ORGANIZATION OF WORK CENTERS FOR CONVICTS’ LABOR ADAPTATION

2020 ◽  
pp. 24-28
Author(s):  
Сергей Евгеньевич Илюхин
Keyword(s):  
Legal Status ◽  
Penal System ◽  
Labor Organization ◽  
Correctional Institution ◽  
Correctional Institutions ◽  
Similar Work ◽  
Legitimate Interests ◽  
Quality Of Products ◽  
Production Labor

Вовлечение администрацией исправительного учреждения в трудовую деятельность осужденных способствует привитию им желания трудиться, получению ими профессии, повышению квалификации, что имеет колоссальное значение для подготовки их к жизни уже после отбытия наказания. Уровень трудовой занятости осужденных оказывает непосредственное влияние на морально-психологическую атмосферу в исправительных учреждениях, а также профилактику преступлений и правонарушений в связи с занятостью осужденных. В исправительных учреждениях образованы структурные подразделения, такие как центры трудовой адаптации осужденных (далее - ЦТАО) или учебно-производственные (трудовые) мастерские. Производственная деятельность на территориях исправительных учреждений обладает определенной спецификой. На сегодняшний день многие предприятия и организации проявляют желание взаимодействовать с учреждениями уголовно-исполнительной системы в сфере организации труда и производства каких-либо товаров, однако эти объемы пока не велики, если сравнивать с аналогичной работой, проводимой в европейских странах. Автором отмечается, что одной из причин этого является низкое качество выпускаемой продукции. Чтобы достичь более высоких результатов, необходимо заинтересовать осужденных путем выполнения сотрудниками законных интересов трудоустроенных осужденных в ЦТАО (предоставления отпуска, оплаты труда и т. д.). Следует отметить, что при функционировании ЦТАО имеется множество проблем, затрагивающих в том числе и правовое положение осужденных. В данной статье предложены меры по улучшению функционирования центров трудовой адаптации в исправительных учреждениях и вовлечению осужденных в деятельность данных центров. The involvement of convicts in the work by the correctional institution administration helps to stimulate their desire to work, to get a profession, to improve their skills, which is of great importance for preparing them for life after serving their sentence. The level of convicts’ employment directly affects the moral and psychological atmosphere in correctional institutions, as well as the prevention of crimes and offenses in connection with the employment of convicts. In correctional institutions, structural divisions are formed, such as centers for labor adaptation of convicts (hereinafter referred to as CLAC) or training and production (labor) workshops. Production activities on the territories of correctional institutions have certain specifics. Today, many enterprises and organizations are willing to cooperate with institutions of the penal system in the field of labor organization and production of any goods, but these volumes are not yet large, when compared with similar work carried out in European countries. The author notes that one of the reasons for this is the low quality of products and in order to achieve better results, it is necessary to interest convicts by fulfilling the legitimate interests of employed convicts in the Central administrative CLAC (granting leave, payment of labor, etc.). It should be noted that there are many problems in the functioning of the Central administrative CLAC, including those affecting the legal status of convicts. This article suggests measures to improve the work of labor adaptation centers in correctional institutions and the involvement of convicts in the activities of these centers.

scholarly journals Verification of Reports on Prison-Related Crimes in the Context of Ensuring the Rights and Legitimate Interests of Convicts

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 628-634
Author(s):  
Aleksandr S. Shatalov
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
The Body ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Penal System ◽  
Correctional Institution ◽  
Correctional Institutions ◽  
Legitimate Interests ◽  
The Moment

