scholarly journals RNAM EXPRESSION AND DNA METHYLATION OF DKK2 GENE IN COLORECTAL CÂNCER

2021 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-60
Author(s):  
Ronaldo Eliezer MAMELLI ◽  
Aledson Vitor FELIPE ◽  
Tiago Donizetti SILVA ◽  
Vanessa HINZ ◽  
Nora Manoukian FORONES

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is the third most common neoplasm in the world. Methylation of tumor related genes in CpG islands can cause gene silencing and been involved in the development of cancer. The potential role of DKK2 as a biomarker for early diagnosis of colorectal cancer remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the profile of methylation and RNAm expression of DKK2 as potential predictors of colorectal cancer diagnosis and prognosis. METHODS: Expression of mRNAs encoding DKK2 in 35 colorectal cancer tissues was quantified using real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis. The DNA methylation was studied by high resolution melting analysis. The general characteristics of the patients were collected. DKK2 methylation and expression were compared to clinical, pathological aspects and overall survival. RESULTS: Among the 35 patients studied, 18 were male, 10 were on right colon and 25 on left colon. Among the 20 patients with high hypermethylation, 15 of them had mRNA low expression of DKK2. There was no significant association between DKK2 promoter methylation and mRNA DKK2 expression and clinical or pathological features. DKK2 promoter methylation (P=0.154) and DKK2 RNA expression (P=0.345) did not show significant correlation with overall survival. CONCLUSION: DKK2 promoter methylation and DKK2 RNA status appear to be biomarkers of cancer diagnosis but not predictors of prognosis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zijian Chen ◽  
Zenghong Huang ◽  
Yanxin Luo ◽  
Qi Zou ◽  
Liangliang Bai ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor kinases (NTRKs) are a gene family function as oncogene or tumor suppressor gene in distinct cancers. We aimed to investigate the methylation and expression profiles and prognostic value of NTRKs gene in colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods An analysis of DNA methylation and expression profiles in CRC patients was performed to explore the critical methylations within NTRKs genes. The methylation marker was validated in a retrospectively collected cohort of 229 CRC patients and tested in other tumor types from TCGA. DNA methylation status was determined by quantitative methylation-specific PCR (QMSP). Results The profiles in six CRC cohorts showed that NTRKs gene promoter was more frequently methylated in CRC compared to normal mucosa, which was associated with suppressed gene expression. We identified a specific methylated region within NTRK3 promoter targeted by cg27034819 and cg11525479 that best predicted survival outcome in CRC. NTRK3 promoter methylation showed independently predictive value for survival outcome in the validation cohort (P = 0.004, HR 2.688, 95% CI [1.355, 5.333]). Based on this, a nomogram predicting survival outcome was developed with a C-index of 0.705. Furthermore, the addition of NTRK3 promoter methylation improved the performance of currently-used prognostic model (AIC: 516.49 vs 513.91; LR: 39.06 vs 43.64, P = 0.032). Finally, NTRK3 promoter methylation also predicted survival in other tumors, including pancreatic cancer, glioblastoma and stomach adenocarcinoma. Conclusions This study highlights the essential value of NTRK3 methylation in prognostic evaluation and the potential to improve current prognostic models in CRC and other tumors.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. e0200735 ◽  
Author(s):  
Afsaneh Mojtabanezhad Shariatpanahi ◽  
Maryam Yassi ◽  
Mehdi Nouraie ◽  
Amirhossein Sahebkar ◽  
Fatemeh Varshoee Tabrizi ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexei J. Stuckel ◽  
Wei Zhang ◽  
Xu Zhang ◽  
Shuai Zeng ◽  
Urszula Dougherty ◽  
...  

