scholarly journals THE EFFECT OF WORK ENVIRONTMENT ON TEACHERS’ PERFORMANCE AT SMA NEGERI 1 DULUPI

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-233
Author(s):  
Nur Rahmi

This study was conducted to determine how much the Physical Work Environment (X1), Non-Physical Work Environment (X2) affect, both simultaneously and partially, teachers’ performance (Y) at SMA Negeri 1 Dulupi. This study used quantitative method and the data collection was carried out by using a questionnaire instrument. The analysis techniques used in this study was Path Analysis. From the research results, it was found that the Physical Work Environment and Non-Physical Work Environment simultaneously affected teachers’ performance (Y) at SMA Negeri 1 Dulupi with a value of 0.715 (71.5%). The Fcount showed a result of 14.268 while the Ftable was 3.25 and the probability sig 0.000 < probability ɑ = 0.05. This means that at the 95% confidence level, the Work Environment variable (X), which consists of the Physical Work Environment (X1) and the Non-Physical Work Environment (X2), has a positive and significant effect on Teachers’ Performance (Y). Partially, the physical work environment has a positive and significant effect on teachers’ performance of 0.619 (61.9%), and the non-physical work environment partially has a positive and significant effect on teachers’ performance of 0.247 (24.7%).

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 198-210
Author(s):  
Gunarso Wiwoho

This study aims to examine and analyze the influence of organizational culture, servant leadership, and non-physical work environment on motivation and job performance in employees of the Central Bureau of Statistics of Kebumen Regency. Data collection is done by a questionnaire using a 4 Likert scale option. The population of this study is the total number of employees, namely 44 employees. Sampling techniques with saturated sampling techniques or all employees as research respondents. Data analysis techniques using descriptive analysis techniques and statistics include validity test, reliability test, classic assumption test, hypothesis test, correlation analysis, and path analysis (path analysis) with the help of SPSS for windows version 23.0. The results of this study namely organizational culture have no effect on motivation. Servant leadership has a positive and significant effect on motivation. The non-physical work environment has a positive and significant effect on motivation. Organizational culture has a positive and significant effect on job performance. Servant leadership does not affect job performance. Non-physical work environment does not affect job performance, and Motivation has a positive and significant effect on job performance.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-179
Author(s):  
Sahat Parulian ◽  
Ahmad Hidayat Sutawijaya

This study aims to determine and clarify the effect of work environment and work motivation for workload and its implementation on employee performance. Respondents 67 employees (entire population). Data collection is done through interviews and questionnaires. Data were analyzed using path analysis (SmartPls 3.0 software) and correlation matrix between dimensions (SmartPls 3.0 software). The results showed that: (1) Work Environment and Motivation both partially and simultaneously affect Employee Performance; (2) Work environment, motivation and workload both partially and simultaneously affect employee performance; (3) Workload mediates the work environment and motivation on performance. Based on the analysis of the correlation matrix between dimensions, to improve the Work Environment, which has a positive correlation with Workload, it is recommended to maintain and improve the dimensions of Non-Physical Work Environment and also for employee performance also to improve the Physical Environment dimension. To increase motivation, which has a positive correlation with workload, it is recommended to maintain and improve hygiene. And for employee performance that is increasing the dimensions of intrinsic appreciation. To increase the workload that has a positive correlation with employee performance it is advisable to maintain and improve the dimensions of frustration


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 119
Author(s):  
Dewi Fitriani ◽  
Nurlaela Nurlaela ◽  
Dirarini Sudarwadi

The research objective is to examine the effect of physical work environment, non-physical work environment and work discipline on employee performance. This type of research is quantitative. Data analysis using multiple linear regression, R2 test, t test, and F test. Respondents were teachers of SMK Negeri 1 Manokwari, using saturated sample techniques with a sample of 45 employees. The results showed that partially the physical work environment variable had no effect on performance, as evidenced by the results of the t test which showed a significance value greater than 0.05 (0.449), non-physical work environment variables did not affect performance as evidenced by the t test results indicating significant value greater than 0.05 (0.961) and the results of the t test on work discipline variables affect performance, as evidenced by a significant value smaller than 0.05 (0,000). Simultaneously that physical work environment, non physical work environment, work discipline have a significant effect on performance, as evidenced by the F test, a significant value of 0,000 is smaller than 0.05 (0,000).  