Introduction: the article considers problematic issues related to the participation of penal system officials in procedural activities to verify reports of crimes committed by convicted persons, accused persons, and suspects in correctional institutions, and puts forward proposals aimed at improving the effectiveness of these activities. Our arguments are directly related to the following: determining the moment from which the calculation of the terms of such an inspection should begin, assessing the expediency of such an inspection, actual content of the procedural actions it contains and participation of the defender in them. We come to the conclusion that penal system officials are not sufficiently motivated to use the procedural powers of the body of inquiry and participate in pre-trial proceedings in criminal cases. Moreover, they are often poorly prepared to participate in criminal procedural activities; this fact not only entails violations of the rights and legitimate interests of convicts, but also allows the latter to avoid criminal liability for new crimes committed on the territory of a correctional institution. The fact that many heads of penitentiary institutions are afraid that the number of criminally punishable actions in the territories under their control would increase also has a negative impact on the quality of procedural activity. As a result, the official criminal statistics mainly show only those prison-related offences, which cannot be hushed up. Methods: we make the following classification of the problems of responding to various violations of criminal law prohibitions by persons sentenced to imprisonment, as well as suspects and accused persons held in custody: 1) problems related to the reasons for initiating a criminal case; 2) problems related to the reasons for initiating a criminal case; 3) problems related to checking the reports of prison-related offences; 4) problems related to the adoption of final procedural decisions and the provision of qualified legal assistance to convicted persons in the implementation of verification actions. Taking into account the specifics of the problems, we put forward the ways to overcome and solve these problems. Discussion: the latency of prison offences has been and remains quite high, and the procedural activity itself carried out in connection with their commission is very far from ideal. In such conditions, there is a growing need for timely and professional response on the part of officials of correctional institutions (including pre-trial detention centers) to various violations of criminal law prohibitions committed by persons sentenced to imprisonment, as well as suspects and accused persons held in custody. Results: we prove that the above-mentioned response is mandatory and has a number of specific features, primarily due to the environment in which it is carried out.

CRIMINOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF CRIMES AIMED AT DISORGANIZING THE ACTIVITIES OF INSTITUTIONS THAT PROVIDE ISOLATION FROM SOCIETY, AND THOSE WHO ARE CONVICTED OF COMMITTING THEM

2020 ◽  
pp. 45-50
Author(s):  
Андрей Владимирович Кулаков ◽  
Ольга Рениславовна Родионова
Keyword(s):  
General Theory ◽  
State Policy ◽  
Criminal Behavior ◽  
Penal System ◽  
Modern State ◽  
Qualitative Composition ◽  
Correctional Institution ◽  
Correctional Institutions ◽  
Prison Staff ◽  
The Creation

В настоящее время создание безопасных условий исполнения и отбывания уголовного наказания в виде лишения свободы, укрепление защищенности сотрудников пенитенциарных учреждений от возможных угроз и опасных посягательств является одной из актуальных задач, стоящих перед уголовно-исполнительной системой. Данная ситуация сложилась в результате современной государственной политики в сфере противодействия преступности, а именно гуманизации наказания, что привело к изменению количественного и качественного состава осужденных, отбывающих наказание в местах лишения свободы, и осложнило оперативную обстановку. В статье отмечается, что несмотря на незначительное количество действий, дезорганизующих работу исправительного учреждения, в структуре пенитенциарной преступности, данные деликты имеют повышенную общественную опасность, так как совершаются в период отбывания наказания, и высокую латентность в силу как объекта (основного, дополнительного и факультативного), так и способа посягательства. Признавая криминологические данные основой для выработки мер противодействия преступности, в том числе пенитенциарной, авторы исследуют показатели одного из видов преступлений, совершаемых в исправительных колониях, - дезорганизация деятельности учреждений, обеспечивающих изоляцию от общества, а также личность преступника. Проведенное исследование позволило дать криминологическую характеристику преступлений, направленных на дезорганизацию деятельности учреждений, обеспечивающих изоляцию от общества, в частности, исправительных учреждений, а также определить особенности личности осужденных, их совершающих. Результаты исследования могут быть использованы при разработке теории преступного поведения и личности преступника, в частности, пенитенциарного. Currently, the creation of safe conditions for the execution and serving of criminal sentences in the form of deprivation of liberty, strengthening the protection of prison staff from possible threats and dangerous attacks is one of the urgent tasks facing the penal system. This situation has developed as a result of modern state policy in the field of combating crime, namely, the humanization of punishment, which has led to a change in the quantitative and qualitative composition of convicts serving sentences in places of deprivation of liberty, and has complicated the operational situation. The article notes that despite the small number of actions that disorganize the work of a correctional institution, in the structure of penitentiary crime, these torts have an increased public danger, since they are committed during the period of serving a sentence, and high latency due to both the object (both the main and optional) and the method of encroachment. Recognizing criminological data as the basis for developing measures to counteract crime, including penitentiary, the authors study indicators of one of the types of crimes committed in correctional colonies - disorganization of institutions that provide isolation from society, as well as the identity of the criminal. The research made it possible to give criminological characteristics of crimes aimed at disorganizing the activities of institutions that provide isolation from society, in particular correctional institutions, as well as to determine the personality of the convicted person who commits them.The results of the study can be used in the development of a General theory of criminal behavior and the personality of the criminal, and the penitentiary in particular.

scholarly journals PREVENTION OF OFFENSES AMONG PERSONS HELD IN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS AS A MEASURE TO ENSURE THE PERSONAL SAFETY OF CONVICTED PERSONS

