scholarly journals Analysis of Improving Students' Physics Conceptual Understanding through Discovery Learning Models Supported by Multi-representation: Measurement Topic

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 57 ◽  
Author(s):  
La Sahara ◽  
Nafarudin Nafarudin ◽  
Suritno Fayanto ◽  
Babajanova Asal Tairjanovna

This study aimed to analyze students' conceptual understanding by using a multi-representation assisted discovery learning model in measurement. This research was conducted in Public High School 1 Kendari. This research is a quasi-experimental study using a one-group pre-post test design. The research method consisted of a conceptual comprehension test using a caliper and a screw micrometer in an essay in the form of a multi-representational test on long measurements. The analysis showed an increase in conceptual understanding between the pre-test and post-test with an average pre-test score of 16.24 (SD = 14) and a post-test of 61.4 (SD = 21). These results indicate an increase in students' understanding of concepts after learning with an average N-gain increase of 0.5 (SD = 0.2) in the medium category. It also obtained the most significant increase in students' understanding of the indicators mentioned parts caliper and micrometer with an N-gain average of 0.6 in the medium category.

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (11) ◽  
pp. 1563
Author(s):  
Joko Warsito ◽  
Subandi Subandi ◽  
Parlan Parlan

<p><strong>Abstract:</strong> The purpose of this study was to (1) identify and analyze students 'misconceptions on the topic of chemical bonding with the Three-Tier diagnostic test (2) to determine the effectiveness of the ECIRR model in improving student misconceptions (3) to determine the retention of students' conceptual understanding 3 weeks after remedies. This research is a descriptive and quasi-experimental study with the design of One Group Pre - Test Post - Test Design. The research subjects were 33 students of class X IPA in a high school outside Java. The results showed that (1) found 41 types of misconceptions on the topic of chemical bonding (2) remedial learning with the ECIRR model was able to reduce student misconceptions from 61.5% to 22.4%, and (3) retention of students' understanding of remedial results by 82.5 % with very good criteria.</p><strong>Abstrak:</strong> Tujuan penelitian ini adalah (1) mengidentifikasi dan menganalisis miskonsepsi siswa pada topik ikatan kimia dengan tes diagnostik <em>Three-Tier</em> (2) mengetahui keefektifan model ECIRR dalam memperbaiki miskonsepsi siswa (3) mengetahui retensi pemahaman konsep siswa tiga minggu setelah remidi. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif dan eskperimen semu dengan rancangan <em>One Group Pre - Test Post – Test Design</em>. Subjek penelitian adalah 33 siswa kelas X IPA suatu SMA di luar Jawa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa (1) ditemukan 41 jenis miskonsepsi pada topik ikatan kimia<em> </em>(2) pembelajaran remidi model ECIRR mampu mereduksi miskonsepsi siswa dari 61,5% menjadi 22,4%, dan (3) retensi pemahaman siswa hasil remidi sebesar 82,5% dengan kriteria sangat baik.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 21-27
Author(s):  
Lasmi Lasmi ◽  
Masri Masri

AbstrakTujuan penelitian ini adalah mengetahui perbedaan kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa antara model discovery learning dan jigsaw. Jenis penelitian adalah eksperimen semu. Tempat penelitian diaksanakan di SMP Negeri 18 Kota Bengkulu. Populasi pada penelitian seluruh siswa kelas VII. Sampel penelitian dipilih secara acak sederhana yaitu kelas VII.1 sebagai kelas eksperimen 1, pembelajaran dengan menggunakan model discovery learning, kelas VII.5 sebagai kelas eksperimen 2, pembelajaran dengan menggunakan model kooperatif tipe jigsaw, dan kelas VII.3 sebagai kelas kontrol, pembelajaran dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran konvensional. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa kelas eksperimen 1 memperoleh nilai rata-rata tes akhir (post-test) kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa yaitu 12,13, nilai rata-rata eksperimen 2 yaitu 11,45, dan nilai rata-rata kelas kontrol yaitu 9,26. Berdasarkan hasil analisis uji anava satu jalur, dengan signifikan 0,05 diperoleh 𝐹ℎ𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑛𝑔 = 𝐹𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑙 = 0,34, maka H0 ditolak. Artinya ada perbedaan signifikan rata-rata kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa pada kelas eksperimen 1, kelas eksperimen 2, dan kelas kontrol. Berdasarkan uji beda nyata (BNT) menunjukan bahwa pembelajaran yang memberikan hasil penalaran matematis yang berbeda adalah model pembelajaran discovery learning dengan konvensional, dan model kooperatif tipe jigsaw dengan konvensional. Sedangkan pembelajaran dengan model discovery learning dan model kooperatif tipe jigsaw tidak memberikan hasil kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa yang berbeda. Model discovery learning dan model kooperatif tipe jigsaw memberikan hasil lebih baik bila dibandingkan dengan model konvensional.Kata kunci: kemampuan penalaran matematis, model discovery learning, model Jigsaw AbstractThe purpose of this study was to determine students' mathematical reasoning abilities with discovery learning models and jigsaw type cooperative learning models. This type of research is quasi-experimental research. The population in this study were all students of class VII SMP Negeri 18 Bengkulu City in the   academic year 2019/2020. The sample of this study was selected by simple random sampling, namely class VII.1 as experimental class 1 using the discovery learning models, class VII.5 as experimental class 2 using the jigsaw type cooperative learning models, and class VII.3 as control class using conventional learning models. Data were collected by means of tests of students' mathematical reasoning abilities. Based on the results of the one-way ANOVA test, there are significant differences in students' mathematical reasoning abilities in the experimental class 1, experiment class 2 and the control class. The results          of the real difference test (BNT) show that learning that gives different results is the discovery learning models with conventional learning models, and the jigsaw type cooperative learning model with conventional learning models. Meanwhile, learning with discovery learning models and jigsaw type cooperative learning models does not give different results for students' mathematical reasoning abilities. Discovery learning models and jigsaw type cooperative learning models give better results when compared to conventional learning.Keywords: mathematical   reasoning   ability,   discovery   learning   model,   Jigsaw   model


