Discontinuation of Work Relationship In The Pandemic Time Covid-19 In Indonesian National Law

The corona virus pandemic has shaken not only Wuhan, but also the world. This virus has spread widely to almost all countries in a short time. Meanwhile, in Indonesia the corona virus began to be detected when two Indonesian citizens (WNI) tested positive for the corona virus on March 1, 2020. The two Indonesians had previously had contact with a foreign national (WNA) from Japan who lived in Malaysia at an event. in Jakara. Based on data up to April 20, 2020, the number of victims due to the corona virus was 6,760 cases. A total of 590 of them died and 747 people were declared cured. Termination of Employment (PHK) is something that is very feared by employees. This is due to the chaotic economic conditions which have an impact on many companies that have to go out of business, and of course have an impact on the unilateral termination of employment by employers. To protect workers' rights due to layoffs, the Government as one of the elements in carrying out industrial relations has provided legal protection guarantees for workers whose employment has been terminated by employers as regulated in Chapter XII, precisely in Article 150-172 of Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower.

Download Full-text

Implementation of Prudential Principles in the Use of Disinfectants as an Effort to Prevent Covid-19 Pandemic for Legal Protection of Ecosystems

Journal of Morality and Legal Culture ◽

10.20961/jmail.v1i1.46496 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 1 (1) ◽

pp. 58

Author(s):

Otih Handayani

Keyword(s):

Public Health ◽

Environmental Law ◽

Legal Protection ◽

Legal Certainty ◽

Legal Research ◽

Healthy Environment ◽

Rapid Spread ◽

The World ◽

The Government ◽

Almost All

The Covid-19 pandemic spreads almost all over the world, including Indonesia. The rapid spread of many fatalities resulted in the government using various means to overcome the pandemic, among others, with preventive efforts through massive disinfectant spraying. This research aims to lysis on applying the principle of prudence in the use of a disinfectant. This research is doctrinal/normative legal research with a statutory approach. Data is collected with literature studies, qualitatively analyzed. The results describe the use of large and inappropriate disinfectants that cause environmental pollution and adverse effects on public health. Environmental law analysis using Law No. 32 of 2009 and the regulations below can protect legal certainty and protect everyone's right to a good and healthy environment to protect the entire ecosystem.

Download Full-text

Pandemi Covid-19 Sebagai Alasan Force Majeure Dalam Melakukan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja di Indonesia

SALAM Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar i ◽

10.15408/sjsbs.v7i8.16552 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (8) ◽

pp. 695-706

Author(s):

Mustakim Mustakim ◽

Syafrida Syafrida

Keyword(s):

Supreme Court ◽

Virus Disease ◽

Legal Protection ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

Corona Virus ◽

Force Majeure ◽

The Supreme Court ◽

Work Relationship

AbstractThe fact of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemics was often made as a reason by a lot of companies to conduct massive layoffs (PHK) in Indonesia. The regulation about force majeure to do massive layoffs (PHK) could only be found in Article 164 Act No. 13 Year 2003 about employment and it is not that specific about what kind of condition which could be categorized as force majeure that enables companies to conduct massive layoffs PHK. The statement of problem of this research is the spread of Covid-19 a condition categorized as force majeure that could become the reason to do a massive layoffs and how is the legal protection of worker toward the layoffs during the Covid-19 pandemics? This is normative research with constitutional and conceptual approach. The result from the observation and analysis indicated that the Covid-19 pandemics could be qualified as a force majeure but to conduct massive layoffs the companies need to experience loss or disadvantage and already closed permanently or massive layoffs is conducted for efficiency as what has been regulated by Article 164 point (1) and (3) Act No. 13 Year 2003 about employment by doing some steps in advance as stated in Minister Hand-outs No. SE-907/MEN/PHI-PPHI/X/2004, 28th October 2004 and the decision of the Supreme Court No. 19/PUU-IX/2011, 20th June 2012. Keywords: Work relationship, massive layoffs, Covid-19 ABSTRAKFakta penyebaran Corona Virus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) banyak dijadikan alasan bagi perusahaan-perusahaan untuk melakukan pemutusan hubungan kerja (PHK) d Indonesia. Pengaturan mengenai alasan force majeure dalam melakukan PHK hanya terdapat dalam Pasal 164 Undang-Undang No. 13 Tahun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan dan tidak terlalu rinci bagaimana kondisi yang dapat dikualifikasi sebagai force majeure sehingga perusahaan dapat melakukan PHK. Rumusan masalah penelitian ini adalah apakah penyebaran Covid-19 merupakan kondisi yang dikualifikasi force majeure sehingga dapat dijadikan alasan untuk melakukan pemutusan hubungan kerja dan bagaimana perlindungan hukum pekerja atas pemutusan hubungan kerja yang terjadi pada masa penyebaran Covid-19 ? Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konsep. Dari hasil penelusuran dan analisis dapat ditegaskan penyebaran Covid-19 dapat dikualifikasi sebagai keadaan memaksa namun untuk melakukan PHK perusahaan harus mengalami kerugian dan telah tutup secara permanen atau PHK dilakukan dengan alasan efisiensi sebagaimana diatur Pasal 164 ayat (1) dan (3) Undang-Undang No. 13 Taun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan dengan terlebih dahulu melakukan langkah-langkah dalam Surat Edaran Menteri Nomor SE-907/MEN/PHI-PPHI/X/2004, tertanggal 28 Oktober 2004 dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 19/PUU-IX/2011, tertanggal 20 Juni 2012. Kata kunci : Hubungan Kerja, Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja, Covid-19