2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-139
Author(s):  
O.V. Pronina ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Penal System ◽  
Correctional Institution ◽  
Correctional Institutions ◽  
Personal Safety ◽  
Law And Order ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Concept Of Law ◽  
Concept Of Law

The article considers the concept of "law and order in a correctional institution". The connection of the concept of "law and order" with the concept of "personal security of convicts"is analyzed. The author proposed changes and additions to the Instructions for the Prevention of Offenses among persons held in institutions of the penal system «approved by the order of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation of May 20, 2013. No. 72, which, in his opinion, will have a positive impact on the measures for the prevention of offenses in correctional institutions carried out by employees of the penitentiary system in order to ensure an appropriate level of law and order and ensure the personal safety of convicts.

scholarly journals On some organizational-legal problems arising during the release of persons who have served their sentences in correctional institutions of the penal system

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 318-324
Author(s):  
E. V. Emelyanova ◽  
◽  
T. P. Matveeva ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Social Protection ◽  
International Experience ◽  
Social Adaptation ◽  
Penal System ◽  
Correctional Institution ◽  
Correctional Institutions ◽  
The Past ◽  
Successful Adaptation ◽  
Legal Problems ◽  
Domestic Practice

Currently much attention is paid to the process of preparing convicts for release since it is extremely important for their successful adaptation in society. It must be remembered that the domestic practice of liberation and international experience in this field have a long history, and the modern institution of liberation has been formed for more than a decade. As you know, turning to positive examples of the past allows, based on current achievements, to obtain results that meet the requirements of today. A study conducted by the authors confirmed the presence of a number of organizational, economic, legal problems in the field of preparing prisoners for release, despite the fact that today the issues of re-socialization of those released are in the focus of state attention. For example the staff of a correctional institution has serious difficulties in issuing and purchasing travel documents for those released from places of deprivation of liberty. In addition interaction with services related to the process of social adaptation of those released (employment, social protection, etc.) is complicated. The solution of these and other emerging problems requires improving regulatory support and increasing the effectiveness of organizing training and providing assistance to persons released from serving their sentences.

scholarly journals Problematic issues of legal regulation of the grounds for introduction special conditions in the institutions of the penal system of Russia and ways to solve them

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 347-355
Author(s):  
D. V. Gorban’ ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Penal System ◽  
Correctional Institution ◽  
Correctional Institutions ◽  
Operational Environment ◽  
Martial Law ◽  
State Of Emergency ◽  
Detention Centers ◽  
Penal Institutions ◽  
Capture And Release

In practice of institutions and bodies of the penal system arise situations in which their normal activities are temporarily interrupted and they become the so-called special order of functioning. These are: natural disasters, riots of convicts, accidents, announcement of the state of emergency or imposing martial law, group disobedience of convicts, capture and release of hostages in the territory of a correctional institution, search and detention of convicts who escaped from a correctional institution, fires. In the event of these abnormal situations the operational environment is sharply complicated, and there are grounds for introducing special conditions in correctional institutions as well as pre-trial detention centers. The special conditions regime is a complex of organizational measures introduced when a state of emergency, martial law and special situations are established in the area of the correctional institution, as well as in the event of mass unrest or group disobedience of convicts. The study of the problematic issues of introducing this regime is an urgent area of research in modern penitentiary science. The article presents an attempt to comprehensively review the practical issues of introducing special conditions in penal institutions. The author considers it possible to supplement the list of grounds enshrined in the law for introducing a special conditions regime with a few more and makes suggestions for improving the current penal legislation.

On the issue of creating integrated correctional institutions in the Russian Federation

2020 ◽  
pp. 58-63
Author(s):  
Ирина Николаевна Коробова
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
International Standards ◽  
Penal System ◽  
Correctional Institution ◽  
Correctional Institutions ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Creation ◽  
Multi Mode

