MELIGITIMASI TINDAKAN NEGARA BERDASARKAN KEKUASAAN (MACHSTAAT)

ABSTRAKArtikel ini membahas Putusan Nomor 95/B/2017/PT.TUN.JKT yang melanggengkan tindakan negara berdasarkan kekuasaan (machtstaat). Objek sengketa dalam perkara a quo adalah Surat Peringatan Ketiga (SP 3) yang diterbitkan oleh Kasatpol PP Jakarta Selatan, yang isinya meminta para penggugat untuk membongkar bangunan rumah miliknya. Dari data tersebut, penulis menemukan rumusan masalah, yaitu: apakah pertimbangan majelis hakim banding dalam merumuskan SP 3 "tidak bertentangan dengan asas-asas umum pemerintahan yang baik dan Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan" sudah tepat?; dan apakah pertimbangan hukum dalam putusan a quo dapat memberikan jaminan perlindungan akan hak atas tanah berdasarkan Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria dan Undang-Undang Pengadaan Tanah? Dalam menganalisis putusan a quo, penulis menggunakan metode socio legal science. Hasil analisis penulis, putusan a quo yang mengatakan bahwa "penerbitan SP 3 tidak bertentangan dengan peraturan perundang-undangan dan asas-asas umum pemerintahan yang baik" merupakan sebuah pertimbangan yang tidak tepat. Karena penertiban itu bertentangan dengan asas kepastian hukum, dan bertentangan dengan Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan, Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria dan Undang-Undang Pengadaan Tanah. Putusan a quo tidak dapat memberikan perlindungan hukum pada para pemilik tanah, karena Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria dan Undang-Undang Pengadaan Tanah memberikan perlindungan hukum kepada masyarakat untuk memiliki tanah.Kata kunci: pengadaan tanah untuk pembangunan, hak atas tanah, tindakan melawan kewajiban hukum. ABSTRACT This article discusses the Decision of Number 95/B/2017/PT.TUN.JKT which perpetuates the state actions based on power (machtstaat). The object of the dispute in the a quo case was the Third Warning Letter (SP 3) that issued by Head of the Civil Service Police Unit of South Jakarta (Kasatpol PP Jakarta Selatan), which asked the plaintiffs to demolish their house. From these data, the authors found the formulation of the problem, namely: are the considerations of the appeals panel of judges in formulating SP 3 "not contrary to the general principles of good governance and the Government Administration Law" are appropriate?; and whether legal considerations in a quo decision can provide guarantees of protection of land rights based on the Basic Agrarian Law and the Land Procurement Law? In analyzing the a quo verdict, the author uses the socio legal science method. The results of the author's analysis, a quo verdict which states that "SP 3 issuance does not conflict with statutory regulations and the general principles of good governance" is an inaccurate consideration because the regulation is contrary to the principle of legal certainty, and contrary to the Government Administration Law, the Basic Agrarian Law and the Land Procurement Law. A quo verdict cannot provide legal protection to landowners, because, the Basic Agrarian Law and the Land Procurement Law provide legal protection for the community to own land.Keywords: land acquisition for development, land rights, actions against legal obligations.

Download Full-text

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEMEGANG HAK ATAS TANAH DALAM PENETAPAN GANTI RUGI TERKAIT DENGAN PENGADAAN TANAH UNTUK KEPENTINGAN UMUM

Yuridika ◽

10.20473/ydk.v27i3.301 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 27 (3) ◽

Author(s):

Rizky Amalia

Keyword(s):

Legal Protection ◽

Land Rights ◽

Government Agency ◽

Economic Life ◽

Land Acquisition ◽

Government Agencies ◽

The Government

Land acquisition is done by way of release or transfer of land rights of the holders of rights over land to government agencies that require ground. As a form of respect for the rights of holders of land rights, which require land-party in this case is the government agency, provide appropriate compensation on the basis of agreement between both parties through consultation. Form of legal protection given to holders of land rights is the determination of compensation based on the deliberations, the proper compensation that can provide a better survival than the level of socio-economic life before the affected land acquisition, and submission of objections to the amount of indemnification. Custody compensation cannot be the basis for taking land holders of land rights by Government agencies that require ground.Key Words : land acquisition, legal protection, custody compensation.

