scholarly journals PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF DENGAN PENDEKATAN NUMBERED HEAD TOGETHER DAN MOTIVASI BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR SISWA

Sigma ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 148
Author(s):  
Abd Fatah
Keyword(s):  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
Vocational School ◽  
Research Subjects ◽  
High Learning ◽  
School Students ◽  
Cooperative Model ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
The Subject

The objectives of this study are: 1) To determine the differences in learning outcomes shown by students who learn using the NHT-type cooperative model and conventional learning on the learning outcomes of vocational school students in Sampang on the subject of financial mathematics (annuity). 2) the difference in learning outcomes shown by students who have high learning motivation with students who have low learning motivation towards learning outcomes of vocational school students in Sampang on the subject of annuity. 3) To determine the interaction between the use of the cooperative learning model type NHT and conventional learning, as well as student motivation on learning outcomes of vocational students in Sampang on the subject of annuity. This type of research is an experiment with research subjects of class XII students, the instruments are tests and questionnaires. The homogeneity of the research subjects was tested by using the independent sample test. Data normality was tested with one sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov. Hypothesis testing uses two way ANOVA by displaying the average value of descriptive statistics as a level of differentiation. Based on the results of the study it can be concluded that: 1) There are differences in learning outcomes shown by students who learn using the NHT type cooperative model and accepted conventional learning with a significance level of 0.000 (<0.05). The highest mean is found in the NHT type learning model which in total obtained results of 89.27. 2). There are differences in learning outcomes shown by students who have high learning motivation with students who have low learning motivation who are accepted with a significance level of 0.000 (<0.05). The highest mean is found in high learning motivation, which in total is 88.84. 3) There is a significant interaction between the NHT type learning model, conventional and learning motivation on student learning outcomes on the subject of annuities received at a significance level of 0.001 (<0.05). While the highest mean is found in the interaction between the NHT type learning model with learning motivation of 89.74.

scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN DAN MOTIVASI BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR KOMPUTER KETERAMPILAN DAN PENGELOLAAN INFORMASI (KKPI)

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
Astuty Sriwahyuni Tarigan ◽  
Abdul Hamid K ◽  
Efendi Napitupulu
Keyword(s):  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Student Motivation ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
High Learning ◽  
Model Learning ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Drill And Practice

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk: (1) Mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar KKPI siswa yang diajarkan dengan model pembelajaran tutorial dan model pembelajaran drill and practice. (2) Mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar KKPI siswa dengan motivasi belajar tinggi dan motivasi belajar rendah. (3) Mengetahui interaksi antara model pembelajaran dengan motivasi belajar siswa terhadap hasil belajar KKPI. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuasi eksperimen. Hasil analisis data diperoleh; (1) hasil belajar KKPI siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan media pembelajaran drill and practice lebih tinggi daripada hasil belajar KKPI siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan model pembelajaran tutorial. Hal ini ditunjukkan Fhitung = 114,59 dan Ftabel = 4,01 untuk taraf signifikansi ∝=0.05 dengan derajat dk (1,56). (2) hasil belajar KKPI siswa yang memiliki motivasi belajar tinggi lebih tinggi daripada hasil belajar KKPI siswa dengan motivasi belajar rendah. Hal ini ditunjukkan Fhitung = 167,04 dan Ftabel = 4,01 untuk taraf signifikansi ∝=0.05 dengan derajat dk (1.56), dan (3) terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan motivasi belajar siswa dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar KKPI. Hal ini ditunjukkan Fhitung = 16,82 dan Ftabel = 4,01 untuk taraf signifikansi ∝=0.05 dengan derajat dk (1,56). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar KKPI, model pembelajaran drill and practice tepat digunakan bagi siswa yang memiliki motivasi belajar tinggi. Siswa yang memiliki motivasi belajar rendah lebih efektif dibelajarkan dengan model pembelajaran tutorial. Kata Kunci: Model Pembelajaran, Motivasi Belajar, Hasil Belajar KKPI  Abstract: This study aims to: (1) Know the differences in KKPI learning outcomes of students taught with tutorial learning models and drill and practice learning models. (2) Knowing the differences in learning outcomes of KKPI students with high learning motivation and low learning motivation. (3) Determine the interaction between the learning model and student learning motivation towards KKPI learning outcomes. This research is a quasi-experimental research. The results of data analysis are obtained; (1) KKPI learning outcomes of students taught with drill and practice learning media are higher than KKPI learning outcomes of students who are taught with tutorial learning models. This is indicated by Fcount = 114.59 and Ftable = 4.01 for the significance level ∝ = 0.05 with degrees dk (1.56). (2) KKPI learning outcomes of students who have high learning motivation are higher than KKPI learning outcomes of students with low learning motivation. This is indicated by Fcount = 167.04 and Ftable = 4.01 for the significance level ∝ = 0.05 with degrees dk (1.56), and (3) there is an interaction between learning models and student motivation in influencing KKPI learning outcomes. This is indicated by Fcount = 16.82 and Ftable = 4.01 for the significance level ∝ = 0.05 with degrees dk (1.56). The results showed that to improve KKPI learning outcomes, the drill and practice learning model is appropriate for students who have high learning motivation. Students who have low learning motivation are more effectively taught with a tutorial learning model. Keywords: Learning Model, Learning Motivation, KKPI Learning Outcomes

