scholarly journals Penerapan Model Student Facilitator and Explaining (SFE) dengan Media Poster untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (01) ◽  
pp. 105-118
Author(s):  
Sonia Andam Sari ◽  
Eline Yanty Putri Nasution ◽  
Laswadi Laswadi

This study used quantitative approach with experiment method. The research design was posttest-only control group. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of cooperative learning model type Student Facilitator and Eksplaining (SFE) with poster media through students’ mathematical representation ability. The population was all of seventh grade students in SMPN 7 Sungai Penuh. Two sample were choosen withdraw. Conventional method was implemented in control group, while cooperative learning model type Student Facilitator and Eksplaining (SFE) with poster media was implemented in experiment group. The instrument in this study was students’ mathematical representation ability test that the test items was analyzed first. The instrument was given in the end of learning process in both groups. The result of the data analysis was obtained that: (1) the average of students’ mathematical representation ability test in control group was 66,67 while in experiment group was 73,43; (2) the students’ mathematical representation ability who study under cooperative learning model type Student Facilitator and Eksplaining (SFE) with poster media was higher than who study under conventional method; (3) there was an effect of cooperative learning model type Student Facilitator and Eksplaining (SFE) with poster media through the students’ mathematical representation ability.

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 75
Author(s):  
Lika Yulinda ◽  
Kasmudin Mustapa ◽  
Ratman Ratman

This study aim was to determine the influence of application of cooperative learning model type numbered head together combination with contextual teaching and learning toward learning outcomes of students in SMA Imanuel Palu. This study used quasi experimental design with non randomized pretest-posttest control group. Sample used were two classes, Xb (n=30) as experimental and Xa (n = 30) as control one. The test of student learning outcomes data used the t-test statistical analysis of the two parties. The results of data analysis obtained, the average score of experimental class () was 50.50 with a standard deviation of 9.79 and for control class () was 41.03 with a standard deviation of 11.01. The result of testing hypothesis with the statistical t-test of two parties obtained that –ttable < tcalculation > +ttable (tcalculation = 2.35 and ttable = 2.00) with a significance level α= 0.05 and 58 degrees of freedom, then H0 was rejected and Ha was accepted. The result of the data analysis showed that there was any in learning outcomes between students in experimental class and the control class, until concluded there is any influences of application of cooperative learning model type numbered head together combination with contextual teaching and learning toward learning outcomes of students in SMA Imanuel Palu.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rivdya Eliza ◽  
Khadijah Khadijah ◽  
Utari Wulandari

The purpose of this study is 1) To know the motivation to learn mathematics of taught by using cooperative learning model type Pair Check with reward higher than student motivation taught by convensional learning,and 2) To know the mathematical reasoning ability which was taught by using cooperative learning model type Pair Check with reward on material function is higher than students mathematical reasoning ability taught by convensional learning. This type of research is Quasi Experimental Research with Randomized Control Group Only Design. The population in this study is all eighth grade student of SMPN 19 Padang. In obtaining the sample class it is need to be done normality, homogeneity and equality of classroom average tests the class selected as the experimental class is VIII.5 class and the control class is VIII.3. The result of the research shows that 1) learning motivation of students which was taught by using cooperative learning Pair Check model with Reward is higher than student’s motivation taught by convensional learning. Hypothesis test that is t-score (7.034) > t-table (1.67), 2) students' mathematical reasoning ability after being taught by cooperative model type Pair Check with reward is higher than the students' mathematical reasoning abilities taught by conventional learning models. Seen from the average score of the experimental class test score of 80.16 and the average of the control class test score of 74.13. After hypothesis testing using t-test, obtained tscore > t-table (1.867 > 1.67) at 95%. So it can be student mathematical reasoning ability of class VIII SMPN 19 Padang which is taught by cooperative learning model type Pair Check with reward is higher than taught by using conventional learning.Keywords: Mathematic Reasoning Ability And Student Motivation, Model Cooperative Type Pair Check, Reward Fungsi, And Mathematic


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 124-135
Author(s):  
Havizhah Havizhah ◽  
◽  
Muhaimin Muhaimin ◽  
Damris Muhammad ◽  
◽  
...  

This study aims to see the effect of the cooperative learning model type of group investigation and adversity quotient of students on the mastery of chemical concepts on salt hydrolysis. This research is a quasi-experimental research with a control group posttest only design using a 2 × 3 factorial design. The research was conducted in class IX MIA SMA N 10 Batanghari with two classes. Sampling was done by total sampling. Data collection techniques are questionnaires, tests and documentation. The test instrument was used to determine the value of mastery of chemical concepts on salt hydrolysis. Meanwhile, the questionnaire instrument was used to determine the level of adversity quotient of students. Data processing used two-way ANOVA. The results showed that the cooperative learning model group Investigation type and the adversitiy quotient of the climber type students had high mastery of chemical concepts, but there was no interaction between the group investigation type learning model and the adversity quotient on the mastery of chemical concepts on salt hydrolysis due to the learning model and adversity quotient influence on mastery of chemical concepts independently. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded: (1) there is an effect of the group investigation type cooperative learning model on the mastery of chemical concepts (2) there is an effect of students adversity quotient on chemical concept mastery (3) there is no interaction between the cooperative learning model group investigation type with students' adversity quotient on mastery of chemical concepts in salt hydrolysis.


