scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN INKUIRI TERIMBING BERBASIS KEARIFAN LOKAL TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KREATIF PESERTA DIDIK PADA MATERI BIOTEKNOLOGI

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 38-48
Author(s):  
Berti Yolida ◽  
◽  
Median Agus Priadi

This study aims to determine the effect of local wisdom-based guided inquiry learning models on students' creative thinking skill. The design in this research used a pretest-posttest non-equivalent control grup. The sample of this research was students of class IX E dan IX F which were sampled from the population in a cluster random sampling manner. Data in this research were quantitatif data obtained fromnthe average pretest, posttest, and N-gain values which were then statistically analyzed using the t test at 5% confidence level through the SPSS 17. The results showed that the creative thinking skill of experimental class students obtained good criteria with an average acquisition of 58.9 and it is known that the significance value at sig. (2-tailed) <0.05 which means that there is a significant influence on the experimental class. Thus, learning using guided inquiry models based on local wisdom influences students' creative thinking skill.

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-68
Author(s):  
Heni Sintia ◽  
Riswan Jaenudin ◽  
Siti Fatimah

Abstract This research entitled "Comparison of Learning Results Students Between Using Inquiry Learning Model with Learning Models Discovery on Economics Class X class at SMA Negeri 1 Gelumbang". The problem formulation is “whether there are differences in learning outcomes of learners between using the model of learning inquiry with the model of learning discovery on the subjects of economy class X in SMA Negeri 1 Gelumbang”. This research is a comparative study, which uses a compeletely randomized design design, with a pretest posttest form. Population in this research is all class X in SMA Negeri 1 Gelumbang. The sample used cluster random sampling, so selected X class IPS 2 as experiment class 1 which amounted to 32 students and X IPS 3 as experiment class 2 amounted to 30 students. Data collection techniques used are tests and observations. Hypothesis using parametric statistic that is test-t and obtained tcount value bigger than table or 2,692 bigger than 1,671 hence hypothesis of Ho refused and Ha accepted. It can be concluded that there are differences in learning outcomes of learners between using the model of learning Inquiry with the model of learning Discovery on the subjects of economy class X in SMA Negeri 1 Gelumbang. Abstrak Penelitian ini berjudul “Perbandingan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Yang Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Inquiry dengan Model Pembelajaran Discovery pada Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi kelas X di SMA Negeri 1 Gelumbang”. Adapun rumusan masalah yaitu “apakah ada perbedaan hasil belajar peserta didik yang menggunakan model pembelajaran Inquiry dengan model pembelajaran Discovery pada mata pelajaran ekonomi kelas X di SMA Negeri 1 Gelumbang”. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian komparatif, yang menggunakan desain compeletely randomized design, dengan bentuk 2 kelas pretest posttest. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh kelas X di SMA Negeri 1 Gelumbang. Sampel penelitian menggunakan cluster random sampling, sehingga terpilih kelas X IPS 2 sebagai kelas eksperimen 1 yang berjumlah 32 peserta didik dan X IPS 3 sebagai kelas eksperimen 2 berjumlah 30 peserta didik. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan yaitu tes dan observasi. Hipotesis menggunakan statistik parametris yaitu uji t dan diperoleh nilai thitung lebih besar dari ttabel atau 2,692 lebih besar dari 1,671 maka hipotesis Ho ditolak dan Ha diterima. Dapat disimpulkan ada perbedaan hasil belajar peserta didik antara menggunakan model pembelajaran Inquiry dengan model pembelajaran Discovery pada mata pelajaran ekonomi kelas X di SMA Negeri 1 Gelumbang


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-162
Author(s):  
Firda Awalia Putri ◽  
Susriyati Mahanal ◽  
Vita Ria Mustikasari

