Plastic BGA Module FA Process Flow Development

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhaofeng Wang ◽  
Lars Wagner ◽  
Chuan Cheah
Keyword(s):  
Failure Analysis ◽  
Multichip Module ◽  
Corrosion Mechanism ◽  
Front Side ◽  
Process Flow ◽  
Analysis Process ◽  
Flow Development ◽  
Die Attach

Abstract A failure analysis process flow development for a board mount plastic BGA multichip module is described. Both front and backside approaches are investigated. Following the probing (at both front and backside), front side chemical de-cap procedure is also developed to expose the components without disturbance. The development of this failure analysis process flow has successfully isolated defective IC dice, identified a die attach interface corrosion mechanism, and assembly related die top mechanical defects. This process can be adopted to failure analysis for other plastic BGA modules.

Flip-Chip Bump Interface Failure Mechanisms In Plastic BGA Packages and Failure Analysis Process Flow

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhaofeng Wang
Keyword(s):  
Failure Analysis ◽  
Flip Chip ◽  
Failure Mechanisms ◽  
Integrity Test ◽  
Forming Process ◽  
Interface Failure ◽  
Process Flow ◽  
Analysis Process ◽  
Bga Packages ◽  
Intermittent Contact

Abstract The present paper studies several failure mechanisms at both UBM and Cu substrate side for flip-chip die open contact failures in multi-chip-module plastic BGA-LGA packages. A unique failure analysis process flow, starting from non-disturbance inspection of x-ray, substrate and die level C-SAM, bump x-section followed by a bump interface integrity test including under-fill etching and bump pull test and/or substrate etch has been developed. Four different types of failure mechanism in multiple chip module that are associated with open/intermittent contact, ranging from device layout design, UBM forming process defect, to assembly related bump-substrate interface delamination have been identified. The established FA process has been proved to be efficient and accurate with repeatable result. It has facilitated and accelarated new product qualification processes for a line of high power MCM modules.

Failure Analysis Process Flows and Common Failure Mechanisms in Flip-Chip Packaged Device

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steve Hsiung ◽  
Victer Chan
Keyword(s):  
Failure Analysis ◽  
Flip Chip ◽  
Failure Mechanisms ◽  
Fault Identification ◽  
Process Flow ◽  
Packaging Technology ◽  
Root Cause ◽  
Analysis Process ◽  
Complex Construction ◽  
Non Destructive

Abstract With the increasing complexity of packaging technology, especially Flip-chip, package failure analysts face challenges to identify failure root cause. Due to the complex construction of Flip-chip packages, the conventional failure analysis process flow needs to be enhanced. Thus, generating a bench marked failure analysis process flow specifically for Flip-chip packaged devices becomes necessary. In this paper, the failure analysis process flow for Flip-chip package devices along with different failure mechanisms will be discussed and demonstrated. For instance, even in a simple continuity-open failure, instead of cross-sectioning the device as the initial fault identification step, the process flow details how to start from non-destructive C-SAM, TDR, to destructive die removal, polishing and finally cross-sectioning.

A New Deprocess Flow of Failure Analysis for MEMS Motion Sensor

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun-An Huang ◽  
Han-Yun Long ◽  
King-Ting Chiang ◽  
Li Chuang ◽  
Kevin Tsui
Keyword(s):  
Failure Analysis ◽  
Optical Microscopy ◽  
Motion Sensor ◽  
Thermal System ◽  
Layer By Layer ◽  
Sensor Failure ◽  
Process Flow ◽  
New Process ◽  
Cutting System ◽  
Successful Observation

Abstract This paper demonstrates a new de-process flow for MEMS motion sensor failure analysis, using layer by layer deprocessing to locate defect points. Analysis tools used in this new process flow include IR optical microscopy, thermal system, SEM and a cutting system to de-process of MEMS motion sensor and successful observation defect points.

Backside Mechanical Preparation Methodology for Effective Failure Analysis on Small and Non-Exposed Die Paddle Package

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ong Pei Hoon ◽  
Ng Kiong Kay ◽  
Gwee Hoon Yen
Keyword(s):  
Failure Analysis ◽  
Chemical Etching ◽  
Chemical Resistance ◽  
Etching Time ◽  
Lead Frame ◽  
Front Side ◽  
Electrical Measurements ◽  
Mechanical Preparation ◽  
Die Surface ◽  
Copper Lead

Abstract Chemical etching is commonly used in exposing the die surface from die front-side and die backside because of its quick etching time, burr-free and stress-free. However, this technique is risky when performing copper lead frame etching during backside preparation on small and non-exposed die paddle package. The drawback of this technique is that the copper leads will be over etched by 65% Acid Nitric Fuming even though the device’s leads are protected by chemical resistance tape. Consequently, the device is not able to proceed to any other further electrical measurements. Therefore, we introduced mechanical preparation as an alternative solution to replace the existing procedure. With the new method, we are able to ensure the copper leads are intact for the electrical measurements to improve the effectiveness and accuracy of physical failure analysis.

