scholarly journals Pemanfaatan Situs Sejarah Candi Jabung Sebagai Sumber Belajar Untuk Meningkatkan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa IPS

Jurnal Tinta ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 44-54
Author(s):  
Siti Nurul Hidayah

This study aims to obtain an overview of the utilization of the historical temple site of Jabung to improve the critical thinking of social science students at the Islamic Institute of Islamic Sciences Zainul Hasan Genggong Probolinggo. The research method used is mixed methods, in which the form of this study combines two approaches namely qualitative and quantitative, this study uses data collection techniques of observation, interviews and tests. The results of data analysis from this study indicate that T count is -9.439 and T table is 1.742 which means that T count is greater than T table (-9.439>1.742) which means that the utilization of the temple history site as a source of learning can improve the critical thinking of IPS students , the results of this study can also be seen from the results of the tests between pretest and posttest, the test results showed that the average score of pretest was 72.00%, while the average score in the post test was 87.05%. The results of the pretest towards posttets increased by 15.05%. Based on the results of the analysis of the data, it can be concluded that in this study the utilization of the historical sites of Candi Jabung as an effective learning resource can improve the critical thinking of social science students.

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Uus Toharudin ◽  
Iwan Setia Kurniawan

This study aims to determine the critical thinking skills of prospective teachers of biology at Pasundan University in the course of educational psychology. Implementation of Problem Based Learning learning model aims to measure students' critical thinking skills. The method used in this study is a quasi-experimental design with Randomized Control Group Posttest, data obtained based on the analysis, the data is described to obtain information or a description of the results of this research. The population in this study were 104 students, the sample in this study were 39 students for the experimental group-1 and 39 students for the experimental group-2. Data collected test data obtained from the test results of students who are given a score based on the indicators. results of research show that the critical thinking skills of prospective teachers of biology in educational psychology courses including category sufficient for the experimental group-1 and category well for the experimental group-2. The average score of the experimental group-1 amounted to 2.73, and the average score of the experimental group-2 by 3.05. Indicators of critical thinking skills at the highest indicator 3 (I-3) with an average of 3.38 for the experimental group-1 and 3.41 for the experimental group-2. Indicators of critical thinking skills are the lowest in two indicators (I-2) that is equal to 2.23 for the experimental group-1 and 2.74 for the experimental group-2. The average percentage of absorption problems in the experimental group-1 amounted to 51.25%, while the experimental group-2 amounted to 57.21%. The results of significance test p-value (0.008). Based on the significance of the test results can be concluded that the experimental group-2 has the critical thinking skills is better than the experimental group-1.


Akademika ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (02) ◽  
pp. 53-64
Author(s):  
Sirwan Sirwan ◽  
Kamal Kamal

The purpose of this study was to: (1) knowing the level of practicality e-module based on mobile learning; (2) determine the effectivenes of using system e-module based on mobile learning in skill competency test TKJ.  The research method experimental design one group pre-test and post-test. Data were collected through multiple choice  test given to respondens before being given treatment and after being given treatment, then the data would then be analyzed using tes t. The results of the e-module practicality test throught a questionnaire distributed to students showed that the e-module based on mobile learning practicality used by students, while according to the assessment by the two media experts that e-module based on mobile learning was practical with an average score of 88.9%. Student readiness in UKK has been successfully improved using mobile learning-based e-modules. Increased readiness of students in UKK is in the medium category with a gain score of 0.4%. The T test results indicate that the Sig. (2-tailed) of 0.000 <0.05. The mean pre-test value was 78.6456 with Std.Deviation 4.85293. The highest value is 90.00 and the lowest value is Std.Deviation 6.57910. The highest score was 96.67 and the lowest score was 73.33.


Author(s):  
Elinda Rizkasari ◽  
Zulela MS ◽  
Muhammad Japar

This research aims for developing social sciences studying sources in elementary school. This research uses a research method and research procedure development using the Dick and Carey model which has 10 stages. Also, angket is used to determine the feasibility of media in terms of expert validation and field trials and a test to measure the student’s tolerance. Evaluation held by three steps: the first is an expert judgement conducted by media experts and social sciences materials. The second step is done by evaluating a small group with 10 students whose result showed that the source of learning in the form of a hero storybook is worthy of use. Finally, it was continued with the field group test with 25 students. T-test analysis results show differences in learning outcomes between pre-test and post-test. From the average score, indicating that learning resources developed is effectively used for the improvement of student’s understanding of social science learning in elementary school.