Download Full-text

Pelaksanaan Pencatatan Blokir Sertipikat Hak Atas Tanah (Studi di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Sleman dan Bantul)

Tunas Agraria ◽

10.31292/jta.v2i2.32 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 2 (2) ◽

pp. 117-135

Author(s):

Anisa Sekarsari ◽

Haryo Budhiawan ◽

Akur Nurasa

Keyword(s):

Legal Protection ◽

Land Rights ◽

Legal Certainty ◽

Land Registration ◽

Land Dispute ◽

Time Period ◽

Recording Process ◽

Potential Loss ◽

The Government

Abstract: In order to give the assurance of legal certainty, certainty of rights and legal protection to holders and owners of land rights, the land registration shall be carried out. However, there is still a land dispute which now become a homework for The Government. This is because the certificate which should be a strong evidentiary can not guaranteed the legal certainty for the owner, so the person who right the land can blocking the certificate of land rights at Land Office. The issuance of Regulation Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial / Head of National Land Office Number 13 Year of 2017 concerning the Procedures of Block and Sita which expected to create uniformity, standardization in recording process and abolition of registration blocked, it turns out not all the rules can be implemented at The Land Office of Sleman and Bantul Regency.The result of this research shows that blocking certificate process at Sleman Land Office and Bantul Land Office have a policy that the applicant is required to pay the blocking recording fee after the blocking received. Makes a potential loss to the (PNBP) which should be owned by Land Office for faced the problem of KKPweb application which have not been able to accomodate the time period of blocking. Keywords : blocking certificate, blocking, registration blocked Intisari: Dalam rangka memberikan jaminan kepastian hukum dan kepastian hak serta perlindungan hukum kepada pemegang dan pemilik hak atas tanah, maka dilaksanakan pendaftaran tanah. Namun demikian, masih saja terjadi sengketa pertanahan yang saat ini menjadi pekerjaan rumah bagi Pemerintah. Hal ini disebabkan karena, sertipikat sebagai alat pembuktian yang kuat ternyata belum menjamin kepastian hukum pemiliknya sehingga pihak yang merasa berhak atas tanah tersebut dapat melakukan blokir sertipikat hak atas tanah di Kantor Pertanahan. Dikeluarkannya Permen ATR/Kepala Nomor 13 Tahun 2017 tentang Tata Cara Blokir dan Sita yang diharapkan bertujuan untuk mewujudkan keseragaman, standarisasi dalam pelaksanaan pencatatan dan penghapusan catatan blokir ternyata tidak semua peraturan tersebut dapat dilaksanakan di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Sleman dan Bantul. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa pelaksanaan pencatatan blokir di kantor pertanahan Kabupaten Sleman dan Kabupaten Bantul terdapat kebijakan yaitu pemohon diwajibkan membayar biaya pencatatan blokir setelah blokirnya diterima membuat potensial loss terhadap (PNBP) yang seharusnya didapat kantor pertanahan untuk kendala yang dihadapi yaitu Aplikasi KKPweb yang belum dapat mengakomodir jangka waktu blokir. Kata Kunci: blokir sertipikat, pemblokiran, pencatatan blokir

Download Full-text

Misconception on the Authority Abuse of Power in the Law Enforcement against Corruption

Asian Social Science ◽

10.5539/ass.v13n9p51 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 13 (9) ◽

pp. 51

Author(s):

Sadjijono Sadjijono ◽

Bagus Teguh Santoso

Keyword(s):

