across tumor types and the landscape of g or sBRCA1/2 alterations varied according to cancer type. Furthermore, ctDNA can be used as a potential tool to detect BRCA1/2 alterations.

scholarly journals Anticancer Applications and Pharmacological Properties of Piperidine and Piperine: A Comprehensive Review on Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Perspectives

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sicon Mitra ◽  
Uttpal Anand ◽  
Niraj Kumar Jha ◽  
Mahipal S. Shekhawat ◽  
Suchismita Chatterjee Saha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Therapeutic Potential ◽  
Black Pepper ◽  
Piper Nigrum ◽  
Molecular Formula ◽  
Cycle Arrest

Piperine and piperidine are the two major alkaloids extracted from black pepper (Piper nigrum); piperidine is a heterocyclic moiety that has the molecular formula (CH2)5NH. Over the years, many therapeutic properties including anticancer potential of these two compounds have been observed. Piperine has therapeutic potential against cancers such as breast cancer, ovarian cancer, gastric cancer, gliomal cancer, lung cancer, oral squamous, chronic pancreatitis, prostate cancer, rectal cancer, cervical cancer, and leukemia. Whereas, piperidine acts as a potential clinical agent against cancers, such as breast cancer, prostate cancer, colon cancer, lung cancer, and ovarian cancer, when treated alone or in combination with some novel drugs. Several crucial signalling pathways essential for the establishment of cancers such as STAT-3, NF-κB, PI3k/Aκt, JNK/p38-MAPK, TGF-ß/SMAD, Smac/DIABLO, p-IκB etc., are regulated by these two phytochemicals. Both of these phytochemicals lead to inhibition of cell migration and help in cell cycle arrest to inhibit survivability of cancer cells. The current review highlights the pharmaceutical relevance of both piperine and piperidine against different types of cancers.

THE RISK OF DEVELOPING GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER IN WOMEN AFTER AN IN VITRO FERTILIZATION PROGRAM

2021 ◽  
pp. 7-13
Author(s):  
Allakhyarov D.Z. ◽  
Petrov Yu.A. ◽  
Palieva N.V.
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
In Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Gynecological Cancer ◽  
The Body ◽  
Fertilization Program ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Increased Risk

This article presents reviews of literature sources on the issue of assessing the risk of developing gynecological cancer in women after an in vitro fertilization program. Infertility and infertile marriages have now become quite a big problem of modern medicine. Against the background of the unfavorable demographic situation in the Russian Federation, this problem is becoming quite urgent. The main way to solve this situation is assisted reproductive technologies, among which the most common is in vitro fertilization. The in vitro fertilization program is accompanied by a hormonal ovulation stimulation procedure to obtain a female germ cell capable of fertilization. Against the background of the active use of the in vitro fertilization procedure, many patients had concerns related to the risk of developing gynecological cancer after the IVF procedure, which is due to the use of hormonal drugs to stimulate the ovaries. Also of concern is the fact that certain types of cancer, including ovarian cancer, endometrial cancer and breast cancer, are hormone-dependent. In this regard, multiple large-scale studies were conducted, which showed that the risk of developing gynecological cancer is really increased in patients after the in vitro fertilization program. In particular, breast cancer in women after the in vitro fertilization program is more common by 10%, and in women without a history of pregnancy and over the age of 40, it is more common by 31%. The increased risk may be due to age-related vulnerability to the effects of hormones or higher doses of hormones during the IVF procedure. Ovarian cancer and endometrial cancer are also more common in patients after IVF. According to the research results, it is suggested that it is not the IVF procedure itself that causes the development of cancer, but excessive hormonal load of the body, which leads to the launch of carcinogenesis.

Acanthosis nigricans in patient with breast cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma: case report and review of the literature

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 196-199
Author(s):  
Erik K. Saribekyan ◽  
A. G Zubovskaya
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Clinical Case ◽  
Acanthosis Nigricans ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Skin Hyperpigmentation ◽  
Underlying Malignancy

Acanthosis nigricans (AN) is characterized by hyperpigmented, thickened skin plaques with a velvety texture. The histology of these lesions shows hyperkeratosis and dermal papillomatosis. According to the clinical data the key role in the development of acanthosis nigricans belongs to an excessive concentration of growth factors. Such condition is ofparticular interest because of its association with internal malignancies. Its malignant form is often associated with gastric adenocarcinoma (55-61%), though coexistence with a variety of other malignancies (ovarian cancer, endometrial carcinoma, bladder cancer, etc.) has been reported. Clinical case of patient with AN and coexisting breast cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma is presented. The severity of skin manifestations improved after chemotherapy, mastectomy and radiation therapy. However, skin hyperpigmentation relapsed after development of the hepatocellular carcinoma and the progression of the primary tumor. An underlying malignancy should be suspected in each case of AN.