Download Full-text

PERUBAHAN STATUS HUBUNGAN KERJA PEKERJA PERUSAHAAN PENYEDIA JASA PEKERJA DALAM HUKUM KETENAGAKERJAAN

E-JURNAL THE SPIRIT OF LAW ◽

10.33121/tsl.v1i1.37 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 1 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Miftakhul Huda

Keyword(s):

Employment Status ◽

Service Providers ◽

Labor Law ◽

Legal Protection ◽

Employment Law ◽

Basic Principles ◽

Employment Agreement ◽

Labor Service ◽

Work Relationship ◽

The Government

Regulation of service providers working in employment law is always opposed to thenorms and principles of law. The existence of labor service company that can not beseparated in the dynamics of development in the Indonesian labor force of restrictionsare clear and precise in the formulation of legislation. Changes in employment status asone of the forms of legal protection of workers' labor service provider is one of therestrictions set by the Government through Act No. 13 of 2003 on Labour in particularlabor relations agreements. Given the setting in Employment Act can not be separatedfrom the basic principles of the agreement, then the restriction that there must still bebased on the basic principles. Protection laws enacted by not considering the basicprinciples of the law will only make the problem more complex labor and potentiallycreates new problems.Keyword :Labor law, work relationship, employment agreement

Download Full-text

Ethical and legal aspects of disaster response under Indonesian legal system

MATEC Web of Conferences ◽

10.1051/matecconf/201822904006 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 229 ◽

pp. 04006

Author(s):

Ida Susanti

Keyword(s):

Legal System ◽

Disaster Response ◽

Legal Protection ◽

Legal Aspects ◽

Displaced Persons ◽

Legal Ethics ◽

Force Majeure ◽

Legal Position ◽

The Government ◽

Almost All

Indonesia is a vulnerable country to disasters. Because almost all islands in Indonesia has the volcanoes, Indonesia is in the ring of fire, which potentially triggers a volcano eruption disaster. Moreover, earthquake, flood, tsunami, landslides regularly occur in Indonesia. It is very important to the response to such disasters. Recently, many regulations have been issued by the government, yet many unjust or indecent treatment have been experienced by displaced persons or the victims of disasters. Some illustrations concerning how bad legal position of disasters’ victims, especially their private rights, will be explored. It is common that in a contract, a natural disaster will be considered as a force majeure. A legal consequence of this condition is, the disasters’ victims must defray or restore the damage by themselves. It could be very unfair or inhumane because, after the disaster usually, many victims lose their capacity to perform their previous legal obligation. In this issue, the law fails to protect, because legal solution could be formally legitimate but substantially unfair. In this case, ethical consideration must be endorsed, for increasing their capacity to recover from the disaster. This paper describes disaster responses in Indonesian’s legal system, especially in the context to protect displaced persons or victims of disasters; and to explore justification to use legal ethics to protect them, in case legal protection fails to provide substantive justice for disasters’ victims.