Law Enforcement ◽

Good Governance ◽

Government Officials ◽

Legal Concept ◽

Abuse Of Power ◽

Government Administration ◽

The Absolute ◽

The Law ◽

The Government ◽

Administrative Jurisdiction

Law No. 30/ 2014 on Government Administration brings the strength and the averment on the performance of the governmental functions which include executive, legislative, and juridical in order to provide the public services (bestuurzorg). Such regulation also aims to prevent and to eliminate any kinds of the maladministration done by the government officials/organs in implementing their functions so that good governance can be realized. In implementing their function, the government should rely on the useful performance (doelmatigheid) and the effectiveness (doeltreffenhgeid) according to the norms of each authority. It is a sophism when the ‘authority’ and/or the ‘competence’ mentioned under the Law No. 30/ 2014 on Government Administration are defined differently in the letterlijk gramatikal wet without associating those terms with an understanding of bevoegheid in an administrative legal concept. An idea that distinctively defines the term ‘competence’ as a right and ‘authority’ as a power is considered as an inconsistent idea, which may cause dualism and distortion in the common law enforcement reffering to the administrative law, particularly related to the concept of the authority abuse of power mentioned under the Law No. 31/ 1999 amended by the Law No. 20/ 2001 on deeds against corruption. As the result, when the notion of ‘authority abuse of power’ is defined as a right (as mentioned in article 1, subsection 5 jo. article 17, Law No. 30/ 2014 on Government Administration), it will be characterized into the absolute competence of the administrative jurisdiction, and when the notion of ‘authority abuse of power’ is defined as a power (as mentioned in article 3, Law No. 31/ 1999 on deeds against corruption), it will be characterized into the absolute competence of the corruption-act jurisdiction. Meanwhile, implementing the government’s ‘competence’ and/or ‘authority’ is characterized into one concept based on the norms of the authority power.

Download Full-text

DIMENSION OF WHISTLEBLOWING SYSTEM: URGENSITY OF LEGISLATION STRENGTHENING

JURNAL HUKUM DAN PERADILAN ◽

10.25216/jhp.8.3.2019.371-390 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 8 (3) ◽

pp. 371

Author(s):

Bobby Briando ◽

Sri Kuncoro Bawono ◽

Tony Mirwanto

Keyword(s):

Supreme Court ◽

Good Governance ◽

Legal Protection ◽

Three Dimensions ◽

Circular Letter ◽

Victim Protection ◽

The Government

Eradication of corruption in Indonesia is still the main agenda of the government in building good governance. One method to expose corruption is to use a whistleblower role that can help find the criminal mode of corruption. Whistleblower mechanism is divided into three main dimensions: Human, Structure and Process. But in practice whistleblower reporters in corruption cases in Indonesia have not received maximum legal protection. In Indonesia the normative regulation governing pursuant to Law No.13 of 2006 concerning Witness and Victim Protection as well as Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) No.4 Year 2011 on Treatment of Criminal Reporting and Witness of Actors Cooperation The results show that from three dimensions of whistleblower system still does not yet have binding legislation. Whistleblower reporters only accept lightening relief. Specific whistleblower legislation is urgent. In legislation, at least, it should be in accordance with Whistleblower's protection.

Download Full-text

PENGGUNAAN PENGAYA (ADD-ON) AUTOCRAT PADA GOOGLE SHEETS DALAM APLIKASI SERING CUTI

Jurnal SAINTEKOM ◽

10.33020/saintekom.v10i1.129 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 10 (1) ◽

pp. 37

Author(s):

ROCHMAT ALI SYAEFUDIN ◽

Wahyu Hanggoro Suseno

Keyword(s):

Information Technology ◽

Information Systems ◽

Human Resource ◽

Good Governance ◽

Application Form ◽

Government Administration ◽

The Government ◽

Mail Address ◽

E Mail

The use of information technology in the government administration is carried out to realize good governance. The use of information systems enables the automation of work and service functions including for human resource administration. Administration of employee leave at the Politeknik Kesehatan Kementerian Kesehatan Surakarta still running manually. Employees who will take leave apply it manually and often cause problems because the application not in accordance with the provisions, among others are the misidentification of the authorized official to provide leave which makes the administration of employee leave ineffective. Sering Cuti using free Google facilities which easy to learn and can be easily used by employees and Autocrat add-on. This add-on processes mail merge the employee leave data, converting into filled application form and sends directly to the employee's e-mail address. Autocrat uses in the Sering Cuti has made it easier to administer and reduce errors in employee leave applications. Sering Cuti can be accessed by employees easily and apply for employee leave anywhere online.