A phase I-II and pharmacodynamic (PD) study of the combination of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib (B) and paclitaxel (P) in patients with taxane-sensitive solid tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13029-13029
Author(s):  
E. Gallerani ◽  
S. Cresta ◽  
D. Tosi ◽  
C. Sessa ◽  
G. Capri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Anticancer Agents ◽  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear

13029 Background: Proteasome inhibition blocks the chemotherapy-induced activation of NF-кB increasing chemosensitivity to anticancer agents due to increased apoptosis. NF-кB is frequently aberrantly activated in primary human carcinomas and over-expressed in aggressive breast cancer lines1 supporting the rationale for combining B with P. We designed a phase I-II and PD trial to determine the recommended dose (RD) of the B&P combination, to screen for antitumor activity in patients with potentially taxane-sensitive tumors, to search for drug-induced changes and to identify potential surrogate markers of drug activity and toxicity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Methods: Eligibility included ECOG performance status < 2, neurotoxicity < 2 and adequate organ functions. Treatment was given Q21 days: B on days 1,4, 8 and 11 and P on days 1 and 8. PBMC for gene expression profiling have been collected on day 1 and 4 before and after therapy. RECIST for response was applied. Results: Twenty-nine patients (20 female, median age 60 yrs) were accrued and 25 are evaluable (breast cancer: 13, ovarian cancer: 7, prostate cancer 1, other 4) ; 16 pts were treated in 4 escalation levels and the RD defined respectively at 1.3 mg/m2/dose & 100 mg/m2/dose for B&P. Neurotoxicity was the main toxicity (G1 36%, G2 20% and 1 case G3) requiring treatment discontinuation in 2 pts at cy 6 & 7. Other toxicities (all grades) were nausea and vomiting (68%), diarrhea (56%, G3 12%), alopecia (52%), asthenia (36%, G2 4%), and myalgia (32%, G2 8%). Antitumor activity consisted of 3 PR in pts with ovarian cancer lasting respectively 14, 8+ and 16 wks; 2 PRs in pts with breast cancer (12+ wks,14+ wks) and 1 PR in a pt with prostate cancer. Conclusions: Thus far the regimen has acceptable toxicity with evidence of antitumor activity. The trial will continue until accrual of four additional patients as planned. Footnotes 1 Adams J Current Opin Oncol 2002, 14:628–634. [Table: see text]

Bioactivity of Greek honey extracts on breast cancer (MCF-7), prostate cancer (PC-3) and endometrial cancer (Ishikawa) cells: Profile analysis of extracts

2009 ◽  
Vol 116 (3) ◽  
pp. 702-708 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna V. Tsiapara ◽  
Mari Jaakkola ◽  
Ioanna Chinou ◽  
Konstadia Graikou ◽  
Tiina Tolonen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Profile Analysis ◽  
Ishikawa Cells ◽  
Mcf 7

scholarly journals Do sex hormones confound or mediate the effect of chronotype on breast and prostate cancer? A Mendelian randomization study.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryony L Hayes ◽  
Timothy Robinson ◽  
Siddhartha P. Kar ◽  
Katherine S Ruth ◽  
Konstantinos K Tsilidis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Protective Effect ◽  
Sex Hormones ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk ◽  
Total Testosterone ◽  
Testosterone Levels ◽  
Bioavailable Testosterone ◽  
Breast And Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND Previous research has demonstrated that a morning-preference chronotype is protective against both breast and prostate cancer. Sex hormones have been implicated in relation to both chronotype and the development of both cancers. This study aims to assess whether sex hormones confound or mediate the effect of chronotype on breast and prostate cancer risk using a Mendelian Randomization (MR) framework. METHODS We obtained genetic variants strongly (p<5x10-8) associated with chronotype and sex hormones (total testosterone, bioavailable testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), and oestradiol from previously published genome-wide association studies (GWAS) that had been undertaken in UK Biobank and 23andMe (n=244,207 females and n=205,527 males). These variants were used to investigate causal relationships with risk of breast and prostate cancer using summary data from the largest available consortia in breast (nCases/nControls=133,384/ 113,789) and prostate cancer (nCases/nControls=79,148/61,106). This was achieved using a series of MR approaches: univariable, bidirectional and multivariable. Results Overall, we found evidence for a protective effect of genetically predicted tendency towards morning preference on both breast (OR=0.93, 95% CI:0.88, 1.00) and prostate (OR=0.90, 95% CI:0.83, 0.97) cancer risk. There was evidence that an increased tendency to morning preference reduces bioavailable testosterone levels in both females (mean SD difference=-0.08, 95% CI:-0.12, -0.05) and males (mean SD difference=-0.06, 95% CI:-0.09, -0.03), and reduces total testosterone levels in females (mean SD difference=-0.07, 95% CI:-0.10, -0.03). We also found evidence to support higher total and bioavailable testosterone increasing the risk of breast cancer (OR=1.15, 95% CI:1.07, 1.23, OR=1.10, 95% CI:1.01, 1.19 respectively) and higher bioavailable testosterone increasing prostate cancer risk (OR=1.22, 95% CI:1.08, 1.37). While findings from univariable and bidirectional MR analyses indicated that testosterone may lie on the causal pathway between chronotype and cancer risk, there was evidence for a bidirectional association between chronotype and testosterone in females, implicating testosterone as both a confounder and mediator of the chronotype effect on breast cancer risk. However, the effects of chronotype remained largely unchanged when accounting for testosterone in multivariable MR, suggesting that any confounding or mediating effect is likely to be minimal. Conclusions This study has extended previous findings regarding the protective effect of chronotype on breast cancer and found evidence to suggest that morning preference also reduces prostate cancer risk in men. While testosterone levels were found to be closely linked with both chronotype and cancer risk, there was inconsistent evidence for the role of testosterone in mediating the effect of morning preference chronotype on both breast and prostate cancer. Findings regarding the potential protective effect of chronotype on both breast and prostate cancer risk are clinically interesting. However, this may not serve as a direct target for intervention, since it is difficult to modify someone's morning/evening preference. Given this, further studies are needed to investigate the mechanisms underlying this effect and to identify other potential modifiable intermediates.