scholarly journals The Influence of Scramble Learning Models and Motivation Learning on the Results of Citizension Education Class V SD Students State 101766 Bandar Setia

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 288-304
Author(s):  
Dewi Lestari ◽  
Reh Bungana ◽  
Siman Siman
Keyword(s):  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Student Development ◽  
Learning Process ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
High Learning ◽  
Quasi Experimental

Teachers have a duty to encourage, guide and provide learning facilities to achieve goals. Teachers have a responsibility to see everything that happens in the classroom to help student development. Teachers must be able to carry out their duties properly by first having to understand carefully the matters relating to the teaching and learning process, because the success of the learning process is supported by the ability of the teacher to develop and generate activeness and students in the learning process. The research method used is the Quasi Experiment (Quasi Experimental Method) with the research design as the basis for the implementation of the research is to distinguish the influence of the Inquiry method and the effect of conventional methods on learning outcomes of Citizenship Education in terms of high learning motivation and low learning motivation where the treatment class is class Va student and Vb class. The following is presented sequentially descriptive data regarding: (1) Civics learning outcomes students are taught using scramble learning model, (2) Civics student learning outcomes are taught using the expository model, (3) Civics student learning outcomes have high learning motivation, (4) Civics student learning outcomes have motivation to learn low, (5)Civics learning outcomes of students who have high learning motivation are taught with the Scramble learning model, (6) Civics learning outcomes of students who have low learning motivation are taught with the Scramble learning model, (7) Civics learning outcomes of students who have high learning motivation are taught using the expository learning model, (8) Civics learning outcomes of students who have low learning motivation are taught using the expository learning model.

scholarly journals METODE MENGAJAR DAN MOTIVASI TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR KETERAMPILAN SERVIS FLATTENIS LAPANGAN(STUDI EKSPERIMEN PADA MAHASISWA FIK UNM MAKASSAR)

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Hasbunallah AS ◽  
Ahmad Rum Bismar
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Study ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Teaching Methods ◽  
Design Method ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
High Learning ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Lower Effect ◽  
Academic Year

