scholarly journals IMPLEMENTATION OF GOOD GOVERNANCE-BASED PUBLIC SERVICES IN IMMIGRATION SECTOR IN MAKING PASSPORTS OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-104
Author(s):  
Mahdivikia Daffa Ekananda

According to Law Number 25 of 2009 regarding Public Services, it's been defined that public offerings are sports or collection of sports withinside the context of pleasant provider desiresaccording with statutory policies for each citizen and resident of goods, offerings, and/or administrative offerings. supplied with the aid of using public provider providers. Meanwhile, the belief of correct governance is right governance and a procedure completed in each public and personal businesses to make decisions. According to PP no. one zero one of 2000 Good Governance is a central authority that develops and establishes the ideas of professionalism, accountability, transparency, fantastic provider, democracy, efficiency, effectiveness, rule of regulation and may be regularly occurring with the aid of using the entire community. This magazinepursuits to peer what and the way correct governance-primarily based totally public offerings are withinside the immigration zone in Indonesia. Increasing the excellent of public provider shippingand transparency of information, that is one of the ideas withinside the formation of correctgovernance, which pursuits to reduce forms and facilitate public affairs in Indonesia.

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Sultoni Fikri ◽  
Syofyan Hadi

The Ombudsman as a state institution has the duty to oversee the administration of the state, particularly in public services in order to realize good governance. Therefore the institution is demanded to be independent and impartial to other state institutions. In addition, the presence of the Ombudsman becomes a manifestation of legal protection for the community in the event of maladmnistration conducted by the apparatus/state officials in using their authority. The birth of the Ombudsman is inseparable from history in Scandinavian countries, including in Denmark. The Danish Ombudsman, known as the Folketingets Ombudsmand, has become one of the most important institutions in the state system there. While in Indonesia, its position has received less attention. This difference makes the writer interested to compare it. The approach used in this paper uses a micro-type body of norm approach, which is a legal comparison that uses the Act as the basis for comparison, which is used is Act Number 37 of 2008 concerning the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia compared to the Danish Ombudsman Act. Whereas the legal comparison method uses analytical method. The result of this research is to reconstruct the law in Law Number 37 Year 2008 concerning the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia by adopting from what is in the Danish Ombudsman Act. the hope is that the existence of ORI is so respected and recommendations from ORI are not merely morally binding but are legally binding.Ombudsman sebagai lembaga negara yang memiliki tugas untuk mengawasi dari penyelenggaraan negara, khususnya pada pelayanan publik agar terwujudnya good governence. Oleh karena itu lembaga tersebut dituntut untuk bersifat independen dan tidak memihak kepada lembaga negara lainnya. Selain itu hadirnya Ombudsman menjadi suatu perwujudan perlindungan hukum bagi masyarakat apabila terjadi maladmnistrasi yang dilakukan oleh aparatur/pejabat negara dalam menggunakan kewenangannya. Lahirnya Ombudsman tidak lepas dari sejarah di negara Skandinavia, termasuk di Denmark. Kedudukan Ombudsman Denmark atau dikenal sebagai Folketingets Ombudsmand, lembaga tersebut menjadi salah satu lembaga penting dalam sistem ketatanegaraan disana. Sedangkan di Indonesia keududukannya kurang mendapat perhatian. Perbedaan inilah yang membuat penulis tertarik untuk membandingkannya. Pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penulisan ini menggunakan pendekatan mikro jenis bodies of norm, yaitu perbandingan hukum yang menggunakan Undang-Undang sebagai dasar untuk melakukan perbandingan, yang dipakai adalah Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2008 tentang Ombudsman Republik Indonesia dibandingkan dengan The Ombudsman Act Denmark. Sedangkan untuk metode perbandingan hukum menggunakan analytical method. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah untuk dilakukan rekonstruksi hukum pada Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2008 tentang Ombudsman Republik Indonesia dengan mengadopsi dari apa yang ada di The Ombudsman Act Denmark. harapannya adalah eksistensi ORI begitu disegani dan rekomendasi dari ORI tidak sekadar mengikat secara moral melainkan mengikat secara hukum.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Komarudin Komarudin ◽  
Satmoko Yudo