2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (6-7) ◽  
pp. 101-108
Author(s):  
Oleksandr Kulyk

Universities seeking to provide modern education face a constant need to update their courses. This study was conducted to collect and analyze empirical data to help philosophy course designers consider the views of Ukrainian students about effective ways to learn this subject. A survey was conducted among 40 humanities students and 34 social science students to determine participants’ views on a number of key issues related to the organization of the learning process in the Philosophy course. Most of the students surveyed said that of the types of skills and knowledge that can be acquired during the course, they will find critical thinking skills and the skills needed to build and argue their own positions on ethical, social and worldview issues most valuable in their future professional activities. The majority of respondents named traditional lectures and discussions of lecture videos as their preferred forms of learning philosophy. Their preferred forms of assessment of students’ knowledge and skills in philosophy were essays, as well as reports and participation in the discussion during practical lessons. The study also identified three significant differences in the responses of the surveyed humanities and social science students. First, socio-scientific students valued the opportunity to develop their communication skills in the framework of the Philosophy course significantly more than humanities students. Second, humanities students included thought experiments among the most desirable ways of learning philosophy, unlike social science students, who included case studies. Third, in contrast to humanities students, social science students considered quizzes to be one of the best forms of assessment for the course. In addition to the above, this study also compared the data on the opinions of social sciences and humanities students with the results of the previous survey of 60 STEM students about their thoughts on the course. The comparative analysis revealed five common features and two significant differences in the responses of students from these three fields of knowledge. The common belief among surveyed students in all three groups is that learning philosophy can provide them with the skills and knowledge they will need in their professional activities after graduation from university. Moreover, they prefer skills to knowledge. In all three groups of respondents, a large number of students named critical thinking and argumentation skills as the ultimate achievements in the learning of philosophy. Another finding was that surveyed students from all three groups do not give priority to learning the concepts of modern philosophers over learning the ideas of ancient philosophers. In addition, respondents from all three fields showed the least interest in those forms of knowledge and skills that are difficult to use outside of highly specialized philosophical activities. As for the differences, the study showed that STEM students are significantly less likely to believe that they will need the historico-philosophical components of the Philosophy course in their further professional activities than students in the humanities and social sciences. They are also more interested in developing communicative skills in the process of learning philosophy than the surveyed humanities students.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 201
Author(s):  
Ishmatud Diyanah ◽  
A. Rosyid Al Atok

This study aimed to describe the application and analysis of student's critical thinking skills in learning that used a jigsaw cooperative model with monopoly game media. The study used classroom action research with a quantitative descriptive approach. The application of the jigsaw type cooperative learning model with monopoly game media was applied in several stages, namely group formation, rolling dice in turns, followed by transaction activities in the form of a combination of answering questions, renting, selling, and buying assets until finally one of the students became an absolute rich person called a monopolist. The student's critical thinking ability before taking action measured through the pretest. It showed that the percentage of completeness obtained by students was 65.6% with a minimum completeness criterion of 75. The student's critical thinking ability after the action in cycle I showed that there was a change in the percentage of completeness obtained by students of 66.67% of the pretest results to 76.67% of the post-test results. In the second cycle, there was a change of 76.67% from the pretest results to 90% from the post-test results, thus student's critical thinking skills in learning that used a jigsaw cooperative model with monopoly game media increased by 10% in cycles I and 13,33% in cycle II.


Author(s):  
Dika Garsinia ◽  
Ratih Kusumawati ◽  
Arie Wahyuni

This research uses quantitative descriptive methods. The subjects of this study were 28 students of class VIII Al Bisyri Islamic Middle School. Data obtained by observation, questionnaire, and written test. ADDIE development model (Analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation). Data collection instruments used in the form of learning media questionnaires, student response questionnaires, rational test results. From the results of the research process obtained the value of media experts with an average score of 87.08 (good category), while the mathematics teacher material experts obtained an average score of 88.57 (very good category) so that the media included in the valid category. From the results of the practicality of Powtoon animation video learning media obtained an average score of 84.96 (practical categories), so that it meets the practical aspects in terms of effective, interactive, interesting, efficient, and creative. Whereas based on the posttest value which is higher than the pretest value, the posttest value is 81.50 higher than the pretest value of 67.57 that the effective learning media is used. Based on this analysis it can be concluded that the video animation media using Powtoon software has fulfilled valid, practical and effective criteria.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhajir

This study aimed at producing a valid, practical, and effective Civics learning device with guided inquiry model to train the students’ critical thinking skills. The development of the learning device used Dick and Carey model and was tested in the classroom using One-Group Pretest-Posttest Design. The data were collected through observation, test, and questionnaire. The data analyses were through descriptive quantitative, qualitative, and t-test.From the findings in the trial classroom, it was found a valid, practical, and effective learning device. It was valid because the average score given by civics learning expert was more than 4 in the interval 1-5, and achievement test showed that it was valid, reliable, and sensitive. It was practical because the teachers’ ability in managing the classroom showed good and very good category, and the students' activities were categorized as effective. The learning device was effective because the students’ response was positive, the students’ achievement test was thorough, and the students’ thinking skill was increased.Results of the effectiveness of the learning device oriented guided inquiry method can be seen from the teacher's ability to manage to learn very well, students’ learning activity was effective, students’ response was positive, learning mastery was classically achieved namely 93.33%, and students’ critical thinking ability increased.Based on the results of data analysis, it can be concluded that Civics learning device Oriented Guided Inquiry Method developed is feasible and can train students' critical thinking skills in learning.


