scholarly journals Implementation of the Third Mission of the Universities: Regional Aspect

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (31) ◽  
pp. 323-338
Author(s):  
Ekaterina G. Shumik ◽  
Olga A. Baturina
Keyword(s):  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Federal District ◽  
University Development ◽  
Social Events ◽  
Regional Aspect ◽  
National Economic ◽  
University Support ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The University ◽  
Far Eastern

National economic growth plays an important role in the education rate of society, since there is a strong connection between the success of the country and the level of development of human capital. In this sense, universities, as leaders of higher education, can powerfully affect the socio-economic development of society. In this article, the authors investigated different models of university development with the intention of determining the importance of their association. In addition, the authors evaluated the level and trends of the development of alliances between the universities of the Far Eastern Federal District (FEFD) as a tool for the implementation of their mission. To do this, they analyzed the websites of FEFD universities to reflect data on common activities within social activities. They also did a comparative analysis to compare the characteristics of the universities and evaluate the differences in the implementation of the social function. Finally, the correlation analysis was used to determine the effect of social events, the number of students and the university ranking. Based on these analyzes, it can be concluded that most of the universities are located in three regions: Primorsky and Khabarovsk Territories, as well as the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia), which are pioneers in terms of the number of students. While there is a tendency to reduce government involvement in university support, the FEFD increases. In addition, it has been shown that there is a relationship between the position in the ranking of universities in the region and the number of social events. Regarding the structure of university activities in matters of social responsibility, the development of university partnership interactions in the process of implementation of social responsibility has been verified, but the level of formalization of relationships is extremely low.

scholarly journals Economic Accessibility of Food: a Regional Aspect

2022 ◽  
Vol 2021 (4) ◽  
pp. 538-547
Author(s):  
Antonina Kolesnyak ◽  
Nataliya Polyanskaya
Keyword(s):  
Local Population ◽  
Federal District ◽  
General Level ◽  
Cash Income ◽  
Income Per Capita ◽  
Regional Aspect ◽  
Per Capita ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right ◽  
Far Eastern

The general level of socio-economic development and the quality of life depend on the economic availability of food, i.e. the ability of the local population to buy products recommended by the Ministry of Health. Each family has the right to afford quality food for all household members. The local economic availability of food depends, first of all, on the income per capita in a particular region. The present research assessed the economic availability of food in the Republic of Buryatia using such indicators as food supplies, cash income per capita, household budget structure, and self-sufficiency in basic foodstuffs. The results were compared with the food situation in other regions of the Far Eastern Federal District and the average Russian data.

scholarly journals Diagnostics of Inequality in the Social Sphere of the Far Eastern Regions of the Russian Federation

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-67
Author(s):  
Lyudmila Kovalchuk ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Social Development ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Federal District ◽  
Social Sphere ◽  
Interregional Interaction ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Far Eastern ◽  
Negative Phenomena

The expansion of the borders of the Far Eastern Federal District due to the inclusion of the Trans-Baikal Territory and the Republic of Buryatia in its composition actualizes the problem of inequality of regions (primarily in the social sphere), which in the new boundaries of the macroregion has significantly increased and has acquired a «supernormal» character. It has been established that the lag of the «new» Far Eastern subjects in the level of social development is accompanied by an increase in negative phenomena in the social sphere. The necessity of implementing a set of measures to form a «corridor of opportunities» that regions can use, including within the framework of interregional interaction within the Far Eastern Federal District, has been substantiated

scholarly journals Первый клинический случай трансплантации сердца в Дальневосточном федеральном округе

2020 ◽  
pp. 95-99
Keyword(s):  
Heart Transplantation ◽  
Federal District ◽  
Extreme Climate ◽  
First Case ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Far Eastern

The first case of heart transplantation in the Far Eastern Federal District is described in the article. Transplantation of heart was performed in Republican hospital No. 1 – the National center of medicine (Yakutsk) on July 06, 2018. In our opinion, transplantation of heart is necessary and feasible in such regions as, the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia), which has difficult and extreme climate and geography, remote settlements with population less than 1 million people.

scholarly journals Domestic market of Arctic Uluses of Sakha (Yakutia) in the Far Eastern Federal District macro area

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (01) ◽  
pp. 186-192
Author(s):  
Yang Lifen ◽  
Yuriy Yu. Fedorov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Supply And Demand ◽  
Far East ◽  
Federal District ◽  
Market Potential ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Government Body ◽  
Far Eastern

This study reviews and compares the market potential of two macro-areas in the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) in the AZRF (Arctic zone of the Russian Federation) and the FEFD (Far Eastern Federal District. Moreover, this work shows that a significant part of supply and demand in municipalities' domestic markets is concentrated in the FEFD. Until recently, the AZRF and the FEFD were not considered by the State as a single government body. Transferred powers to the Ministry of the Russian Federation for the development of the Far East and the Arctic has allowed the territory of the Arctic uluses of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) to be included in the social and economic development of the FEFD.

