Reinforcement Learning From Pixels: Waterflooding Optimization

Author(s):  
Ruslan Miftakhov ◽  
Igor Efremov ◽  
Abdulaziz S. Al-Qasim

Abstract The application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) methods in the petroleum industry gain traction in recent years. In this paper, Deep Reinforcement Learning (RL) is used to maximize the Net Present Value (NPV) of waterflooding by changing the water injection rate. This research is the first step towards showing that the use of pixel information for reinforcement learning provides many advantages, such as a fundamental understanding of reservoir physics by controlling changes in pressure and saturation without directly accounting for the reservoir petrophysical properties and wells. The optimization routine based on RL by pixel data is tested on the 2D model, which is a vertical section of the SPE 10 model. It has been shown that RL can optimize waterflooding in a 2D compressible reservoir with the 2-phase flow (oil-water). The proposed optimization method is an iterative process. In the first few thousands of updates, NPV remains in the baseline since it takes more time to converge from raw pixel data than to use classical well production/injection rate information. RL optimization resulted in improving the NPV by 15 percent, where the optimum scenario shows less watercut values and more stable production in contrast to baseline optimization. Additionally, we evaluated the impact of selecting the different action set for optimization and examined two cases where water injection well can change injection pressure with a step of 200 psi and 600 psi. The results show that in the second case, RL optimization is exploiting the limitation of the reservoir simulation engine and tries to imitate a cycled injection regime, which results in a 7% higher NPV than the first case.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prosper Kiisi Lekia

Abstract One of the challenges of the petroleum industry is achieving maximum recovery from oil reservoirs. The natural energy of the reservoir, primary recoveries in most cases do not exceed 20%. To improve recovery, secondary recovery techniques are employed. With secondary recovery techniques such as waterflooding, an incremental recovery ranging from 15 to 25% can be achieved. Several theories and methods have been developed for predicting waterflood performance. The Dykstra-Parson technique stands as the most widely used of these methods. The authors developed a discrete, analytical solution from which the vertical coverage, water-oil ratio, cumulative oil produced, cumulative water produced and injected, and the time required for injection was determined. Reznik et al extended the work of Dykstra and Parson to include exact, analytical, continuous solutions, with explicit solutions for time, constant injection pressure, and constant overall injection rate conditions, property time, real or process time, with the assumption of piston-like displacement. This work presents a computer implementation to compare the results of the Dykstra and Parson method, and the Reznik et al extension. A user-friendly graphical user interface executable application has been developed for both methods using Python 3. The application provides an interactive GUI output for graphs and tables with the python matplotlib module, and Pandastable. The GUI was built with Tkinter and converted to an executable desktop application using Pyinstaller and the Nullsoft Scriptable Install System, to serve as a hands-on tool for petroleum engineers and the industry. The results of the program for both methods gave a close match with that obtained from the simulation performed with Flow (Open Porous Media). The results provided more insight into the underlying principles and applications of the methods.


2014 ◽  
Vol 1073-1076 ◽  
pp. 2310-2315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming Xian Wang ◽  
Wan Jing Luo ◽  
Jie Ding

Due to the common problems of waterflood in low-permeability reservoirs, the reasearch of finely layered water injection is carried out. This paper established the finely layered water injection standard in low-permeability reservoirs and analysed the sensitivity of engineering parameters as well as evaluated the effect of the finely layered water injection standard in Block A with the semi-quantitative to quantitative method. The results show that: according to the finely layered water injection standard, it can be divided into three types: layered water injection between the layers, layered water injection in inner layer, layered water injection between fracture segment and no-fracture segment. Under the guidance of the standard, it sloved the problem of uneven absorption profile in Block A in some degree and could improve the oil recovery by 3.5%. The sensitivity analysis shows that good performance of finely layered water injection in Block A requires the reservoir permeability ratio should be less than 10, the perforation thickness should not exceed 10 m, the amount of layered injection layers should be less than 3, the surface injection pressure should be below 14 MPa and the injection rate shuold be controlled at about 35 m3/d.


Energies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 816 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daigang Wang ◽  
Yong Li ◽  
Jing Zhang ◽  
Chenji Wei ◽  
Yuwei Jiao ◽  
...  

Due to the coexistence of multiple types of reservoir bodies and widely distributed aquifer support in karst carbonate reservoirs, it remains a great challenge to understand the reservoir flow dynamics based on traditional capacitance–resistance (CRM) models and Darcy’s percolation theory. To solve this issue, an improved injector–producer-pair-based CRM model coupling the effect of active aquifer support was first developed and combined with the newly-developed Stochastic Simplex Approximate Gradient (StoSAG) optimization algorithm for accurate inter-well connectivity estimation in a waterflood operation. The improved CRM–StoSAG workflow was further applied for real-time production optimization to find the optimal water injection rate at each control step by maximizing the net present value of production. The case study conducted for a typical karst reservoir indicated that the proposed workflow can provide good insight into complex multi-phase flow behaviors in karst carbonate reservoirs. Low connectivity coefficient and time delay constant most likely refer to active aquifer support through a high-permeable flow channel. Moreover, the injector–producer pair may be interconnected by complex fissure zones when both the connectivity coefficient and time delay constant are relatively large.