Author(s):  
Rusmartini Rusmartini

The aims of this research were to increase the activities and the result of study by implementation of cooperative learning model type jigsaw with picture media. The method of the research was Classroom Action Reserach. The instrument of data collection used observation sheet and test. Technique of data analysis used qualitative and quantitative analysis. The result showed that the student activity in cycle I 62,58% (active) and cycle II 81,50%(activeenough). The result study of the cognitivie in cycle I 71,31%(good) and cycle II80,42%(good).Keywords:  activity,  jigsaw,  picture media,  result study


Author(s):  
Fety Risdiyati ◽  
Sri Endah Miyanti ◽  
Laela Sagita

The research aims to determine the effectiveness of cooperative learning model type Think Talk Write (TTW) and type Think Pair Share (TPS) toward the mathematic communication skill students of grade 8th in MTs N Godean. This type of research is comparative descriptive which aplies Pretest Posttest Control Group Design. An instrument used in this study there are two kinds of the instruments learning and instruments data collection. An instrument consisting of learning implementation lesson plans and sheets of student activity, instruments gather data consists of broad observation, questionnaire, a test (pretest and posttest) and documentation. Analysis of data on research use t test some help software Ms. Excel 2010 and SPSS 20. The results of research pretest and posttest show that experiment class with cooperative model type Think Talk Write (TTW) and control class with cooperative model type Think Pair Share (TPS) normal distribution, both classes are homogenous and both classes have the same initial capability. The cooperative learning model type Think Talk Write (TTW) is same effective with cooperative learning model type Think Pair Share (TPS) toward the mathematic communication skill students. The level of effectiveness cooperative learning model type Think Talk Write (TTW) is 0,30 with medium category and the level of effectiveness cooperative learning model type Think Pair Share (TPS) is 0,28 with low category. Cooperative learning model type Think Talk Write (TTW) is same effective with cooperative learning model type Think Pair Share (TPS) because the students are individually active role in group discussions and there is the same syntax for these two models namely stage think.Keyword: Cooperative learning model type Think Talk Write (TTW), cooperative learning model type Think Pair Share (TPS), mathematic communication skill students.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 83
Author(s):  
Bejo Apriyanto ◽  
Fahrudi Ahwan Ikhsan ◽  
Elan Artono Nurdin ◽  
Fahmi Arif Kurnianto

Selection of the right learning model will increase the chances of achieving student learning success. The choice of learning model should pay attention to students' ability which is generally not the same among students one to another. The main factors are the various intelligence and student backgrounds. In addition, the absorptive capacity of the subject matter between students with one student is not the same so that affect learning outcomes achieved. Therefore, teachers need alternative learning model to overcome the diversity of student characteristics, one of them is with individual learning. However, the large number of students in the classroom and the various shortcomings in individual learning such as the effectiveness of learning, time, effort, and curriculum demands, as well as other obstacles, then individual learning is very unlikely to be implemented. An alternative that teachers can do is through the use of learning models that lead to programmed individual learning. The model of learning in accordance with the problem is Model Team Assisted Individualization (TAI). The TAI model is designed as a learning model that combines individual learning with cooperative learning. With the TAI model, the weaknesses that exist in individual learning and on cooperative learning can be minimized with the advantages that exist in both. This study aims to determine the effect of the use of TAI Model on the results of IPS geography learning. This research includes quasi experiment type, using Pretest-posttest Control Group Design design. The subjects consisted of one experimental class and one control class, grade VII student SMPN 4 Lumajang. The research instrument is a test consisting of prates and pascates. The data analysis technique uses t-test with SPSS 16.00 for Windows. The result of data analysis shows that the learning result of IPS geography of students using TAI model is better than students who do not use TAI Model. Thus it can be argued that the use of TAI model influences the learning outcomes Geography IPS Geography students proposed for teachers in the field of study Geography is to make the Model TAI as an alternative model of learning to improve student learning outcomes. Suggestions for further research are piloting the TAI Model on different materials and levels of higher classes or schools, as well as combining with more varied learning media so as to show a great influence on student learning outcomes and gain greater benefits from the TAI Model. Key Words: Model Team Assisted Individualization (TAI), Geography Learning Result


SIMBIOSA ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Destaria Sudirman ◽  
Fenny Agustina ◽  
Pikal Candra

This study aims to determine the type of use of Cooperative Learning Model (TGT) Team Tournament Game Against Student Results. This study is arandomized experiment with design Posttest Only Control Group Design with class VII entirepopulation. The sample in this study is the number of students VIIF class 30as aclass VIID experimental class and the number of students as a control group of 30 people. Sampling using a simple random sample (random sampling), data analysis techniques using ttest. Based on test data analysis instrument of 40 multiple choice questions about  the 32 validated, while the reliability test is high (0.80 to 1.00). Test data results are normal prerequisites of F<F table (1.029 <1, 860) and homogeneity homogeneous L hitung <L table (0.138 <0.161), with an average value of 83 experimental class and the average value of the control class 68 shows the hypothesis test resultst (6,89)>t table α of 5%(1.70). So that Ha=μ1 ≠ μ2 received whileHo=μ1=μ2 cancel, there are differences TGT cooperative learning model with the lecture method to the learning outcomes of students of class VII in photosynthetic material. Keywords: Cooperative  Learning Model, Type TGT (Team Game Tournament), the Results learning outcomes