The aim of this study is to analyze the difference of students learning result on Natural Science subject who study using guided inquiry and conventional learning. The subjects of this study involve the students VIII grade of MTs Negeri Malang III that selected by cluster random sampling. The measurement of students learning result through posttest of multiple choice item which is analyzed is using precondition test and t-test. The result of study showed that there was a difference on students learning result who learnt using guided inquiry learning and those who used conventional learning Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perbedaan hasil belajar IPA peserta didik yang belajar dengan pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing dan pembelajaran konvensional. Subjek penelitian ini adalah peserta didik kelas VIII MTs Negeri Malang III yang dipilih secara cluster random sampling. Pengukuran hasil belajar peserta didik melalui posttest soal pilihan ganda yang dianalisis menggunakan uji prasyarat dan uji-t. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar peserta didik yang belajar dengan pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing dan peserta didik yang belajar dengan pembelajaran konvensional.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-180
Author(s):  
Jofi Kuswanto ◽  
Muh. Nasir ◽  
Ariyansyah Ariyansyah

Penelitian ini merupakan jenis penelitian quasy experimental dengan desain equivalent control group. Sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Wera. Teknik pengambilan sampel yang digunakan adalah teknik cluster random sampling dengan materi keanekaragaman hayati. Proses pengumpulan data peneliti menggunakan instrumen tes, , observasi, Dari hasil penelitian, model pembelajaran konvensional terhadap Kemampuan Literasi Sains pada kelas kontrol diperoleh nilai rata-rata pretest sebesar 66.79 dan nilai rata-rata posttest sebesar 79.29 sedangkan model pembelajaran gaided inquiry terhadap Kemampuan Literasi Sains pada kelas eksperimen diperoleh nilai rata-rata pretest sebesar74.64, dan nilai rata-rata posttest sebesar 85.71. Hasil uji hipotesis kemampuan literasi sains ditemukan nilai sig 2-tailed 0,02. Oleh karena nilai sig < 0,05, artinya H0 ditolak H1 diterima, maka dapat disimpulkan bahwa pembelajaran biologi dengan model gaided inquiry berpengaruh terhadap Kemampuan Literasi Sains siswa kelas X pada materi keanekaragaman hayati di SMA Negeri 1 Wera. Kata Kunci : gaided inquiry, Kemampuan Literasi Sains


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dewi Ekaputri Pitorini ◽  
Suciati Suciati ◽  
Joko Ariyanto

Penelitian bertujuan untuk mengetahui ada atau tidaknya perbedaan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah tertulis siswa melalui model pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing dengan Inkuiri Terbimbing dipadu Dialog Socrates. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode quasi experimental research dengan desain penelitian posttest only with nonequivalent group design. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas XI IPA SMA Negeri A Karanganyar Tahun Pelajaran 2018/2019. Teknik pengambilan sampel yang digunakan adalah cluster random sampling. Sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah kelas XI IPA 1 sebagai kelas eksperimen 1 dengan model pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing dan kelas XI IPA 2 sebagai kelas eksperimen 2 dengan model pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing dipadu Dialog Socrates. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan teknik tes dan teknik non tes. Uji hipotesis yang digunakan adalah uji t. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa nilai rata-rata argumentasi ilmiah tertulis kelas eksperimen 2 lebih tinggi yaitu 74,44 dibandingkan dengan kelas eksperimen 1 yaitu 65,99. Hasil uji t menunjukkan bahwa thitung>ttabel (4,675>1,99444), artinya terdapat perbedaan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah tertulis siswa yang signifikan antara kelas eksperimen 1 dan kelas eksperimen 2. Simpulan penelitian ini adalah bahwa ada perbedaan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah tertulis siswa melalui model pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing dengan Inkuiri Terbimbing dipadu Dialog Socrates. Students' argumentation skills: A comparison between the guided-inquiry learning model and the Socrates dialogue-integrated guided-inquiry learning model AbstractThe research aimed to determine whether there was a difference in students’ written scientific argumentation skills through Guided Inquiry learning model and Guided Inquiry learning model integrated with Socratic Dialogue. The research was quasi-experimental research. The research design used was posttest only with nonequivalent group design. The population in this research were all students of class XI IPA of SMA Negeri A Karanganyar academic year 2018/2019. The sampling technique used in this research was cluster random sampling. The sample in this study was class XI IPA 1 as the experimental class 1 with the Guided Inquiry learning model and class XI IPA 2 as the experimental class 2 with the Guided Inquiry learning model combined with Socrates Dialogue.  The data collection technique used was test technique and non-test technique. The hypothesis test used was t-test. The results of the research showed that the average scientific written argument for the experimental class 2 was higher at 74.44 compared to the experimental class 1 at 65.99. The t-test results show that tcount>ttable (4,675> 1,99444), meaning that there were significant differences in students' written scientific argumentation skills between the experimental class 1 and the experimental class 2. The conclusion of this study was that there was a difference in students' written scientific argumentation skills through the Guided Inquiry learning model with Guided Inquiry learning model integrated with Socrates Dialogue.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Sariningsih Sariningsih ◽  
Purwati Kuswarini Suprapto ◽  
Liah Badriah

