scholarly journals ANALISIS OTONOMI DAERAH DALAM MENGUATKAN NEGARA KESATUAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA (STUDI TERHADAP UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 32 TAHUN 2004 JUNCTO UNDANG-UNDANG NO 12 TAHUN 2008 TENTANG PEMERINTAHAN DAERAH)

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nuria Siswi Enggarani

<div class="WordSection1"><p align="center"><strong>Abstract</strong></p><p><em>This study aims to assess the regional autonomy in Indonesia in strengthening the republic of Indonesia based on Law No. 32/2004 and find a model that can strengthen the autonomy of the Unitary Republic of Indonesia. This research is normative law research that focused on the literature data. The approach used in this study is using the principles of law approach, systematic approach to legislation, research on the level of vertical synchronization, historical, as well as the hermeneutic approach using deductive research. data used in the study is from literature using primary and secondary materials. results of the study showed that affairs and supervision is the most important element in strengthening the framework of the Unitary State of the republic of Indonesia and is the basis for the implementation of special autonomy. Indicators used to determine that the Act No. 32/2004 can strengthen the republic of Indonesia or not is seen from the elements of affairs and supervision. If the writer sees affairs and the provisions of Law No. 32/2004 lead to the  interpreted assumption that lead to strengthen federalism and lead to recentralization model of autonomy that strengthen the unity of the State is to change the system of wide and broaden autonomy become wide autonomy, focused and responsibility. division System of the affair is defined for both the provincial government and local municipality government but it focuses on the reference to the distribution of the central and regional affair. The concurrent affairs division is only constitutes on government affairs in order to strengthen the unitary state republic of Indonesia. Using principles of decentralization, de-concentration and co-administration are done justly. Supervision of the implementation of obligatory affair is deleted because supervision has been done by the governor as a government representative. Form of autonomy that can strengthen Indonesia is local autonomy in the form of broaden autonomy and specific Autonomy or asymmetric decentralization.</em></p><ul><li><strong><em>Keywords</em></strong><strong><em>: </em></strong><em>r</em><em>egiona</em><em>l Autonomy, strengthening, unitary state of the republic Indonesia, Law No. 32/2004.</em></li></ul><p align="center"><strong>Abstrak</strong></p><p>Penelitian ini bertujuan mengkaji otonomi daerah di Indonesia dalam menguatkan Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia menurut UU No 32/2004 dan menemukan model otonomi daerah yang dapat menguatkan Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif memfokuskan pada data kepustakaan. Pendekatan yang dipergunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah menggunakan pendekatan asas-asas hukum, pendekatan sistematika peraturan perundang-undangan, penelitian terhadap taraf sinkronisasi vertical, sejarah serta menggunakan pendekatan Hermeneutic dengan menggunakan penalaran deduktif. Data penelitian yang digunakan adalah data dari studi kepustakaan yang berupa bahan hukum primer dan sekunder.Hasil kajian menunjukan bahwa, Urusan dan pengawasan merupakan elemen yang paling penting dalam rangka menguatkan Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia dan merupakan dasar bagi diterapkannya otonomi luas. Indikator yang digunakan untuk mengetahui bahwa UU No 32/2004 dapat menguatkan Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia atau tidak adalah dilihat dari elemen urusan dan pengawasan. Jika penulis melihat urusan dan pengawasan dalam ketentuan UU No 32/2004 menimbulkan asumsi penafsiran yang mengarah pada kecenderungan menguatkan kearah ke federalisme dan mengarah resentralisasi Model otonomi yang menguatkan Negara kesatuan terletak dengan mengubah system otonomi seluas-luasnya menjadi otonomi luas, focus dan bertanggung jawab. Sistem pembagian urusan diperincibaik bagi pemerintah daerah provinsi dan pemerintah daerah kabupaten/kota tetapi focus sesuai dengan  acuan dalam penyusunan system pembagian urusan pusat dan daerah. Pembagian urusan yang bersifat <em>concurrent   </em>hanyaterletak padaurusan pemerintah dalam rangka menguatkan Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia. Penggunaan asas desentralisasi, dekonsentrasi dan tugas pembantuan dilakukan secara seimbang. Pengawasan terhadap pelaksanaan urusan wajib, dihapus karena pengawasan telah dilakukan oleh gubernur sebagai wakil pemerintah. Bentuk otonomi yang dapat menguatkan Negara kesatuan republik indonesia adalah otonomi daerah dalam bentuk otonomi luas dan Otonomi Khusus atau desentralisasi asimetris.</p></div><ul><li><strong>Kata kunci</strong>: <em>Otonomi daerah, penguatan, Negara Kesatuan republik Indonesia, UU No 32/2004.</em></li></ul>

