Empirical Antimicrobial Prescriptions in Patients with Clostridium difficile Infection at Hospital Admission and Impact on Clinical Outcome

2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (11) ◽  
pp. 1101-1106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aurora Pop-Vicas ◽  
Eman Shaban ◽  
Cecile Letourneau ◽  
Angel Pechie
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Clostridium Difficile ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Hospital Admission ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Prolonged Exposure ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Concurrent Use ◽  
Independent Risk Factors ◽  
The Impact

Objective.To determine, among patients with Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) at hospital admission, the impact of concurrent use of systemic, non-CDI-related antimicrobials on clinical outcomes and the risk factors associated with unnecessary antimicrobial prescribing.Design.Retrospective cohort study.Setting.University-affiliated community hospital.Methods.We reviewed computerized medical records for all patients with CDI at hospital admission during a 24-month period (January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2009). Colectomy, discharge to hospice, and in-hospital mortality were considered to be adverse outcomes. Antimicrobial use was considered unnecessary in the absence of physical signs and laboratory or radiological findings suggestive of an infection other than CDI or in the absence of antimicrobial activity against the organism(s) recovered from clinical cultures.Results.Among the 94 patients with CDI at hospital admission, 62% received at least one non-CDI-related antimicrobial during their hospitalization for CDI. Severe complicated CDI (odds ratio [OR], 7.1 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.8–28.5]; P = .005), duration of non-CDI-related antimicrobial exposure (OR, 1.2 [95% CI, 1.03–1.36]; P = .016), and age (OR, 1.1 [95% CI, 1.0–1.1]; P = .043) were independent risk factors for adverse clinical outcomes. One-third of the patients received unnecessary antimicrobial therapy. Sepsis at hospital admission (OR, 5.3 [95% CI, 1.8–15.8]; P = .003) and clinical suspicion of urinary tract infection (OR, 9.7 [95% CI, 2.9–32.3]; P< .001) were independently associated with unnecessary antimicrobial prescriptions.Conclusions.Empirical use of non-CDI-related antimicrobials was common. Prolonged exposure to non-CDI-related antimicrobials was associated with adverse clinical outcomes, including increased in-hospital mortality. Minimizing non-CDI-related antimicrobial exposure in patients with CDI seems warranted.

scholarly journals 575. Evaluation of Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus Infections

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S271-S271
Author(s):  
Gauri Chauhan ◽  
Nikunj M Vyas ◽  
Todd P Levin ◽  
Sungwook Kim
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
History Of ◽  
Vancomycin Resistant ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE) occurs with enhanced frequency in hospitalized patients and are usually associated with poor clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk factors and clinical outcomes of patients with VRE infections. Methods This study was an IRB-approved multi-center retrospective chart review conducted at a three-hospital health system between August 2016-November 2018. Inclusion criteria were patients ≥18 years and admitted for ≥24 hours with cultures positive for VRE. Patients pregnant or colonized with VRE were excluded. The primary endpoint was to analyze the association of potential risk factors with all-cause in-hospital mortality (ACM) and 30-day readmission. The subgroup analysis focused on the association of risk factors with VRE bacteremia. The secondary endpoint was to evaluate the impact of different treatment groups of high dose daptomycin (HDD) (≥10 mg/kg/day) vs. low dose daptomycin (LDD) (< 10 mg/kg/day) vs. linezolid (LZD) on ACM and 30-day readmission. Subgroup analysis focused on the difference of length of stay (LOS), length of therapy (LOT), duration of bacteremia (DOB) and clinical success (CS) between the treatment groups. Results There were 81 patients included for analysis; overall mortality was observed at 16%. Utilizing multivariate logistic regression analyses, patients presenting from long-term care facilities (LTCF) were found to have increased risk for mortality (OR 4.125, 95% CI 1.149–14.814). No specific risk factors were associated with 30-day readmission. Patients with previous exposure to fluoroquinolones (FQ) and cephalosporins (CPS), nosocomial exposure and history of heart failure (HF) showed association with VRE bacteremia. ACM was similar between HDD vs. LDD vs. LZD (16.7% vs. 15.4% vs. 0%, P = 0.52). No differences were seen between LOS, LOT, CS, and DOB between the groups. Conclusion Admission from LTCFs was a risk factor associated with in-hospital mortality in VRE patients. Individuals with history of FQ, CPS and nosocomial exposure as well as history of HF showed increased risk of acquiring VRE bacteremia. There was no difference in ACM, LOS, LOT, and DOB between HDD, LDD and LZD. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals The Impact of CKD Anaemia on Patients: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Clinical Outcomes—A Systematic Literature Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-21
Author(s):  
Eirini Palaka ◽  
Susan Grandy ◽  
Heleen van Haalen ◽  
Phil McEwan ◽  
Oliver Darlington
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Cardiac Events ◽  
Ckd Progression ◽  
Ckd Stage ◽  
Associated Risk Factors ◽  
The Impact