Abstrak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh model pembelajaran guided inquiry terhadap hasil belajar peserta didik di kelas XI MIPA SMA Negeri 1 Sindangkasih pada materi sistem saraf manusia. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan pada bulan September 2018 sampai dengan bulan Juli 2019 di SMA Negeri 1 Sindangkasih. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah true experiment. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh kelas XI MIPA SMA Negeri 1 Sindangkasih sebanyak 3 kelas. Sampel yang digunakan sebanyak 2 kelas yaitu kelas XI MIPA 1 sebagai kelas eksperimen dan kelas XI MIPA 3 sebagai kelas kontrol yang diambil dengan teknik cluster random sampling. Teknik pengumpulan data berupa tes tulis hasil belajar pada materi sistem saraf manusia yang dilakukan sebelum dan sesudah pembelajaran berlangsung. Data hasil penelitian dianalisis dengan menggunakan uji ancova. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat pengaruh model pembelajaran guided inquiry terhadap hasil belajar peserta didik pada materi sistem saraf manusia di kelas XI MIPA SMA Negeri 1 Sindangkasih.Abstract. This study aimed to determine the effect guided inquiry learning model toward learning outcomes of students in XI MIPA classes at SMA Negeri 1 Sindangkasih on nervous system subject. This research was conducted from September 2018 until July 2019 at SMA Negeri 1 Sindangkasih. The research used the true experiment method. The population in this study were all XI MIPA at SMA Negeri 1 Sindangkasih as many as 3 classes. The sample used was 2 classes, namely class XI MIPA 1 as the experimental class and class XI MIPA 3 as the control class taken by cluster random sampling technique. Data collection techniques in the form of tests of learning outcomes on the nervous system subject was conducted before and after learning process were taken place. The datas were analyzed by using the Ancova test. The results showed that there was the effect guided inquiry learning model toward learning outcomes of students on nervous system subject in XI MIPA classes at SMA Negeri 1 Sindangkasih.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mulyaningrum Lestari

<em>IMPLEMENTATION OF INTUITION BASED LEARNING MODEL ON STUDENT CREATIVITY. The purpose of this study was to determine the implementation of intuitive learning models for the creativity of class X students. The population of this study was class X students of SMAN 2 Sragen. The sample of this study was taken by cluster random sampling and selected class X. MIA 4 as an experimental class that uses expository learning, and class X.Mia 5 as a class that uses intuitive learning. Analysis of the data in this study were students in the class who used expository learning models, on average meeting the level of fluency thinking by 71.9% and still not meeting the level of other creative thinking. Then, students in the class who use the intuitive learning model obtained students who meet the level of thinking Flexibility and fluency thinking level of 82.14%. So it can be said that the creativity of students who get an intuitive-based learning model is better than students who get an expository learning model</em>


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 119-128
Author(s):  
Mei Kristina Situmorang ◽  
Muhammad Syahril Harahap ◽  
Marzuki Ahmad