The aim of this experimental study was todetermine the effect of all teaching methods, part, mixed and motivation result learning toward of flat service skill courts tennis. Learning motivation is divided into two parts, namely high andlow.This research was conducted at Faculty of Sport ScienceState University of Macassar,the academic year 2014/2015. Experimental using factorial design method 2x3. The sample consisted of 60 students were divided into 6 groups, each consisting of 10 students. Data analysis technique is a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's test at a significance level of α= 0.05. The results of this study indicate that ( (1) overall teaching methods higher effect of the part teacing methods on learning outcomes flat tennis service skills (2) overall teaching methods lower effect of the part teacing methods on learning outcomes flat tennis service skills, (3) overall teaching methods lower effect of the part teacing methods on learning outcomes flat tennis service skills,(4) there is interaction between the overall teaching methods, part teaching methods and combined teaching methods and learning motivation outcomes flat tennis service skills,(5) overall teaching methods higher effect of the part teacing methods on learning outcomes flat tennis service skillsusing a high learning motivation, (6) overall teaching methods lower effect of the part teacing methods on learning outcomes flat tennis service skillsusing a high learning motivation, (7) part teaching methods lower effect of the combined teacing methods on learning outcomes flat tennis service skillsusing a high learning motivation, (8) overall teaching methods higher effect of the part teacing methods on learning outcomes flat tennis service skillsusing a low learning motivation, (9) overall teaching methods lower effect of the part teacing methods on learning outcomes flat tennis service skillsusing a low learning motivation, (10) part teaching methods lower effect of the combined teacing methods on learning outcomes flat tennis service skillsusing a low learning motivation.

Studi perbedaan antara model pembelajaran think talk write dan example non example terhadap keterampilan menulis narasi ditinjau dari motivasi belajar pada peserta didik kelas iv sekolah dasar

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Annisa' Nur Latifah
Keyword(s):  
Factorial Design ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Writing Skills ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
Narrative Writing ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
High Learning ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

<p class="Abstract"><em>Th</em><em>e </em><em>goals </em><em>of this research </em><em>to find out: (1) </em><em>the </em><em>different of narrative writing skills between students </em><em>that teached</em><em> using Think Talk Write learning model with Example Non Example learning model; (2) differences in narrative writing skills between students who hashigh learning motivation and low learning motivation; (3) the interaction between learning models and learning motivation trough narrative writing skills. This research is quantitative experimental with 2x2 factorial design. The technique</em><em> to got sample</em><em> us</em><em>ing </em><em>cluster random sampling</em><em>.</em><em> Two</em><em> W</em><em>ay</em><em>sAnava </em><em>was used </em><em>to</em><em> analys</em><em> the</em><em> data with a significance level of 0.05.The results of th</em><em>isresearch were</em><em> (1) there</em><em> was a</em><em> differen</em><em>t</em><em> in narrative writing skills between students who </em><em>teached by</em><em> Think Talk Write learning model with Example Non Example learning model with F<sub>A</sub> = 6.259; (2) there </em><em>was a </em><em>differen</em><em>t</em><em> in narrative writing skills between </em><em>the</em><em> high learning motivation and low learning motivation with F<sub>B</sub> = 35,688; (3) there is no interaction between the learning model and learning motivation towards narrative writing skills as indicated by F<sub>AB</sub> = 0.628.</em><em></em></p><p class="Abstract"><em> </em></p><strong>            <em>Keyword:</em></strong><em> think talk write, example non example, narrative writing skills, elementary school</em>

scholarly journals PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR FISIKA DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEAD TOGETHER BERBANTU LEMBAR KEGIATAN SISWA DENGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN LANGSUNG PADA MATERI POKOK OPTIK GEOMETRI

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 33
Author(s):  
Rappel Situmorang
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Instructional Model ◽  
Testing Hypotheses ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Student Activity ◽  
Average Value ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Subject