Download Full-text

IMPLIKASI ASAS RETROAKTIF TERHADAP KEABSAHAN AKTA NOTARIS/PPAT DALAM PEMBERIAN HAK GUNA BANGUNAN BAGI PERSEROAN TERBATAS

Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) ◽

10.24843/jmhu.2017.v06.i01.p08 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 6 (1) ◽

pp. 89

Author(s):

Made Gelgel

Keyword(s):

Limited Liability ◽

Land Rights ◽

Land Registration ◽

Legal Norms ◽

Delegation Of Authority ◽

Legal Principle ◽

Agrarian Law ◽

The Government ◽

The Concept Of Law ◽

Year 2013

Further and deeper research into the validity of the Retroactive Principle is required in order to provide assertiveness about the arrangement of Retroactive Principles in the field of agreement law in the Indonesian legal system, especially the Building Rights Agreement in Agrarian Law and the existence of obscure legal norms in the case of the legal Notary / PPAT to the granting right of building use for a period of validity is reviewed according to the provisions of Article 28 of Regulation of Head of National Land Agency Number 2 Year 2013 concerning the Delegation of Authority of Land Rights and Land Registration Activity and by using case approach of PT. Pan Pacific Nirwana Resort. This research is a normative legal research that is derived from the existence of obscurity of legal principle and legal norm contained in the provisions of Law Number 5 Year 1960 on Basic Agrarian Law Basic (UUPA) in the provisions of Article 30 and Article 28 Regulation of Head of National Land Agency No. 2 of 2013 on the Delegation of Authority of Land Rights and Land Registration Activities. The conclusion of this research in Agrarian Law there is legal uncertainty in the concept of law building rights agreement with a period of time that is still running and the future is approved by a new regulation by the government which caused the previous agreement to occur normatively contradictory whether using retroactive or non-retroactive principle and the validity of deed Notary / PPAT in the granting of right to building to limited liability company which is still valid time is reviewed according to UUPA, Article 28 Regulation of Head of National Land Agency Number 2 Year 2013 regarding Delegation of Authority of Land Rights and Land Registration Activity and Article 1320 Privat Law and by using approach case PT. Pan Pacific Nirwana Resort is not valid. Penelitian lebih lanjut dan mendalam terhadap keberlakuan Asas Retroaktif diperlukan dalam rangka memberikan ketegasan tentang pengaturan Asas Retroaktif [1] di bidang hukum perjanjian dalam sistem hukum Indonesia khususnya perjanjian Hak Guna Bangunan dalam Hukum Agraria serta masih adanya kekaburan norma hukum dalam hal keabsahan akte Notaris/PPAT terhadap Perseroan Terbatas dalam pemberian Hak Guna Bangunan yang jangka waktunya masih berlaku dikaji menurut ketentuan Pasal 28 Peraturan Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Nomor 2 Tahun 2013 tentang Pelimpahan Kewenangan Pemberian Hak Atas Tanah Dan Kegiatan Pendaftaran Tanah serta dengan menggunakan pendekatan kasus PT. Pan Pasific Nirwana Resort. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif yakni beranjak dari adanya kekaburan asas hukum dan norma hukum yang terdapat di dalam ketentuan Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-pokok Agraria (UUPA) dalam ketentuan Pasal 30 dan Pasal 28 Peraturan Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional No. 2 Tahun 2013 tentang Pelimpahan Kewenangan Pemberian Hak Atas Tanah Dan Kegiatan Pendaftaran Tanah. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini dalam Hukum Agraria terdapat ketidakpastian hukum dalam konsep hukum perjanjian Hak Guna Bangunan dengan jangka waktu yang masih berjalan dan ke depannya di sahkan suatu peraturan baru oleh pemerintah yang menyebabkan perjanjian sebelumnya terjadi pertentangan secara normatif apakah menggunakan asas retroaktif atau non retroaktif dan keabsahan Akta Notaris/PPAT dalam Pemberian Hak Guna Bangunan terhadap Perseroan Terbatas yang jangka waktunya masih berlaku dikaji menurut UUPA, Pasal 28 Peraturan Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Nomor 2 Tahun 2013 tentang Pelimpahan Kewenangan Pemberian Hak Atas Tanah Dan Kegiatan Pendaftaran Tanah jo Pasal 1320 KUH Perdata serta dengan menggunakan pendekatan kasus PT. Pan Pasific Nirwana Resort adalah tidak sah.

