Exploration for diamonds in West Greenland has experienced a major boost within the last decade following the establishment of world-class diamond mines within the nearby Slave Province of the Canadian Arctic. Numerous companies have active programmes of diamond exploration and increasingly larger diamonds have been discovered, notably a 2.392 carat dodecahedral stone recovered by the Canadian exploration company Hudson Resources Inc. in January 2007. The Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS) is currently carrying out several studies aimed at understanding the petrogenesis of diamondiferous kimberlites in Greenland and the physical and chemical properties of their associated mantle source regions (e.g. Hutchison 2005; Nielsen & Jensen 2005). Constraint of the mantle geotherm, i.e. the variation of temperature with depth for a particular mantle volume, is an important initial step in assessing the likelihood of such a volume to grow diamonds and hence the diamond potential of associated deep-sourced magmatic rocks occurring at surface. Cool geotherms are often present within old cratonic blocks such as West Greenland (Garde et al. 2000) and provide a good environment for the formation of diamonds (Haggerty 1986). This study aims to constrain the mantle geotherm for the southern extent of the North Atlantic Craton in Greenland by applying three-phase geothermobarometry calculations using chemical compositions of clinopyroxene, orthopyroxene and garnet from four-phase kimberlite-hosted lherzolite xenoliths. Xenoliths have been sampled from kimberlites from two areas in South-West Greenland: Midternæs and Pyramide- fjeld (Fig. 1). Kimberlites in the Pyramidefjeld area principally occur as sheeted sills hosted in the Pyramidefjeld granite complex of Palaeoproterozoic Ketilidian age. In contrast, Midternæs kimberlites occur as outcrops within a single, extensive and undulating sill hosted within pre-Ketilidian granodioritic gneiss and Ketilidian supracrustal rocks. Pyramidefjeld kimberlites have been shown to be Mesozoic (Andrews & Emeleus 1971), and work is currently being carried out to further constrain the ages of these and the Midternæs kimberlites and also xenoliths using modern methods. No attempt is made herein to provide a correct petrological classification of the rocks hosting the xenoliths; however, the abundance of clinopyroxene reported by Andrews & Emeleus (1971) suggests that further work may more correctly conclude a classification as ‘orangeite’ after Mitchell (1995). Notwithstanding this, the term ‘kimberlite’ is employed throughout in order to be consistent with that adopted by previous authors. The Precambrian Pyramide fjeld granite complex and adjacent Archaean granod ioritic gneisses are host to several kimberlite sheets located at various levels between 400 and 900 m elevation (Fig. 1A; Andrews & Emeleus 1971, 1975). Kimberlites are mainly found as loose blocks in scree; however, these are almost always sourced locally from in situ bodies. Sheets can often be found deep within overhanging clefts, particularly in granitic walls. The kimberlite bodies are gently dipping, typically 20 degrees, and with a range of strikes. The maximum thickness of sills is approximately 2 m but thickness varies significantly over short distances. In many instances, the occurrence of kimberlite is seen to be controlled locally by structures in the country rocks. Field observations of the range of orientations of intrusive bodies do not appear to suggest a particular focal point which could be a likely location for an intrusive centre such as a pipe. This observation is in line with what is seen throughout West Greenland where kimberlite emplacement appears as dykes and sills (Larsen & Rex 1992) rather than the pipes and blows which are common in other world-wide settings. The occurrence of xenoliths amongst Pyramidefjeld kimberlites is highly variable with the most xenolith-rich localities being in the vicinity of Safirsø (Fig. 1A). The majority of xenoliths are dunites with occasional wehrlites and lherzolites (Emeleus & Andrews 1975). Of particular interest from the point of view of thermobarometry is the occurrence of garnet. This is rarely found, even in clinopyroxene-bearing samples, and the two samples chosen for thermobarometry (Fig. 1A) represent the majority of the garnet-bearing xenoliths identified within an estimated total population of 75 xenoliths collected. The Midternæs kimberlites are hosted in Archaean gneisses and Proterozoic supracrustal rocks (Fig. 1B; Andrews & Emeleus 1971, 1975). The style of kimberlite emplacement and occurrence of garnet-bearing xenoliths are closely similar to those of Pyramidefjeld. Contours of elevation between outcrops suggest that the kimberlites form parts of a largely contiguous single body dipping at approximately 30 degrees to the west-south-west. Individual outcrops as in Pyramidefjeld indicate that the body varies in thickness and undulates in response to local structure. The south-western portion of the body which outcrops near the glacier Sioralik Bræ, is considerably thicker than elsewhere (Fig. 2) and in some places is seen to have a true thickness in excess of 4 m. Xenoliths are less abundant on average than in Pyramidefjeld kimberlites, but a similar variety and proportion of rock types and infrequent occurrence of garnet is observed. The kimberlites from both areas were intruded along zones of platy jointing which likely were caused by degassing of the magma and formed just prior to the kimberlite intrusion. In contrast to some kimberlites in other cratons, very few xenoliths of local, lower crustal rock types have been recognised in the kimberlites from Pyramidefjeld and Mid ternæs. The intrusions are therefore believed to have been of a non-explosive nature, perhaps because of host-rock rheol - ogy or due to emplacement at relatively deep crustal levels. Here we report on calculations of equilibrium pressure and temperature using compositions of three-phase assemblages of garnet, orthopyroxene and clinopyroxene from Midternæs and Pyramidefjeld mantle xenoliths.
Systems epidemiology of metabolomics measures reveals new relationships between lipoproteins and other small molecules
