Advanced Thin Wafer Support Processes for Temporary Wafer Bonding

2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 (1) ◽  
pp. 000361-000363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy McCutcheon ◽  
Dongshun Bai

The ZoneBOND™ process has been developed to allow temporary wafer bonding at acceptable temperatures (usually less than 200°C), survival through higher-temperature processes, and then demounting at room temperature. The technology utilizes standard silicon or glass carriers and current thermoplastic adhesives developed by Brewer Science, Inc. The separation process consists of three components: removal of the adhesive in the outer zone, lamination of the device side of the pair, and separation of the carrier wafer from the adhesive. Developments of these key areas are the focus of this paper.

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 (DPC) ◽  
pp. 000419-000441 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Fleming ◽  
Jong-Uk Kim ◽  
Janet Okada ◽  
Kevin Wang ◽  
Michael Gallagher ◽  
...  

The development of adhesives that enable handling, processing, and assembly of thin wafers and die is a key technical challenge for the realization of 3D devices. We will present on temporary adhesive technology for processing of thinned wafers that is amenable to either mechanical or laser-assisted debonding that can occur at room temperature. Temporary wafer bonding has emerged as the method of choice for handling silicon wafers during the thinning and high-temperature backside processing required for the manufacture of 3D device structures. Among the requirements for temporary wafer bonding materials to be used in high volume manufacturing are simple device and carrier wafer preparation, high-throughput wafer bonding, thermal stability to 300 °C or higher, and clean room-temperature release directly from the device wafer using either mechanical or laser-assisted debonding We will present successful temporary wafer bonding using a BCB (benzocyclobutene)-based material that can meet these requirements. The mode of adhesive release from a device wafer will be discussed in detail as it relates to wafer thinning and handling, and material physical properties and resistances will be expressed. Formulation requirements needed for successful debonding will be presented, with an emphasis on a laser-debonding scheme that utilizes either a 248nm or 308nm laser source capable of ablating a laser sensitive layer residing between a glass carrier and the temporary wafer bonding material. Successful room temperature tape-peeling of the adhesive film after ablation and carrier removal will be discussed.


2004 ◽  
Vol 829 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Arokiaraj ◽  
S. Vicknesh ◽  
A. Ramam

AbstractA method to bond directly Indium Phosphide to Indium phosphide at low temperatures has been realized. The treatment of wafers in HF and oxygen plasma exposure prior to bonding is helpful in activating the surface of the wafers at room temperature. This surface activation is useful to bond the wafers at room temperature. Further higher temperature (220°C) treatment with pressure, aided in the completion of the wafer bonding process. The interface of the bonded structures revealed a very thin amorphous layer of oxide when examined under high resolution TEM. Cross-sectional micro Raman measurements revealed signatures corresponding to some disordered associated layer at the interface. Current-Voltage characteristics exhibited ohmic conduction across the interface. The wafer bonding method developed would serve as a useful tool for the fabrication of photonic and optoelectronic devices.


2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 138-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy McCutcheon ◽  
Robert Brown ◽  
JoElle Dachsteiner

The ZoneBOND process has been developed as an alternative temporary bonding process that bonds at an acceptable temperature (usually less than 200°C), survives through higher-temperature processes, and then debonds at room temperature. The technology utilizes standard silicon or glass carriers and current thermoplastic adhesives developed by Brewer Science, Inc.


2003 ◽  
Vol 76 (4) ◽  
pp. 876-891 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. N. Datta ◽  
A. G. Talma ◽  
S. Datta ◽  
P. G. J. Nieuwenhuis ◽  
W. J. Nijenhuis ◽  
...  

