scholarly journals Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Jigsaw Puzzle Map Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika Materi Himpunan Ditinjau dari Tipe Kepribadian Siswa Kelas VII Semester 1 MTsN 1 Bojonegoro Tahun Ajaran 2015/2016

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 82
Author(s):  
Anis Umi Khoirotunnisa’

The research was conducted with the aim to determine: (1) which one results better mathermatics learning achievements between Jigsaw puzzle map and conventional learning model, (2) wich one results better mathematics learning achievements student with rational personality type, idealist personality type, guardian personality type, and artisan personality type in solving mathematics problems, (3) whether there is an interaction between learning model and the type of personality to the mathematics achievement of students.it was quantitative with quasi experimental research. The subject of this research was taken by using a cluster random sampling. The subject of this research 70 student of the seven grade whom come from 2 class students at MTsN I Bojonegoro. The techniques of collecting the data in this research were questionnaire and written test. The result of this eksperiment is : (1) jigsaw puzzle map learning model are better than convenstional learning model. (2) personality type give effect in mathematics learning achievements student, (3) there is no interaction between learning model ang the type of personality to the mathematics achievent students.

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
Nur Rohman

The objectives of this research are to investigate whether there is difference of influence student learning result after application of cooperative script learning model assisted mind map with direct instruction learning model on the subject of Program Linear class X of SMA Plus Al-Amanah Balongsumber Dander Bojonegoro in the academic year of 2014/2015. This study is a quasi-experimental study using a study design of post-test - only control design. The sampling technique using cluster random sampling technique. The sample in this research is class X-B as an experimental class and class X-C  as the control class. Data mathematics learning result obtained using the technique of tests, and the tests used in the form of an objective test. Data were analyzed by an independent comparative statistical t-test. Based on the research results, it was concluded that: there is a significant difference between students' mathematics learning result that learned through the cooperative scriptlearning model assisted mind map with the students that learned through direct instruction learning. This suggests there are differences in the effect of the cooperative script learning model assisted mind map with direct learning model mathematics instruction on learning result of students on the subject of Program Linear second semester of class X SMA Plus Al-Amanah Bojonegoro.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dewi Mutia Anggraeni ◽  
Paridjo . ◽  
Eleonora Dwi W

Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan : (1) Untuk mengetahui apakah ada perbedaan prestasi belajar matematika antara peserta didik yang diajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry dan model pembelajaran Ekspositori.(2) Untuk mengetahui apakah prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry lebih baik dari pada yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar tinggi.(3) Untuk mengetahui apakah prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembeljaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry tidak lebih baik daripada yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar rendah. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah peserta didik kelas VII SMP Negeri 3 Brebes tahun pelajaran 2016/2017. Pengambilan sampel menggunakan teknik cluster random sampling. Sampel yang diambil sebanyak 2 kelas eksperimen, 2 kelas kontrol, dan 1 kelas ujicoba. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah tes, angket, dan dokumentasi. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan dengan menetapkan taraf signifikansi 5% adalah uji Anava dengan Rancangan Acak Kelompok, uji-t satu pihak kanan, dan uji-t satu pihak kiri, yang sebelumnya telah dilakukan uji prasyarat yaitu uji normalitas dan uji homogenitas. Dari hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa: (1) Ada perbedaan prestasi belajar matematika antara peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry dengan model pembelajaran Ekspositori. (2) Prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry lebih baik daripada yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar tinggi. (3) Prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry tidak lebih baik atau sama dengan yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar rendah. Abstract: This study aims: (1) To find out whether there are differences in mathematics learning achievement between students taught by using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach and Expository learning models. (2) To find out whether the mathematics learning achievements of students taught by the model Think Pair and Share learning through the Inquiry Approach is better than those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of high learning independence. (3) To find out whether the mathematics learning achievement of students taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach is not better than those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of low learning independence. The population in this study were students of class VII of SMP Negeri 3 Brebes academic year 2016/2017. Sampling uses cluster random sampling technique. Samples taken were 2 experimental classes, 2 control classes, and 1 trial class. Data collection techniques used were tests, questionnaires, and documentation. The data analysis technique used by setting the 5% significance level is the Anova test with the Randomized Group Design, the right-hand t-test, and the left-hand t-test, which has previously been carried out prerequisite tests namely normality test and homogeneity test. From the results of the study it can be concluded that: (1) There are differences in mathematics learning achievement between students who are taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach with the Expository learning model. (2) Mathematics learning achievement of students taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach is better than those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of high learning independence. (3) Mathematics learning achievements of students taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach are not better or the same as those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of low learningindependence. Keywords: ThinkPairandShare, InquiryApproach, Learning Independence, Mathematics Learning Achievement.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-52
Author(s):  
Beni Junedi ◽  
Ade Susanti