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-212
Author(s):  
Ridwan Ridwan ◽  
Mulia Jaya ◽  
Rusdi Rusdi

Encoding is one of the mandatory matters that is not related to basic services. To elaborate regional authority related to coding matters, mapping of coding affairs is carried out in the context of structuring the Provincial / Regency / City Regional Institutional Apparatus in the Field of Encoding according to the direction of Law No. 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government. With the enactment of Law Number 23 Year 2014 in the Jambi Provincial Government, especially in the Bungo District, realizing harmonization of policies between the center and the regions that synergize with each other and will achieve the goals of Regional Autonomy in the welfare of people's lives. In the Bungo Regency in the coding activity supported by 17 sub-districts within the Regency area, the implementation was not yet optimal. This research uses qualitative research methods, qualitative research has a flexible nature. This research found that the implementation of the duties and functions of the Bungo Regency coding team in maintaining confidential government information in the context of efforts to realize the integrity of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia (NKRI) had not gone well. This is evidenced by the lack of awareness and responsibility of the coding team on the duties and functions of the coding field. Obstacles or obstacles facedby the coding team in carrying out their functions in safeguarding confidential government information in an effort to realize the integrity of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia, including lack of awareness and full support from superiors or officials authorized to carry out coding functions and functions, there is no means from the government in the implementation of duties and functions in the coding field.


Author(s):  
Anél Du Plessis ◽  
Oliver Fuo

This article responds to the tension inherent in the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa 1996 which lists ‘the environment’ proper as a function of national and provincial government. The authors discuss one of the arguments raised in the recently decided case of Marius Nel and Others v Hessequa Local Municipality and Others (2015) with particular emphasis on what the court’s reasoning adds to the growing body of jurisprudence on local government’s authority to govern environmental matters and the need for cooperative environmental governance in the South African context. The article features an overview of the relevant facts and findings in the Hessequa case, followed by a discussion of the implications of the court’s judgment.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 58-72
Author(s):  
I Wayan Bandem ◽  
I Nyoman Suandika

As Article 1 paragraph (3) of the State Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia is the stateof Indonesia is a state of law. Understanding the rule of law is simply a country whose administrationof power is based on law. and Article 1 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution that the Indonesian stateis a Republican unitary state with a government structure that is the Government, Provincial RegionalGovernment, Regency / City Regional Government and the lowest government is the VillageGovernment which has their respective leaders based on legislation applicable legislation. Inconnection with the establishment of the LPD in article 33 of the 1945 Constitution and in Article 18Bparagraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia which reads "that the staterecognizes and respects customary law units and their traditional rights insofar as it is still alive andin accordance with the development of society and the principle of the unitary State of the Republic ofIndonesia, which is regulated in law. So the provincial government of Bali based on the Rural CreditSeminar dated February 21, 1984 in Semarang The Governor of Bali initiated the establishment ofVillage Heritage Institutions (LPD) in the province of Bali in the role of national development with theaim of: 1) Encouraging economic development in rural communities through targeted savings andeffective capital distribution; 2) Eradicating the practice of bondage, illegal pawns, and others in thecountryside; 3) Creating business opportunities for villagers and rural workers, and; 4) Increasingpurchasing power and facilitating traffic payments and circulation So that the authors are interested inexamining the Tax Exemption Benchmark for LPDs in Bali Province with the research method used isjuridical-normative research. Taking into account that the starting point of research on legislation andthe fact that it began from the founding of the LPD in 1984 until now has not been taxed. In the courseof its operation the LPD in Bali by the three Ministers in 2009 issued a Joint Decree of the Minister ofFinance, Minister of Home Affairs, Minister of State for Koprasi and Small and Medium Enterprisesand Governor of Bank Indonesia Number.351.1 / KMK.010 / 2009, Number 900-639A in 2009, Number01 / SKB / M.KUKM / IX / 2009, Number 11 / 43A / KRP.GBI / 2009 concerning the DevelopmentStrategy of Microfinance Institutions. Affirmed through a letter from the Minister of Home AffairsNumber 412.2 / 3883 / SJ dated November 4, 2009 to the managers of institutions microfinance thatdoes not yet have a clear institutional status based on the prevailing laws and regulations. So that theGovernor of Bali Made Mangku Pastika on behalf of the provincial government of Bali submits a Letterof Governor of Bali Number 900/8999 / PLP. Ekbang dated 15 December 2009 to Minister of InternalAffairs The Republic of Indonesia prihal; The Strategy for the Development of MicrofinanceInstitutions. Thus, with the issuance of Law Number 1 of 2013 concerning Microfinance Institutions(MFIs), it was stated that the Village Credit Institutions and Pitih Negari Granaries and institutionsthat existed before the Laws were in effect were declared to be based on adat and not subject to thisLaw. The real benefits of the existence of LPD can be proven by the distribution of net profits each yearas profit retribution by dividing the following: 60% for fertilizing LPD business capital, 10%production services for labor, contributions to Indigenous Villages 20% for development funds inPakraman Village, as well as 5% for social funds, and 5% for empowerment funds deposited by theLPD at the agency / agency that is given the authority to regulate and manage them based on the Perdaand Decree of the Governor of Bali.