В настоящее время происходит процесс активного реформирования уголовно-исполнительной системы, кроме того, параллельно проводится работа по изменению уголовно-исполнительного законодательства. Количество осужденных, содержащихся в местах лишения свободы, неизменно снижается, причем прослеживается определенная тенденция, когда исправительные учреждения одного вида режима переполнены, другие заполнены не в полном объеме, в связи с чем их количество уменьшается, в частности, на всей территории Российской Федерации имеется только 22 колонии для несовершеннолетних. В уголовно-исполнительном законодательстве РФ содержится норма, предусматривающая отбывание наказания в исправительном учреждении, расположенном в пределах территории субъекта Российской Федерации, в котором осужденный проживал или был осужден. Однако в настоящее время соблюдение данного принципа достаточно проблематично, и выходом из сложившейся ситуации может быть создание комплексных (мультирежимных) исправительных учреждений. Данное положение не противоречит и положениям международных стандартов исполнения наказаний, подобные положения имеются и в Минимальных стандартных правилах в отношении обращения с заключенными 2015 г., и в Европейских пенитенциарных правилах. Все это обосновывает актуальность изучаемой темы. Currently, there is a process of active reform of the penal system, in addition, work is being carried out in parallel to change the penal legislation. The number of convicts held in places of deprivation of liberty is constantly decreasing, and there is a certain trend when correctional institutions of one type of regime are overcrowded, while others are not filled in full, which is why their number is decreasing, in particular, there are only 22 juvenile colonies throughout the Russian Federation. Among the principles of deprivation of liberty, the penal legislation of the Russian Federation singles out the principle of serving a sentence in a correctional institution located within the territory of the subject of the Russian Federation where the convicted person lived or was convicted. However, at present, compliance with this principle is quite problematic, so the solution to this situation may be the creation of complex (multi-mode) correctional institutions. This provision does not contradict the provisions of international standards for the execution of sentences, such provisions are found in the standard Minimum rules for the treatment of prisoners of 2015, and in the European prison rules. All this justifies the relevance of the topic under study.

scholarly journals Increasing the Production Potential of an Agricultural Enterprise by Increasing the Motivation of its Employees

2021 ◽  
Vol 93 ◽  
pp. 04001
Author(s):  
S.V. Yekimov ◽  
V.A. Tkachenko ◽  
S.N. Voit ◽  
K.V. Zavgorodniy ◽  
O.І. Zayats
Keyword(s):  
Agricultural Sector ◽  
Market Competition ◽  
Production Potential ◽  
Qualitative And Quantitative ◽  
Economic Entity ◽  
Agricultural Enterprise ◽  
Manufactured Products ◽  
Quality Of Products ◽  
Production Labor

The production potential of an agricultural enterprise is a set of interacting production, labor and other resources at the disposal of this enterprise . The qualitative and quantitative parameters of these resources, as well as their degree of integration interaction, largely determine the production capabilities of an agricultural enterprise as an economic entity. At the same time , in our opinion , the production potential determines only the potential ability of an enterprise to produce goods or services , and therefore , in our opinion, it cannot be a fully objective indicator of its usefulness. The production potential of the enterprise can be fully realized, provided that its characteristics and its components meet certain parameters of the manufactured products.In the conditions of market competition, success can be achieved only if there is a high quality of the products produced.The production potential to a certain extent depends on the quality of products that are produced by the enterprise. The agricultural sector of the economy is labor-intensive, so the quality of manufactured products, and therefore the production potential of an agricultural enterprise, depends on successful motivation to work.

Criminal procedure powers of the head of the institution of the penal correction system as a subject of inquiry: implementation problems

2020 ◽  
pp. 144-149
Author(s):  
Андрей Станиславович Александров
Keyword(s):  
Legal Status ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Correctional Institution ◽  
Correctional Institutions ◽  
Detention Center ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Law ◽  
Implementation Problems ◽  
Correction System

В статье рассматриваются особенности уголовно-процессуального статуса учреждений и органов уголовно-исполнительной системы. Поднимаются вопросы об уголовно-процессуальных компетенциях начальника исправительного учреждения и следственного изолятора в качестве органа дознания. Автором обозначена проблема размытости правового статуса начальника исправительного учреждения в действующем уголовно-процессуальном законодательстве. Отмечены особенности осуществления дознания в целом и дознания в условиях исправительных учреждений в частности. Обозначены противоречия в правоприменительной практике органов прокуратуры и положений уголовно-процессуального закона. В статье рассмотрены различные позиции ученых относительно компетенций начальников исправительных учреждений в производстве неотложных следственных действий. Рассмотрена отдельная практика усиления прокурорского надзора за уголовно-процессуальной деятельностью учреждений и органов УИС исходя из требований ст. 5, 40, 150, 157 УПК РФ. Затронут на сегодня спорный вопрос о способности или неспособности начальника исправительного учреждения возбудить уголовное дело или вынести отказной материал. Делается акцент на недопустимости неоднозначного понимания со стороны правоприменителя норм уголовно-процессуального законодательства. The article discusses the features of the criminal procedural status of institutions and bodies of the penal correction system. Questions are raised about the criminal procedural competencies of the head of the correctional institution and the pre-trial detention center as the subject of inquiry. The author outlines the problem of blurring the legal status of the head of the correctional institution in the current criminal procedure legislation. Peculiarities of the implementation of the inquiry in general and of inquiry in the conditions of correctional institutions in particular are noted. The contradictions in the law enforcement practice of the prosecution authorities and the provisions of the criminal procedure law are indicated. The article discusses the various positions of scientists regarding the competencies of the heads of correctional institutions in the production of urgent investigative actions. A separate practice of strengthening prosecutorial supervision of the criminal procedure activities of the institutions and bodies of the penal correction system based on the requirements of Art. 5, 40, 150, 157 Code of Criminal Procedure. Today, the controversial issue of the ability or inability to initiate a criminal case or to bring out refusal material by the head of the correctional institution will be raised. The emphasis is on the inadmissibility of the ambiguity of understanding by the law enforcer of the norms of criminal procedure legislation.