This study aims to describe mathematic creative thinking ability and student’s metacognitive during Covid-19 pandemic in SMA Negeri 1 Andam Dewi. This research was conducted by applying descriptive quantitative method. Sample of this research is 20 students which taken by using cluster random sampling technique from 36 students.  Questionnaire and test were used in collecting the data. Questionnaire sheet shows the average of students’ metacognitive  is 78.61 (good category) and test sheet shows the average of mathematic creative thinking ability is 83.53 (high category). Futhermore by using ttest Kolmogorov- Sminov shows significant value is less than 0.05 (0.000<0.05). It means there is any significant influence of students’ metacognitive on mathematic creative thinking ability during Covid-19 pandemic in SMA Negeri 1 Andam Dewi.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-83
Author(s):  
Listia Ernaeni ◽  
Indra Gunawan

Abstract: This study uses the type of Quasy Experiment Design with the design of Non Equivalent Control Group Design. The study used two classes as the experimental class and the control class. The study population was VII grade students. The sampling technique used is Cluster Random Sampling. Based on data analysis and discussion, there are differences in the average value of learning outcomes (posttest) between learning using the advanced organizer and conventional learning models, from the results of the t test also known that 0.044 <0.05 which means H0 is rejected which indicates the influence of the model advanced organizer learning on students' creative thinking abilities.Abstrak: Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis Quasy Eksperiment Design dengan rancangan desain Non Equivalent Control Group Design. Penelitian menggunakan dua kelas sebagai kelas eksperimen dan kelas kontrol.. Populasi penelitian adalah peserta didik kelas VII. Teknik pengambilan sampel yang digunakan dengan cara Cluster Random Sampling. Berdasarkan analisis data dan pembahasan, terdapat perbedaan nilai rata-rata hasil belajar (postest) antara pembelajaran dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran advanced organizer dan konvensional, dari hasil perhitungan uji t juga diketahui bahwa 0,044 < 0,05 yang berarti H0 ditolak yang menunjukkan adanya pengaruh model pembelajaran advanced organizer terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif peserta didik.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 73
Author(s):  
Lailil Mukarrom ◽  
Bayu Widiyanto ◽  
Yuni Arfiani

<p>Penelitian ini bertujuan mengetahui peningkatan creative thinking skill peserta didik antara penerapan model <em>cooperative learning</em> berbantu peta konsep dengan penerapan model <em>cooperative learning</em> tanpa peta konsep pada tema pencemaran lingkungan. Penelitian ini dilakukan pada peserta didik kelas VII di SMP Negeri 8 Pemalang. Desain penelitian ini adalah <em>pretest-postest control group design</em>. Teknik pengambilan sampel yang digunakan adalah <em>purposive sampling</em>. Pengujian penelitian ini menggunakan uji <em>paired sample t-test</em>. Instrumen yang digunakan yaitu soal pretest dan postest berbentuk uraian dengan 7 soal,  lembar observasi dan lembar penilaian hasil tugas mandiri peserta didik.  Hasil penelitian menunjukkan ada peningkatan yang signifikan dengan nilai signifikansi pada kelas eksperimen sebesar 0,016&lt;0,05 dan pada kelas kontrol sebesar 0,013&lt;0,05 antara penerapan model <em>cooperative learning</em> berbantu peta konsep dan model <em>cooperative learning</em> tanpa peta konsep untuk meningkatkan <em>creative thinking skill</em> peserta didik pada tema pencemaran lingkungan.</p><p> </p><p>This study aims to determine the improvement of students' creative thinking skills between the application of cooperative learning models assisted with concept maps and the implementation of cooperative learning models without concept maps on the theme of environmental pollution. This research was conducted on grade VII students at SMP Negeri 8 Pemalang. The design of this study was the pretest-posttest control group design. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling. The testing of this study used a paired sample t-test. The instrument used was a matter of pretest and posttest in the form of a description with seven questions, an observation sheet, and an assessment sheet of students' independent assignment results. The results showed a significant increase with a significance value in the experimental class of 0.016 &lt;0.05 and in the control class of 0.013 &lt;0.05 between the application of cooperative learning models assisted with concept maps and cooperative learning models without concept maps to improve participants' creative thinking skills students on the theme of environmental pollution.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document