scholarly journals ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT ZONES IN SINGLE-INDUSTRY URBAN SETTLEMENTS: PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS (THE CASE OF THE REPUBLIC OF KARELIA)

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 (2) ◽  
pp. 106-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
О. Ларченко ◽  
O. Larchenko
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Federal District ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
Social And Economic Development ◽  
Single Industry ◽  
Urban Settlements ◽  
General Scientific ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Far Eastern ◽  
Advanced Development

<p>The Russian Federation is currently moving to a new model of spatial development of its economy, also by creating areas of advanced social and economic development. The Far Eastern Federal District was the first in establishing of such special regime territories. In 2014, the process spread to single-industry urban settlements. In this case, the main purpose is to develop business enterprises not connected with the townforming enterprise. For the Republic of Karelia, issues related to monotowns cities are relevant. On the territory of the republic there are eleven mononowns, and two of them contain territories of advanced development, i.e. «Nadvoitsy» and «Kondopoga». The purpose of this article is to assess the functioning of the zones of advanced development and their impact on the development of the region, as well as to identify problems<br />and develop proposals for their elimination. The research employed such general scientific methods and techniques as induction and deduction, synthesis, comparative and comparable analysis. The article reveals the features and the role of the territories of advanced social and economic development in the economic development of the country and the region in particular, as exemplified by the Republic of Karelia. The study has identified the problems of the zones and their development. The author proposes a number of specific measures to improve the efficiency of advanced development zones</p>

scholarly journals Implementation Corporate Social Responsibility Of Regional Owned Business Agencies To Help Handling Covid-19 In Kendal

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 84-98
Author(s):  
Andhang Kuswandriyo
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Economic Democracy ◽  
The People ◽  
The Social ◽  
National Economic ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Environmental Mobilization ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Corporate Social

Abstract                                                                              Improve the welfare of the community in the area around the company and corporate responsibility. This can happen because the community feels affected by the environment that comes from the company's operations. The improvement of conditions in the social environment is one way of fulfilling the responsibilities known as corporate social responsibility or CSR. The definition of economic democracy in the national economy is based on the principles of unity, equity, sustainability of function, environmental mobilization, independence, and in maintaining the balance of development and national economic unity, it is important to support the 'main economic institutions; to determine the welfare of the people. CSR activities for the community are a process of migration and are related to the existing resources in the community. Currently, Social Welfare is no longer voluntary in nature but it has become the responsibility of many companies to implement it, although so far there have been no serious sanctions imposed on non-CSR companies. Keywords: CSR; Corporate social responsibility; Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 40 of 2007; Community Welfare

СОЦИАЛЬНО-ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКОЕ ПОЛОЖЕНИЕ НОВЫХ СУБЪЕКТОВ ДВФО ПРИ СРАВНЕНИИ С ДРУГИМИ СУБЪЕКТАМИ ФЕДЕРАЛЬНОГО ОКРУГА

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.A. Ushakov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Far East ◽  
Federal District ◽  
Eastern Region ◽  
Socioeconomic Indicators ◽  
Low Socioeconomic ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Far Eastern

