scholarly journals GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (2(67)) ◽  
pp. 176-182
Author(s):  
V.K. SYMONENKO
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Civil Society ◽  
Economic System ◽  
Public Administration ◽  
National Economy ◽  
Management System ◽  
The State ◽  
State Administration ◽  
National Economic ◽  
Socio Economic Development

Topicality. The processes of the reforming and transforming of the state administration system in the country, which have been going on for more than a quarter of a century and do not lead to a significant increase in the level of well-being and do not allow to achieve even the values of indicators of socio-economic development of the 1991th year’s level, determine the relevance of the development of conceptual and scientific- methodological approaches to the organization of management system and public administration in the national economy. The main conceptual idea is to determine the direction of further socio-economic development of society and to regulate the transformation of the national economy management system on the basis of the prevalence of the actual significance and effectiveness of the system of state administration over the fact of its functioning for the sake of its own existence.Aim and tasks. The purpose of the article is to determine the conceptual framework for the regulation of transformation processes in the system of public administration and management in order to effectively influence the changes in national economic system and facilitate its restructuring from the raw material type to the economic system oriented on creation of the maximum possible value added.Research results. The interrelation and interdependency of the power and the system of public administration are analysed. It is defined the character and degree of influence of civil society on political and socio-economical processes which take place in the state. The essence of problems of real democratization processes in society reducing and the emphasis on arising threats that are caused by alignment of the reform processes and the failure of the tasks fulfill for the transformation of the economic system are analyzed and solved.The threat of curtailment of the processes of democratization and attainment of objects of radical socio-economical reforms going on in the country are emphasized. The specific measures on forming of civil society as an active state governor and on creation of effective system of public administration and regulation are justified and proposed. The appropriateness and validity of the proposed regulatory measures has been proved.Conclusions. It is established that one of the necessary and priority tasks is to maintain and create conditions for the rise of civil society sprouts in our country and for developed civil society establishment, which will become the basis and the key to successful implementation of the public administration reform, and will facilitate the efficiency of state power, will increase the welfare of the population. It is also necessary to support political will and aspirations of political elites to build an effective national economic system.

INCREASING THE COMPETITIVENESS OF THE NATIONAL ECONOMY THROUGH THE CREATION OF AN INNOVATION SYSTEM

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (10) ◽  
pp. 76-82
Author(s):  
A. L. Poltarykhin ◽  
◽  
M. A. Ponomarev ◽  
S. V. Nikolaev ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Economic System ◽  
National Economy ◽  
Innovation System ◽  
Innovative Development ◽  
National Economic ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
Main Factors ◽  
The Creation

The article discusses increasing the competitiveness of the national economy based on the creation of an innovation system. One of the main factors in increasing competitiveness is the innovative development of economic entities. The lag in innovative development prevents the emergence of technological industries within the country and restrains the socio-economic development of the national economic system.

scholarly journals ON THE NEED TO IMPLEMENT THE PRINCIPLE OF "FORMATION OF A LABOR INCENTIVE PROGRAM" OF F. TAY-LOR'S SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT SYS-TEM IN MODERN CONDITIONS OF SO-CIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (27) ◽  
pp. 13-27
Author(s):  
A.V. Tebekin ◽  
◽  
A.P. Taburchak ◽  
V.S. Petrov ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Economic System ◽  
National Economy ◽  
Management System ◽  
Scientific Management ◽  
Economic Systems ◽  
Incentive Program ◽  
Condi Tions ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
Labor Incentive

The article presents the results of a study of the processes of implementing the principle of "formation of a labor incentive program" of the F. Taylor scientific management system, formed to manage enterprises as socio-economic systems of the microeconomic level, in relation to the modern macroeco-nomic system of socio-economic develop-ment at the state (national economy) level. The features of the implementation of the principle of the "labor incentive program" in the implementation of the processes of managing the socio-economic development of Russia both in conditions of nominal eco-nomic stability and in objectively crisis condi-tions of management are demonstrated. The problems of implementation of the principle of "formation of the labor incentive program" in the management of the national socio-economic system in modern conditions are analyzed, and proposals are formulated to ensure its implementation.

scholarly journals THREATS AND RISKS OF INTEGRATED RURAL DEVELOPMENT: THE STATE AND WAYS TO OVERCOME

2021 ◽  
pp. 8-23
Author(s):  
Л.Н. Усенко ◽  
А.Н. Тарасов ◽  
Юй. Сунь
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Rural Development ◽  
Public Administration ◽  
Economic Planning ◽  
The State ◽  
Development Methodology ◽  
Integrated Rural Development ◽  
National Economic ◽  
Socio Economic Development

В статье изложены результаты исследования факторов, влияющих на эффектив-ность государственного управления комплексным развитием сельских территорий. Де-лается вывод о целесообразности внедрения в практику государственного управления социально-экономическим развитием методологии и инструментов народно-хо-зяйственного планирования. The article outlines the results of a study of factors that affect the effectiveness of public administration in integrated rural development. It is concluded that it is appropriate to introduce in the practice of public administration socio-economic development methodology and tools of national economic planning.

