scholarly journals On the issue of defining the essence of the object of the intangible cultural heritage: historical retrospective and significance for the development of modern society

2018 ◽  
Vol 55 ◽  
pp. 05009
Author(s):  
Muminat Doguzhaeva ◽  
Nikolai Dorokhov ◽  
Tatiana Kochemasova ◽  
Natalia Nazarenko ◽  
Evgeniya Simaeva

The authors attempt to consider the reflection of the issues of preserving the intangible cultural heritage in the normative legal acts of the Russian Federation in different historical periods. The paper traces the state position in relation to the manifestations of the intangible cultural heritage as to the unique products of the nation with its language and history. The Purpose (the object) of the paper is the following: on the basis of analysis of historical normative material, to consider the current state and forecast possible options for the formation of Russia’s socio-cultural policy with an emphasis on the importance of the intangible cultural heritage.

Author(s):  
Алена Павловна Шишова

В статье рассматривается основной инструмент государственной культурной политики «Стратегия государственной культурной политики на период до 2030 года» и его роль в обеспечении сохранения культурного наследия Российской Федерации. Цель исследования заключается в выявлении значения данного инструмента для обеспечения сохранности памятников культуры Российской Федерации и развития этого сегмента культуры. Автором проанализированы основные положения Стратегии, результаты её влияния на сферу сохранения культурного наследия, обозначены основные проблемы государственного управления в исследуемой сфере. Научная новизна исследования состоит в обобщении результатов работы в сфере культуры в целом и управлении культурным наследием, в частности, а также в выявлении влияния Стратегии на сферу сохранения культурного наследия. The article deals with the main instrument of the State cultural policy «Strategy of the State cultural policy until 2030» and its role in ensuring the preservation of the cultural heritage of the Russian Federation. The author analyses its main provisions and its impact on the preservation of cultural heritage. The article identifies the main problems of public administration in the field of cultural heritage preservation.


2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 114-118
Author(s):  
Ливцов ◽  
Viktor Livtsov

In the article the question of preservation of cultural heritage in the Russian Federation is considered. Special attention is paid to the regional aspect of the problem, using the Orel region as an example. Using data of sociological polls and official statistics, the author substantiates the need to develop a new regional strategy of realization of state cultural policy for the given region.


2020 ◽  
Vol 210 ◽  
pp. 03008
Author(s):  
Nikolay Sarayev ◽  
Svetlana Studenikina

The purpose of this work is to establish and determine, on the basis of a systematic analysis, the factors influencing the state of food security of the Russian Federation, the problems of legal support of national priorities related to food independence. Qualitative and quantitative characteristics of the current state of food security in the Russian Federation are closely related to the criteria for the development of the socio-economic system of the state. An important condition for the effective implementation of national priorities is the normative regulation of the toolkit of state management impact on the threats and risks of food independence. To understand the essence of these problems and minimize their consequences, the authors substantiate the need to study the indicated problem within the framework of the concept of legal dementia. Legal dementia is a state of compliance by subjects of law with the provisions of the law, which is characterized by non-fulfillment to one degree or another by state bodies not only of their functions, but also by the inability to respond, due to a low level of competence and professionalism, to factors that weaken the effectiveness of legal guarantees.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Damir Kh. Valeev ◽  
Anas G. Nuriev ◽  
Rafael V. Shakirjanov

The implementation of the constitutional right to judicial protection is an important guarantee for participants in legal relations in case of violation of the rights of one of the parties or a threat of violation of the rights of participants in legal relations. Judicial protection is of particular relevance for the participants in legal relations, who do not speak the languages in which the administration of justice is carried out. Within the framework of this article, the authors analyze indicators that are designed to, on the one hand, signal on the current state and existing possibilities of implementing the constitutional right to judicial protection in the state languages of the subject of the Russian Federation (statistical function), and, on the other hand, determine growth drivers that can provide language guarantees for the territory of our state, which is defined as a democratic federal legal state according to Art. 1 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation. Within the framework of this article, three indicators are highlighted and analyzed: 1) existing legal potential for the implementation of the constitutional right to judicial protection in civil cases in the state languages of the republics within the Russian Federation; 2) analysis of the practical implementation of the opportunities currently available for the implementation of the constitutional right to judicial protection in civil cases in the state languages of the republics within the Russian Federation; 3) determination of growth points in the implementation of the constitutional right to judicial protection in civil cases in the state languages of the republics within the Russian Federation


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 39-46
Author(s):  
O. V. Boltinova

The paper is devoted to financial control exercised over the implementation of “megasience” class scientific projects. In order to create an innovative economy, the State continues to develop research and development, in particular the creation of unique projects of the “megasience” class. Funding for such studies is usually carried out from budgets of various levels of the Russian Federation’s budgetary system as part of priority national projects or federal programs. Therefore, state financial control over the effective and targeted use of funds of the budgets of the budget system of the Russian Federation gains importance. The paper discusses the current conditions of state financial control over the implementation of scientific projects of the “megasience” class, defines the list of subjects possessing the powers of both internal and external state financial control, highlights their differences and characteristics. The author carries out the analysis of monitoring as one of the activities of the Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation, where emphasis is made on budgetary monitoring. The paper analyzes problems and shortcomings in the implementation of state financial control over the scientific projects. It also describes the features of the current state of state financial control and highlights tendencies of its development and improvement.


