scholarly journals The Difference Effect Of Explosion Power Of Arm Muscle Exercise And Flexibleness Exercise Observed From Intensity Of Exercise Toward Ability In Front Handspring Gymnastics Athlete In Gymnastics Club Of Semen Padang

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Deffri Anggara ◽  
Feby Elra Perdima
Keyword(s):  
Significant Influence ◽  
Female Athletes ◽  
Muscle Exercise ◽  
Ability Test ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Intensity Of Exercise ◽  
Difference Effect ◽  
Better Than ◽  
Data Result

This research aims to explain the differences effect of explosion power of arm muscle exercise and flexibleness exercise with 50:50%  intensity by explotion power of arm muscle and flexibleness exercising with intensity 70:30% toward front handspring ability of gymnastics athlete in PT Semen Padang Club. The method of this research is quasi experimental method. The population of this research is 31 athletes, but the sample was obtained through purposive random sampling, so it was got 20 female athletes. The data of ability test front handspring aims to get information about ability of front handspring artistics gymnastics athletes of PT Semen Padang Club.Analysis data result shows that: (1) explosion power of arm muscle and flexibleness exercises with 50:50% intensity give significant influence toward ability of front handspring gymnastics athlete in PT Semen Padang Gymnastics Club. The increasing ability of front handspring is 4,1, (2) explosion power of arm muscle exercise and flexibleness exercise with 70:30 % give significant influence toward ability of front handspring gymnastics athlete in PT Semen Padang Gymnastics Club. The increasing ability of front handspring is 7,8, (3) There is difference between explosion power of arm muscle exercise and flexibleness exercise with 50:50% intensity and 70:30% intensity toward ability of front handspring gymnastics athlete in gymnastics club of PT Semen Padang, and explosion power of arm muscle exercise method and flexibleness exercise with 70:30% intensity is better than 50:50% intensity.

scholarly journals Pembelajaran diskursus multi representasi terhadap peningkatan kemampuan komunikasi dan disposisi matematis mahasiswa

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ratni Purwasih ◽  
Martin Bernad
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Microsoft Excel ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Ability Test ◽  
First Semester ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Communication Ability ◽  
Mean Differences ◽  
Better Than

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui peningkatan kemampuan komunikasi dan disposisi mahasiswa melalui pembelajaran diskursus multi representasi (DMR). Metode penelitian ini adalah metode kuasi eksperimen dengan desain penelitian pretset-posttest control group design. Populasi penelitian adalah seluruh mahasiswa pendidikan matematika STKIP Siliwangi Bandung yang mengikuti mata kuliah metode pembelajaran matematika sekolah SD pada semester ganjil Tahun Ajaran 2016/2017 yang terdiri dari 3 kelas, yaitu: A1, A2 dan A3. Sampel penelitian dipilih 2 kelas dari populasi penelitian, terpilih kelas A2 sebagai kelas kontrol yang terdiri dari 35 orang mahasiswa dan kelas A1 sebagai kelas eksperimen yang terdiri dari 36 orang mahasiswa. Analisis data dilakukan terhadap gain hasil tes kemampuan mahasiswa mata kuliah metode pembelajaran matematika sekolah SD. Sedangkan analisis skala disposisi matematis mahasiswa menggunakan Microsoft Excel 2010. Untuk memperoleh data penelitian digunakan instrumen berupa tes uraian dan skala disposisi. Analisis penelitian menggunakan uji perbedaan rata-rata mann whitney. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) Pencapaian dan peningkatan kemampuan komunikasi matematis yang mendapat pembelajaran DMR lebih baik daripada mahasiswa yang mendapat pembelajaran konvensional; dan (2) Disposisi matematis mahasiswa yang pembelajarannya menggunakan DMR lebih baik daripada mahasiswa dengan pembelajaran yang menggunakan pendekatan konvensional. Learning multi discourse representation to enhance students communication and their mathematical disposition AbstractThis study aims to determine the improvement of students’ mathematical communication and dispositions ability through multi-representation discourse (DMR) learning. This research method is quasi-experimental with the design of pretset-posttest control group. The population is all students of mathematics education STKIP Siliwangi Bandung attending the course subject of  Metode Pembelajaran Matematika SD (Elementary Mathematics Learning Method) in the first semester of 2016/2017 academic year consisting of three classes, namely: A1, A2 and A3. The samples are selected from two classes; A2 as the control group consisting of 35 students and A1 as the experimental group consisting of 36 students.. Data analysis is performed to find out the gain from the results of students’ ability test in the subject of Metode Pembelajaran Matematika  SD; while the students’ mathematical disposition scale analysis is conducted by using Microsoft Excel 2010. To obtain research data, the instruments of  description test and disposition scale are used. The analysis of research uses the Mann Whitney’s mean differences test. The results show that: (1) the achievement and improvement of communication ability of the students’ receiving DMR learning are better than those who receive conventional learning; and (2) Mathematical disposition of students with DMR learning is better than those with the conventional approach.