Anaemia is a common consequence of chronic kidney disease (CKD); however, the risk factors for its development and its impact on outcomes have not been well synthesised. Therefore, we undertook a systematic review to fully characterise the risk factors associated with the presence of anaemia in patients with CKD and a contemporary synthesis of the risks of adverse outcomes in patients with CKD and anaemia. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from 2002 until 2018 for studies reporting the incidence or prevalence of anaemia and associated risk factors and/or associations between haemoglobin (Hb) or anaemia and mortality, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), hospitalisation, or CKD progression in adult patients with CKD. Extracted data were summarised as risk factors related to the incidence or prevalence of anaemia or the risk (hazard ratio (HR)) of outcome by Hb level (<10, 10–12, >12 g/dL) in patients not on dialysis and in those receiving dialysis. 191 studies met the predefined inclusion criteria. The risk factor most associated with the prevalence of anaemia was CKD stage, followed by age and sex. Mean HRs (95% CI) for all-cause mortality in patients with CKD on dialysis with Hb <10, 10–12, and >12 g/dL were 1.56 (1.43–1.71), 1.17 (1.09–1.26), and 0.91 (0.87–0.96), respectively. Similar patterns were observed for nondialysis patients and for the risks of hospitalisation, MACE, and CKD progression. This is the first known systematic review to quantify the risk of adverse clinical outcomes based on Hb level in patients with CKD. Anaemia was consistently associated with greater mortality, hospitalisation, MACE, and CKD progression in patients with CKD, and risk increased with anaemia severity. Effective treatments that not only treat the anaemia but also reduce the risk of adverse clinical outcomes are essential to help reduce the burden of anaemia and its management in CKD.

scholarly journals Impact of Delayed Oral Vancomycin for Severe Clostridium difficile Infection

2018 ◽  
Vol 54 (5) ◽  
pp. 294-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunish Shah ◽  
Benjamin Ereshefsky ◽  
Laura Pontiggia ◽  
Michael Cawley
Keyword(s):  
Clostridium Difficile ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Clostridium Difficile Infection ◽  
Initial Treatment ◽  
Oral Vancomycin ◽  
End Of Treatment ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Severe Clostridium Difficile Infection ◽  
The Impact

Background: Treatment of severe Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) with oral vancomycin (VAN) is known to be superior to treatment with metronidazole (MDZ). However, previous studies have not evaluated the impact on patients when oral VAN therapy is delayed after diagnosis of severe CDI. Materials and Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective study of adult patients who were diagnosed with severe CDI. The objective was to compare clinical outcomes for patients treated initially with oral VAN versus patients receiving delayed oral VAN after at least 48 hours of initial treatment with MDZ. The primary outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality. Results: There were 101 patients who comprised the initial oral VAN group, while 20 patients comprised the delayed oral VAN group. There was no significant difference in all-cause in-hospital mortality for patients in the initial oral VAN treatment group compared to those who had delayed oral VAN therapy (4.95% vs 15.00%, P = 0.13). Patients who were initially treated with oral VAN experienced a significantly higher rate of clinical cure (49.50% vs 20.00%, P = 0.02), shorter median postinfection length of hospitalization (7.0 days vs 13.0 days, P < 0.001), shorter median time to resolution of leukocytosis (3.9 days vs 10.4 days, P = 0.01), and were less likely to have an end of treatment serum creatinine greater than 1.5 times their baseline (8.7% vs 29.4%, P = 0.03). Conclusion: Patients who receive oral VAN as their initial treatment for severe CDI experience improved clinical outcomes compared to patients receiving delayed oral VAN after being initially treated with MDZ.

scholarly journals Predictive value of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio for disease deterioration and serious adverse outcomes in patients with COVID-19: a prospective cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhi-Yong Zeng ◽  
Shao-Dan Feng ◽  
Gong-Ping Chen ◽  
Jiang-Nan Wu
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Hospital Admission ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Neutrophil To Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio

Abstract Background Early identification of patients who are at high risk of poor clinical outcomes is of great importance in saving the lives of patients with novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the context of limited medical resources. Objective To evaluate the value of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), calculated at hospital admission and in isolation, for the prediction of the subsequent presence of disease progression and serious clinical outcomes (e.g., shock, death). Methods We designed a prospective cohort study of 352 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 between January 9 and February 26, 2020, in Yichang City, Hubei Province. Patients with an NLR equal to or higher than the cutoff value derived from the receiver operating characteristic curve method were classified as the exposed group. The primary outcome was disease deterioration, defined as an increase of the clinical disease severity classification during hospitalization (e.g., moderate to severe/critical; severe to critical). The secondary outcomes were shock and death during the treatment. Results During the follow-up period, 51 (14.5%) patients’ conditions deteriorated, 15 patients (4.3%) had complicated septic shock, and 15 patients (4.3%) died. The NLR was higher in patients with deterioration than in those without deterioration (median: 5.33 vs. 2.14, P < 0.001), and higher in patients with serious clinical outcomes than in those without serious clinical outcomes (shock vs. no shock: 6.19 vs. 2.25, P < 0.001; death vs. survival: 7.19 vs. 2.25, P < 0.001). The NLR measured at hospital admission had high value in predicting subsequent disease deterioration, shock and death (all the areas under the curve > 0.80). The sensitivity of an NLR ≥ 2.6937 for predicting subsequent disease deterioration, shock and death was 82.0% (95% confidence interval, 69.0 to 91.0), 93.3% (68.0 to 100), and 92.9% (66.0 to 100), and the corresponding negative predictive values were 95.7% (93.0 to 99.2), 99.5% (98.6 to 100) and 99.5% (98.6 to 100), respectively. Conclusions The NLR measured at admission and in isolation can be used to effectively predict the subsequent presence of disease deterioration and serious clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19.

Risk factors and clinical outcomes associated with blood culture contamination

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Justin M. Klucher ◽  
Kevin Davis ◽  
Mrinmayee Lakkad ◽  
Jacob T. Painter ◽  
Ryan K. Dare
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Blood Culture ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Hospital Charges ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Contaminated Blood

Abstract Objective: To determine patient-specific risk factors and clinical outcomes associated with contaminated blood cultures. Design: A single-center, retrospective case-control risk factor and clinical outcome analysis performed on inpatients with blood cultures collected in the emergency department, 2014–2018. Patients with contaminated blood cultures (cases) were compared to patients with negative blood cultures (controls). Setting: A 509-bed tertiary-care university hospital. Methods: Risk factors independently associated with blood-culture contamination were determined using multivariable logistic regression. The impacts of contamination on clinical outcomes were assessed using linear regression, logistic regression, and generalized linear model with γ log link. Results: Of 13,782 blood cultures, 1,504 (10.9%) true positives were excluded, leaving 1,012 (7.3%) cases and 11,266 (81.7%) controls. The following factors were independently associated with blood-culture contamination: increasing age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01–1.01), black race (aOR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.15–1.51), increased body mass index (BMI; aOR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00–1.02), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (aOR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.02–1.33), paralysis (aOR 1.64; 95% CI, 1.26–2.14) and sepsis plus shock (aOR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.07–1.49). After controlling for age, race, BMI, and sepsis, blood-culture contamination increased length of stay (LOS; β = 1.24 ± 0.24; P < .0001), length of antibiotic treatment (LOT; β = 1.01 ± 0.20; P < .001), hospital charges (β = 0.22 ± 0.03; P < .0001), acute kidney injury (AKI; aOR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.40–1.83), echocardiogram orders (aOR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.30–1.75) and in-hospital mortality (aOR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.31–2.16). Conclusions: These unique risk factors identify high-risk individuals for blood-culture contamination. After controlling for confounders, contamination significantly increased LOS, LOT, hospital charges, AKI, echocardiograms, and in-hospital mortality.

scholarly journals Does Vancomycin Resistance Increase Mortality? Clinical Outcomes and Predictive Factors for Mortality in Patients with Enterococcus faecium Infections

Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 105
Author(s):  
Jatapat Hemapanpairoa ◽  
Dhitiwat Changpradub ◽  
Sudaluck Thunyaharn ◽  
Wichai Santimaleeworagun
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Vancomycin Resistance ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Joint Infections ◽  
Bone And Joint Infections ◽  
The Impact