Download Full-text

Work Relationship Terminated Employees Legal Protection To Get Severance Payment From PT. Kertas Lecess Related To Law Of Bankruptcy And Law Of Labor

Widya Yuridika ◽

10.31328/wy.v3i1.1276 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 3 (1) ◽

pp. 11

Author(s):

Susilawati Ussy RafaRayya

Keyword(s):

Legal Protection ◽

The State ◽

Point Of View ◽

District Court ◽

Economic Aspects ◽

Economic Point ◽

Work Relationship ◽

The Government ◽

Arbitrary Action ◽

Debt Payment

This research titled is work relationship terminated employees legal protection to get severance payment from PT. Kertas Lecess related to law of bankruptcy and law of labor. The position of the worker or labor can be seen in two aspects, namely in terms of juridical and socio-economic aspects. From a socio-economic point of view, workers need legal protection from the state for the possibility of arbitrary action by entrepreneur. The form of protection provided by the government is by making regulations that bind workers and employeee, in this case there is Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Delaying Obligations of Debt Payment Jo. Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Labor Jo. MK Decision No. 67 / PUU-XI / 2013PT. The regulation is used as a basis for employees of PT. Kertas Lecess to sue the BUMN to be declared bankrupt and responsible for paying severance for its employees. PT. Kertas Lecess is a state-owned enterprise (BUMN), which went bankrupt in September 2019. There are around 1800 workers who must receive termination of employment. The value of severance payment for workers affected by layoffs is around Rp. 300 billion. Employees affected by layoffs protest because they have not received severance payment and even 1,900 employees who have not received their salary for 4 years. PT. Kertas Lecess was decided bankrupt by the Surabaya Commercial Court as a result of the cancellation of the peace proposal submitted by 15 of his employees on September 25, 2018. With the above considerations, the Panel of Judges of the Surabaya District Court, decided to grant the request for a cancellation of peace (Homologation) and stated that PT. Kertas Lecess is proven guilty of negligence for the non-payment of the salaries of PT. Kertas Lecess employees.

Download Full-text

Kebijakan Kewajiban Vaksin Covid-19 Bukan Bentuk Pelanggaran HAM oleh Pemerintah

INICIO LEGIS ◽

10.21107/il.v2i2.13051 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 2 (2) ◽

pp. 183-193

Author(s):

Aprilina Pawestri ◽

Ida Wahyuliana

Keyword(s):

Human Rights ◽

Large Change ◽

John Stuart Mill ◽

Government Policies ◽

Economic Conditions ◽

Human Rights Violations ◽

Corona Virus ◽

Pros And Cons ◽

The Government ◽

The Right

ABSTRAKKeberadaan corona virus di Indonesia membawa perubahan yang sangat besar pada kondisi ekonomi, kesehatan, pendidikan dan lain sebagainya. Berbagai kebijakan di ambil salah satunya adalah pemberian vaksin secara masal dan bertahap. Namun kebijakan ini menimbulkan pro dan kontra dalam masyarakat. Khususnya kebijakan kewajiban vaksin yang dinilai melanggar hak asasi manusia. Karena seharusnya pilihan vaksin adalah sukarela. Ini diperkuat dengan munculnya sanksi bagi yang menolak dilakukan vaksinasi. Kajian ini lakukan untuk mengurai permasalahan apakah kewajiban vaksinasi COVID-19 merupakan bentuk pelanggaran hak asasi manusia yang dilakukan oleh pemerintah. Untuk menjawab rumusan tersebut digunakan metode penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan undang-undang dan konseptual. Dan hasil penelitian ini bahwa kebijakan pemerintah menetapkan kewajiban vaksin tidak bisa lantas di justifikasi sebagai bentuk pelanggaran hak asasi manusia. Karena masyarakat juga memiiki kewajiban sebagai warganegara di bidang kesehatan sebagaimana Pasal 9 ayat 1 UU No. 36 Tahun 2009. Diperkuat Komnas HAM dan sejalan dengan teori yang di sebutkan John Stuart Mill bahwa setiap individu memiliki hak untuk bertindak berdasarkan keinginan mereka selama tindakan mereka tidak merugikan orang lain. Dengan tetap mengupayakan langkah persuasif dengan menimalkan sanksi administratif. Kata Kunci: kebijakan, kewajiban vaksin, pelanggaran HAM ABSTRACTThe existence of corona virus in Indonesia brings a very large change in economic conditions, health, education and so on. Various policies are taken, one of which is the provision of vaccines en masse and gradually. But this policy raises pros and cons in society. Especially the policy of vaccine obligations that are considered to violate human rights. The vaccine option should be voluntary. This is reinforced by the emergence of sanctions for those who refuse vaccinations. This study was conducted to unravel the problem of whether the COVID-19 vaccination obligation is a form of human rights violations committed by the government. To answer the formulation is used normative research methods with legal and conceptual approaches. And the results of this study that government policies set vaccine obligations can not be then justified as a form of human rights violations. Because the community also has obligations as citizens in the field of health as Article 9 paragraph 1 of Law No. 36 of 2009. Strengthened Komnas HAM and in line with the theory mentioned by John Stuart Mill that every individual has the right to act on their wishes as long as their actions do not harm others. By continuing to pursue persuasive steps by imposing administrative sanctions.Keywords: policies, vaccine obligations, human rights violations