Author(s):  
Prehantoro Prehantoro

The Republic of Indonesia as a unitary state adheres to the principle of decentralization in government administration, by providing opportunities and flexibility to the regions. This research journal uses two problem formulations, namely whether the Special Region of Yogyakarta is part of the asymmetrical decentralization perspective studied from Law Number 13 of 2012. This type of research is nomartive legal research.Theoretically,asymmetric decentralization is actually relatively new in Indonesia than the development of regional autonomy and decentralization theories which only prioritize the transfer of authority from the center to the regions. Asymmetric decentralization doesn’t only talk about the delegation of authority, but also how authority, finance, supervision and institutions are contextually decentralized. Based on the description above, it can be concluded that the authority determined in Law Number 13 of 2012 concerning the Privileges of the Special Region of Yogyakarta is one of the provoncial-level autonomous regions in Indonesia. Special Region of Yogyakarta and it’s status as Special Region in accordance with Article 5 paragraph 2 letter a, Article 9, and Article 16.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 138-143
Author(s):  
Aslan Aslan ◽  
Baso Madiong ◽  
Almusawir Almusawir

Berpegang pada asas desentralisasi, yaitu dalam penyelenggaraan pmerintahan di Indonesia, menyerahkan kekuasaan kepada kepala daerah untuk menyelenggarakan otonomi daerah, Negara kesatuan republik Indonesia. Undang-undang otonomi daerah telah mengalami beberapa kali perubahan, setelah diundangkannya pemerintah daerah nomor 23, tahun 2014, dengan adanya otonomi daerah diiharapkan dapat membuka peluang bagi setiap daerah untuk lebih mampu memberdayakan segala potensi yang dimiliki daerah dan masyarakat dalam mewujudkan kesejahteraan dan daerahnya kemajuan. Untuk itu, pemekaran Pulau Sebatik Sebatiksangat diharapkan masyarakat di pulau tersebut sehingga dapat mempermudah beberapa hal seperti proses administrasi, pelayanan kesehatan dan lain sebagainya. Dalam penelitian ini penulis mengumpulkan data melalui angket, observasi dan dokumentasi di Pulau Sebatik. Berdasarkan hasil hukum kepulauan sebatik maka layak dilakukan pembinaan karena syarat-syarat pembentukannya sudah terpenuhi, aspirasi masyarakat sebatik, dan potensi potensi daerah yang cukup. Daerah Otonom Pulau Sebatik sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan dan aspirasi masyarakat telah terpenuhi Sehingga pelaksanaan pembentukan. Daerah Otonomi Pulau Sebatik masih kurang memadai, Terkait Sumber Daya Manusia Dalam Pembentukan. Adhering to the principle of decentralization, like in the administration of government in Indonesia, hands over power to the regional head to carry out regional autonomy, the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia. The regional autonomy law has undergone several changes after the promulgation of the Regional Government Number 23 of 2014. With this regional autonomy, it is hoped that it will open up opportunities for each region to be more capable of empowering all the potential that the regions and communities have in realizing the welfare and progress of their regions. For this reason, the expansion of Sebatik Island is highly expected by residents on the island so as to facilitate several matters such as administrative processes, health services and so on. In this study the authors collected data through questionnaires, observations and documentation on Sebatik Island. Based on the results in the sebatik island law, it is appropriate for the formation to be carried out because the requirements for formation have been met, which are the aspirations of the sebatik community and the potential for regional potential that is sufficient. So that the implementation of the formation of the autonomous region of the Sebatik Island in accordance with statutory regulations and the aspirations of the community have been fulfilled. Those related to human resources, infrastructure, and capital in the formation of the Sebatik Island Autonomous Region are not yet adequate.


