scholarly journals Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Auditory, Intellectually, Repetition (Air) terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-57
Author(s):  
Maria Luthfiana ◽  
Reny Wahyuni

This study aims to determine the completeness of mathematics learning outcomes of VIII grade students of SMP Negeri Selangit after applying the Auditory, Intellectually, Repetition (AIR) learning model. The research method, is a quantitative research with quasi-experimental research design (quasi experiment). The sample in this study was grade VIII.4 students consisting of 30 students. Data collection was carried out using test techniques. The test data collected was analyzed using t-test. The results of the study, based on t-test analysis with a significant level α = 0.05, obtained an average test score before the application of the Auditory, Intellectually, Repetition (AIR) learning model was 22.15 and after the application of the Auditory learning model, Intellectually, Repetition (AIR) obtained an average test score of 73.94 with tcount> ttable (2,821)> (1,699). Conclusion, student mathematics learning outcomes after VIII SMP Negeri Selangit after the application of the Auditory, Intellectually, Repitition (AIR) model are significantly completed. Keywords: Auditory, Learning Outcomes, Intellectually, Repetition

Eksponen ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-79
Author(s):  
Venty Meilasari

This research aimed to find out: (1) which one providing better mathematics learning outcomes, GI model or direct learning model, (2) which one providing better mathematics learning outcomes, the high, medium or low learning independence students, (3) interaction between learning models and learning independence on mathematics learning outcomes. This research used the quasi-experimental research method with 2×3 factorial design. The population were all students of the 8 th class of SMP Negeri 6 Surakarta on academic year 2015/2016. The sample was taken using purposive sampling. The instruments used were learning independence questionnaire and mathematics learning outcomes test. The proposed hypothesis of the research were analyzed by using two-way analysis of variance. The conclusions of this research were as follow. (1) GI model provided better mathematics outcomes than direct learning model. (2) The high learning independence student had better mathematics learning outcomes than medium and low learning independence students, and the medium had as good as low learning independence students. (3) there was no interaction between learning models and learning independence on mathematics learning outcomes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-74
Author(s):  
Ivanatul Nurizza ◽  
Wuli Oktiningrum

Implementation of the teaching and learning process in general still use conventional learning models so as to result in low mathematics learning outcomes of students, especially in the surrounding material and flat building area. This study aimed to measure the differences in learning outcomes of class IV students through STAD (Student Teams Achievement Division) learning model and conventional learning. This study used quasi-experimental quantitative research design by looking at the differences in mathematical value results in pre-test and post-test between control class and experimental class. Based on the data analysis, the results of the study showed that there were differences in the learning outcomes of mathematics students of class IV who use the learning model Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) and conventional learning. This was evidenced by the average value of the control class which increased by 9.88% from 54.36 to 64.24 while the average value of the class in the experimental class reached 24.92% from 55.80 to 80.72.


Eksponen ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 61-71
Author(s):  
Robia Astuti ◽  
Nurmitasari Nurmitasari ◽  
Susanti Diah Lestari

The aimed of this research was: 1) to know the difference of the average of mathematics learning result of students obtained through Cooperative Script model with the average of student learning result obtained through STAD type cooperative learning model in class VII class material in SMP Negeri 1 Banyumas, and 2) to know the average of mathematics learning outcomes which is better between students whose learning is obtained through Cooperative Script model with students whose learning is obtained through STAD type cooperative learning model in class VII class material in SMP Negeri 1 Banyumas. The population in this study is all students of class VII even semester SMP Negeri 1 Banyumas academic year 2016-2017 with the number of 162 students divided into 5 (five) class. The sampling technique uses cluster random sampling. Obtained Class VII A amounted to 33 students as experimental class and class VII B which amounted to 33 students as a control class. Learning outcomes obtained through the test in the form of a description consists of 4 items. Data were analyzed using two-t test and one-party test. Data analysis using two-party t test with 5% real level obtained by result of 1,999 and 2,602, < , so reject H0 and accept H1 which indicate that there is difference of mean result of learning of mathematics between them. Analysis of data using t-test one party with 5% real level obtained ttable = 1.670 and tcount = 2.602 turns < , so H0 rejected and accepted H1 which indicates that the average mathematics learning outcomes of students applied Cooperative Script learning model more both from the STAD type cooperative learning model. The result of t test analysis concluded that there is influence of Cooperative Script model to the result of learning of class VII in SMP Negeri 1 Banyumas


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-112
Author(s):  
Ika Irmawati ◽  
Lisma Dian Kartika Sari ◽  
Tri Astindari

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of using Geogebra software on student learning outcomes on the quadratic function material in Class X MA Sarji Ar-Rasyid Situbondo. The research method used a quasi-experimental research design with data collection techniques used, namely pretest and posttest. The data analysis technique used the normality test, homogeneity test, and t-test. From the t-test analysis, results obtained sig 0.263> ɑ 0.05. So it can be concluded that there is no significant effect between students taught by learning GeoGebra software with conventional learning. This result is due to students' low ability and experience in using Geogebra software for mathematics learning.