The prevalence of enterococcal infection, especially E. faecium, is increasing, and the issue of the impact of vancomycin resistance on clinical outcomes is controversial. This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of infection caused by E. faecium and determine the risk factors associated with mortality. This retrospective study was performed at the Phramongkutklao Hospital during the period from 2014 to 2018. One hundred and forty-five patients with E. faecium infections were enrolled. The 30-day and 90-day mortality rates of patients infected with vancomycin resistant (VR)-E. faecium vs. vancomycin susceptible (VS)-E. faecium were 57.7% vs. 38.7% and 69.2% vs. 47.1%, respectively. The median length of hospitalization was significantly longer in patients with VR-E. faecium infection. In logistic regression analysis, VR-E. faecium, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores, and bone and joint infections were significant risk factors associated with both 30-day and 90-day mortality. Moreover, Cox proportional hazards model showed that VR-E. faecium infection (HR 1.91; 95%CI 1.09–3.37), SOFA scores of 6–9 points (HR 2.69; 95%CI 1.15–6.29), SOFA scores ≥ 10 points (HR 3.71; 95%CI 1.70–8.13), and bone and joint infections (HR 0.08; 95%CI 0.01–0.62) were significant risk factors for mortality. In conclusion, the present study confirmed the impact of VR-E. faecium infection on mortality and hospitalization duration. Thus, the appropriate antibiotic regimen for VR-E. faecium infection, especially for severely ill patients, is an effective strategy for improving treatment outcomes.

scholarly journals Body Mass Index, Multi-Morbidity, and COVID-19 Risk Factors as Predictors of Severe COVID-19 Outcomes

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 215013272110185
Author(s):  
Sanjeev Nanda ◽  
Audry S. Chacin Suarez ◽  
Loren Toussaint ◽  
Ann Vincent ◽  
Karen M. Fischer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Hospital Admission ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Risk Score ◽  
The Body ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Nasopharyngeal Swab ◽  
Morbidity Score ◽  
The Impact

Purpose The purpose of the present study was to investigate body mass index, multi-morbidity, and COVID-19 Risk Score as predictors of severe COVID-19 outcomes. Patients Patients from this study are from a well-characterized patient cohort collected at Mayo Clinic between January 1, 2020 and May 23, 2020; with confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis defined as a positive result on reverse-transcriptase-polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR) assays from nasopharyngeal swab specimens. Measures Demographic and clinical data were extracted from the electronic medical record. The data included: date of birth, gender, ethnicity, race, marital status, medications (active COVID-19 agents), weight and height (from which the Body Mass Index (BMI) was calculated, history of smoking, and comorbid conditions to calculate the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and the U.S Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) multi-morbidity score. An additional COVID-19 Risk Score was also included. Outcomes included hospital admission, ICU admission, and death. Results Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the impact on mortality or hospital admission. Age, sex, and race (white/Latino, white/non-Latino, other, did not disclose) were adjusted for in the model. Patients with higher COVID-19 Risk Scores had a significantly higher likelihood of being at least admitted to the hospital (HR = 1.80; 95% CI = 1.30, 2.50; P < .001), or experiencing death or inpatient admission (includes ICU admissions) (HR = 1.20; 95% CI = 1.02, 1.42; P = .028). Age was the only statistically significant demographic predictor, but obesity was not a significant predictor of any of the outcomes. Conclusion Age and COVID-19 Risk Scores were significant predictors of severe COVID-19 outcomes. Further work should examine the properties of the COVID-19 Risk Factors Scale.

Impact of empirical antibiotic regimens on mortality in neutropenic patients with bloodstream infection presenting with septic shock

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariana Chumbita ◽  
Pedro Puerta-Alcalde ◽  
Carlota Gudiol ◽  
Nicole Garcia-Pouton ◽  
Júlia Laporte-Amargós ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Septic Shock ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Neutropenic Patients ◽  
Prospective Cohorts ◽  
Independent Risk Factors ◽  
The Impact

Objectives: We analyzed risk factors for mortality in febrile neutropenic patients with bloodstream infections (BSI) presenting with septic shock and assessed the impact of empirical antibiotic regimens. Methods: Multicenter retrospective study (2010-2019) of two prospective cohorts comparing BSI episodes in patients with or without septic shock. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for mortality in episodes with septic shock. Results: Of 1563 patients with BSI, 257 (16%) presented with septic shock. Those patients with septic shock had higher mortality than those without septic shock (55% vs 15%, p<0.001). Gram-negative bacilli caused 81% of episodes with septic shock; gram-positive cocci, 22%; and Candida species 5%. Inappropriate empirical antibiotic treatment (IEAT) was administered in 17.5% of septic shock episodes. Empirical β-lactam combined with other active antibiotics was associated with the lowest mortality observed. When amikacin was the only active antibiotic, mortality was 90%. Addition of empirical specific gram-positive coverage had no impact on mortality. Mortality was higher when IEAT was administered (76% vs 51%, p=0.002). Age >70 years (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.2-4.7), IEAT for Candida spp. or gram-negative bacilli (OR 3.8, 1.3-11.1), acute kidney injury (OR 2.6, 1.4-4.9) and amikacin as the only active antibiotic (OR 15.2, 1.7-134.5) were independent risk factors for mortality, while combination of β-lactam and amikacin was protective (OR 0.32, 0.18-0.57). Conclusions: Septic shock in febrile neutropenic patients with BSI is associated with extremely high mortality, especially when IEAT is administered. Combination therapy including an active β-lactam and amikacin results in the best outcomes.