Download Full-text

Legal Protection for Vaccine Recipients Covid-19 in Indonesia

International Journal of Law and Public Policy ◽

10.36079/lamintang.ijlapp-0302.262 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 3 (2) ◽

pp. 75-82

Author(s):

Muhammad Mahendra Abdi

Keyword(s):

Virus Disease ◽

Human Life ◽

Legal Protection ◽

Corona Virus ◽

The People ◽

The Republic ◽

The Government

Regulation of the Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia Number 10 of 2021 concerning the Implementation of Vaccination in the Context of Combating the Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic, this Minister of Health Regulation is a government step in carrying out the legality of administering the COVID-19 vaccine because the spread of the COVID-19 virus is very fast. Occurs in humans, thus creating great concern for human life because it can lead to death. Therefore, the government took a response action by providing vaccinations for the people of Indonesia, the purpose of this vaccination is to overcome the high spread of COVID-19, the provision of the covid-19 vaccine given to the Indonesian people must also fulfill the proper rights for the recipients of the COVID-19 vaccine, so that when there is an impact on the administration of the Covid-19 vaccine, the government can handle it quickly. The problems in this paper are how is legal protection for people who receive the COVID-19 vaccine, the extent to which the government provides legal protection rights to people who receive the COVID-19 vaccine.

Download Full-text

PENGAMBILALIHAN DAN PENUTUPAN PERUSAHAAN YANG BERDAMPAK PADA PERSELISIHAN PEMUTUSAN HUBUNGAN KERJA MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 13 TAHUN 2003 TENTANG KETENAGAKERJAAN

Jurnal Ius Constituendum ◽

10.26623/jic.v3i1.866 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 3 (1) ◽

pp. 107

Author(s):

Mohammad Ilyas

Keyword(s):

Dispute Settlement ◽

Industrial Relations ◽

Legal Protection ◽

Employment Termination ◽

Work Relationship ◽

Dispute Settlements ◽

Continue Employment ◽

Pass Through ◽

The Stability ◽

Continue Work

ABSTRAK Perusahaan pada hakikatnya dibentuk untuk mencari keuntungan dan atau laba yang sebesar-besarnya, namun dalam aktivitasnya tersebut tidak dapat dihindari pula terjadinya kerugian pada perusahaan sehingga demi menjaga stabilitas perekonomian perusahaannya, pengusaha melakukan kegiatan pengambilalihan, maupun penutupan perusahaan. Adapun beberapa hal yang menjadi rumusan-rumusan masalah yaitu bagaimana perlindungan hukum terhadap buruh / pekerja ketika terjadi Perselisihan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja (PHK) akibat pengambilalihan maupun penutupan perusahaan? dan bagaimana permasalahan dan model Penyelesaian Perselisihan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja antara pekerja dan pengusaha akibat tindakan pengambilalihan maupun penutupan perusahaan?. Ada dua bentuk perlundungan hukum terhadap buruh / pekerja ketika terjadi Perselisihan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja (PHK) akibat pengambilalihan maupun penutupan perusahaan, yaitu perlindungan hukum bagi pekerja / buruh atas pengusaha yang tidak bersedia melanjutkan hubungan kerja dan perlindungan hukum bagi pekerja / buruh yang tidak bersedia melanjutkan hubungan kerja. Upaya hukum yang dapat ditempuh pekerja untuk menyelesaikan perselisihan pemutusan hubungan kerja tersebut dapat melalui jalur Penyelesaian Perselisihan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja di luar Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial (non litigasi) ini dapat dilakukan dengan penyelesaian melalui bipartit, konsiliasi Arbitrase, mediasi. Dan Penyelesaian Perselisihan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja melalui Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial.ABSTRACTThe company is essentially formed to seek benefit and/or profits as much as possible, but in its activities, it cannot be avoided also the loss of the company so that in order to maintain the stability of the company's economy, entrepreneurs make takeover activities, as well as the closure of the company. As for some matters, the formulation of the problem is how to protect the law against the workers/labors when there is a Dispute Termination of Employment (PHK) due to the takeover or closure of the company? And how are the problems and models of the Settlement of Employment Dispute Settlements between workers and employers due to takeover or closure of the company? There are two forms of legal protection to the worker/labor in the Employment Termination (PHK) resulting from the takeover or closure of the company, namely legal protection for workers/laborers against the employer who are unwilling to continue employment and legal protection for workers who are unwilling to continue work relationship. Legal remedies by which the employee may resolve the termination disputes may pass through the Termination Dispute Settlement outside the Industrial Relations Court (non litigation) may be made by settlement through bipartite, arbitration conciliation, mediation. And Termination Dispute Settlement is through Industrial Relations Court.