Аннотация. Республика Бурятия и Забайкальский край указом президента Российской Федерации 3 ноября 2018 года вошли в состав Дальневосточного федерального округа. Эти субъекты имеют свою социальноэкономическую специфику по отношению к другим субъектам по структуре экономики, уровню жизни населения, экономикогеографическому положению. Одна из главных целей работы была сравнить новые субъекты с другими субъектами Дальневосточного федерального округа по структуре экономики и социальноэкономическому положению и его динамики. Оба региона как было установлено имеют схожие структуры экономики с приграничными субъектами юга Дальнего Востока. Они имеют довольно низкие социальноэкономические показатели по отношению к подавляющему большинству субъектов Российской Федерации, так и в особенности среди субъектов Дальневосточного региона находясь наряду с Еврейской автономной областью в числе аутсайдеров. Это было подсчитано на примере одного из коэффициентов сравнения, который показывает степень социальноэкономического развития между субъектами федерального округа. Также на примере этого коэффициента выявлено, что рассматриваемые регионы также уступают значительной части других регионов по динамике социальноэкономических показателей. Оба региона имеют небольшую долю в социально экономических показателях округа, прежде всего за счет слабого развития регионов. Это вызывает и снижение этих показателей в расчете на 1 человека по округу. Был выявлен ряд экономических особенностей и географических факторов характерных для причинноследственной связи низкого социальноэкономического положения и развития Республики Бурятия и Забайкальского края по отношению к другим субъектам федерального округа. На примере структуре экономики регионов указано, что наибольшие социальноэкономические показатели имеют регионы с высокой долей промышленности за счет добычи полезных ископаемых. Обозначен ряд факторов, которые сказываются или должны сказываться положительно на развитии новых субъектов в будущем в составе нового федерального округа. Были подсчитаны изменения социальноэкономических показателей для Дальневосточного федерального округа в результате произошедшего изменения его границ. By a decree of the President of the Russian Federation on November 3, the Republic of Buryatia and the TransBaikal Territory became a part of the Far Eastern Federal District. These subjects have their own socioeconomic specifics relatively to other subjects by the structure of economy, the standard of living of the population, and the economic geographical position. One of the main goals of the work was to compare new subjects with other subjects of the Far Eastern Federal District in terms of the economic structure, a socioeconomic situation, and its dynamics. Both regions were found to have similar economic structures with the border regions of the south of the Far East. They have rather low socioeconomic indicators relatively to the overwhelming majority of the subjects of the Russian Federation, and especially among the subjects of the Far Eastern region, being together with the Jewish Autonomous Region among the outsiders. This was calculated by example of one of the comparison coefficients, which shows the degree of socioeconomic development between the subjects of the Federal district. Besides, by example of this coefficient, it was revealed that the regions under consideration conceded a significant part of other regions in the dynamics of socioeconomic indicators. Both regions have a small share in the socioeconomic indicators of the district, primarily because of weak development of the regions. This causes a decrease in these indicators per 1 person in the district. A number of economic features and geographical factors typical of a causal relationship of a low socioeconomic status and development of the Republic of Buryatia and the TransBaikal Territory relatively to other subjects of the Federal district were identified. By example of the structure of regional economy, it is indicated that, the regions with the highest share of industry have the highest socioeconomic indicators at the expense of mining. A number of factors are indicated that affect or should have a positive effect on the development of new subjects in future as part of a new federal district. The changes in socioeconomic indicators for the Far Eastern Federal District that occurred as a result of the change in its borders have been calculated.

Problems of updating the cadaster of stationary anthrax-unfavorable points of the Far Eastern Federal District of the Russian Federation

2021 ◽  
pp. 41-49
Author(s):  
Zorigma Fedorovna Dugarzhapova ◽  
Elena Vladimirovna Kravets ◽  
Mariya Aleksandrovna Ivacheva ◽  
Margarita Valentinovna Chesnokova ◽  
Sergey Vladimirovich Balakhonov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Federal District ◽  
Literary Sources ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Far Eastern ◽  
The Village ◽  
The City ◽  
Official Data

The results of updating the Cadastre of stationary anthrax-unfavorable points in the Russian Federation (2005) and the creation of databases for nine out of 11 subjects of the Far Eastern Federal District (in the Magadan Region and the Chukotka Autonomous District, anthrax was not officially registered) are presented, information on 1285 points has been updated, instead of 1089 previously recorded. For the period 1856–2008 according to official data and literary sources, 8346 heads of animals and 253 people fell ill in nine subjects. The largest share of sick animals (72.3 %) falls on the Republic of Buryatia, and people (45.1 %) — in the Zabaikalsky Territory. The years of manifestation of activity of 99.8 % of permanently unfavorable points for anthrax are known. Most of the new points were formed in 1890–1899 and 1930–1939. Anthrax on the territory of the Far Eastern Federal District was annually recorded from 1910 to 1989. The maximum epizootic activity was noted in the city of Blagoveshchensk in the Amur Region and in the village of Kyren in the Republic of Buryatia. Based on updated information on the former and renamed settlements in accordance with the territorial-administrative division of the country; specified locations of settlements, former collective and state farms, liquidated in the 90s of the twentieth century; data on years of activity, species and number of dead animals and sick people; Determination of the geographical coordinates of the SNP created a database of stationary anthrax-unfavorable points in six regions (Zabaikalsky, Kamchatka, Primorsky and Khabarovsk territories, Jewish Autonomous Okrug, Sakhalin and Amur regions.

scholarly journals Infrastructure zones of economic development of the Far Eastern federal district of Russia

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
А.В. Мошков
Keyword(s):  
Federal District ◽  
Water Area ◽  
Economic Problem ◽  
Infrastructure Development ◽  
Social Infrastructure ◽  
Economic Activities ◽  
Autonomous Region ◽  
Magadan Region ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Far Eastern