Author(s):  
Gina Ayu ◽  
Yesi Gusmania

Abstrak.Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui (1) Pengaruh model pembelajaran Tipe Team Assisted Individualization terhadap hasil belajar matematika, (2) Pengaruh model pembelajaran Konvensional terhadap hasil belajar matematika, (3) Perbedaan pengaruh model pembelajaran Tipe Team Assisted Individualization dengan model pembelajaran Konvensional terhadap hasil belajar matematika. Jenis penelitian ini adalah Quasi Eksperimental dengan desain Non-equivalent Posttest-Only Control Group Design. Populasi penelitian adalah seluruh Siswa Kelas XI SMK Widya 2 Batam tahun pelajaran 2017/2018 dengan jumlah 34 siswa. Teknik pengampilan sampel dilakukan dengan teknik  Sampling Jenuh. Data diperoleh dengan instrumen yang telah diuji validitas dan reliabilitasnya. Analisis data yang digunakan adalah one sample t test dan independen sample test. Hasil penelitian menunjukan: (1) Terdapat pengaruh model pembelajaran Team Assisted Individualization terhadap hasil belajar, hal ini terlihat dari () (3,0962,093) (2) Tidak terdapat pengaruh model pembelajaran Konvensional terhadap hasil belajar, hal ini terlihat dari () (1,844 2,160), (3) Terdapat perbedaan pengaruh antara model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Team Assisted Individualzation denganmodel pembelajaran konvensionalterhadap hasil belajar Matematika( = 3,385 = 2,037)Kata Kunci :Team Assisted Individualization, Hasil Belajar. Abstract. This research intent to know: (1) influence of learning model of Team Assisted Individualization to mathematics learning result, (2) the influence of conventional learning model on mathrmatics learning autcomes, (3) differences in Team Assisted Individualization learning model with conventional learning model on mathrmatics learning autcomes. The type of this research was quasi experimental research with Non-equivalent Posttest-Only Control Group Design. The population in this research is all of students at eleventh grade students of SMK Widya 2 Batam in 2018/2019 academic year with two classes that total 34. The techniqeue of collecting sample used sampling jenuh. The data obtained used instrument test has tested validity and reliability. The data analysis used one simple t test and independent samles test. The finding results showed: (1) there are influence of Team Assisted Individualization learning model on learning outcomes, this is seen () (3,0962,093) (2) there is no conventional learning model on the learning outcomes, this is seen () (1,844 2,160) (3) there are differences in the influence of Team Assisted Individualization learning model with the conventional learning midel on mathematics learning outcomes ( = 3,385 = 2,037) Kata Kunci :Team Assisted Individualization, Learning Outcomes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 43-51
Author(s):  
Aryati Apriliah ◽  
Maria Luthfiana ◽  
Reny Wahyuni

The purpose of this study was to determine the completeness of the mathematics learning outcomes of class VIII students of Selangit State Middle School 2017/2018 Academic Year after the Learning Model Auditory, Intellectually, Repetition (AIR) was applied. The type of research used is in the form of a quasi experiment. The population is all eighth grade students of Selangit Public Middle School, consisting of 126 students and as a sample are students of class VIII.4 consisting of 30 students. Data collection is done by test techniques, test data collected is analyzed using t-test. Based on the t-test analysis with a significant level of α = 0.05, tcount> ttable (2,821)> (1,699) was obtained, so it can be concluded that the mathematics learning outcomes of students after VIII Selangit Public Middle School after the implementation of the learning model Auditory, Intellectually, Repitition (AIR ) significant completion with the average test scores before the implementation of the learning model Auditory, Intellectually, Repetition (AIR) 22.15 and after 73.94 before the implementation of the learning model Auditory, Intellectually, Repetition (AIR).


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-27
Author(s):  
S. Supratman ◽  
Sri Wulandari Muhlis

The formulation of the problem in this research are: (1) How the result of learning mathematics of students after taught by SAVI learning model?, (2) How the result of learning mathematics of students after taught by NHT learning model?, (3) Is the result of learning mathematics of students who taught with SAVI learning model is higher than students taught by NHT learning model. The purpose of this study are: (1) To know how the results of learning mathematics students after teaching with SAVI learning model, (2) To find out how the results of learning mathematics students after being taught with NHT learning model, (3) To determine whether the results of learning mathematics students taught by SAVI learning models higher than students taught by NHT learning models. Type of research using experimental method. The population in this study is all students of class X spread in 11 parallel classes with the number of 310 people. Sampling was done by using cluster random sampling technique. In this research as a sample taken 2 classes from the entire population that is class X A3 as experiment class 1 using SAVI learning model and class X A1 as experiment class 2 using NHT learning model. From result of data analysis obtained that: (1) result of student learning taught by using SAVI learning model which consist of 25 students show minimum value 62, maximum value 96, mean (mean) 80,36, with standard deviation 9,10; (2) student learning outcomes taught using NHT learning model consisting of 25 students showing minimum score 62, maximum value 96, mean (mean) 79,62, with standard deviation 10,512; (3) result of t-test analysis using independent sample t-test obtained tcount = 0,302 at = 0,05 with degrees of freedom (dk) = 48 obtained t table = 2,011. Because t <t table then Ha is rejected and H0 is accepted. So it can be concluded that the mathematics learning outcomes of students who were taught with the SAVI model was not higher than the students taught by the NHT model.