Ventricular Fibrillation After Release of an Aortic Cross-Clamp in Valvular Surgery: Independent Risk Factors, Outcomes, and Incidence from Access Routes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weichao LI ◽  
heng li ◽  
Jianping Gong ◽  
Weihua Liu ◽  
BaoJun Fu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Ventricular Fibrillation ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Aortic Cross Clamp ◽  
Valvular Surgery ◽  
Htk Solution ◽  
Independent Risk Factors

Abstract Background Predictors and clinical outcomes of VF-ACC and the relative VF-ACC incidence with various access routes have not been well documented. This study aimed to identify predictors, clinical outcomes, and relative incidences of ventricular fibrillation after the release of an aortic cross-clamp (VF-ACC) with various access routes in valvular surgery.Patients and methods In this single-center and retrospective cohort study, we screened 228 consecutive patients undergoing valve surgery, and a total of 119 patients were included in the study. The primary outcomes were the relative incidence and predictors of VF-ACC with access routes, and secondary endpoints included effects of VF-ACC on 30-day mortality, perioperative ventricular arrhythmias (VAs), and heart failure with ejection fraction < 50% (HFEF < 50%).Results VF-ACC incidence varied on the basis of access routes. VF-ACC occurred in 58.3% of patients with aortic valve replacement via transverse aortotomy (TAo-AVR), in 48.6% of patients with aortic and mitral replacements via transseptal and transverse aortotomy access (TSAo-MAVR), and in 20% of patients with mitral valve replacement via transseptal access (TS-MVR). Seven independent risk factors were identified: HTK solution (AOR: 4.90, p = 0.002), smoking status (AOR: 6.30, p = 0.001), cerebrovascular disease (CBD) [(AOR: 7.08, p = 0.022)], regional wall motion abnormality (RWMA) [(AOR: 8.33, p < 0.001)], perioperative VAs (AOR: 4.85, p = 0.001), HFEF < 50% (AOR: 5.66, p = 0.002), and left ventricular mass index (LVMI) [(AOR: 0.962, CI: 0.941–0.984)].Conclusions VF-ACC was the most common in TAo-AVR and the least common in TS-MVR. HTK solution, smoking status, CBD, perioperative VAs, HFEF < 50%, and RWMA were associated with an increased risk of VF-ACC, and low LVMI acted as a protective factor. Patients with VF-ACC commonly experienced perioperative VAs or HFEFs < 50%.Clinical trial registration: ChiCTR2100050961.

scholarly journals Oxidative Stress Inside the Pathogenesis of Ascending Aorta Aneurysms: A Clearer Vision for Identifying Promising Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmela Balistreri ◽  
Calogera Pisano ◽  
Giovanni Ruvolo
Keyword(s):  
Oxidative Stress ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Genetic Variants ◽  
Complex Disease ◽  
Ascending Aorta ◽  
Oxygen Species ◽  
Aorta Aneurysm ◽  
Independent Risk Factors ◽  
The Impact ◽  
And Oxidative Stress

Ascending aorta aneurysm (AsAA) is a complex disease, currently defined an inflammatory disease. In the sporadic form, AsAA has, indeed, a complex physiopathology with a strong inflammatory basis, significantly modulated by genetic variants in innate/inflammatory genes, acting as independent risk factors and as largely evidenced in our recent studies performed during the last 10 years. Based on these premises, here, we want to revise the impact of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and oxidative stress on AsAA pathophysiology and consequently on the onset and progression of sporadic AsAA. This might consent to add other important pieces in the intricate puzzle of the pathophysiology of this disease with the translational aim to identify biomarkers and targets to apply in the complex management of AsAA, by facilitating the AsAA diagnosis currently based only on imaging evaluations, and the treatment exclusively founded on surgery approaches.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document