Lengthy Prison Term as a Psychological Issue in the Penal System of the Russian Federation

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 218-223
Author(s):  
YURII E. SUSLOV
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Scientific Research ◽  
Penal System ◽  
Correctional Institution ◽  
Correctional Institutions ◽  
Educational Work ◽  
Prolonged Stay ◽  
Prison Term ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: the paper analyzes scientific data related to the definition of the phenomenon “lengthy prison term” and demonstrates a relative and conditional nature of this phenomenon. Available scientific research findings in this area suggest that the duration of serving a sentence is an exclusively subjective measure for various criminals. Goal: to identify the impact of the length of prison sentences on convicts in the context of their reformation. Methods: we use general scientific research methods (analysis, synthesis, comparison, generalization). The work is based on the results derived from the analysis of relevant foreign and domestic studies. Results: by analyzing the influence of specific features inherent in correctional institutions, we reveal the following inconsistency: custodial sentences and lengthy prison terms contribute to the adaptation of convicts to prison conditions, development of negative changes in their personality, destructive conduct, etc. In addition, prolonged stay in a correctional institution reduces the impact of major means of reformation such as prison regime, educational work, and socially useful work. Conclusions: when determining the length of prison term, it is necessary to proceed not so much from the nature and degree of public danger of the act, but from individual features of the criminal’s personality, their social environment, and the motive for the crime committed. It is necessary to abandon the quantitative approach to determining the mea sure of punishment expressed in the length of the prison term. Key words: lengthy prison term; serving a sentence; correctional institutions; crime; convicts; reformation; punishment; penal system of the Russian Federation; isolation conditions.

scholarly journals On Types of Correctional Institutions

2021 ◽  
pp. 860-867
Author(s):  
Sergei Savushkin
Keyword(s):  
Negative Impact ◽  
Criminal Policy ◽  
The State ◽  
Correctional Institution ◽  
Correctional Institutions ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Logical Method ◽  
Goals And Objectives

Introduction. Due to the different density of population in the Russian Federation and the scale of its territory, correctional system facilities should represent a unified system, in which the institutions are interrelated and interchangeable. In the conditions of a large number of types and sub-types of correctional institutions, the possibility of interchangeability is weakened. Problems associated with the quality of ensuring the internal isolation of convicts have a significant impact on the level of crime and penitentiary security. Hence, the punishment execution practice should more flexibly use the norms on separation of convicts to achieve goals and objectives of the penal executive legislation. Methods: the research used a dialectical method for cognizing objective reality, a logical method, a modeling method, a formal legal method, a systemic method. Results and discussion: the constantly changing socio-criminological portrait of the offender and the level of crime force the legislator to revise criminal-legal and criminal-executive criteria for differentiating those sentenced to imprisonment. The mentioned reasons also affect group differentiation that occurs in the process of distributing convicts to dormitory accommodation (cells) within the correctional institution. The crime level in a separate RF subject and changes in the state criminal policy require the reassignment of correctional institutions as a whole. The system of correctional institutions should not overwhelmingly depend on the criminal-legal criteria of those sentenced to imprisonment and the changing criminal policy of the state, and at the same time, departmental regulation should not bolster the legislatively established system of correctional institutions. Conclusions: the legislator has established a wide range of types of correctional institutions for those sentenced to imprisonment. Remoteness of some of them from the place of residence of convicts, to a certain extent, has both positive and negative impact on their social ties, which ultimately affects the effectiveness of implementation of the panel enforcement legislation goals and objectives.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document