Manajemen Ekonomi Outopilot: Kegagalan Negara Mencari Identitas?

Liquidity ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 142-152
Author(s):  
Mukhaer Pakkanna
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
National Economy ◽  
The State ◽  
Political Democracy ◽  
Economic Democracy ◽  
Quality Of Democracy ◽  
Economic Disparities ◽  
National Economic ◽  
Production And Distribution

Political democracy should be equivalent to the economic development of the quality of democracy, economic democracy if not upright, even the owner of the ruling power and money, which is parallel to force global corporatocracy. Consequently, the economic oligarchy preservation reinforces control of production and distribution from upstream to downstream and power monopoly of the market. The implication, increasingly sharp economic disparities, exclusive owner of the money and power become fertile, and the end could jeopardize the harmony of the national economy. The loss of national economic identity that makes people feel lost the “pilot of the state”. What happens then is the autopilot state. Viewing unclear direction of the economy, the national economy should clarify the true figure.

scholarly journals The Application of Gamification in Public Administration (the Technological Potential)

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 18-22
Author(s):  
Aleksandr V. Averin ◽  
◽  
Irina V. Pogodina ◽  
Danila A. Avdeev ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Civil Society ◽  
Public Administration ◽  
The State ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
Technological Potential ◽  
State Administration ◽  
Governance Processes

Governments are showing an interest in, or incorporating, gamification into their governance processes and/or services to citizens. The article describes the concept of gamification, examines its potential from the point of view of using elements of the game in public administration, for example, on the websites of authorities and special platforms, as well as in offline mode. The conclusion is made about the goals of introducing gamification into the practice of public authorities. The state administration can not only be the author of these projects, but also assist civil society institutions (public associations, citizens) in their development.

scholarly journals Features of construction of the model socially oriented national economy

2020 ◽  
pp. 48-55
Author(s):  
Оlena Golovnya ◽  
Iryna Kinash
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Public Sector ◽  
Economic System ◽  
National Economy ◽  
State Regulation ◽  
The State ◽  
Social Orientation ◽  
Economic Mechanism

The background of the development of the model of economic development of Ukraine in the context of social orientation has been analyzed taking into account the interdependent influence of the mechanism of market relations and economic policy of the state. It is researched that the economic mechanism of socially oriented market economy contains organizational structure of production (vertical and horizontal), specific forms of functioning of economic system (state and non-state regulation of the market), as well as a specific institutional base (including its legislative component). The constituents of the economic system are entities formed by large economic entities (eg financial corporations). The authors argue that the economic mechanism of a socially oriented national economy is a complex structure and system of interconnections and includes: a) a system of balanced markets; b) public sector of economy; c) large economic structures that fulfill the regulatory role of the state for the economy as a whole and at the same time increase the market sensitivity to medium and long-term programs of its development; d) public sector administrative and production subsystem; e) system of operative state regulation of economy; e) a budget-balancing system with a powerful core; g) regulatory framework governing mid-market processes. The study states that Ukraine, in rather difficult conditions, produces the parameters of its own national model of socio-economic development for the long term. The country has not yet formulated or implemented an effective model of economic development that would fully reflect its national characteristics and interests and become a macroeconomic basis for effective state regulation It is determined that in the conditions of construction of a new model of the national economy the role of non-governmental and charitable organizations is increasing. The role of non-governmental organizations, which represent one of the most optimal legal forms to assist citizens in solving their common problems, upholding common interests, is a compulsory attribute of the model of socially oriented national economy.

scholarly journals ARCHITECTONICS OF BUDGET MECHANISM OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE STATE

2018 ◽  
pp. 45-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoryana LOBODINA
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Public Administration ◽  
State Regulation ◽  
The State ◽  
Practical Application ◽  
Leading Role ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
Scientific Approach ◽  
The Relationship

Introduction. The need to neutralize the threats to Ukraine's national security requires review of the priorities of public administration. Given the leading role of the budget as the imperative dominant of the system of state regulation of socio-economic development, the use of which is linked to the practical application of the budget mechanism of the socio-economic development of the state, the feasibility of modernizing the said mechanism is beyond doubt. The above circumstances determine the indisputable relevance of the study of the architecture of the budget mechanism and the search for ways to improve its structure, the integration of financial methods, forms, tools and instruments. Purposes. The purpose of the article is to formulate its own scientific approach to the structuring of the budget mechanism of the socio-economic development of the state, the characteristics of its elements and the relationship between them. Results.The result of the study proved that the optimal combination of elements of the budget mechanism allows the state to effectively influence the socio-economic processes, ensuring the functioning and development of the national economy, affordable and quality public services to the population, solving social problems and others. So in terms of transformation of budgetary relations and orientation of public finance to economic growth and improving public welfare scientific approaches to structuring the budget mechanism require revisionand clarification. Conclusion. Taking into account the directions of budget resources movement, the budget mechanism of the socio-economic development of the state proposes to distinguish two main subsystems: the mechanism of budget funds formation and the mechanism of using budget funds. In each of the subsystems, financial methods, forms, tools, levers are distinguished and characterized in the context of providing the architectural budget mechanism.