Geofluids ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Xiang Li ◽  
Yuan Cheng ◽  
Wulong Tao ◽  
Shalake Sarulicaoketi ◽  
Xuhui Ji ◽  
...  

The production of a low permeability reservoir decreases rapidly by depletion development, and it needs to supplement formation energy to obtain stable production. Common energy supplement methods include water injection and gas injection. Nitrogen injection is an economic and effective development method for specific reservoir types. In order to study the feasibility and reasonable injection parameters of nitrogen injection development of fractured reservoir, this paper uses long cores to carry out displacement experiment. Firstly, the effects of water injection and nitrogen injection development of a fractured reservoir are compared through experiments to demonstrate the feasibility of nitrogen injection development of the fractured reservoir. Secondly, the effects of gas-water alternate displacement after water drive and gas-water alternate displacement after gas drive are compared through experiments to study the situation of water injection or gas injection development. Finally, the reasonable parameters of nitrogen gas-water alternate injection are optimized by orthogonal experimental design. Results show that nitrogen injection can effectively enhance oil production of the reservoir with natural fractures in early periods, but gas channeling easily occurs in continuous nitrogen flooding. After water flooding, gas-water alternate flooding can effectively reduce the injection pressure and improve the reservoir recovery, but the time of gas-water alternate injection cannot be too late. It is revealed that the factors influencing the nitrogen-water alternative effect are sorted from large to small as follows: cycle injected volume, nitrogen and water slug ratio, and injection rate. The optimal cycle injected volume is around 1 PV, the nitrogen and water slug ratio is between 1 and 2, and the injection rate is between 0.1 and 0.2 mL/min.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barzan Ahmed ◽  
Farhad Abdulrahman Khoshnaw ◽  
Mustansar Raza ◽  
Hossam Elmoneim ◽  
Kamil Shehzad ◽  
...  

Abstract A case study is presented detailing the methodology used to perform the clean-out operation in a water disposal well of Khurmala Field, Kurdistan Region of Iraq. Untreated disposed water caused scaling and plugging in perforated liner and in the open hole that eventually ceased injection. Multiple attempts and investments were made in recent years to resume access to the injection zone using high-pressure hydro-jetting tools coupled with acid treatments. However, these attempts yielded futile efforts. Before proceeding with the decision of workover, it was decided to go for one final attempt to regain wellbore access using Fluidic Oscillator (SFO). Fluidic Oscillator (SFO) having pulsing, cavitation and helix jetting action was used in combination with a train of fluids consisting of diesel, 28% HCl and gel. The clean out was performed in stages of 10m, to clean the fill from 1091m to 1170m. Since the well bore was initially isolated from the injection zone, the cleanout was conducted with non-nitrified fluids. As the cleanout progressed and access to the liner and open hole was regained, the circulation of insoluble fill to surface required a lighter carrying fluid. Nitrification, volume of the fluids, batch cycling, and ROP were designed considering the downhole dynamic changes expected during each stage of the operation. The combination of SFO, the thorough selection of treatment fluids and the accurate downhole hydraulics simulations pertaining to different stages of the operation offered an effective solution and regained the connectivity between the wellbore and the injection zone. The injection rate of water increased from 0 bpm at 700 psi to 15 bpm at 200 psi. Throughout this operation, the SFO helix, cavitation, and acoustic pulse (alike) jetting proved to be more effective than other single acting rotating jetting tools. Also, Environmental impact was reduced by eliminating the need for a rig workover operation. The matching of the injection pressure when the well was first completed and the post job value indicated that the complete zone was exposed and scale deposits were removed from the critical matrix or bypassed. SFO has an effective jetting near wellbore region, while the kinetic energy transferred via fluid makes the impact stronger in the deeper region. Internal mechanism of the tool allows it to handle high pumping rate and pressures, external finishing offer multi-port orientation of outflow that allows targeting the fill in desired directions. Presently the SFO used in the case study is the only technology that has pulse, cavitation, and helix jetting structure. Also, since the tool does not require redressing, it proves to be an efficient, safe and cost effective alternative


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Yongjiang Zhang ◽  
Benqing Yuan ◽  
Xingang Niu