scholarly journals 531 A Phase 1b multi-tumor cohort study of cabozantinib plus atezolizumab in advanced solid tumors: results of the triple-negative breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and endometrial cancer cohorts

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A562-A562
Author(s):  
Ira Winer ◽  
Akhila Wimalasingham ◽  
Joaquina Baranda ◽  
Armando Santoro ◽  
Kristen Spencer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Phase 1B

BackgroundCabozantinib, a multiple receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, promotes an immune-permissive environment which might enhance the activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors. COSMIC-021 (NCT03170960), a multicenter phase 1b study, is evaluating the combination of cabozantinib with atezolizumab in advanced solid tumors; here we present efficacy and safety results in patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), ovarian cancer (OC), and endometrial cancer (EC).MethodsEligible patients had locally advanced or metastatic TNBC, OC, or EC and had radiographically progressed on prior systemic anticancer therapy. One or two lines of prior therapy were permitted. Patients with OC were platinum resistant or refractory. Prior treatment with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 agents was allowed for patients with TNBC. Patients received cabozantinib, 40 mg PO QD, plus atezolizumab, 1200 mg IV Q3W. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by investigator. Other endpoints included safety, duration of response (DOR), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). CT/MRI scans were performed Q6W for the first year and Q12W thereafter.ResultsAs of February 19, 2021, 30–32 patients were enrolled in each of the cohorts. 47% of patients with TNBC, 47% with OC, and 40% with EC had received 2 lines of prior therapy. Median follow-up was 18.7 months, 20.8 months, and 19.0 months for the TNBC, OC, and EC cohorts, respectively. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 33% of patients with TNBC, 56% with OC, and 37% with EC. One Grade 5 treatment-related adverse event of pulmonary hemorrhage occurred in the TNBC cohort and one of encephalitis occurred in the OC cohort. Cabozantinib plus atezolizumab demonstrated clinical activity in all three tumor cohorts (table 1).Abstract 531 Table 1ConclusionsCabozantinib in combination with atezolizumab demonstrated encouraging clinical activity in patients with previously treated advanced cancers.AcknowledgementsMedical writing support provided by Suvajit Sen, PhD (Exelixis, Inc.)Trial RegistrationNCT03170960Ethics ApprovalYesConsentYes

Does IVF Increase Risk for Gynaecological Cancer?

2021 ◽  
pp. 83-95
Author(s):  
Leonidas Zepiridis ◽  
Εvangelia Mareti ◽  
Theodoros Theodoridis
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Gynecological Cancer ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Female Population ◽  
Interesting Issue ◽  
Fertility Treatments ◽  
Increase Risk ◽  
Common Malignancy

Whether fertility treatments and in particular IVF are related to carcinogenesis in women is a rather interesting issue, which is of interest in more than one specialty. The female malignancies we refer to are mainly those of the breast, endometrium, and ovary, with breast cancer being the most common malignancy in the female population affecting 1 in 8 women worldwide; ovarian cancer is the 6th in frequency, and endometrial cancer, which is the most common gynecological cancer after breast cancer, has an incidence of 8% of all. The chapter aims to present current evidence regarding correlation between IVF treatment and risk of various gynaecological cancers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document