Author(s):  
Suharyo Suharyo

<p>Era Otonomi Daerah secara nyata, jelas dan tegas dilaksanakan di Indonesia sejak adanya reformasi di segala bidang, hal ini merupakan perwujudan pelaksanaan demokrasi lokal diseluruh Indonesia, dengan berbagai kemandirian dalam konteks Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia (NKRI) yang tetap pada koridor peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku. Dalam melaksanakan otonomi daerah di wilayahnya tiap daerah memiliki kewenangan pembentukan Peraturan Daerah (Perda), selain mengatur hubungan sosial kemasyarakatan yang berisi kewajiban dan larangan, Perda acapkali dilengkapi dengan sanksi pidana. Berangkat dari hal tersebut penelitian ini bermaksud mencari bentuk pembentukan Perda yang ideal dan aspiratif dan melihat efektivitas penerapan sanksi pidana dalam produk Perda di tengah masyarakat. Dengan menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dapat disimpulkan bahwa diperlukan pelibatan warga masyarakat mulai dari pembentukan Raperda termasuk dalam pembahasan penetapan sanksi pidana. Terhadap perumusan sanksi pidana di dalam Perda harus menghindari adanya pengaturan pidana kurungan. Oleh sebab itu guna efektifitas pelaksanaan Perda diperlukan sosialisasi yang intensif dengan cara-cara kekeluargaan dan perlunya strategi persuasif, preventif, akomodatif, dan simpatik dalam penegakan Perda.</p><p>The Regional Autonomy era is tangibly, clearly and firmly held in Indonesia since reformasi period (reform) in all fields, this is the manifestation of the implementation of local democracy throughout Indonesia, with a variety of self-reliance in the context of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia (NKRI), which remained at the corridor of applicable law. In implementing regional autonomy, each region has the authority to establish the Regional Regulation (Perda) that regulates social relationships which isstated obligations and prohibition. It is also often comes with criminal sanctions. Toward those facts, this research intends to seek the ideal form to establish regional regulation and to observe the effectiveness ofenforcing criminal sanctions in society as a product of regional regulation. Using normative-jurist method can be concluded that it needs the involvement of citizens in making draft regional regulations (Raperda) and also in establishing criminal sanctions. While developing a formula for criminal sanctions in regional regulation, it should avoid an imprisonment. Therefore, for the implementation of the regional regulation to be effective, there should be an intensive dissemination in relationship way and the need for persuasive strategies, preventive, accommodating and sympathetic in enforcing the regional regulation.</p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 98-110
Author(s):  
Hastangka Hastangka ◽  
Armaidy Armawi ◽  
Kaelan Kaelan

Penggunaan istilah empat pilar kehidupan berbangsa dan bernegara untuk program sosialisasi telah menimbulkan polemik dan perdebatan di masyarakat. Empat pilar tersebut meliputi Pancasila, UUD 1945, NKRI, dan Bhinneka Tunggal Ika yang dirumuskan oleh MPR RI. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mendeskripsikan dampak sosialisasi Empat Pilar tersebut terhadap pendidikan Pancasila di perguruan tinggi. Data penelitian diambil dari buku, jurnal ilmiah, artikel surat kabar, dan berita di media online ataupun offline, dan dokumen yuridis, seperti peraturan perundang-undangan. Analisis data menggunakan pendekatan interpretatif, induksi-analitis, semiotik, dan analisis wacana. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa (1) sosialisasi empat pilar berdampak pada ambiguitas pemaknaan dan pemahaman baik dari peserta didik maupun dosen dalam pembelajaran Pancasila sebagai dasar atau pilar kehidupan bernegara dan berbangsa, dan (2) penggunaan istilah empat pilar telah mengacaukan pemahaman dan pengetahuan para peserta didik dalam memahami Pancasila.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The application of the term “Four Pillars of Life of the People and the Nation” in socialization creates polemic and debate in society. Those four pillars are Pancasila, the 1945 Constitution, the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia, and Unity in Diversity, which formulated by the People's Consultative Assembly of the Republic of Indonesia. The objective of this research is to investigate the impact that socialization has on the education of Pancasila in a higher level of education. The research data obtained from books, scientific journals, newspaper articles, other online and offline sources, and legal documents, for instance, legislation. Interpretative, analytic-induction, semiotic, and disclosure approaches applied to the analysis. The result shows that the socialization has immense impacts on 1). The ambiguity toward the meaning and the understanding by both students and lecturers in learning Pancasila as the pillar of the life of the people and the nation, and 2).  The use of the term “four pillars” has disrupted the understanding and the knowledge of students in their comprehension toward Pancasila.