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Mohammad Ridho Kholid ◽  
Dhanan Abimanto ◽  
Wiwied Pratiwi

This article was to find out about the effectiveness of applying dictogloss technique on students’ narrative text. A Quasi-Experimental design was used in this method, with using pre-test and post test design. Subject of this research was at the eleventh grade  at state senior high 10 Bandar Lampung.  The result of this study showed that the value of to  (tobservation ) was 5.2. The value of t table with degree of freedom 38 in significance degree 5 % was 2.02 and in significance degree 1% was 2.71. It indicated that to was higher than or 2.02 < 5.26 > 2.71. for those analysis, the null hypothesis (Ho) was rejected and t alternative hypothesis (Ha) was accepted. Hence, it was inferred that there were significant difference between students’ narrative writing score who were taught by dictoglos technique. Keywords: Dictogloss Technique, Experimental Design, Narrative Text


2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 215-229
Author(s):  
R. Mursid

The purpose of this study to find out: (1) whether there are differences in competency draw orthogonal projection (MPO) between the students taught using problem based learning (PBL) and taught using discovery learning (DL); (2) whether there is a difference between the competence of MPO students who have the ability of spatial visualization (KSV) which has KSV high and low; and (3) whether there is an interaction effect between constructivist learning models to competence MPO students. The research method using a quasi- experimental design with a 2x2 factorial study, while data analysis techniques using ANOVA two paths at the significance level  = 0.05. The results showed that: (1) the competence of MPO students taught by PBL model of superior competence MPO model DL; (2) competence MPO students who have high KSV superior competence MPO KSV students who have low; and (3) there are significant interaction between constructivist learning models and KSV against MPO competence of students.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 268
Author(s):  
Nurulistyawan Tri Purnanto ◽  
Laily Himawati ◽  
Nur Ajizah

ABSTRAK Rendahnya cakupan ASI eksklusif di Indonesia menjadikan anak terkurangi haknya untuk mendapatkan makanan bernutrisi tinggi bagi pertumbuhan. Hal ini dikarenakan kurangnya produksi ASI pada ibu menyusui. Pemberian tindakan non farmakologi seperti teh daun kelor diharapkan mampu meningkatkan produksi ASI sehingga anak tetap mendapatkan ASI. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk untuk mengetahui pengaruh konsumsi teh daun kelor terhadap peningkatan produksi ASI di Kabupaten Grobogan. Metode penelitian ini berjenis quasi experimental study dengan menggunakan one group prepost test design pada 60 responden. Intervensi dilakukan selama 3 minggu untuk menilai produksi ASI antara Pre dan Post intervensi. Data dianalisa dengan menggunakan Uji Paired t-Test. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan rata-rata ASI pada tahap pre-test sebanyak 152,00 meningkat menjadi 158,50 pada tahap post-test. Terdapat perbedaan jumlah ASI dengan p-value sebesar 0,002 dengan nilai korelasi sebesar 0,934. Kesimpulan penelitian ini adalah terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan pada konsumsi teh daun kelor untuk produksi ASI.  Kata Kunci : Teh Daun Kelor, Produksi ASI


2008 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Boshoff ◽  
C. Gerber

Millions of rands are spent on sponsorship in general every year, and on sports sponsorships in particular. Yet little is known about the effectiveness of this expenditure. In addition, sponsors are often not sure whether only their brands benefit from a sponsorship or whether competing brands in the same product category also benefit from their efforts.In this study an attempt is made to clarify these considerations by comparing both the brand recall and the brand recognition of companies (and brands) who sponsored the 2007 Cricket World Cup. To determine whether brand recall and brand recognition increased during a sponsorship campaign, a quasi-experimental study was conducted by means of a one-group pre-test-post-test design. The data were collected using a convenience sample of 131 undergraduate students.The results seem to suggest that both the brand recall and the brand recognition levels of the sponsors increased significantly (α = 0,05), but that neither the brand recall nor the brand recognition levels of non-sponsor brands increased. The results therefore show that sponsorship does in fact increase brand awareness, by significantly increasing unaided brand recall, as well as increasing brand recognition and that non-sponsoring companies and brands do not benefit indirectly from their competitors’ sponsorships in terms of brand recall and brand recognition.