Unique Autoclave Stress Induced Failure Mechanism

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Butchko ◽  
Bruce T. Gillette
Keyword(s):  
Corrosion Rate ◽  
Grain Boundary ◽  
Failure Analysis ◽  
Failure Mechanism ◽  
Metal Corrosion ◽  
Corrosion Mechanism ◽  
Reliability Testing ◽  
Process Change ◽  
Transistor Reliability ◽  
Pass Through

Abstract Autoclave Stress failures were encountered at the 96 hour read during transistor reliability testing. A unique metal corrosion mechanism was found during the failure analysis, which was creating a contamination path to the drain source junction, resulting in high Idss and Igss leakage. The Al(Si) top metal was oxidizing along the grain boundaries at a faster rate than at the surface. There was subsurface blistering of the Al(Si), along with the grain boundary corrosion. This blistering was creating a contamination path from the package to the Si surface. Several variations in the metal stack were evaluated to better understand the cause of the failures and to provide a process solution. The prevention of intergranular metal corrosion and subsurface blistering during autoclave testing required a materials change from Al(Si) to Al(Si)(Cu). This change resulted in a reduced corrosion rate and consequently prevented Si contamination due to blistering. The process change resulted in a successful pass through the autoclave testing.

Contributions of a Formal Analysis Metaprocess to Breakthrough Failure Analysis Results

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steve Ferrier ◽  
Kevin D. Martin ◽  
Donald Schulte
Keyword(s):  
Failure Analysis ◽  
Formal Analysis ◽  
Photon Emission ◽  
Flow Analysis ◽  
Formal Structure ◽  
Ic Design ◽  
Analysis Process ◽  
Secondary Failure ◽  
Leakage Failure ◽  
Wafer Manufacturing

Abstract Application of a formal Failure Analysis metaprocess to a stubborn yield loss problem provided a framework that ultimately facilitated a solution. Absence of results from conventional failure analysis techniques such as PEM (Photon Emission Microscopy) and liquid crystal microthermography frustrated early attempts to analyze this low-level supply leakage failure mode. Subsequently, a reorganized analysis team attacked the problem using a specific toplevel metaprocess.(1,a) Using the metaprocess, analysts generated a specific unique step-by-step analysis process in real time. Along the way, this approach encouraged the creative identification of secondary failure effects that provided repeated breakthroughs in the analysis flow. Analysis proceeded steadily toward the failure cause in spite of its character as a three-way interaction among factors in the IC design, mask generation, and wafer manufacturing processes. The metaprocess also provided the formal structure that, at the conclusion of the analysis, permitted a one-sheet summary of the failure's cause-effect relationships and the analysis flow leading to discovery of the anomaly. As with every application of this metaprocess, the resulting analysis flow simply represented an effective version of good failure analysis. The formal and flexible codification of the analysis decision-making process, however, provided several specific benefits, not least of which was the ability to proceed with high confidence that the problem could and would be solved. This paper describes the application of the metaprocess, and also the key measurements and causeeffect relationships in the analysis.

Localization Techniques on a 0.15um CMOS Device: Charge Pump Failure Analysis

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Pan ◽  
Thomas Gibson
Keyword(s):  
Failure Analysis ◽  
Focused Ion Beam ◽  
Ion Beam ◽  
Electrical Characterization ◽  
Charge Pump ◽  
Front Side ◽  
Pump Failure ◽  
Electrical Failure ◽  
Optical Proximity Correction ◽  
A Charge

Abstract In recent years, there have been many advances in the equipment and techniques used to isolate faults. There are many options available to the failure analyst. The available techniques fall into the categories of electrical, photonic, thermal and electron/ion beam [1]. Each technique has its advantages and its limitations. In this paper, we introduce a case of successful failure analysis using a combination of several fault localization techniques on a 0.15um CMOS device with seven layers of metal. It includes electrical failure mode characterization, front side photoemission, backside photoemission, Focused Ion Beam (FIB), Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) and liquid crystal. Electrical characterization along with backside photoemission proved most useful in this case as a poly short problem was found to be causing a charge pump failure. A specific type of layout, often referred to as a hammerhead layout, and the use of Optical Proximity Correction (OPC) contributed to the poly level shorts.

Fan-Out Wafer-Level Packaging (FOWLP) of Large Chip with Multiple Redistribution Layers (RDLs)

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 123-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Lau ◽  
Ming Li ◽  
Nelson Fan ◽  
Eric Kuah ◽  
Zhang Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thin Layer ◽  
Glass Wafer ◽  
Front Side ◽  
Wafer Level ◽  
Molding Compound ◽  
The Third ◽  
Wafer Level Packaging ◽  
Die Attach ◽  
Solder Balls ◽  
Test Package

This study is for fan-out wafer-level packaging with chip-first (die face-up) formation. Chips with Cu contact-pads on the front side and a die attach film on the backside are picked and placed face-up on a temporary-glass-wafer carrier with a thin layer of light-to-heat conversion material. It is followed by compression molding with an epoxy molding compound (EMC) and a post-mold cure on the reconstituted wafer carrier and then backgrinding the molded EMC to expose the Cu contact-pads of the chips. The next step is to build up the redistribution layers (RDLs) from the Cu contact-pads and then mount the solder balls. This is followed by the debonding of the carrier with a laser and then the dicing of the whole reconstituted wafer into individual packages. A 300-mm reconstituted wafer with a package/die ratio = 1.8 and a die-top EMC cap = 100 μm has also been fabricated (a total of 325 test packages on the reconstituted wafer). This test package has three RDLs; the line width/spacing of the first RDL is 5 μm/5 μm, of the second RDL is 10 μm/10 μm, and of the third RDL is 15 μm/15 μm. The dielectric layer of the RDLs is fabricated with a photosensitive polyimide and the conductor layer of the RDLs is fabricated by electrochemical Cu deposition (ECD).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document