Abstract The use of thiurams such as Tetramethyl thiuram disulfide (TMTD) or Tetrabenzyl thiuram disulfide (TBzTD) has been explored to achieve higher cure efficiency. The studies suggest that a clear difference exists between the effect of TMTD versus TBzTD. TMTD reacts with Bis (triethoxysilylpropyl) tetrasulfide (TESPT) and this reaction can take place even at room temperature. On the other hand, the reaction of TBzTD with TESPT is slow and takes place only at higher temperature. High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) with mass (MS) detection, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (NMR) and other analytical tools have been used to understand the differences between the reaction of TMTD and TESPT versus TBzTD and TESPT. The reaction products originating from these reactions are also identified. These studies indicate that unlike TMTD, TBzTD improves the cure efficiency allowing faster cure without significant effect on processing characteristics as well as dynamic properties. The loading of TESPT is reduced in a typical Green tire compound and the negative effect on viscosity is repaired by addition of anhydrides, such as succinic anhydride, maleic anhydride, etc.


MRS Advances ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (43) ◽  
pp. 2907-2916 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shulong Lu ◽  
Shiro Uchida

ABSTRACTWe studied the InGaP/GaAs//InGaAsP/InGaAs four-junction solar cells grown by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE), which were fabricated by the novel wafer bonding. In order to reach a higher conversion efficiency at highly concentrated illumination, heat generation should be minimized. We have improved the device structure to reduce the thermal and electrical resistances. Especially, the bond resistance was reduced to be the lowest value of 2.5 × 10-5 Ohm cm2 ever reported for a GaAs/InP wafer bond, which was obtained by the specific combination of p+-GaAs/n-InP bonding and by using room-temperature wafer bonding. Furthermore, in order to increase the short circuit current density (Jsc) of 4-junction solar cell, we have developed the quality of InGaAsP material by increasing the growth temperature from 490 °C to 510 °C, which leads to a current matching. In a result, an efficiency of 42 % at 230 suns of the four-junction solar cell fabricated by room-temperature wafer bonding was achieved.


2018 ◽  
Vol 281 ◽  
pp. 182-188
Author(s):  
Yong Sing Ng ◽  
Yun Ming Liew ◽  
Cheng Yong Heah ◽  
Mohd Mustafa Al Bakri Abdullah ◽  
Kamarudin Hussin

The present work investigates the effect of alumina addition on the thermal resistance of fly ash geopolymers. Fly ash geopolymers were synthesised by mixing fly ash with activator solution (A mixture of 12M sodium hydroxide and sodium silicate) at fly ash/activator ratio of 2.5 and sodium silicate/sodium hydroxide ratio of 2.5. The alumina (0, 2 and 4 wt %) was added as an additive. The geopolymers were cured at room temperature for 24 hours and 60°C for another 24 hours. After 28 days, the geopolymers was heated to elevated temperature (200 - 1000°C). For unexposed geopolymers, the addition of 2 wt % of alumina increased the compressive strength of fly ash geopolymers while the strength decreased when the content increased to 4 wt.%. The temperature-exposed geopolymers showed enhancement of strength at 200°C regardless of the alumina content. The strength reduced at higher temperature exposure (> 200°C). Despite the strength degradation at elevated temperature, the strength attained was relatively high in the range of 13 - 45 MPa up to 1000°C which adequately for application as structural materials.


2005 ◽  
Vol 488-489 ◽  
pp. 287-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadayoshi Tsukeda ◽  
Ken Saito ◽  
Mayumi Suzuki ◽  
Junichi Koike ◽  
Kouichi Maruyama

We compared the newly developed heat resistant magnesium alloy with conventional ones by Thixomolding® and aluminum alloy by die casting. Tensile properties at elevated temperatures of AXEJ6310 were equal to those of ADC12. In particular, elongation tendency of AXEJ6310 at higher temperature was better than those of the other alloys. Creep resistance of AXEJ6310 was larger than that of AE42 by almost 3 orders and smaller than that of ADC12 by almost 2 orders of magnitude. Fatigue limits at room temperature and 423K of AXEJ6310 was superior among conventional magnesium alloys.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 (DPC) ◽  
pp. 000698-000725 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Zoschke ◽  
Klaus-Dieter Lang