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-84
Author(s):  
Titi Kurniati ◽  
Jaenab Jaenab

This study aims to find out how much influence the Physical Work Environment on Employee Job Satisfacion (Study of the Bima City Library Departement employees). While the formulation of the problem of this research is whether the Work Environment affects the Employee Job Satisfacion (Study of the Bima City library staff). The research instrument used a questionnaire. The type of research  used Associative, this study was conducted at the Bima City Library Office, the population in this study was a total of 43 employees and the sample used in this study amounted to 30 employees using purposive sampling technique (sampling based on criteria). Data analysis used is a simple linear regression analysis using the equation, namely: Y = a + bx. The results of the initial analysis show that the indicators used are valid for measuring existing variables. The result of subsequent analyzes show that the Physical Work Environment variable influences the regression coefficient of 0.752Keywords: Physical Work Environment, Employee Job Satisfacion


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 2536
Author(s):  
Komang Alit Bagus Putra Pratame ◽  
I Wayan Suana

Job satisfaction is a person's perspective both positive and negative about their work. The purpose of the study was to examine the effect of the non-physical work environment on intrinsic motivation and job satisfaction of PT. Wibisana Marine Adventure. 48 people used as samples, with saturated sampling method. Data collected through interviews and questionnaires and analyzed using Path analysis. The results of this study found that the non-physical work environment had a positive and significant effect on intrinsic motivation. Non-physical work environment has a positive and significant effect on employee job satisfaction. Intrinsic motivation has a positive and significant effect on employee job satisfaction. The implication of the results of this study is that when the non-physical work environment obtained by employees increases intrinsic motivation, the intrinsic motivation felt by employees becomes stronger so that it has the potential to increase job satisfaction. Keywords: non physical work environment, intrinsic motivation, job satisfaction


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 351-354
Author(s):  
Srie Hartati ◽  
Rafida Khairan ◽  
Manda Dwipayani Bhastary ◽  
Emilia Embun Sari

The success of an organization is inseparable from the quality of human resources that the organization has. Work achievement deserves a look in support of the achievement of organization goals. The main focus in this study is to analyze the effect of work placement, motivation and non-physical work environment on teacher work performance at Budisatrya Foundation. Data collection using questionnaires. The results of the study showed that all variables of work placement, motivation and non-physical work environment significantly affected the teacher's work performance. The variable that has the greatest influence in improving work performance is the non-physical work environment. The implications of the findings suggest that the variables of work placement, motivation and non-physical work environment that exist at Foundation Budisatrya have been excellent. Especially the emotional connection between the teacher and the foundation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Zaharuddin Zaharuddin ◽  
Adeng Gunawan

The Effect of Compensation and Physical Work Environment on Employee Performance Through Job Satisfaction As Intervening Variables in PD. Center Optikal Serang. This study aims to determine the effect of compensation and physical work environment on employee performance through job satisfaction as intervening variable in PD. Center Optikal Serang. The sample in this study as many as 50 respondents taken by census of the total population of employees in the PD. Center Optikal Serang  . The method of analysis used in this study is path analysis (path analysis) by testing the t-statistics. The analyzer uses SEM-PLS Version software. 20. The results showed that the compensation did not affect the employee's performance because t statistics (1,421 1,96) and p values (0,162) 0,05. Compensation has a significant effect on job satisfaction because the statistical t value (6,855) 1,96) and p values (0,000) 0,05. The physical work environment has no effect on satisfaction due to the statistical t value (0.846) 1.96), as well as the p values (0.401) 0.05. the physical work environment has an effect on the employee's performance because the statistic t value (2,83 6 1,96) and p values (0,007 0,05) job satisfaction influence to employee performance because of t statistic value (3,198) 1,96). Similarly, the value of p values (0.002) 0.05.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 16-26
Author(s):  
Siti Kusandhitasari Jayaningrum ◽  
Kusuma Chandra Kirana ◽  
Gendro Wiyono