scholarly journals PENERAPAN MODEL CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING PROCEDURES UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN PEMAHAMAN KONSEP MATEMATIS SISWA MTs

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
Safitri Safitri
Keyword(s):  
Conceptual Understanding ◽  
Mathematical Concept ◽  
Mathematical Concepts ◽  
Ability Test ◽  
Concept Understanding ◽  
Flat Side ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Class Viii ◽  
Three Stages ◽  
Better Than

The purpose of this research was to find out the increase in the ability to understand mathematical concepts of students who were taught with better Conceptual Understanding Procedures (CUPs) models than students who were taught with convensional model on the material of flat side space in MTsS Dama Puteh. The CUPs models has three stages including: individual, triplets, and class discussions. The author uses an experimental research design with a quasi-experimental design. Sampling was done using population random sampling. In this study all students of class VIII MTsS Dama Puteh. In this study consisted of two classes, namely class VIIIB as an experimental class and class VIIIA as a control class. Data collection using the ability test mathematical concept understanding of the results showed that based one the t-test obtained tcount = 1,8 and ttable = 1,68. Because tcount > ttable so that it can be concluded that the increased ability of understanding mathematical concepts of students taught with more CUPs models better than students who were taught with convensional models on the material to build flat side spaces in MTsS Dama Puteh.

scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW-STAD DAN KECERDASAN INTERPERSONAL TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR PENDIDIKAN AGAMA KATOLIK

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 101
Author(s):  
Saidi Perri Marbun ◽  
Mukhtar . ◽  
R. Mursid
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Religious Education ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Education Students ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Better Than

Abstrak: tujuan penelitian ini adalah (1) untuk mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD dalam mata pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Katolik; (2) untuk mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki kecerdasan interpersonal tinggi  dengan siswa yang memiliki kecerdasan interpersonal rendah; (3) untuk mengetahui interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan kecerdasan interpersonal dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar Pendidikan Agama Katolik. Metode dalam penelitian quasi-eksperimen. Desain penelitian faktorial 2 x 2. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) Hasil belajar Pendidikan Agama Katolik siswa dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw lebih baik dibandingkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD; (2) Hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki kecerdasan interpersonal tinggi lebih baik dibandingkan dengan hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki kecerdasan interpersonal rendah; dan (3)             Terdapat nteraksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan kecerdasan interpersonal dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar PAK.  Kata Kunci: model pembelajaran, kooperatif tipe JIGSAW dan STAD, kecerdasan interpersonal, pendidikan agama katolik Abstract: the objectives of this study are (1) to find out the differences in student learning outcomes that are taught using the Jigsaw type cooperative learning model and the STAD type cooperative learning model in Catholic Religious Education subjects; (2) to find out the difference in learning outcomes of students who have high interpersonal intelligence and students who have low interpersonal intelligence; (3) to determine the interaction between learning models and interpersonal intelligence in influencing the learning outcomes of Catholic Religious Education. Methods in quasi-experimental research. 2 x 2 factorial research design. The results showed that: (1) The learning outcomes of Catholic Religious Education students with a jigsaw type cooperative learning model were better than the STAD type cooperative learning model; (2) The learning outcomes of students who have high interpersonal intelligence are better than the learning outcomes of students who have low interpersonal intelligence; and (3) There is interaction between cooperative learning models and interpersonal intelligence in influencing PAK learning outcomes. Keywords: learning models, JIGSAW and STAD cooperative types, interpersonal intelligence, catholic religious education

PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS PENGALAMAN TIPE KNISLEY-MULYANA DALAM UPAYA MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN REPRESETASI MATEMATIS SISWA

2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 78
Author(s):  
Mrs Isty Yulianti ◽  
Mr Kusnandi
Keyword(s):  
Junior High School ◽  
Mathematical Representation ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Mathematical Skills ◽  
Ability Test ◽  
Experience Based Learning ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Effective Group ◽  
Better Than

This article presents the results of quasi-experimental research design with pretest-post test control group to assess the ability of the mathematical representation student’s using experience-based learning model of type Knisley-Mulyana. The study was conducted on student of junior high school. Two classes were randomly selected to serve as the study sample. Students in experimental class get Knisley-Mulyana learning, while students in the control class get the conventional learning. There are two main instruments used, namely the ability test of mathematical representation and questionnaires. Questionnaires used to evaluate the response of students towards learning with Knisley-Mulyana model. The Results showed that students who acquire the learning of mathematics by using Knisley-Mulyana model provide a achievement of the mathematical representation capability better than students who received conventional learning. Viewed from the mathematical skills, students in the high group and low group with Knisley-Mulyana learning achieve their ability of mathematical representation better than students in the same group who received conventional learning. In other words the most effective group of students in the application of Knisley-Mulyana learning is a high and low groups. In addition, students responded well to learning by using Knisley-Mulyana model.Key words: Knisley-Mulyana, Mathematical Representation

scholarly journals Eksperimentasi TAPPS dan GI terhadap Pengetahuan dan Sikap Sosial Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ek Ajeng Rahmi Pinahayu ◽  
Nur Alamsyah ◽  
Risma Nurul Auliya ◽  
Luh Putu Widya Adnyani
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Mathematical Knowledge ◽  
Social Attitudes ◽  
Thinking Aloud ◽  
The Social ◽  
Eighth Grade Students ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Conventional Models ◽  
Better Than

<em>Education is faced with multi-dimensional problems, including the low competence of mathematical knowledge and the crisis of social aspects. This study aims to determine the difference in the effect of Thinking Aloud Pair Problem Solving (TAPPS), Group Investigation (GI), and Conventional models on knowledge competence and social attitudes in terms of learning styles. This is a quasi-experimental research, with a population of all eighth-grade students at SMP Negeri 24 Jakarta. Hypothesis testing used two-way multivariate analysis with unequal cells. The results of the research included: (1) TAPPS produced knowledge competence better than GI and conventional, and GI was better than conventional, (2) TAPPS and GI produced the same social attitudes, and both were better than conventional, (3) visual and auditorial resulted in the same good knowledge competence, and both were better than kinesthetic, (4) visual and auditory produced the same good social attitudes, and both were better than kinesthetic, (5) TAPPS and GI, knowledge competence of the three learning styles were equally good, whereas conventionally there were differences, (6) TAPPS and GI, social attitudes of the three types of learning styles were equally good, while conventionally there were differences, (7) in visual and auditory, knowledge competence of the three models were the same, while there were differences in kinesthetic, and (8) in visual and auditory, the social attitudes of the three models were the same, while there were differences in kinesthetic.</em>

scholarly journals Pengaruh Model Brain Based Learning untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Koneksi Matematis dan Pencapaian Self Concept Siswa

Syntax Idea ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (9) ◽  
pp. 2110
Author(s):  
Mekarina Mekarina
Keyword(s):  
Growth And Development ◽  
Self Concept ◽  
Ability Test ◽  
Mathematical Connections ◽  
Scientific Approach ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Brain Based Learning ◽  
The Brain ◽  
Mathematical Connection ◽  
Better Than