In colorectal cancer (CRC), upregulation of the C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) is correlated with metastasis and poor prognosis, highlighting the need to further elucidate CXCR4’s regulation in CRC. For the first time, DNA methylation and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine aberrations were investigated to better understand the epigenetic regulation of CXCR4 in CRC. CXCR4 expression levels were measured using qPCR and immunoblotting in normal colon tissues, primary colon cancer tissues and CRC cell lines. Publicly available RNA-seq and methylation data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were extracted from tumors from CRC patients. The DNA methylation status spanning CXCR4 gene was evaluated using combined bisulfite restriction analysis (COBRA). The methylation status in the CXCR4 gene body was analyzed using previously performed nano-hmC-seal data from colon cancers and adjacent normal colonic mucosa. CXCR4 expression levels were significantly increased in tumor stromal cells and in tumor colonocytes, compared to matched cell types from adjacent normal-appearing mucosa. CXCR4 promoter methylation was detected in a minority of colorectal tumors in the TCGA. The CpG island of the CXCR4 promoter showed increased methylation in three of four CRC cell lines. CXCR4 protein expression differences were also notable between microsatellite stable (MSS) and microsatellite instable (MSI) tumor cell lines. While differential methylation was not detected in CXCR4, enrichment of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) in CXCR4 gene bodies in CRC was observed compared to adjacent mucosa.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4625-4625
Author(s):  
Nicholas Achille ◽  
Laura Michaelis ◽  
Scott E. Smith ◽  
Eliza Germano ◽  
Nancy J. Zeleznik-Le ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4625 Background: Gene silencing via methylation of CpG islands in the promoter regions of many genes but specifically of APAF1, p15INK4B, p16INK4A, RARB, and CDH1 appears to play a role in pathogenesis of myeloid malignancies. Azacitidine (AZ) causes demethylation by inhibiting DNA methyltransferase and has already been shown to be an effective therapy for myelodysplastic syndromes. The demethylation induced by AZ is detectable in about 48 hours and increases significantly after 5 days of therapy. After that, the effect tends to plateau. Methods: We initiated a Phase 2 study of patients with non-BCR-ABL MPDs to determine clinical response to AZ therapy and correlate it with promoter DNA methylation and gene re-expression. The protocol was approved by the institutional IRB. Patients received AZ 75mg/m2 s/c for days 1–7 and repeated every 28 days for a minimum of 4 cycles. Responders were allowed to continue treatment until disease progression. Pretreatment and D 7 peripheral blood samples were analyzed for promoter methylation status and expression of the 5 genes mentioned above. Bisulfite conversion of DNA was followed by quantitative PCR using primers specific for methylated or for unmethylated promoter regions. For gene re-expression analysis, quantitative RT-PCR was performed with RNA isolated from the same patient samples and the same time points as the DNA methylation analyses. Results: Seven patients were enrolled before the study closed due to lack of accrual. The diagnoses were: Myelofibrosis (MF) 4, essential thrombocythemia 1, unclassified MPD with dysplasia 2. One patient with MF and one with unclassified MPD responded, the latter with normalization of marrow karyotype. Both responses were accompanied by significant decrease in APAF1 promoter methylation and surprisingly, an increase in promoter methylation of RARB. In three of the non-responders, APAF1 methylation increased. In patients with decreased Apaf1 methylation, a statistically significant increase in mRNA expression was observed. Conclusions: Within its limitations, this small trial shows that the methylation status of selected genes, particularly of APAF1 and RARB (inversely) is associated with response to treatment with azacitidine in patients with MPDs. In non-responders, Apaf1 methylation appears to increase. A larger study will be necessary to confirm these preliminary observations. Disclosures: Smith: Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Cephalon: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Spectrum: Consultancy; GSK: Speakers Bureau. Nand:Celgene Corporation: Research Funding.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 315-315
Author(s):  
Wei Meng ◽  
Arnab Chakravarti ◽  
Tim Lautenschlaeger