The subject of algorithm and programming is one of the important knowledge that need to be mastered by students in computer science. To learn it, students are required to have several skills, such as logic, critical thinking, problem solving, etc. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to design and build multimedia applications to support critical thinking, called computational stories, on studying basic programming with a problem-posing model approach by involving cases in everyday life. In this application, students are given some cases in the form of code with the C programming language. Then, students are asked to arrange a correct story line from the choices available. From this research experiment, the results show that this multimedia can improve critical thinking based on comparison of pre-test and post-test results with an average of 32.9 to 72.47. With an average gain value of 0.58 included in the medium category.


Author(s):  
Dini Widianti ◽  
Rifqatussa'adah ◽  
Zwasta Pribadi Mahardhika ◽  
Angga Rizki Oktavian ◽  
Astri Annisa Wigati ◽  
...  

Introduction: The COVID-19 disease has an impact on the disruption of routine services and other health priorities including the provision of reproductive health services. Public awareness and knowledge of cancer including risk factors, efforts to prevent it, symptoms that arise, and early detection of cancer are still lacking, so it is necessary to increase knowledge to the public. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of counseling on the level of knowledge of the target group on breast cancer and cervical cancer in the pandemic era as well as to socialize about COVID-19. Methods: Research is carried out through Zoom Meeting media with educational media PowerPoint presentations, videos, and BSE demonstrations with an average number of 40 participants. The pretest was given a google form link that was distributed by the teacher to the WhatsApp group of the parents of students. The material was continued with a question-and-answer session and filling in the google post-test form. Data were analyzed by calculating the average pre-test and post-test scores to see the differences in participants' knowledge before and after counseling. Results: The average pre-test results of the participants were 6.7 and the post-test 9, analyzed with SPSS. There was an increase in participants' knowledge after counseling, it can be seen from the average score obtained from the post-test results that were higher when compared to the average score of pre-test average. Discussion: Counseling was deemed effective enough to educate parents or guardians about reproductive health, as seen from the enthusiasm of the participants during the activity and actively asking questions during the question-and-answer session. Conclusion: In conclusion, counseling can increase the knowledge of participants.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 653
Author(s):  
Dede Endang Mascita ◽  
Iyay Robia Khoerudin ◽  
Johar Maknun

This study focused on teaching model cycle capability poetry appreciation. This study aimed to describe the process of learning by using learning model cycle. Describe the activity of students in the learning cycle to learning poetry appreciation by applying the 5 stages: (a) generating interest (enggament), (b) exploration ( Exploration), (c) an explanation (explanation), (d) elaboration (elaboration), and evaluation (evaluation), and determine the effect on the ability of learning model cycle appreciation of poetry.Based on the results of this study concluded 1) The process of learning poetry appreciation by applying the learning model cycle can improve student learning outcomes. 2) Activity of students in learning poetry appreciation by using the model of the cycle of learning can help students actively learn independently in groups , solve the problem of learning. Applying learning model cycle can assist students in learning menningkatkan understanding. 3) learning model cycle affect the ability of appreciation of poetry and effective against the appreciation of poetry. Applying learning model cycle is expected to help teachers and students to improve the quality of teaching so that learning objectives can be achieved the expected goals.The data in this study of student understanding of the appreciation of poetry that includes elements that build the poem with assessment criteria include a general overview of the contents of understanding aspects of poetry, pemhaman tone, understanding feeling / sense, image understanding, understanding the style of language, understanding the message, understanding the content of the poem in life.To test the hypothesis based on the assumption that different test results obtained from the initial ability appreciation of poetry and learning achievement as indicated by the value of pretest and post-test that includes testing the experimental classes and control classes.Based on the analysis there are differences in pretest and post-test results of the experimental class, which is the result of the analysis, sig ( 2 - tailed ) < 0.05, then Ho is rejected and Hi which is the research hypothesis is accepted that effective learning model cycle of the ability of appreciation of poetry.Applying learning model cycle is expected to help teachers and students to improve the quality of teaching so that learning objectives can be achieved.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document