The purpose of this study was to analyze the improvement of students' mathematical connection skills and self-concept with a brain based learning (BBL) model with a scientific approach. The background of this research is that the reality on the ground shows that students' mathematical connection abilities are not as expected. One of the factors causing these problems is learning that does not provide flexibility for students to optimally empower the potential of the brain. This resulted in students having difficulty connecting between materials and the level of student confidence that was lacking. This study uses a quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental method. The sample in this study were 37 students in the control class and 36 in the experimental class. The instrument used is a mathematical connection ability test and a self-concept questionnaire. The results of the study are: 1) the increase in mathematical connection ability with the BBL model is higher than with the scientific approach; 2) the achievement of students' self-concept with the BBL model is better than the scientific approach; 3) there is a relationship between the ability of mathematical connections and students' self-concept with the BBL model. Based on the results of the study, it is hoped that the next researcher can choose a method that can encourage the growth and development of students' positive self-concepts, in order to influence students' beliefs about their abilities, and ultimately affect student achievement.

scholarly journals Perbedaan Pengaruh Model Latihan Konsentrasi Dan Tanpa Model Latihan Konsentrasi Terhadap Peningkatan Kemampuan Shooting Game Atlet Petanque Undikma

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ridwan Lubis ◽  
Andi Gilang Permadi
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Method ◽  
Training Model ◽  
T Test ◽  
Test Analysis ◽  
Ability Test ◽  
Purposive Sampling ◽  
Average Value ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Better Than

This research is motivated by the inconsistency in the shooting ability of athletes in shooting games in Petanque sports, both at the regional and national levels. This study aims to determine the effect of the concentration training model on the improvement of the shooting game ability of Undikma Petanque athletes. This study used an experimental method with the design of "two group pretest posttest design". The instruments used for the shooting ability test were the shooting station numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 with a distance of 6 meters, 7 meters, 8 meters, and 9 meters. The subjects in this study were 14 Undikma Petanque athletes. Samples were taken from the purposive sampling. Based on the results of the t-test analysis showed the same significant results between the concentration training model and without concentration training. However, the concentration training model results are better than without the concentration training model seen with the average value of shooting using the pretest concentration training model results of 4.71 increased by 13.00. The amount of increase was 8.28. Without the concentration training model, the initial pretest average result was 3.42 and increased to 10.00. The amount of increase was 6.57. The difference in the average shooting game result increment with the concentration training model, and without the concentration training model is 1.71.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Group Investigation dengan Asesmen Otentik terhadap Prestasi Belajar Dan Konsep Diri Siswa.

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
I GEDE ERY SUHARTAWAN . ◽  
PROF. DR. I WAYAN SANTYASA, M.Si. . ◽  
DR. I MADE KIRNA, M.Si. .
Keyword(s):  
Random Sampling ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Authentic Assessment ◽  
Self Concept ◽  
Questionnaire Data ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Model Group ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Better Than