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 138-145
Author(s):  
Adelia Putri Rahayu ◽  
Ningrum Ningrum ◽  
Tiara Anggia Dewi

The Cooperative Learning model Inside Outside Circle is a learning strategy that allows students to exchange information at the same time and so that students can think critically and improve communication skills towards their learning outcomes, by applying the inside outside circle model in the classroom when the learning process will certainly make students produce meaningful knowledge.As for the problems in the research conducted by researchers, "There are still many students who have not experienced mastery learning in the economic learning outcomes of class X students of SMA 3 Metro in the academic year 2018/2019". From these problems, the formulation of the problem is "Is there an effect of Cooperative Learning learning type Inside Outside Circle on the economic learning outcomes of class X students of SMA Negeri 3 Metro academic year 2018/2019". The purpose of this study was to influence the use of the model of cooperative learning type inside outside circle on the economic learning outcomes of class X students of Negeri 3 Senior High School Metro tshun lesson 2018/2019. Then the hypothesis in this study are as follows: "There is an influence of the use of cooperative learning model type inside outside circle on the economic learning outcomes of class X students of SMA 3 Metro in the academic year 2018/2019". This type of research is a kind of pseudo research (Quasi Experimental), with an experimental design form that is the form of The Non-Equivalent Control Group Design. This design has a population of all classes X IPS 1, 2, 3, 4 with a total of 135 students. The experimental class is class X IPS 2 with a total of 32 students, and the control class is class X IPS 3 with a total of 35 students, the sampling method in this study is in the form of a Purposive Sample.Based on the results of the research conducted, the hypothesis is accepted, because the value of tcount> t table can be seen in the appendix list G, at a significance level of 5%, namely 3.18> 1.70. Students who are declared complete with KKM are (70) after being given treatment with the inside outside circle model which is as many as 28 students or with a percentage of 87.5% and those that are not complete are 4 students with a percentage of 12.5%. Thus it shows that the Cooperative Learning Model Type Inside Outside Circle has a positive influence on the economic learning outcomes of class X students of State High School 3 Metro Academic Year 2018/2019


Author(s):  
Ni KomangAyu Sutami

The purpose of this research is to determine the significant differences of mastering science knowledge competence between class that are taught by cooperative learning model type student facilitator and explaining based reinforcement and class that are taught by conventional learning in grade IV students in SD Gugus Budi Utomo East Denpasar in academic years 2017/2018. This research is a quasi eksperimental research with non-equivalent control group design. The research subject is the IV grade of SD Gugus Budi Utomo amounting 315 student. This researh consists of 2 classes of 66 students is taken by random sampling technique. The data were collected using the test method in the form of a standard multiple choice objective test. The data obtained were analyzed using descriptive statistics and inferential statistics that t-test. Based on data analysis result obtained  thitung = 5,540 > ttabel = 2,000 at 5% significance  level and dk = 64. So Ho rejected which means  there is a significant differences of mastering science knowledge competence between class that are taught by cooperative learning model type student facilitator and explaining based reinforcement and class that are taught by conventional learning. The mean of experimental class is 86,90 and the control class is 77,36. Thus it can be concluded that the cooperative learning  model type student facilitator and explaining based reinforcement  influence on the mastery competence of science’s knowledge of grade IV students in SD Gugus Budi Utomo East Denpasar in academic years 2017/2018.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Lidwina Felisima Tae ◽  
Fakhruddin Fakhruddin ◽  
Imelda Paulina Soko ◽  
Bagus Hary Prakoso

Two Stay Two Stray  is a cooperative learning model which is majoring the cooperation of each member of group to finish the task given and give chance to its member to share information each other with another group member by following a certain pattern. The purpose of this research is  to investigate the difference of learning achievement between students who have been taught using cooperative learning model of Two Stay Two Stray  type with three intersection  pattern and students who have been taught using cooperative learning model of Two Stay Two Stray  type with the simple pattern. The participants of this research are two groups of 10th grader, the A class as the experiment group and the B class as the control group respectively.  The instruments used in this research is Two Stay Two Stray with three intersection pattern and simple pattern learning which is manifested in the syllabus, Teaching Implementation Plan (RPP), and the questions for pre test and post test. The results of the data analysis were: 1) There was a difference in achievement between students who have been taught using cooperative learning of Two Stay Two Stray  type with three intersection pattern and students who have taught using a model of cooperative learning by Two Stay Two Stray  type with simple pattern, 2) the learning achievements of students who have taught using cooperative learning model of Two Stay Two Stray  type with three intersection pattern were higher than students who have taught using cooperative learning model of Two Stay Two Stray  type with simple pattern.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document