The research aims to find out the students' mathematical understanding using situation-based learning model students of class X IPA, the type of research used is quasi-experimental design research, taking class X IPA 3 as an experimental class and class X IPA 2 as a control class. The technique used in this sampling is cluster random sampling. Research instruments in the form of tests to determine the level of mathematical understanding of students. The data obtained will be analyzed with the hypothesis test t-test. Hypothesis test results obtained a significant value <0.05 which is 0.049 <0.05. Based on these results it was concluded to reject H0 and accept Ha. This means the average student's mathematical understanding ability using the Situation-Based Learning model is better than the average student's mathematical understanding ability using conventional learning.


Author(s):  
Hidayat Bahktiar ◽  
Budi Usodo ◽  
Riyadi Riyadi

<p><strong>Abstract:</strong> This research aimed to find out: (1) which one gives better in mathematics learning achievement, learning model of Think Pair Share (TPS) with Problem Posing, Think Pair Share (TPS) or conventional, (2) which one have better in mathematics learning achievement, students having climbers, campers or quitters of Adversity Quotient, (3) in each learning model, which one have better mathematics learning achievement, students having climbers, campers or quitters of Adversity Quotient, (4) in each student’s level of Adversity Quotient which one gives better in mathematics learning achievement, learning model of TPS with Problem Posing, TPS or conventional. This research was a quasi-experimental research with 3 x 3 factorial design. The population of the research was all students class XI majors group technology, health and agriculture of SMK in Boyolali. The samples were chosen by using stratified cluster random sampling. The instruments that were used to collect the data were the documentation of mathematics achievement, questionnaire of Adversity Quotient and test of mathematics achievement. The technique of analyzing the data was two-ways ANOVA with unbalanced cells. The result of research showed as follows: (1) learning model of TPS with Problem Posing provided better learning achievement than model of TPS and conventional, learning model of TPS provided better learning achievement than conventional, (2) the students having climbers and campers had same achievement, and the students having climbers and campers had better  achievement than those having quitters, (3) in each learning model, the students having climbers and campers had the same achievement, and the students having climbers and campers had better achievement than those having quitters, (4) in each Adversity Quotient, learning model of TPS with Problem Posing provided better learning achievement than TPS and conventional, learning model of TPS provided better learning achievement than conventional.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>Think Pair Share (TPS), Problem Posing, and Adversity Quotient (AQ)</p>


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Desi Tri Utami ◽  
Nuning Melianingsih

<p>This research aims to prove the effect of the Think Pair Share (TPS) cooperative learning model on students' mathematics learning achievement in terms of logical-mathematical intelligence. The research is a quasi-experimental study. The population of the research is all seventh grade students of State Junior High Schools in Sukoharjo Regency. The data analysis technique used is a two-way analysis of variance with unequal cells. The conclusions of the research are: (1) TPS learning model produces learning achievement better than conventional learning model; (2) there is no difference in mathematics learning achievement between students with high and average logical-mathematical intelligence, and students with average and low logical-mathematical intelligence; students with high logical-mathematical intelligence have better mathematics learning achievement than those with low logical-mathematical intelligence; (3) in the group of students with high, average, and low logical-mathematical intelligence, the use of conventional and TPS learning models produces equally good learning achievements; (4) in the group of students with high and low logical-mathematical intelligence, the use of conventional and TPS learning models produces equally good learning achievements; in the group of students with average logical-mathematical intelligence, the TPS learning model produces learning achievements better than conventional learning model</p>