The Law of Information and Electronics Transaction, the Law of Public Information Transparency, the Law of Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia, and the Law of Public Services  is a part of the legal system related to information and public services. These four laws should be scrutinized in terms of technology application. To create prime services in the management of clean water and waste water, it has been developed the technology information system of clean water and waste water processing (SITPABLC). SITPABLC is the information system to provide information and technology services due to supporting the implementation of these four laws.         Keywords: informasi, transaksi elektronik, informasi publik, keterbukaan informasi publik, pelayanan publik, ombudsman, dan good governance. 


Author(s):  
Dodik Setiawan Aji ◽  
◽  
Irma Cahyaningtyas

This study aims to discuss issues regarding what is the role and authority of the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia ? What is the process for examining complaints at the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia ? How is the strength of the Ombudsman Recommendation of the Republic of Indonesia in the effort to realize good governance ? The research method used in this research is normative juridical , using secondary legal data obtained through literature study. The results showed that The Ombudsman is a state institution that has the authority to supervise the implementation of public services externally, both those organized by state administrators and the government. The adjudication process by the Ombudsman in resolving public service disputes is only one of several possibilities for resolving public service disputes. The imposition of administrative sanctions for those who ignore the Ombudsman Recommendation shows that basically the Ombudsman is an institution that can actually carry out its function as a supervisory agency.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 218-234
Author(s):  
Kadek Cahya Susila Wibawa

Abstract Basicly, The government carries out three main duties, namely: organizing government, carrying out development, and holding public services. State that is required to attend to serve every citizen and citizen to fulfill the rights and basic needs of the community under government approval, accept the mandate of the UUD NRI 1945 (Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia). Based on data or empirical facts, the fact that public services in Indonesia are still not optimal. The quality of community services that have not been optimal, determine the expectations of the community, will reduce the essence of the objectives of the government (state) to realize social welfare for all the people of Indonesia. For this reason, one of the efforts that must be done immediately in realizing good and prime public services is to optimize public information disclosure in the implementation of public services. The main key to understanding good governance is understanding the principles of good governance. Starting from these principles, a benchmark for the performance of a government will be obtained. Information disclosure is one of the important principles of good governance, which can help to realize good and excellent public service delivery. The constitutional guarantee of the right to public information disclosure agreed is contained in Article 28F of the UUD NRI 1945, then further regulated in Act Number 14 / 2008 Concerning Public Information Openness (UU KIP), related to the budget for public service needs, namely transparent, effective and efficient, accountable and accountable. Public services related to information disclosure will create good governance. Keywords: Information disclosure, public service, good governance. Abstrak Pemerintah pada prinsipnya menjalankan tiga tugas utama, yaitu: menyelenggarakan pemerintahan, melaksanakan pembangunan, dan menyelenggarakan pelayanan publik. Negara wajib hadir untuk melayani setiap warga negara dan penduduk untuk memenuhi hak dan kebutuhan dasar masayarakat dalam kerangka pelayanan publik, sebagaimana amanat UUD NRI 1945. Berdasarkan data atau fakta empiris, tercermin bahwa pelayanan publik di Indonesia masih belum optimal. Kualitas pelayanan publik yang belum optimal, sebagaimana harapan masyarakat, akan mengurangi esensi tujuan pemerintah (negara) untuk mewujudkan kesejahteraan sosial bagi seluruh rakyat Indonesia. Untuk itu salah satu upaya yang harus segera dilakukan dalam mewujudkan pelayanan publik yang baik dan prima adalah mengoptimalkan keterbukaan informasi publik di dalam penyelenggaraan pelayanan publik. Kunci utama memahami good governance adalah pemahaman atas prinsip-prinsip di dalamnya. Bertolak dari prinsip-prinsip ini akan didapatkan tolak ukur kinerja suatu pemerintahan. Keterbukaan informasi merupakan salah satu prinsip yang penting dari good governance, yang dapat membantu untuk mewujudkan penyelenggaraan pelayanan publik yang baik dan prima. Jaminan konstitusional terhadap hak atas keterbukaan informasi publik sebagaimana termaktub dalam Pasal 28F UUD NRI 1945, kemudian diatur lebih lanjut ke dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2008 Tentang Keterbukaan Informasi Publik (UU KIP), menjadi dasar bagi pemerintah untuk melaksanakan fungsi pelayanan publik yang baik, yaitu yang transparan, efektif dan efisien, akuntabel serta dapat dipertanggungjawabkan. Pelayanan publik yang didasarkan pada keterbukaan informasi, akan mewujudkan suatu tata kelola pemerintahan yang baik. Kata kunci: Keterbukaan informasi, pelayanan publik, tata kelola pemerintahan yang baik (good governance).