10.12737/5373 ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 168-183
Author(s):  
Маргарита Романова ◽  
Margarita Romanova ◽  
Екатерина Танеева ◽  
Ekaterina Taneeva

The article studies the genesis of Russian education post the adoption of the Constitution of the Russian federation. The authors provide an evaluation of the current state of Russian education and present their personal view of the educational system improvement. The content analysis of strategic documentation – namely, the State of the Nation – reveals that the Russian Federation lacks a consistent and routinely functioning education development concept, moreover, its model is seen by the authors as incomplete. The authors conclude that it is necessary to Russian-identity-focused system of education aimed at an identification of personnel potential and the state support of continuous education.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 29-40
Author(s):  
Sergey N. Komissarov ◽  
Vladimir M. Soldatov

The article analyzes the practical experience of the participation of the authors of the article in the development and implementation of the republican program for the implementation of the state cultural policy in the Republic of Dagestan. In terms of methodology, the analysis is based on the concept of regional cultural policy previously developed for this program in this subject of the Russian Federation (RF). It takes into account the most important provisions of the approved presidential "Fundamentals of the State Cultural Policy" in 2014, the government "Strategies of the State Cultural Policy for the period until 2030" in 2016, as well as other documents of strategic planning and programming of culture in the Russian Federation. The study showed that these documents require a significant update of the main components of cultural development programs in the regions of the Russian Federation. In this connection, the greatest attention is paid to the authors of the new goals and objectives of the state cultural policy in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, as well as indicators (indicators) of evaluating the effectiveness of implementing regional programs in general, the effectiveness of achieving goals and solving problems in its main areas (sub-programs), in particular.


PIG-BREEDING ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 9-11
Author(s):  
A.A. NOVIKOV ◽  
◽  
E.N. SUSLINA ◽  
D.G. SHICHKIN ◽  
M.G. DUNINA ◽  
...  

An analysis of the state of breeding work in pig-breeding was carried out. The characteristics of the existing organizational structure of pig breeding in the Russian Federation are given, its shortcomings are shown taking into account the zoning of the location of selection and genetic centers. Technological disadvantages of operation of selection-genetic and selection-hybrid centers have been revealed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 458-485
Author(s):  
Irina Ilina ◽  
◽  
Andrey Klypin

Introduction. The article is devoted to the study of the current state of the research and development sector in the Russian Federation during the transition from the first to the second stage of the implementation of the Strategy for the Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Federation. In addition, the authors also prepare proposals for improving the state scientific and technical policies. Methods. This paper employs theoretical methods, including non-comparative and comparative analysis, cognitive synthesis, abstraction and concretization, systemic approach and structural-functional method. Results and Discussion. The paper presents the dynamics of changes in the key indicators of scientific and technical activity in the Russian Federation as well as significant risks and threats/challenges constraining scientific and technical activities, which are divided into two groups: organisational and economic (internal) challenges and global technological (external) challenges. The main research results are: a set of measures in the framework of the state scientific and technological policy, ensuring the further scientific and technological development of the Russian Federation, including the improvement of the public administration system through the development of mechanisms for financing research and development; creation of favourable conditions for involving enterprises of the real economy and other companies in all stages of research and development; creation of an integrated system for assessing scientific, research and technology results; introduction of a holistic system to support scientific, research, technological and innovation activities, providing targeted support at every stage of the innovation life cycle; introduction and development of the mechanism of scientific diplomacy in Russia; development of science and technology at the regional level; development of mechanisms for involving qualified personnel to scientific activities; development of a holistic system of expertise, monitoring and forecasting for scientific, research and technological activities. Conclusion. Results of this research substantiate the assertion that such areas as science, technology and innovation should operate as a whole structure integrated into the socio-economic system of the country and ensuring the technological selfsufficiency and competitiveness of the national economy.


Author(s):  
Vera V. Novoselskaya ◽  

Nowadays, one of the most urgent tasks of the socio-cultural policy of the Russian Federation is to solve the problems of preservation and actualization of the cultural heritage as an important factor in the spiritual and material life of people. The study emphasizes that the issues of preservation and the development of the cultural heritage have always been significant for Russia and the Crimea. So, these issues have become particularly relevant as a result of the events of 2014 − the reunification of the Crimea with Russia and the introduction of various measures against the Crimean Republic of “anctions” nature, which caused an active search for additional resources for the regional development – including the field of culture. According to the developed approach of this article, the cultural heritage can be not only an integral part of history in modern conditions, as well as the Keeper of spirituality, etc., but also a source of the development of territories. At the same time, the author emphasizes that the cultural heritage itself, without “the involvement” in a variety of socio-cultural practices, cannot be a factor of the regional development. Particular attention is paid to the assessment of the regulatory framework of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Crimea in terms of preservation, the usage and the promotion of the cultural heritage. The author notes that this practical importance of the cultural heritage as a resource acquires in the relevant social and constructive practices, and above all – in tourism, are increasingly supported by the point of view in the domestic expert cultural community. The article describes the features of the representation of the cultural heritage of the Crimea. The author provides a description and analysis the number of measures that can attract the cultural heritage to the tourist activities of the region. At the same time, the author notes a certain positive effect of the use of the cultural heritage as a resource of tourism, draws attention to a number of problems that require the consideration and the solution. The conclusions emphasize that the cultural heritage and tourism are interrelated elements of the socio-cultural sphere. However, if the cultural heritage is considered as a resource for the development of territories at the level of the Federal legislation, then the usage of the cultural heritage will be still fragmented in practice. It has a mosaic character, and so it needs to be formed a systematic, interdepartmental approach. Therefore, there is an urgent need to create special platforms for the interaction of the government and the business nowadays in Russia and in its regions, including the Republic of Crimea. It is necessary to use mechanisms of the inter-sectoral coordination between tourism agencies and cultural entities, the purpose of which should be to support and to present a holistic socio-cultural environment of the territories through the implementation of their cultural potential, by means of tourist activities as well.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document