Author(s):  
Marcho Alex Samuel Silitonga

This study aims to determine the effect of the application of the Two Stay Two Stray learning model (TSTS) to the history of student learning outcomes at SMA Negeri 7 Medan. The research method used is quasi-experimental. The study population was students of class X IPS with a sample of 65 students consisting of 34 students of class X IPS 2 as an experimental class and 31 students of class X IPS 1 as a control class. Data collection techniques using observation and tests. The data obtained were analyzed using the t-test. The observation results showed that 91% of the experimental class students who took part in learning with the TSTS model got very good average scores. The average post-test value of the experimental class was 80.3, while the average value of the post-test of the control class that followed the learning with the conventional model was 63.70. T-test results for the post-test scores were obtained tcount > ttable (7,004 > 1,670).These results indicate that the TSTS learning model has a great influence in improving the history of student learning outcomes in class XI IPS 2 SMA Negeri 7 Medan.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 58
Author(s):  
Bunga Oktaveanry Nagara ◽  
Lelly Qodariah ◽  
Jumardi Jumardi

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh model pembelajaran talking stick terhadap hasil belajar peserta didik pada mata pelajaran sejarah kelas X di SMK Grafika Yayasan Lektur. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian kuantitatif eksperimen. Sampel yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu kelas XA sebagai kelas eksperimen dan kelas XB sebagai kelas kontrol. Pada uji validitas instrumen menggunakan korelasi biserial dengan 25 butir soal pilihan ganda dengan 15 butir soal valid an 10 butir soal yang tidak valid. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan adalah uji normalitas, uji homogenitas dan uji hipotesis menggunakan uji t. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar yang diberi perlakuan menggunakan model pembelajaran talking stick lebih tinggi daripada hasil belajar yang diberi perlakuan menggunakan model pembelajaran konvensional, dari analisis data diperoleh rata-rata kelas eksperimen 87,16 dan kelas kontrol 66,85, (2) hasil pengujian hipotesis yang diperoleh thitung>ttabel yaitu  2,107>2,002 pada taraf signifikan α=0,05. Hal tersebut berarti hipotesis dalam penelitian ini dapat diterima dan dinyatakan bahwa terdapat pengaruh model pembelajaran talking stick terhadap hasil belajar peserta didik pada mata pelajaran sejarah kelas X di SMK Grafika Yayasan Lektur. Kesimpulannya bahwa terdapat pengaruh dari model pembelajaran talking stick terhadap hasil belajar peserta didik pada mata pelajaran sejarah kelas X di SMK Grafika Yayasan Lektur.Kata kunci: model pembelajaran talking stick, hasil belajar AbstractThis study aims to determine the effect of the talking stick learning model on student learning outcomes in class X history subjects at the SMK Grafika Foundation for Literature.  The research method used was an experimental quantitative research method.  The sample used in this study is class XA as an experimental class and class XB as a control class. In the validity test the instrument uses biserial correlation with 25 multiple choice questions with 15 valid items and 10 invalid items.  Data analysis techniques used were normality test, homogeneity test and hypothesis testing using t test. The results showed that: (1) there were differences in learning outcomes that were treated using the talking stick learning model higher than learning outcomes that were treated using conventional learning models, from the analysis of the data obtained an experimental class average of 87.16 and a control class 66,  85, (2) the results of testing the hypothesis obtained tcount> ttable is 2.107> 2.002 at a significant level α = 0.05.  This means that the hypothesis in this study can be accepted and it is stated that there is an effect of the talking stick learning model on student learning outcomes in class X history subjects at SMK Grafika Literature Foundation. The conclusion that there is an influence of the talking stick learning model on student learning outcomes in classs X history subjects at SMK Grafika Literature Foundation.Keywords: talking stick learning model, learning outcomes


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Arie Purwa Kusuma ◽  
Maskuroh Maskuroh

The low learning outcomes of mathematics are not appropriate thought of learning models in the classroom. Therefore, the NHT and TPS learning models can be applied to improve the learning of outcomes of the student. This study aims to determine the differences in learning outcomes using the NHT learning model with the TPS learning model. The sampling technique is used as a random sampling cluster with 2 groups of experiments for the first experimental group  (classroom view of TPS model) and the second experimental group (classes of NHT modeling). The instrument of this research uses the test of mathematics learning result. The hypothesis test is used  T-Test. The conclusion of research that are differences in the outcomes of the two learning models (NHT and TPS) on learning outcomes, based on the marginal mean of the TPS learning model is better learning outcomes than the NHT learning model. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document