Further cost reduction and miniaturization of electronic systems requires new concepts for highly efficient packaging of MEMS components like RF resonators or switches, quartz crystals, bolometers, BAWs etc. This paper describes suitable base technologies for the miniaturized, low-cost wafer level chip-scale packaging of such MEMS. The approaches are based on temporary handling and permanent bonding of cap structures using adhesives or solder onto passive or active silicon wafers which are populated with MEMS components or the MEMS wafer themselves. Firstly, an overview of the possible packaging configurations based on different types of MEMS is discussed where TSV based and non-TSV based packaging solutions are distinguished in general. The cap structure for the TSV based solution can have the same size as the MEMS carrying substrate, since the electrical contacts for the MEMS can be routed either thought the cap or base substrate. Thus, full format cap wafers can be used in a regular wafer to wafer bonding process to create the wafer level cavity packages. However, if no TSVs are present in the cap or base substrate, the cap structure needs to be smaller than the base chip, so that electrical contacts outside the cap area can be accessed after the caps were bonded. Such a wafer level capping with caps smaller than the corresponding base chips can be obtained in two ways. The first approach is based on fabrication and singulation of the caps followed by their temporary face up assembly in the desired pattern on a help wafer. In a subsequent wafer to wafer bonding sequence all caps are transferred onto the base wafer. Finally the help wafer is removed from the back side of the bonded caps. This approach of reconfigured wafer bonding is especially used for uniform cap patterns or, if MEMS have an own bond frame structure. In that case no additional cap is required, since the MEMS can act as their own cap. The second approach is based on cap structure fabrication using a compound wafer stack consisting of two temporary bonded wafers. One wafer acts as carrier wafer whereas the other wafer is processed to form cap structures. Processes like thinning, silicon dry etching, deposition and structuring of polymer or metal bonding frames are performed to generate free-standing and face-up directed cap structures. The so created “cap donor wafer” is used in a wafer to wafer bonding process to bond all caps permanently to the corresponding MEMS base wafer. Finally, the temporary bonded carrier wafer is removed from the backside of the transferred caps. With that approach a fully custom specific and selective wafer level capping is possible featuring irregular cap patterns and locations on the MEMS base wafer. Examples like the selective capping process for RF MEMS switches are presented and discussed in detail. All processes were performed at 200mm wafer level.


2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 (DPC) ◽  
pp. 001009-001032
Author(s):  
Mark Oliver ◽  
Jong-Uk Kim ◽  
Michael Gallagher ◽  
Zidong Wang ◽  
Janet Okada ◽  
...  

Temporary wafer bonding has emerged as the method of choice for handling silicon wafers during the thinning and high-temperature backside processing required for the manufacture of 3D device structures. Among the requirements for temporary wafer bonding materials to be used in high volume manufacturing are simple device and carrier wafer preparation, high-throughput wafer bonding, excellent thermal stability, and clean room-temperature release directly from the device wafer. We will present successful temporary wafer bonding using a new BCB (benzocyclobutene)-based material that can meet these requirements. For this temporary wafer bonding technology, wafer preparation involves spin coating the device wafer with the BCB-based adhesive to a thickness of up to 100 μm and spin coating the carrier wafer with an adhesion promoter. The wafers can then be bonded at temperatures as low as 80 °C for as short as 30 seconds. The low bonding temperature means the wafers can be loaded into a preheated wafer bonding tool, eliminating the time needed to heat and cool the bonding chucks during the bonding cycle. Also, no curing of the material is required during the bonding, enabling a short process time and high wafer throughput. Curing of the adhesive is done as a batch oven cure at 210 °C for one hour after which the material is stable enough for backside processes up to 300 °C. The material has been designed to adhere well to the carrier wafer and debond directly from the device wafer without any chemical or radiation pretreatment, leaving a clean device wafer surface in need of only mild cleaning before further processing.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document