Download Full-text

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI TANAH ULAYAT MASYARAKAT ADAT KESULTANAN DELI AKIBAT NASIONALISASI NV DELI MAATSCHAPPIJ [Legal Protection of the Communal Land Rights of the Deli Sultanate due to the Nationalization of NV Deli Maatschaapij]

Law Review ◽

10.19166/lr.v20i1.2401 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 20 (1) ◽

pp. 46

Author(s):

Jeremy Aidianto Naibaho ◽

Bambang Daru Nugroho ◽

Yusuf Saepul Zamil

Keyword(s):

Indigenous Peoples ◽

Legal Protection ◽

Land Rights ◽

Library Research ◽

National Economic ◽

Communal Land ◽

The Government ◽

Plantation Company ◽

Customary Land ◽

The Impact

Abstract Nationalization of a Dutch-owned plantation company, NV Deli Maatschappij, was an attempt by the government to improve national economic situation. However, during the process, communal land which was concessioned to the plantation, was also nationalized and not given compensation by the government which resulted the indigenous people of Deli Sultanate losing their customary land. The former plantation land was converted to Cultivation Rights and handed over to the State Plantation Company This problem led to a prolonged conflict over ownership of the former estate. The purpose of this study is to determine the validity of the nationalization process carried out by Indonesian government on the existence of indigenous peoples’ customary land rights and obtain settlement of customary land rights of indigenous peoples as the impact on nationalization. Furthermore, this research is normative legal research (library research) with a statutory approach (statue approach). Keywords: Nationalization, Communal Land, Compensation Abstrak Proses nasionalisasi Perusahaan Perkebunan milik Belanda, yaitu NV Deli Maatschappij adalah upaya pemerintah untuk memperbaiki perekonomian Negara. Namun dalam pelaksanaannya tanah ulayat yang dikonsesikan kepada perkebunan juga ikut ternasionalisasi dan tidak diberikan ganti kerugian oleh pemerintah yang berakibat Masyarakat Adat Kesultanan Deli kehilangan tanah ulayatnya. Tanah bekas perkebunan diubah menjadi Hak Guna Usaha dan diserahkan kepada Perusahaan Perkebunan Negara. Hal ini menimbulkan konflik berkepanjangan tentang kepemilikan tanah bekas perkebunan tersebut. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif (library research) dengan pendekatan undang-undang (statue approach). Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menilai keabsahan proses nasionalisasi yang dilakukan oleh pemerintah Indonesia terhadap eksistensi hak ulayat Masyarakat Adat dan memperoleh penyelesaian sengketa tanah ulayat Masyarakat Adat sebagai dampak atas nasionalisasi. Kata Kunci: Nasionalisasi, Tanah Ulayat, Ganti Rugi

Download Full-text

PENDAFTARAN TANAH DENGAN ALAS HAK JUAL BELI DI BAWAH TANGAN PADA PROGRAM PENDAFTARAN TANAH SISTEMATIS LENGKAP (PTSL) (Studi Pada Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Lima Puluh Kota)

UNES Law Review ◽

10.31933/unesrev.v3i1.144 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 3 (1) ◽

pp. 40-54

Author(s):

Donald Andrean

Keyword(s):

Task Force ◽

Legal Protection ◽

Secondary Data ◽

Land Rights ◽

Field Studies ◽

Primary Data ◽

Legal Certainty ◽

Land Registration ◽

City District ◽

The Government

In civil law, land is included in registered objects. Therefore ownership of land rights must be registered, for legal certainty. Land registration is regulated in PP No. 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration. However, there are still many lands that have not been registered, to overcome this the government has issued a comprehensive systematic land registration program (PTSL) based on Minister of Agrarian Regulation No. 6 of 2018. The aim of this program is to provide legal certainty and legal protection for land rights owned by the community. The Complete Systematic Land Registration Program (PTSL) provides an opportunity for people who have not registered their land that is located throughout Indonesia in one village or village area. As in the Lima Puluh Kota Regency, there are still many lands that have not been registered, the people obtained them from buying and selling under their hands.The formulation of the problem in this thesis is firstly how is the land registration procedure with the basis of under-selling rights of purchase under the complete systematic land registration program (PTSL) at the fifty-city district land office ?; second, what are the obstacles in the implementation of land registration on the basis of the right to buy and sell under the complete systematic land registration program (PTSL) at the fifty-city district land office? The specification of this research is analytical descriptive, with a normative juridical approach, which is supported by an empirical juridical approach. The data used are secondary data as primary data and primary data as support, which are collected through literature studies and field studies with interview techniques. The data is then analyzed qualitatively and presented in a qualitative descriptive form. The results of the research and discussion of this thesis can be concluded that the procedure of land registration with the basis of the rights under the hand in the PTSL program in fifty cities is carried out with the stages of planning, location determination, preparation, formation and establishment of the PTSL adjudication committee and task force, counseling, physical data collection and collecting juridical data, researching juridical data for proving rights, announcing physical and juridical data and ratifying it, affirming conversion, recognizing rights and granting rights, accounting for rights, issuing certificates of land rights, documenting and submitting the results of activities and reporting.