Download Full-text

CONSUMER PROTECTION RELATED TO DISPENSING PUMP MANIPULATION IN SPBU (GAS STATION)

Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum ◽

10.26532/jph.v7i2.10855 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (2) ◽

pp. 141

Author(s):

Deviana Yuanitasari ◽

Sonny Dewi Judiasih ◽

Ratu Chairunissa

Keyword(s):

Law Enforcement ◽

Consumer Protection ◽

Digital Technology ◽

Industrial Relations ◽

Legal Protection ◽

Research Results ◽

Analytical Research ◽

Gas Station ◽

The Government ◽

Cooperative Relationship

Services in business activities at SPBU (gas station) often created problems between business operators and consumers that can cause cost to consumers. Underhanded practices are carried out by SPBU owner by manipulation digital technology systems that automatically measure the flow of fuel (dispensing pump) that is not in accordance with the measurements. This writing aims to review and analyze responsibility of business operators and legal protection for consumers related to manipulation dispensing pump of SPBU. The method used in this research is normative juridical with descriptive-analytical research specifications conducted with the approval of the regulations in the field of employment in terms of layoffs conducted by companies and research by interviewing the parties involved in industrial relations. Based on the research results obtained answers is: First, the responsibility of business operators who carry out manipulation dispensing pump is to revoke the PASTI PAS predicate within a period of two months and terminating cooperative relationship if the business operators is considered to inflict losses many consumers by Pertamina and granting compensation in accordance with Article 19 of UUPK. Second, legal protection for consumers is protection in the form of preventive and repressive, where prevention is carried out coaching by the government or Pertamina and repressive with law enforcement or settlement of consumer disputes both through the court and outside the court.

Download Full-text

Sustainability of the Legal Profession Amid the Covid-19 Pandemic Situation

The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education ◽

10.15294/ijicle.v2i2.38333 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 2 (2) ◽

pp. 215-218

Author(s):

Damar Sinatria Saputro

Keyword(s):

Disaster Management ◽

Human Relations ◽

Corona Virus ◽

Close Proximity ◽

Rapid Spread ◽

The Status ◽

Difficulty Breathing ◽

The Government ◽

Almost All

The rapid spread of the corona virus certainly affects the disruption of the daily activities of the community both in the area that has been turned into a red zone or even not yet. The provisions for determining national disasters have been stipulated in Law No. 24 of 2007 concerning Disaster Management. In fact, the determination of the status and level of disasters has also been regulated by Presidential Regulation No. 17 of 2018 concerning the Implementation of Disaster Management in Certain Conditions. The virus that sufferers experience symptoms such as fever, dry cough, and difficulty breathing is of course disrupting many sectors, the legal sector certainly is not spared and of course experienced interference. Activities in the field of law are one of the areas that rely heavily on human relations in close proximity. Almost all activities in the field of law require us to be close to other humans. With the corona virus that requires us to keep our distance with others, of course this is very difficult if we want to carry out activities in the field of law that is usually done. Not to mention the fact that the government encourages us to stay at home, then also the closure of various roads that make our Movement very limited.

Download Full-text