This study aims to determine the differences in physics learningoutcomes using cooperative learning model Numbered Heads Together Sheet-assisted Student Activity with direct instruction model in the subjectmatter Geometric Optics in Class X Semester 2 SMAN 7 T.P. 2012/2013. The population in this study were all students of class X consists of 9 parallelclasses. The study sample comprised 2 classes taken by cluster randomsampling is a class X-3 as a class experiment given cooperative learningmodel Numbered Heads Together Student Activity Sheet assisted and X-9 asa control class with direct instructional model, each of which consists of 40students. Pretest data obtained average value is the experimental class andcontrol class 34.90 is 37.10. After being given a different treatment to thesecond class, the average values obtained posttest for the experimental classwas 73.20 and 66.80 control class. The results of testing hypotheses obtainedt-test = 2.78 and t-table = 1.99 at  significance level α = 0.05 and df = 78, ttest>t-table. It showed no significant difference in the learning outcomes of students using cooperative learning model Numbered Heads Together Sheet assisted Student Activity with learning model directly in the subject matterOptical Geometry in class X Semester 2 SMAN 7 T.P. 2012/2013.

scholarly journals Perbandingan Hasil Belajar Matematika Melalui Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Number Head Together dan Student Team Achievement Division Pada Siswa MTs Muhammadiyah Penyasawan Kecamatan Kampar

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 63
Author(s):  
Desi Anggraini
Keyword(s):  
Student Achievement ◽  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Eighth Grade ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Research Subjects ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Student Team

This article aims to determine the differences in the results of learning mathematics by using the appropriate learning model in the application of cooperative learning model Number Head Type Togeteher (NHT) and Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) on the subject of Circles at MTs Muhammadiyah Penyasawan, Kampar District. In this research the problem statement is "Are there differences in learning outcomes of mathematics using Cooperative learning models Number Head Together (NHT) and Student Achievement Division (STAD) types in class VIII MTs Muhammadiyah Penyasawan Kampar District on the subject of Circles?" This article uses comparative research which found a difference between the use of Cooperative learning models Number Head Together (NHT) and Student Achievement Division (STAD) types, in this study the researchers played a direct role as teachers in the learning process. In this study Cooperative Learning NHT type is X1 and STAD type is X2 variable and learning result is Y variable. The population of this study is all Muhammadiyah MTS students and the sample used is VIIIA class as a class using Cooperative Learning Type Number Head Together (NHT) and class VIIIB as a class that uses Student Team Achievement Divison (STAD) Type Learning Model. The research subjects were eighth grade eighth grade students and the object was learning outcomes using the cooperative learning type NHT model and learning outcomes using the STAD learning model. The data collection technique is in the form of observation, documentation and tests conducted at the sixth meeting after the learning meeting is complete. This data is processed using the test-t formula and obtained a t value of 4.115 with a significant value of 2.69 where the significant value obtained from the calculation is greater than the significance level α = 0.05, then Ha is accepted. Based on the results of the data analysis, it was concluded that there were differences in the mathematics learning outcomes of students using the Cooperative learning model Number Head Together (NHT) and Student Achievement Division (STAD) types on the subject of the Circle at MTs Muhammadiyah Penyasawan Kampar Distric

TWO STAY TWO STRAY COOPERATIVE LEARNING MODEL IN MATHEMATICS LEARNING OUTCOMES

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 354
Author(s):  
Monif Maulana
Keyword(s):  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Degrees Of Freedom ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
T Test ◽  
Test Method ◽  
Seventh Grade ◽  
Cooperative Model ◽  
Significance Level

The population in this study was seventh grade students consisting of 7 calsses. The sampling technique use random sampling technique that was by lottery class. From raffle earned that grade VII G class as TS-TS class and VII F Class as ekspository class. Mathematics learning outcomes data obtained using the test method in the form of objective questions. Analysis of the data used one tailed t-test and two tailed t-test. From the test results obtained by the two tailed t-test  = 1,9180 and  = 1,5409, it means  >  with a significance level of 5% and 54 degrees of freedom, which means  was rejected. This suggest that there were differences in mathematics achievement between students who use cooperative model of TS-TS and ekspository learning model. One tailed t-test result obtained that  = 1,9180 and  = 1,5409, it means  >  with a significance level of 5% and 54 degrees of freedom, which means  was rejected. This suggest that the learning outcomes of students who use the cooperative model of TS-TS was better than learning outcomes of students who use the ekspository learning model in even semester of seventh grade student in SMP Muhammadiyah 7 Yogyakarta academic year of 2016/2017

Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Siswa Melalui Penerapan Model Discovery Learning Kelas VIII-A SMPN 2 Piani

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 58
Author(s):  
Ahmad Apriyadi ◽  
R Ati Sukmawati
Keyword(s):  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Discovery Learning ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
Male Students ◽  
Motivation To Learn ◽  
Research Subjects ◽  
Class Viii ◽  
Motivation And Learning

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan motivasi belajar dan hasil belajar siswa kelas VIII-A SMPN 2 Piani melalui model discovery learning. Penelitian ini merupakan  Penelitian Tindakan Kelas (PTK). Siklus I terdiri dari dua kali pertemuan, dan siklus II terdiri dari tiga kali pertemuan. Subjek penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas VIII-A SMPN 2 Piani, yang terdiri dari 9 orang siswa laki-laki dan 11 orang siswa perempuan. Objek penelitan adalah motivasi belajar dan hasil belajar siswa dalam pembelajaran tekanan zat dengan menerapkan model discovery learning. Instrumen penelitian terdiri dari lembar observasi motivasi belajar siswa dan tes hasil belajar. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian diperoleh bahwa motivasi siswa dari siklus I dan siklus II mengalami peningkatan, dari kurang termotivasi menjadi termotivasi. Hasil Belajar siswa kelas VIII-A juga mengalami kenaikan ketuntasan belajar pada siklus I mencapai 65% selanjutnya pada siklus II menjadi 95% (melebihi batas ketuntasan klasikal= 80%). Sehingga model pembelajaran discovery learning dapat dijadikan salah satu cara untuk meningkatkan motivasi dan hasil belajar siswa.This study aims to improve learning motivation and student learning outcomes in class VIII-A at SMPN 2 Piani through a discovery learning model. This study is a classroom tidiness study. Cycles I are two encounters and cycles II are three encounters. The study was done by applying the discovery learning model. Action class consists of twenty pullings of research subjects made up nine male students and eleven female students. The object of research is the motivation to learn and the results of students degrees in the pressure of learning by applying the discovery learning model. The research instrument consisted of learning motivation sheets and learning achievement tests. Based on the research results, it was found that the motivation of students from cycle I and cycle II had increased, from less motivated to be motivated. Learning outcomes of class VIII-A students also experienced an increase in learning completeness in the first cycle reaching 65%; then in the second cycle, it became 95% (exceeding the classical completeness limit = 80%). So the discovery learning model can be a way to increase the motivation and learning result.

scholarly journals Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Word Square untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Siswa pada Tema Makanan Sehat Di Kelas V B SD Negeri 121/IX Jerambah Bolong

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 108
Author(s):  
Mardiana Mardiana
Keyword(s):  
Action Research ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Data Reduction ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Healthy Food ◽  
Class Action ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
School Year ◽  
The Subject

This study is motivated by low student learning motivation that causes students' learning outcomes to be low as well. The purpose of this research is to obtain information and discuss about the application of word square learning model to increase students' learning motivation on the theme of healthy food in grade V B of SD Negeri 121/IX Jerambah Bolong in the 2018/2019 school year. This type of research is a class action research consisting of two cycles in which each cycle follows four stages, namely planning, implementation, observation and reflection. Each cycle consists of two meetings. This research was conducted at SD Negeri 121/IX Jerambah Bolong in the 2018/2019 school year with the subject of research of grade V students of SD Negeri 121/IX Jerambah Bolong consisting of 24 students consisting of 14 men and 10 women. Data collection techniques using observation sheets, tests, field records and documentation. The data is analyzed using percentage and data reduction. The results showed that through the application of word square learning model can increase students' learning motivation on the theme of healthy food in grade V B of SD Negeri 121/IX Jerambah Bolong in the 2018/2019 school year by giving praise. 

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document