Author(s):  
Andi Kaharuddin

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of problem-based learning models towards the mathematics learning outcomes of 6th-grade students of an Elementary School accredited B in Kendari City. This study is quantitative experimental research. The population in this were all 6th-grade students of an Elementary School accredited B in Kendari City. The technique of determining the sample was done by cluster random sampling. Data analysis used is descriptive statistics and inferential statistics where the hypothesis test used is the t-test. The results showed the effect of problem-based learning models better than direct instruction and problem-based learning model positive effect on mathematics learning outcomes of 6th-grade students of an Elementary School Accredited B in Kendari City.


2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Henok Siagian ◽  
Hunter Lumbanbatu

This research aimed to determine the effect of Problem Based Learning Model on physics learning outcome of students in the subject physics mulberry and its unit in X class SMA Katolik Budi Murni 3 of Medan T.P 2013/2014. The kinds of this reaserch is quasi-experimental. The population in this research is all of the students of  X class SMA Katolik Budi Murni 3 of Medan which consisting of  4 classes totally 130 sample students . the cluster random sampling was done by taking 2 classes of 4 classes are randomly. The class of X­­-2 as experiment class and X-4 as control class that each class is 34 and 36 students. The instrument used achievement test is a multiple-choice test consist of 10 questions that have fulfilled content validity. The eksperimental class treated by using Problem Based Learning Model  and control class by using convensional model. Based on t test that Ha is accepted, it means that Problem Based Learning Model has significant impact in improving student learning outcomes. Keywords : Problem Based Learning Model, Studing Result and StudentActivity.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wide Sumiati ◽  
A.A Sujadi

This study aims to find out the effectiveness of TAI model through mathematics learning outcomes in terms of students' student activity. This research was a quasi-experimental research. Sampling technique in this research used Cluster Random Sampling technique. Data collection technique used questionnaire and tests. The data analysis technique used two-way variance analysis with unequal cell. The result of this research was that learning using TAI model is not more effective to use (Fobs< Ftable) with 2.859 <4.00; Students who have high student activity, have mathematics learning outcomes that are no better than those with moderate and low-skilled students (Fobs< Ftable) with 0.5576 < 3.15; There is no interaction between the learning model used and the student activity to the students' mathematics learning outcomes (Fobs< Ftable= 0.44 <3.15). A suggestion on the results of this study is in the process of teaching and learning teachers should be able to create an atmosphere of learning that can make students become more active.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 56
Author(s):  
Durachman Durachman ◽  
Edo Dwi Cahyo

Mathematics is often regarded as a boring subject, meaningless and less related to daily life. The teacher can use a variety of learning approaches that are interesting and make students more focused on paying attention and understanding the subject matter. The realistic mathematics approach in this study is used as a way to improve students' abilities especially in mathematics. The research method used is quasi-experimental with a non-equivalent control group. The population in this study were Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Negeri students in Bandung and Madrasa Ibtidaiyah Negeri Sumedang City. The results showed that the ability to think creatively and mathematical connections of students in the experimental class were better than students who obtained conventional mathematics learning. In addition, students' responses to mathematics learning using a realistic mathematical approach were interpreted as good, this is based on the results of a questionnaire that 86.08% of students were in the experimental class.


Author(s):  
Daswa Daswa

ABSTRACT This study aims to solve the problem of lack of creative thinking ability used sinektik learning model. This research is a quasi-experimental design with a control group of non-equivalence. The subjects in this study were students of MTs Husnul Khotimah Kuningan VIII class are divided into two groups: the experimental group as many as 31 students and a control group as many as 33 students. The experimental group get sinektik learning model, while the control group getting conventional learning models. Collecting data using the research results in the form of test instruments of creative thinking ability. Data were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. Data pretest and posttest of creative thinking ability processed with SPSS 16 for windows. The results showed that an increase in creative thinking abilities of students who study mathematics learning model sinektik better than students who use conventional learning model.                                                                                                          Keywords: sinektik learning model, the ability creative thinking.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document