Conventional hydraulic fracturing has several disadvantages, including a short effective extraction time and low fracture conductivity during long-term extraction. Aiming at overcoming these shortcomings, a similar simulation test of repeated hydraulic fracturing was conducted in this study, and the evolutionary rules regarding the injection water pressure and stress distribution of the coal seam roof during this repeated hydraulic fracturing were revealed. The research results show that after multiple hydraulic fracturing, the number of cracks in the coal seam and the range of fracturing influence have increased significantly. As the number of fracturing increases, the initial pressure required for cracking decreases. The highest water injection pressure of the first fracturing was 2.8 MPa, while the highest water injection pressures of the second and third fracturing were 2.7 MPa and 2.4 MPa, respectively. As the number of fracturing increases, the area of increased stress will continue to expand. After the first fracturing, the impact radius of fracturing is 100 cm. After the second fracturing, the radius of influence of fracturing expanded to 150 cm. When the third fracturing was over, the radius of influence of the fracturing expanded to approximately 250 cm. It can be seen that, compared with conventional hydraulic fracturing, repeated hydraulic fracturing shows better fracturing effect. The research results can be used as a basis for repeated hydraulic fracturing field tests to increase coal seam permeability.


1971 ◽  
Vol 11 (02) ◽  
pp. 185-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satter Abdus ◽  
David R. Parrish

Abstract The widely used Marx and Langenheim solution for reservoir heating by steam injection fails to account for the growth of the hot liquid zone ahead of the steam zone. Furthermore, that solution does not consider radial heat conduction both within and outside the reservoir and vertical conduction within the reservoir. In the present paper, a more realistic and generalized solution is provided by eliminating several restrictive assumptions of the ‘old theory'. However, fluid flow is not considered in this model. The partial-difference equations that describe the condensation within the steam zone and temperature distribution within the system have been solved by finite-difference schemes. Calculated results are presented to show the effects of steam injection pressures ranging from 500 to 2,500 psia and rates, 120 and 240 lb/hr-ft, on the growth of the steam and hot liquid zones. A 50-ft thick reservoir with fixed thermal and physical characteristics was considered. Results show that heat losses from the reservoir into the surrounding rocks are not greatly different from those predicted by Marx and Langenheim. However, the heat distribution is markedly different. A sizable portion of the reservoir heat was contained in the hot liquid zone which grows indefinitely. This means that heat (warm water) could arrive at the producing wells sooner than predicted by the old theory. This is particularly true for low injection rate or high injection pressure. Curiously, for a given injection rate and pressure, the heat content of the hot liquid zone remains (except for early times) essentially a constant percentage of the cumulative heat injected. INTRODUCTION In 1959. Marx and Langenheim1 made a theoretical study of reservoir heating by hot fluid injection. Their solution has been widely used in the industry for the evaluation of the steam-drive process. This solution, however, is based upon an unrealistic assumption that the growth of the hot liquid zone ahead of the steam zone is negligible. Therefore, it cannot predict the arrival of warm water at the producing wells earlier than steam. Furthermore, in the so-called ‘old theory', radial heat conduction both within and outside the reservoir was neglected. Willman et al.2 presented another analytical solution of the same problem. Their solution is comparable to the Marx-Langenheim solution and suffers from the same disadvantages. Wilson and Root3 presented a numerical solution for reservoir heating by steam injection. While radial and vertical heat conduction both within and outside the reservoir were considered, their solution was provided essentially for the injection of a noncondensable fictitious hot fluid. The specific heat of the injected fluid was assumed to be equal to the difference between the enthalpy of steam and the enthalpy of water at the reservoir temperature divided by the difference in the two temperatures. Baker4 carried out an experimental study of heat flow in steam flooding using a sand pack. 4 in. thick and 6 ft in diameter. The steam injection pressure was 2 to 5 psig and rates ranged from 22 to 299 lb/hr-ft. He showed that a significant portion of the injected heat was contained in the hot water zone. The theoretical steamed or heated volume, as calculated by the Marx and Langenheim method, fell between the experimental steamed and heated (including hot water) volumes. Spillette5 made a critical review of the known analytical solutions dealing with heat transfer during hot water injection into a reservoir. These solutions are based upon many restrictive assumptions similar to the simplified solutions of the steam heating process. Spillette also presented a numerical solution for multidimensional heat transfer problems associated with hot water injection and demonstrated the utility and accuracy of the method. Most mathematical models of steam and hot water recovery processes neglect fluid flow considerations.


2021 ◽  
Vol 300 ◽  
pp. 02012
Author(s):  
Zhitao Yan ◽  
Ruohan Hu ◽  
Fengyan Li ◽  
Shouxing Kang ◽  
Liping Zhang

The K2 formation of C68 block is explored by injecting water to maintain formation pressure, but the continuous decrease of injection rate significantly reduces oil production. Therefore, it is important to predict scaling tendency of injected water in the formation. Firstly, ion composition of formation water and injected water was tested according to recommended practices in petroleum industry. Then, wellbottom temperature distribution of injection wells was simulated under injection water rate requirement of oilfield development. Furthermore, based on the “Oddo-Tomson” prediction model of inorganic scale, the scaling trend of water flooding in K2 formation is predicted according to the possible temperature and pressure. The research indicates that sulfate scale cannot be formed in C68 block and there is a slight possibility of carbonate scaling, which provides a basis to select the correct stimulation technology for increasing production.