LITERA ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hastangka Hastangka ◽  
Armaidy Armawi ◽  
Kaelan Kaelan

AbstrakPenggunaan istilah “Empat Pilar Berbangsa dan Bernegara” sebagai program sosialisasi MPR RI telah menimbulkan perdebatan. Istilah yang digunakan sejak tahun 2009 ini memberi dampak pada aspek linguistik di antaranya aspek sosiolinguistik, semantik, pragmatik, dan semiotika bahasa. Penelitian ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan persoalan semiotik penggunaan istilah Empat Pilar Berbangsa dan Bernegara oleh MPR RI, yakni Pancasila, UUD 1945, NKRI, dan Bhinneka Tunggal Ika. Data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini berupa frasa Empat Pilar Berbangsa dan Bernegara. Pengumpulan data dilakukan menggunakan inventarisasi data, kategorisasi data, dan klarifikasi data. Metode untuk menganalisa penelitian ini memakai analisis semiotika. Hasil penelitian sebagai berikut. Pertama, istilah “Empat Pilar Berbangsa dan Bernegara” merupakan preposisi unik dan tidak lazim dalam konteks sosiolinguistik masyarakat Indonesia. Kedua, istilah Empat Pilar Berbangsa dan Bernegara yang mengkategorikan Pancasila, UUD 1945, NKRI, dan Bhinneka Tunggal Ika merupakan bentuk kesalahan semantik dan pragmatik. Ketiga, secara aturan penulisan simbol dan tanda, istilah tersebut bertentangan dengan hakikat kedudukan dan fungsi dari Pancasila, UUD 1945, NKRI, dan Bhinneka Tunggal Ika karena dijadikan sebagai satu varian yang sama, yaitu pilar. Keempat, penggunaan istilah Empat Pilar Berbangsa dan Bernegara telah mengacaukan sistem tanda dan simbol, terutama pada makna semiotis Pancasila, UUD 1945, NKRI, dan Bhinneka Tunggal Ika. Kata Kunci: Bahasa, Empat Pilar, Semiotik, Simbol.    PEIRCE SEMIOTIC ANALYSIS IN THE USE OF THE FOUR PILLAR OF LANGUAGE NATION AND STATE OF MPR RI Abstract The application of the term “Four Pillars of the Nation and of the State” as the socialization program of MPR RI evokes debates. This term, which has been used since 2009, gives a significant  impact in many aspects of linguistics, especially in the aspect of sosiolinguistic, semantic, pragmatic, and semiotics of language. This research aims to describe and analyze the problem of semiotics in the use of the Four Pillars of the Nation and of the State by the People's Consultative Assembly of the Republic of Indonesia. The “Four Pillars” referred to by the People's Consultative Assembly consist of Pancasila, 1945 Constitution, the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia, and Unity in Diversity. The research data is from the phrase “Four Pillars of the Nation and of the State” which is collected by using the data inventory, data categorization, and data clarification. Method of analyzing the data in this research is using semiotic analysis. Result: The results of this study indicate that: first, the term “Four Pillars of the Nation and of the State” is a unique and unusual preposition in the sociolinguistics context of Indonesian society. Second, this term which categorizes Pancasila, the 1945 Constitution, the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia, and Unity in Diversity becomes a  mistake of the language terminology. It is because they are on the contrary to the semantic and pragmatic aspects. Third, based on the rules of writing the symbols and the sign, the Four Pillars of the Nation and of the State does contradict the position and function Pancasila, the 1945 Constitution, the Unitary State of the Republik of Indonesia, and Unity in Diversity originally have, as one exact same variant. Fourth, based on the semiotic aspects, the use of the Four Pillars of the Nation and of the State has disrupted the system of signs and symbols, especially the semiotic meaning of Pancasila, the 1945 Constitution, the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia, and Unity in Diversity. Keywords: language, four pillars, semiotics, symbol.


Wajah Hukum ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 94
Author(s):  
Mhd Ansori

The republic of Indonesia as a unitary state embraces the principle of decentralization in the administration of goverment, by providing opportunies and freedom to the region to organize regional autonomy. Thus, regional autonomy is a policy that is in accordance with the principle of decentralization within the framework of the unitary state of the Indonesian republic. The real autonomy is the flexibility of the region to exercise the authority of the goverment in certain areas that are real and necessary and growing, living and developing in the regions. Of course this is to realize independence, autonomy is closely related to the pattern of relation between the central and regional which includes various aspects of the relationship of authority, supervisory relations, financial relations, and so forth traditional. Soewargono and Djohan stated that one of the main functions of goverment is to make public policy. The role of goverment is more as a servant of society that does not aim to gain profit rather than fulfill what the bureaucracy’s own will. The purpose of this paper to know the role of local goverment in the current era of reformasi. The type of research used is normative juridical research, using conceptual approach, legislation approach, and historical approach.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document