Наиболее важной социально-экономической проблемой, стоящей перед регионами Российской Федерации, является низкий уровень развития производственной и социальной инфраструктуры. Слабое развитие инфраструктуры в Дальневосточном федеральном округе в значительной степени ограничивает возможности эффективного использования богатейшего природно-ресурсного потенциала территории и акватории региона. Наличие же развитой инфраструктуры в регионах предоставляет возможности обеспечения необходимого уровня услуг производственным и конечным потребителям, таким образом, во многом определяя пространственное развитие существующих и перспективных видов экономической деятельности. Под влиянием совокупности экономико-географических факторов на территории Дальневосточного федерального округа сложились два типа социально-экономических (инфраструктурных) зон. Во-первых, широтные зоны: 1) северная – в составе Республики Саха (Якутия), Чукотского автономного округа, Магаданской области, Камчатского края; 2) южная – Приморского и Хабаровского краев, Амурской, Сахалинской областей и Еврейской автономной области; 3) юго-западная – Республики Бурятия и Забайкальского края. Во-вторых, меридиональные: 1) прибрежная (Тихоокеанская) в составе Чукотского автономного округа, Магаданской области, Камчатского, Приморского и Хабаровского краев, Сахалинской области; 2) континентальная – Республики Саха (Якутия), Амурской области и Еврейской автономной области, Республики Бурятия и Забайкальского края. Все зоны отличаются по уровню развития инфраструктурных видов экономической деятельности. При этом наиболее высокий уровень развития инфраструктуры отмечается у субъектов южной широтной и прибрежной меридиональной инфраструктурных зон Дальневосточного федерального округа. Внутри инфраструктурных зон выделяются субъекты округа, которые заметно различаются по обеспеченности услугами производственной и социальной инфраструктуры. Повышение качества и уровня жизни населения возможно, в первую очередь, за счет экономического роста в регионах на основе рационального использования имеющихся в регионах благоприятных факторов, в том числе создания развитой инфраструктурной базы для развития всех видов деятельности. The most important socio-economic problem facing the regions of the Russian Federation is the low level of development of industrial and social infrastructure. To a large extent, poor infrastructure development in the far Eastern Federal district limits the ability to effectively use the rich natural resource potential of the region’s territory and water area. The spatial development of existing and prospective economic activities is also largely determined by the availability of infrastructure facilities in the regions and their ability to provide the necessary level of services to production and end users. Under the influence of a combination of economic and geographical factors, two types of socio-economic (infrastructure) zones have developed on the territory of the far Eastern Federal district. First, the latitudinal zone 1) Northern part of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia), Chukotka Autonomous district, Magadan region, Kamchatka region; 2) southern Primorsky, Khabarovsk, Amur, Sakhalin regions and Jewish Autonomous region; 3) southwest – the Republic of Buryatia and Zabaykalsky Krai. Secondly, meridional: 1) coastal (Pacific) – as part of the Chukotka Autonomous Okrug, Magadan region, Kamchatka, Primorsky and Khabarovsk territories, Sakhalin region; 2) continental – the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia), the Amur region and the Jewish Autonomous region, the Republic of Buryatia and the TRANS-Baikal territory. All zones differ in the level of development of infrastructure types of economic activity. At the same time, the highest level of infrastructure development is observed in the subjects of the southern latitudinal and coastal meridional infrastructure zones of the far Eastern Federal district. Within the infrastructure zones, the subjects of the district are distinguished, which differ markedly in the provision of industrial and social infrastructure services. Improving the quality and standard of living of the population is possible primarily due to economic growth in the regions, on the basis of rational use of favorable factors available in the regions, including the creation of a developed infrastructure base for the development of all types of activities.

scholarly journals Scientific support of the rice growing industry of the agroindustrial complex of the Russian Federation in solving the problems of food security

2020 ◽  
Vol 210 ◽  
pp. 05006
Author(s):  
Vugar Bagirov ◽  
Sergey Treshkin ◽  
Andrey Korobka ◽  
Fedor Dereka ◽  
Sergey Garkusha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Federal District ◽  
Industrial Complex ◽  
Scientific Support ◽  
The World ◽  
Federal Districts ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Agroindustrial Complex ◽  
Far Eastern

According to FAOSTAT, in 2018-2019 rice was planted in 118 countries on an area of 167 million hectares, the annual grain production in the world is about 782 million tons. Rice is the most popular cereal in the diet of the Russian consumer. Rice growing is a small but rather important branch of the agro-industrial complex of the Russian Federation. The main rice producers in the world are China (over 214 million tons), India (over 172 million tons), Indonesia (83 million tons), Bangladesh (56 million tons), Vietnam (44 million tons), Thailand (32 million tons) and Myanmar (25 million tons). In the Russian Federation, rice is grown in three federal districts, in nine subjects: in the Southern Federal District - the Republic of Adygea, Kalmykia, Krasnodar, Astrakhan and Rostov Regions; North Caucasian Federal District - Republics of Dagestan and Chechen; Far Eastern Federal District - Primorsky Territory and the Jewish Autonomous Region. Scientific support of the rice-growing industry in the Russian Federation is carried out by the Federal Scientific Rice Centre.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document