scholarly journals ESSENCE AND CHARACTERISTIC OF INSTITUTIONAL TRANSFORMATIONS AND INSTITUTIONAL CHANGES

2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 107-113
Author(s):  
L. V. Borovskaya
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Economic System ◽  
Bifurcation Point ◽  
National Economy ◽  
Institutional Environment ◽  
Institutional Changes ◽  
Social And Economic Development ◽  
Socio Economic Development ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Republic

The structure of the national model of social and economic development is considered in the composition of types and subtypes of the economic system, taking into account the types of macroeconomic policy and the sector of the national economy, the nature of institutional transformations and institutional changes in the national economy is described, types of modern transformations or choice of alternative development options are identified. The difference between institutional changes and institutional transformations is revealed, namely institutional transformations and institutional changes are associated with the replacement of institutions, but it is the result of the former that the institutions that predetermine the functioning of the main components (predetermining attributes) of the economic system are replaced. It has been established that as a result of institutional transformations, changes take place in the system-forming institutions that predetermine the nature and characteristics of social and economic development. The transformations that took place or are potentially possible are determined in the context of the problem of managing the socio-economic development of the Republic of Crimea. It is determined that in the case of institutional transformations, there is necessarily a specific bifurcation point, characterized by the occurrence of a certain event or group of events, and is the starting platform for a specific institutional transformation. A scheme of various variants (scenarios) of the passage of the bifurcation point in the process of development of the national economy under the influence of external and internal factors is constructed, and changes in the states of development of the national economy during the passage of the bifurcation point are determined. The internal critical instability of the current state of development of the national economy has been studied. It is determined that institutional changes without the flow of institutional transformations represent a combination of the replacement of institutions in certain areas or spheres of socio-economic development. At the same time, the bifurcation point is absolutely not an obligatory condition, as a result of which institutional changes can take place constantly, thus constantly modernizing the institutional environment, taking into account new agreements, decision-making features and many other factors.

scholarly journals ФОРМУВАННЯ ЕФЕКТИВНОЇ СИСТЕМИ УПРАВЛІННЯ ЕКОНОМІКОЮ - ВЕКТОР СУЧАСНИХ РЕФОРМ В УЗБЕКИСТАНІ

2021 ◽  
pp. 45-55
Author(s):  
Алішер Файзійович Расулев ◽  
Сергій Олексанрович Воронін
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
National Economy ◽  
Management System ◽  
The State ◽  
Economic Research ◽  
Human Potential ◽  
Economic Management ◽  
Management Reform ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Market Relations

Formulation of the problem. The use of an effective economic management system allows you to create favorable conditions for achieving long-term economic growth at minimal costs. The purpose of the study is to study foreign experience of economic management reform, review the course of administrative reform in the Republic of Uzbekistan and, on the basis of available data, develop recommendations for the national economy. The subject of this research is the development of the management system of the national economy in the context of the transition to full-fledged market relations. Methods of economic research - system analysis, generalization, scientific abstraction, historical and logical method, classification, etc. The hypothesis of the research is that currently the main vector of reforms in Uzbekistan is optimization and increasing the efficiency of the economic management system. The use of market and administrative instruments will improve the quality parameters of economic development, create conditions for increasing the competitiveness of the economy. Presentation of the main material. The main features of the management reform in various countries of the world are revealed, an analysis of the reform of the national economy management system is made, recommendations for the transition to a full-fledged market are substantiated. The originality and practical significance of the study is that it systematizes the main approaches to the reform of economic management, studies the features of management reform in the Republic of Uzbekistan, substantiates recommendations for increasing its efficiency in the period of overcoming the consequences of forced restrictions and for the future. The conclusions of the study are that “market mechanisms” are just one of many necessary tools to achieve the goals of the country's socio-economic development. Therefore, it is necessary to clearly “outline the boundaries” in which areas the state should introduce market relations, in which to regulate activities and in which - to produce or provide services. When developing a new system of economic management, it is necessary to include tasks for both the development of market institutions and administrative procedures. When carrying out the privatization of enterprises engaged in the extraction of minerals and their primary processing, the controlling stake must be retained by the state. The main resource of the country is the accumulated human potential, which requires special attention from the state during the reform process. The new economic management system must be ready to respond promptly to internal and external challenges

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document