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Dyah Adriantini Sintha Dewi

The Ombudsman as an external oversight body for official performance, in Fikih Siyasah (constitutionality in Islam) is included in the supervision stipulated in legislation (al-musahabah al-qomariyah). Supervision is done so that public service delivery to the community is in accordance with the rights of the community. This is done because in carrying out its duties, officials are very likely to conduct mal administration, which is bad public services that cause harm to the community. The Ombudsman is an institution authorized to resolve the mal administration issue, in which one of its products is by issuing a recommendation. Although Law No. 37 of 2018 on the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia states that the recommendation is mandatory, theombudsman's recommendations have not been implemented. This is due to differences in point of view, ie on the one hand in the context of law enforcement, but on the other hand the implementation of the recommendation is considered as a means of opening the disgrace of officials. Recommendations are the last alternative of Ombudsman's efforts to resolve the mal administration case, given that a win-win solution is the goal, then mediation becomes the main effort. This is in accordance with the condition of the Muslim majority of Indonesian nation and prioritizes deliberation in resolving dispute. Therefore, it is necessary to educate the community and officials related to the implementation of the Ombudsman's recommendations in order to provide good public services for the community, which is the obligation of the government.


Author(s):  
Ewan Ferlie ◽  
Sue Dopson ◽  
Chris Bennett ◽  
Michael D. Fischer ◽  
Jean Ledger ◽  
...  

The chapter discusses management consultants and consulting knowledge in health care, highlighting significant expenditure on consultancy and how consultants have shaped thinking in public services, which some critics suggest has served consultants’ own (financial) interests. The chapter then discusses the way consultants mobilize management knowledge and frame clients’ problems and solutions. It discusses an empirical case study of a consultancy project to redesign NHS organizations to make substantial ‘efficiency savings’. Here, consultants framed the NHS’s problem and solution, and then imposed an organizational redesign. Local NHS managers and clinicians framed the NHS’s problem differently, doubting the consultants’ framing and proposing redesign, but feeling unable to engage in dialogue about these concerns. Consequently, they engaged with the project in a calculated and defensive way, superficially accepting the redesign while waiting for its implementation to fail. Thus, the chapter demonstrates framing politics surrounding management consulting knowledge.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 178-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie De Somer

Abstract The EU’s Schengen zone has been in crisis for over four years. This article critically reviews three scenarios on the way forward for the Schengen area that are currently circulating in the EU policy sphere. These include, first, proposals to improve the current rules on internal border checks within the Schengen Borders Code, either through reform or through better implementation practices. A second scenario relates to ideas on increasing the use of police checks in border regions as alternatives for internal border controls. A third scenario links to proposals on making access to the Schengen zone conditional on cooperation and good governance in the CEAS. It is submitted that the proposals in this third scenario are unfeasible for both political as well as legal reasons. More merit can be found in the discussions around the first two scenarios, albeit bearing in mind a number of important caveats.