Penelitian bertujuan untuk menganalisa : (1) pengaruh kompetensi terhadap kinerja (2) pengaruh kompensasi terhadap kinerja (3) pengaruh lingkungan kerja non fisik terhadap kinerja (4) lingkungan kerja non fisik memoderasi pengaruh kompetensi terhadap kinerja, dan (5) lingkungan kerja non fisik memoderasi pengaruh kompensasi terhadap kinerja. Penelitian adalah kuantitatif dengan metode survey. Pengumpulan data menggunakan kuesioner dengan uji validitas dan reliabilitas. Metode analisis data adalah deskriptif dan inferensial. Hasil penelitian untuk signifikansi 5% : (1) kompetensi berpengaruh terhadap kinerja dengan P Values = 0,001 (2) kompensasi berpengaruh pada kinerja dengan P Values = 0,033 (3) lingkungan kerja non fisik tidak berpengaruh pada kinerja karena P Values = 0,168 (4) lingkungan kerja non fisik tidak memoderasi pengaruh kompetensi terhadap kinerja karena P Values = 0,797 dan Original Sample (O) = 0,038 (5) lingkungan kerja non fisik tidak memoderasi pengaruh kompensasi terhadap kinerja karena P Values = 0,325 dan Original Sample (O) = -0,099   The research aims to analyze: (1) the effect of competence on performance (2) the effect of compensation on performance (3) the influence of non-physical work environment on performance (4) non-physical work environment moderates the effect of competence on performance, and (5) non-physical work environment moderates the effect of compensation on performance. This research is quantitative with a survey method. The data collection uses a questionnaire with validity and reliability tests. The data analysis methods are descriptive and inferential. The results of the study for significance of 5%: (1) competence influences performance with P Values = 0.001 (2) compensation influences performance with P Values = 0.033 (3) non-physical work environment has no effect on performance because P Values = 0.168 (4) non- physical work environment does not moderate the effect of competence on performance because P Values = 0.797 and Original Sample (O) = 0.038 (5) non-physical work environment does not moderate the effect of compensation on performance because P Values = 0.325 and Original Sample (O) = -0.099


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 5928
Author(s):  
Ni Wayan Putri Gresida ◽  
I Wayan Mudiartha Utama

The purpose of this study is to explain the influence of communication, motivation, and physical work environment on employee work discipline. This research was conducted at the Warung Mina Peguyangan Denpasar Branch. The number of samples taken was 45 employees, with a saturated sampling method. Data collection is done through interviews and questionnaires. The analysis technique used is multiple linear regression. Based on the results of the analysis show that communication, motivation, and physical work environment have a positive and significant effect on employee work discipline. The Peguyangan Denpasar Branch Mina Warung is expected to pay more attention to fellow employees' communication, improve the health care of their employees, such as providing health insurance, and arranging rooms so that employees feel comfortable at work. Room arrangement will make it easier for employees to do work quickly, accurately, and accurately to help improve employee work discipline. Keywords: communication, motivation, physical work environment, work discipline


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-114
Author(s):  
Anisa Yani ◽  
Karona Cahya Susena ◽  
Mimi Kurnia Nengsih

The purpose of the study is to determine the employee performance in the Regional Office of the Ministry of  Law and Human Rights (HAM) in Bengkulu. This research is a qualitative study, the informants used in this study were 5 employees of the Regional Office of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights (HAM) in Bengkulu, the data collection techniques used were interviews and the analytical method used was descriptive analysis method. The results of this study indicate that leadership factors can improve the employee performance in the Regional Office of the Ministry of  Law and Human Rights (HAM) in Bengkulu, because the leader always maintains good relations with his subordinates and always cooperates, besides that the leader also provides direction and support in working therefore employees can improve their performance. Motivation factor that can be done by the Regional Office of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights (HAM) in Bengkulu by providing supervision to its employees and also providing job guarantees by way of promotion. A safe and comfortable work environment will improve employee performance, as well as in the the Regional Office of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights (HAM) in Bengkulu. The work environment provided is a physical and non-physical work environment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document