315 Background: DNA methylation and histone modification are widely studied epigenetic events that can decrease gene expression levels. Promoter hypermethylation has been proposed as a potential diagnostic or prognostic biomarker in various cancers. We studied DNA promoter methylation of 5 cancer-associated genes (MRE11, APX1, ERCC1, RASSF1A and RASSF2A ) in paired FFPE bladder cancer tissues and normal adjacent tissue. The MRE11/Rad50/NBS1 complex serves as a single-strand DNA nuclease which participates in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks and replication errors. APX1 plays a key role in regulating H2O2 levels and H2O2 signaling. DNA repair machinery, ERCC1 protein levels in tumor tissue have been shown to predict response to platinum-based chemotherapy. RASSF1 is thought to be a tumor suppressor gene, while the function of RASSF2 is less well understood. Methods: 16 bladder cancer cases with available paraffin-embedded tumor and matched normal adjacent tissue specimens (32 tissue samples) were analyzed. DNA was extracted by Ambion RecoverAll Total Nucleic Acid Isolation kit. FFPE DNA bisulfite modification was performed using Zymo EZ DNA Methylation Kit. Methylation Specific-High Resolution Melting (MS-HRM) analysis was used to assess methylation status. MS-HRM monitors the melting behavior of PCR amplicons by using a DNA intercalating fluorescent dye. Results: MRE11 and APX1 promoters were not methylated in either cancer or normal adjacent samples. The ERCC1 gene was heavily methylated in 94% (30/32) of all cancer and wild type samples. RASSF1A and RASSF2A promoter methylation was significantly different between cancer and normal adjacent tissue. 50% (8/16) RASSF1A and 25% (4/16) RASSF2A had promoter methylation in cancer tissues, while only 6% (1/16) RASSF1A and 0% (0/16) RASSF2A had promoter methylation in normal adjacent tissues. 69% (11/16) of bladder cancer tissues were positive for RASSF1A or RASSF2A promotor methylation while only 1/16 normal adjacent tissue samples was positive for either promotor methylation. Conclusions: The results show that cancer and non-cancer tissue have different RASSF1A and RASSF2A promoter methylation patterns.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 506-506
Author(s):  
Kazunorii Nakamura ◽  
Horomichi Sawaki ◽  
Keishi Yamashita ◽  
Masahiko Watanabe ◽  
Hisashi Narimatsu

506 Background: Glycoprotein expression profile has been proved to be dramatically altered in human cancers, however specific glycogenes which are aberrant in expression in cancer cells has not been fully identified. Recent accumulated evidence supported notion that the reduced expression of tumor suppressor genes is explained by DNA promoter methylation in human cancer. Methods: We used Comprehensive Real time PCR system (CRPS) for glycogenes (189 genes) to identify genes aberrantly expressed in colorectal cancer tissues (CRC) as compared to the corresponding normal mucosa tissues. GCNT2 was of particular interest among the identified genes in CRC. Results: (1) GCNT2 harbors 3 isoforms which have different promoter regions. (2) All of the 3 isoforms of GCNT2 genes were remarkably decreased in CRC as compared to the corresponding normal mucosa, and each isoform expression was strongly associated with other 2 isoforms in primary cancer tissues by TaqMan real time PCR (R = 0.99-995, p < 0.0001). (3) Among the 5 CRC cell lines (DLD1, HCT116, CACO2, LOVO), those which were silenced in expression were reactivated by demethylating agents such as 5-aza-2’ deoxycytidine and trichostatin A. (4) Promoter region of the variant 2 of GCNT2 was consistent with its silenced expression in CRC cell lines by cloned sequence, so we examined DNA methylation status of the promoter of the GCNT2 variant 2 in 50 primary cancer tissues and the corresponding normal tissues. Quantitative MSP revealed that almost half of normal tissues have methylation as high as tumor tissues, while, in the primary CRC with less methylation in the corresponding normal tissues, DNA methylation was higher in primary CRC tissues than in the corresponding normal tissues. Finally, GCNT2 variant 2 stable transfection induced expression of other 2 isoform variants. Conclusions: We identified novel methylation gene GCNT2 among the glycoenes. Glycoenes that were altered in genomic or epigenetic manner have been few, so GCNT2 may play a critical role in cancer progression through glycan change.


2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 1370-1380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ling Chen ◽  
Jun Tang ◽  
Yixiao Feng ◽  
Shuman Li ◽  
Qin Xiang ◽  
...  

Background/Aims: ADAMTS (disintegrin-like and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs) proteins are extracellular zinc metalloproteinases that play an important role in extracellular matrix assembly and degradation, connective tissue structuring, angiogenesis, and cell migration. Multiple studies suggest that ADAMTS proteins (e.g. ADAMTS9) can act as tumor suppressors. In gastric, esophageal, and nasopharyngeal carcinomas ADAMTS9 is frequently down-regulated by promoter methylation. Whether ADAMTS9 can function as a tumor suppressor gene (TSG) in colorectal cancer is still unclear. Methods: We performed immunohistochemistry, RT-PCR, and qRT-PCR, to examine the expression of ADAMTS9 in colorectal cancer cell lines and primary colorectal cancer tissues. Methylation-specific PCR was also carried out to investigate the promoter methylation status of ADAMTS9. We also explored the functions of ADAMTS9 in colorectal cancer cell lines through in vitro experiments. Results: ADAMTS9 expression was down-requlated or silenced in 83.3% (5/6) of colorectal cancer cell lines, and frequently repressed in 65.6% (21/32) of colorectal cancer tissues. Down-regulation of ADAMTS9 was partially due to promoter methylation. Exogenous expression of ADAMTS9 in colorectal cancer cell lines inhibited cell proliferation and migration through the regulation of cell cycle and apoptosis. In addition, ADAMTS9 prevented the activation of Akt, and its downstream targets in colorectal cancer cell lines. Conclusion: Our findings suggest ADAMTS9 is a TSG in colorectal cancer.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 4475-4475
Author(s):  
Fabricio Carvalho ◽  
Gisele W. B. Colleoni ◽  
Manuella Sampaio Almeida ◽  
Andre Luis Carvalho ◽  
Andre Luiz Vettore