Author(s):  
Gulnara I. Bayazitova ◽  
Lidiya Yu. Korge

This article studies the first German translation of the “Six Books on the Republic” by the French lawyer and philosopher Jean Boden, published in 1592. Particular attention is paid to the preface to the treatise, which was written by the translator, a Lutheran priest Johann Oswaldt. There, Oswaldt sets out his position on the “Republic” as well as points out the need for this translation and the relevance of Boden’s treatise for monarchs and rulers. Oswaldt’s foreword is remarkable, firstly, for the terminological synthesis that he carries out. Relying on Boden’s both French and Latin manuscripts of “The Republic”, he carefully selects appropriate German terms to convey their connotations. Second, the German translation of “The Republic” opens the possibility of following the reception of Jean Boden’s ideas in Germany. The authors of this article come to the conclusion that Oswaldt had a practical purpose when he translated the main political work that substantiated the theory of sovereignty. The dedication of the translation to the Duke of Württemberg and the Count of Mümpelgard politicizes his scholarly effort. In fact, following Boden himself, Oswaldt aims to make “The Republic” read and utilized by his patrons. In the long term, the implementation of the ideas outlined in “The Republic” will lead to the foundation of the sovereignty of Württemberg. At the same time, the study of the first German translation has further research implications, since it outlines the area of distribution of Boden’s treatise on the European continent. The German translation followed the Italian and Spanish editions, but appeared earlier than the English translation. Hence, this article might pave the way for studying the reception of the theory of sovereignty in the works of German authors in Russian historiography.


2014 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 68-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Mayfield

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to illustrate what would happen if we were to ignore relationships when leading change. Many believe that project management, change management, and related fields, are a matter of marshalling stuff: working the right processes and tasks, writing the correct documents, having good governance mechanisms in place, etc. People just distract and get in the way. Some tend to concentrate on these technicalities working their computer tools, rather than leaning towards people. The result is huge waste. Organisational change will always cut across different business functions, boundaries and across silos of working. This is where stakeholder engagement leads to successful outcomes. Design/methodology/approach – It is a surprise to many, but listening is probably the most powerful influencing strategy of all. The key is to ask the person you seek to influence, first for their thoughts, fears, and aspirations. If you can show you are genuinely interested, you begin to break down any barriers to change. This helps focus on the need for change rather than present the solution first. Yes, time is money, but often we can let this get in the way of engaging successfully. Conversations like this do take time. It feels counter-intuitive. Findings – There is growing evidence that people who make better leaders have a leaning towards action, they are never victims of “paralysis by analysis”. The self-aware, pro-active manager leading change understands that relationships are central to success and are thinking about their relationships in a real and active way. They think about their mental landscape and on that landscape they see the vital importance of stakeholders and are prepared to spend a far higher proportion of their discretionary time devoted to engaging with other people, quite apart from the structured meetings and emails that we usually describe as “communicating”. Originality/value – Most management books are written with the assumption that the business world is rational, but when it comes to change, it appears this is far from the case. We are taught to put a reasonable proposition to people, the business case, the plan, and so on, then expect people to mull it over for a while, then jump into action – reason – analyse – act. But nearly always the actual sequence is – see – feel – act. There is little doubt that people engage with their stakeholders better if there is some kind of emotional connection.


2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 36
Author(s):  
Hans Nibshan Seesaghur

Since the 1990s, scholars around the world have focused on the complexities of governance reforms. The vicissitudes of the 21st century witnessed global waves for public administration reforms. China, a fast developing socialist country, has been building a strong, robust and modern public governance system. The Socialist Governance of China with Chinese characteristics brought considerable changes in the political, economic and social spheres, transforming the lives of people for betterment. By bringing about economic development through state intervention, introducing rule of law upholding the significance of its people, fostering new ideas, and ushering the ideology of nationalism through “China Dream”, President Xi Jinping and his socialist governance policies have created an excellent example in the world, particularly the capitalist society, demonstrating how society can be developed through socialist ways. Yet, the dynamics of Chinese governance has always been part science and part mystery to other governments that have earned legitimacy through elections, while China’s leaders earned its legitimacy through selection of the most able and their performance in delivering sustained improvements in the quality of life of the Chinese citizens and China's international standing. This paper deals with assessing the relevance of China’s Socialist governance evolution into a science of managing public affairs and the pursuit to optimizing its impact on the state’s economic, political and social spheres.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document