Download Full-text

Legal Protection for Village Communities Against Land Rights in the Construction of a National Strategy Project Through a Complete Systematic Land Registration System (Study of Pasuruan District Land Registration)

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding ◽

10.18415/ijmmu.v8i7.2879 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (7) ◽

pp. 48

Author(s):

Ratna Biraeng Kumalasari

Keyword(s):

Legal Protection ◽

Land Rights ◽

Third Party ◽

Legal Certainty ◽

Registration System ◽

Land Registration ◽

Community Needs ◽

Village Communities ◽

The Republic ◽

The Government

In this study using normative legal research. Policies related to land are required to guarantee legal certainty and certainty of land ownership rights by every person (individual) or by legal entities. So the community needs to register land in order to obtain a certificate of land rights which serves as a strong means of proof of ownership of land rights by someone. Meanwhile, Article 19 paragraph (1) of the Basic Agrarian Law states that to ensure legal certainty by the Government, land registration is held throughout the territory of the Republic of Indonesia. This is done so that land owners can obtain legal certainty for the land they have owned, and it’s intended that rights holders obtain valid evidence in the form of certificates as a strong means of proof as holders of rights to the land they own. Starting from the description above, the researcher can provide several aspects of the study, including: First, the Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) target is so large that it’s not an easy job for the Pasuruan Regency land office, which has 29 State Civil Servants, assisted by 63 non-government employees, due to the limited number of existing staff, the implementation of the Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) land office in Pasuruan Regency involves; 1. The private sector as a third party helping 20,200 fields for measurement and mapping activities, 2. Community participation in assissting Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) in village locations for 10,100 respectively, and 29,700 fields carried out and carried out by the Pasuruan Regency Land Office ASN.

Download Full-text

Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Hak Milik Atas Tanah untuk Pembangunan Kepentingan Umum

Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum ◽

10.22225/juinhum.1.1.2193.95-100 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 1 (1) ◽

pp. 95-100

Author(s):

Made Ayu Wangi Utari Suryatika ◽

I Gusti Bagus Suryawan ◽

I Wayan Arthanaya

Keyword(s):

National Development ◽

Legal Protection ◽

Land Rights ◽

Analytical Form ◽

Careful Consideration ◽

Public Interests ◽

Human Needs ◽

The Government ◽

Materials Used ◽

The Right

The role of land is very important in addition to being the capital for administering the life of the state but also the life of the people. Land function as the fulfillment of human needs in many aspects such as for housing, agriculture, plantations, and industrial activities that require the availability of land. Land has a social function, where one of the government's efforts in the context of national development is development in the public interest, such as the construction of highways, people's settlements, traditional markets, construction of mall buildings and so on. So the problem under investigation is What is the form of legal protection of land rights for the development of public interests, and how is the mechanism for compensating land rights for development of public interests. The method used is normative legal research with legislation and conceptual approaches, as well as sources of legal materials used are primary and secondary legal materials with collection techniques of library legal materials that are analyzed quantitatively in a descriptive analytical form. Based on the results of research and analysis, a conclusion can be drawn from legal protection of land rights that there are two forms of legal protection, namely preventive legal protection and repressive legal protection, in addition, Article 1 number 10 of Law No. 2 of 2012 is the basis of compensation for holders of land rights. The advice that can be delivered is that in practice the holders of land rights are often not satisfied with the compensation provided, according to which the amount of compensation is not proportional to material and material losses. Therefore, it is expected that the government as the land acquisition party applies an objective objectivity where careful consideration and calculation are carried out, so that the compensation as expected by the holder of the right to the land and even later the compensation can become compensation.

Download Full-text