Abstract Introduction: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a B-cell neoplasm characterized by multiorgan dysfunction as a result of bone marrow infiltration by malignant cells and systemic damage of monoclonal circulating protein. Molecular studies have largely focused on acquired genetic aberrations in MM. The accumulation of genetic events is thought to be crucial for the malignant transformation of plasma cells. DNA methylation is associated with several changes in chromatin structure, including the regulation of histone methylation and acetylation and the recruitment of proteins to the methylated sites. This leads to the obstruction of the promoter, and subsequent gene silencing. Aberrant promoter methylation of genes has been described for several genes in MM. This epigenetic event acts as an alternative to mutations and deletions to disrupt tumor suppressor gene function. Objectives: We determined the aberrant DNA methylation status of 20 genes (AIM1, CCNA1, CCND2, CDH1, CDKN2A, CDKN2B, DCC, ESR1, GSTP1, HIC1, MGMT, MINT31, p14ARF, PTGS2, RARβ, RB1, SFN, SOCS1, TGFβR2, and THBS1) in 51 samples of MM and compared the methylation profile with clinicopathological characteristics of the patients. Methods: DNA was isolated using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen), from bone marrow aspirates of MM patients. The promoter methylation pattern was determined by quantitative methylation specific PCR (QMSP). Results: The QMSP analysis showed that PTGS2 (100.0%), SFN (100.0%), CDKN2B (90.2%), CDH1 (88.2%), ESR1 (72.5%), HIC1 (70.5%), CCND2 (62.7%), DCC (45.1%), and TGFβR2 (39.2%) were frequently methylated in MM at diagnosis while hypermethylation of RARβ (16.6%), MGMT (12.5%), AIM1 (12.5%), CDKN2A (8.3%), SOCS1 (8.3%), CCNA1 (8.3%), and THBS1 (4.1%) were rare events. There was no methylation of GSTP1, MINT31, p14ARF and RB1 in the samples tested. The median age of the 51 MM patients was 65 years (range, 27–80 years) and 56.8% were male. According the monoclonal component isotype, the patients were classified as IgG isotype (56.6%), IgA isotype (24.5%) and others (18.8%). The kappa light chain monoclonal protein was present in 64.7% of the patients, while the lambda protein was detected in 27.4% of the cases. Based on Durie Salmon staging system, 5.9% were IA, 3.9% were IIA, 52.9% were IIIA and 33.4% were IIIB, confirming that most of our patients were diagnosed at advanced stage disease. According to ISS system, 13.7% of cases were ISS 1, 31.4% ISS 2, 49% ISS 3. More than 86% of the cases have &gt; 50% of monoclonal plasma cells in their bone marrow assessed by biopsies. Methylation of ESR1 was correlated positively with isotype IgA (p = 0.016), while methylation of THBS1 correlated negatively with isotype IgG (p = 0.031). The 3-year overall survival was 31.5%. The clinicopathological parameters such as Durie Salmon Stage III (p = 0.015), ISS 3 (p = 0.007) and non-transplanted cases (p = 0.019) were significantly associated with reduced overall survival. The aberrant DNA methylation analyses showed that hypermethylation of DCC and TGFβR2 were also correlated with poor survival (p = 0.0034 and p = 0.0016, respectively). The multivariate analysis showed ISS (95% CI, 1.24 – 5.86, p = 0.012) and methylated TGFβR2 (95% CI, 1.02 – 4.62, p = 0.044) strongly correlated with poor outcome. Conclusion: The current study represents the first reported quantitative evaluation of MM methylation profile and our results demonstrated that aberrant promoter methylation is a frequent event in this disease. Furthermore, our data provide evidence that TGFβR2 methylation may be useful as prognostic indicator in MM.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document