Penelitian ini bertujuanmenjelaskan perbedaan prestasi belajar (PB) dan konsep diri (KD) antara siswa yang belajar dengan model Group Investigation (MGI) dan asesmen otentik (AO), MGI,dan model pembelajaran konvensional (MPK). Penelitian eksperimen semu ini melibatkan 5 kelas siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 3 Kubu Karangasem Tahun Pelajaran 2015/2016 sebagai populasi. Tiga sampel ditentukan dengan teknik group random sampling (acak kelas), yaitu kelas VIIIE menggunakan MBI dengan AO, kelas VIIIB menggunakan MGI, dan VIIID menggunakan MPK. Data PB dikumpulkan dengan tes, sedangkan data KD dengan angket. Data dianalisis secara deskriptif dan MANCOVA dengan prestasi belajar dan konsep diri awal siswa berperan sebagai kovariabel. Setelah perlakuan dikontrol dengan PB dan KD awal siswa, hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan signifikan PB IPA dan KD siswa antara yang belajar dengan MGI dengan AO, MGI, dan yang belajar dengan MPK. Baik PB IPA maupun KD siswa yang belajar dengan MGI dengan AO lebih baik dibandingkan dengan MGI dan MPK. Kata Kunci : Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Group Investigation, Asesmen otentik Pembelajaran Konvensional, Prestasi Belajar, Konsep Diri This study aims to explain the difference of students’ achievement (SA) and self concept (SC) among students learning with Group Investigation Model (GIM) and authentic assessment (AA), Group Investigation Model (GIM) and conventional learning models CLM). This quasi-experimental research involving 5 classe of grade VIII SMP Negeri 3 Kubu Karangasem in the year 2015/2016 as a population. Three classes as samples were determined by group random sampling technique, namely the class VIIIE using GIM with AA, VIIIB class using GIM, and VIIID using CLM. Data of the SA were collected by tests, while the SC by questionnaire. Data were analyzed descriptively and MANCOVA with prior SA and students’ SC as covariates. After the treatment was controlled by prior SA and students’ SC, the results of the study showed that there were significant differences of SA and SC among students learned with GIM with AA, GIM, and CLM. Both of SA and SC of student learned in GIM with AA is better than the GIM and as well as in the CLM.keyword : Cooperative Learning Model Group Investigation, Assessment authentic, Conventional Learning, Learning Achievement, Self Concept

scholarly journals Mathematical Representation Ability of Middle School Students through Model Eliciting Activities with STAD Type

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-116
Author(s):  
Zairisma Zairisma ◽  
Vina Apriliani ◽  
Johan Yunus
Keyword(s):  
Simple Random Sampling ◽  
Mathematical Representation ◽  
Control Group ◽  
School Students ◽  
Ability Test ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Learning Mathematics ◽  
Model Eliciting Activities ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Better Than

The ability of mathematical representation is one of the abilities that must be possessed by students in learning mathematics. In fact, students 'mathematical representation ability is still relatively low, so we need a learning model that can improve students' mathematical representation abilities, namely Model Eliciting Activities (MEA) with STAD type. The purpose of this study is to compare the mathematical representation ability of students taught using MEA with STAD type and those taught with conventional learning. The approach to be used is a quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental research method and using a control group pretest-posttest design. The population in this study were all VII grade students. Sampling was done using simple random sampling, which consisted of two classes, class VII1 as the experimental class and class VII2 as the control class. Data collection is used by using a mathematical representation ability test sheet. The data analysis technique used is independent t-test. Based on these analysis it can be concluded that the mathematical representation ability of students taught using MEA with STAD type is better than conventional learning.

scholarly journals DEVELOPING THE ABILITY OF ELEMENTARY STUDENTS METAPHORICAL THINKING THE CITARUM THROUGH THE REALISTIC MATHEMATICS EDUCATION APPROACH

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 84
Author(s):  
Sukma Murni ◽  
Sylvia Rabbani
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Education ◽  
Realistic Mathematics Education ◽  
School Students ◽  
Microsoft Excel ◽  
Ability Test ◽  
Metaphorical Thinking ◽  
Realistic Mathematics ◽  
Thinking Ability ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Better Than

This study aims to determine the development of mathematical Metaphorical Thinking capabilities of Bantaran Citarum Elementary School students through a Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) approach better than those using ordinary learning. The method used in this study was a quasi-experimental method carried out in one of the elementary schools in Dayeuh Kolot Subdistrict, Bandung Regency. Data collection uses the results of pretest and posttest mathematical Metaphorical Thinking abilities. To get the research data, the instrument was used in the form of a mathematical Metaphorical Thinking ability test. Data analysis is done quantitatively, quantitative analysis is carried out on the ability of Metaphorical Thinking. In calculating data processing using Microsoft Excel and SPSS 23. The results showed that the development of mathematical Metaphorical Thinking capabilities which learning using the RME approach was better than those using ordinary learning. Keywords: Metaphorical Thinking, Realistic Mathematics Education.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document