2022 ◽  
Vol 36 (06) ◽  
Author(s):  
VO TAN CHAU ◽  
DUONG HOANG LONG ◽  
CHINDA CHAROENPHONPHANICH

The diesel combustion is primarily controlled by the fuel injection process. The start of injection therefore has a significant effect in the engine, which relates large amount of injected fuel at the beginning of injection to produces a strong burst of combustion with a high local temperature and high NOx formation. This paper investigated the impact of Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil (HVO) and blends of 10%, 20%, 30%, 50%, 80% by mass of HVO with commercial diesel fuel (mixed 7% FAME-B7) to injection process under the Zeuch’s method and compared to that of B7. The focus was on the injection flow rate in the variation of injection pressures, back pressures, and energizing times. The experimental results indicated that injection delay was inversely correlated to HVO fraction in the blend as well as injection pressure. At different injection pressures, HVO revealed a slightly lower injection rate than diesel that resulted in smaller injection quantity. Discharge coefficient was recognized larger with HVO and its blends. At 0.5ms of energizing time, injection rate profile displayed the incompletely opening of needle. Insignificant difference in injection rate was observed as increasing of back pressure.


1974 ◽  
Vol 14 (04) ◽  
pp. 321-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Lehner ◽  
A.S. Williamson

A gas blowout may be brought under control by injecting water into the formation through relief wells. By avoiding direct contact between relief well and blowout well, this technique reduces the inflow of gas by creating sufficient backpressure in the formation itself. It guarantees a feasible, successful relief-well injection rate, no matter how large the lifting capacity of the blowout well may be. A constraint condition on relief-well injection pressures is found that ensures killing of the pressures is found that ensures killing of the blowout. The minimum number of relief wells then follows from injection-pressure limitations. The positions of the relief wells are kept arbitrary in positions of the relief wells are kept arbitrary in the analysis, but the results indicate that their landing points should be close to the blowout well and that direct communications with the latter (e.g., by formation fracturing) should be avoided. The analysis yields no information as to shutoff times or cumulative injection requirements. These must be found from a separate study, which could be guided by the results presented in this paper. Introduction Control over a blowout may be gained by any technique that blocks the escaping reservoir fluid either in the wellbore or in the formation. The method most frequently used is wellbore blockage the recapping of a wild well, for example, or the drilling of a relief well to establish direct connection with the wild-well borehole, followed by the injection of heavy mud at a rate greater than the lifting capacity of the blowing well. There are, however, reservoirs in which blowout conditions may become too severe to allow successful surface operations and also reservoirs in which bottom-hole pressures exceed the pressure that could be pressures exceed the pressure that could be balanced by feasible mud injection rates. Complications that rule out surface operations may also arise when the uncontrolled production from one formation "blows in" at another lower-pressure formation. In such cases the only safe and effective remedy may be to inject water into the formation through relief wells deliberately aimed off the wild-well landing point. This restricts the escape of reservoir fluid by a pressure buildup resulting from the flow of water through the formation, and by the continuous narrowing of the passageways open to the escaping reservoir fluid between spreading water-saturated volumes. When all passageways are closed off by the water, the wild well is under "dynamic" control and may produce a large fraction of the water that is being continuously injected it final plugging operation is still necessary to gain permanent control over the well. The termination of permanent control over the well. The termination of relief-well water injection must then be timed carefully, particularly when dealing with an overpressured gas reservoir.We are concerned here with only the reservoir engineering aspects of bringing a well under "dynamic control by continuously injecting water through relief wells. In considering such an operation, the most important matters to be decided are the following:1. The number of relief wells and their location with respect to the blowout well,2. The water injection rate, and3. The total quantity of water injected at shut-off.In the following we present a simple formula for estimating the minimum successful water-injection rate. The minimum number of relief wells required is then obtain from injection pressure limitations. Using this result, it is possible to determine the optimal strategy for locating relief wells. No information is obtained on cumulative injection requirements or shut-off times. This lies beyond the scope of simple analysis; but such a study -which would probably be undertaken on a computer could clearly be shortened by using the results of this paper as a screening tool. ANALYSIS OF A TWO-DIMENSIONAL PROBLEM In formulating the interrelation of the most important parameters governing the conditions for shut-off, we are forced to idealize.We assume that the fluid flow is two-dimensional in a plane homogeneous reservoir of uniformly thick layers. P. 321


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document