Author(s):  
Apriani Sijabat ◽  
Herna Febrianty Sianipar ◽  
Theresia Monika Siahaan ◽  
Osco P. Sijabat

The goal of this study is to see how problem-solving learning paradigms affect students' grasp of physics ideas. This study is a quasi-experimental study. The sample was chosen using the cluster random class methodology, which consisted of two classes, the first of which was taught using a problem-solving learning model and the second of which was taught using traditional methods. Experiment classes provide problem-solving opportunities to help students better understand physics ideas, while control classes are taught in a traditional manner. Pre- and post-test results from students in both classes were used to collect data. The two-way Anava-test was applied, and the level of significance was found to be 0.000 (sig. 0.05), indicating that problem solving learning is beneficial in improving students’ understanding of physics concepts.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 205
Author(s):  
Ananda Hafizhah Putri ◽  
Sutrisno Sutrisno ◽  
Didi Teguh Chandra

This study aims to obtain a comparative picture of increasing conceptual understanding between students who experience problem-based learning with a multi-representation approach and students who experience problem-based learning without a multi-representation approach. The aspects of understanding studied refer to Bloom's taxonomy, namely translation, interpretation, and extrapolation. This study used a quasi-experimental method with pre test and post test design non equivalent group design. The sample in this study were students from two class X in one high school in the city of Bandung. The experimental class consisted of 28 students and the control class consisted of 25 students. The results showed that the students' understanding of the concept increased with an average n-gain in the experimental class and control class respectively, namely 0.406 with the medium category and 0.289 with the low category. Keywords: multi representation approach, problem based learning, conceptual understanding ABSTRAK. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendapat gambaran perbandingan peningkatan pemahaman konsep antara siswa yang mengalami pembelajaran berbasis masalah dengan  pendekatan multirepresentasi dan siswa yang mengalami pembelajaran berbasis masalah tanpa pendekatan multirepresentasi. Adapun aspek pemahaman yang diteliti merujuk pada taksonomi Bloom, yakni translasi, interpretasi, dan ekstrapolasi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kuasi eksperimen dengan desain pre test and post test non equivalent group design. Sampel pada penelitian ini adalah siswa dari dua kelas X di salah satu SMA di kota Bandung. Kelas eksperimen terdiri dari 28 siswa dan kelas kontrol terdiri dari 25 siswa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemahaman konsep siswa meningkat dengan rata-rata n-gain pada kelas eksperimen dan kelas kontrol masing-masing yaitu sebesar 0,406 dengan kategori sedang dan 0,289 dengan kategori rendah.Kata kunci: pendekatan multirepresentasi, pembelajaran berbasis masalah pemahaman konsep


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Desi Maisura Sidabutar ◽  
Khadijah Khadijah ◽  
Rohani Sitorus

<p><em>This research was conducted in RA Nurhayati, Medan Tembung District, on February 25 to March 9, 2019. The type of research carried out was an experimental study with a quantitative approach. This research method uses Quasi Experimental Designs with Non Equevalent Control Group Design. The population of 29 children by sampling using the Total Sampling technique, so that the entire population is used as a sample. This study aims to determine: (1) Children's linguistic intelligence (2) Children's linguistic intelligence using pop up book media (3) Significant influence of pop up book media on children's linguistic intelligence in RA Nurhayati District Medan Tembung T.A. 2018/2019. The results showed that the use of pop-up media influenced linguistic intelligence of children aged 5-6 years. This is illustrated by the results of the study obtained an average pre-test 26.72 and an average post-test of 52.08. So that the linguistic intelligence of children in the experimental class is better than the control class with an average pre-test 25 and an average post-test of 44.83. Based on the results of hypothesis testing obtained tcount&gt; ttable is 3.226&gt; 2.131 with a significant number of α = 0.05. Thus the hypothesis Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted so that it can be stated There is a Significant Effect of the Use of Pop Up Book Media on Linguistic Intelligence of Children Aged 5-6 Years in RA Nurhayati Medan Tembung District T.A. 2018/2019.</em></p>


2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 69
Author(s):  
Abdul Hakim ◽  
Aisyah .

This study aimed to know the effect of science process skills of students and activity among the inquiry training and the conventional learning. This research is quasi-experimental study using pre-test and post-test design. The population of the study was students in Medan. Techniques that used to gain a simple is cluster random sampling, the first was grade as experimental class used the inquiry training model and the second was grade as the control class used the conventional learning. The instruments of this study were the science process skills test. The activity, affective, and psychomotor was used observation sheet. The analysis results that the inquiry training was better than that conventional learning in improving the science process skills of students.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document