scholarly journals SOCIAL TECHNOLOGIES FOR THE FORMATION OF NATIONAL SELF-CONSCIENCE: Theoretical and Methodological Analysis

Author(s):  
Irina G. Napalkova

Introduction. The relevance of the topic is determined by the subject of analysis “national consciousness”, which is a structure that unites the Russian nation as an ethno-national-state entity. The destiny of Russian statehood, ability to withstand global challenges and threats, as well as the internal direction of development of Russian society largely depend on its stability. After all, as practice shows, excessive absolutization of ethnic identity leads to destructive processes up to the collapse of the country. The main goal of the work is to analyze the theoretical and methodological foundations of the formation of national consciousness in a technological context. Materials and methods. To implement the research strategy, structural analysis, system and analytical methods, functional and axiological approaches, etc. were used. Results. Research problems are related to the specifics of social technologies for the formation of national consciousness, which can be applied in Russian reality. As the technologies that form the national consciousness of the Russian civil nation, the article points out state-administrative ones based on the program-target approach and using technologies of directed socialization and the mechanism of “point secularization of consciousness”. In particular, this is the federal target program “Strengthening the Unity of the Russian Nation and the Ethno-Cultural Development of the Peoples of Russia (2014–2020)”, the state program “Patriotic Education of Citizens of the Russian Federation for 2016–2020”, etc. As the “soft technologies”, first of all, communication technologies are considered, such as PR, branding, propaganda. Discussion and Conclusion. The theoretical and methodological research conducted has shown that communication technologies are not paid enough attention, although they are able to effectively influence public opinion and introduce new values, ideals, attitudes into the mass consciousness. At the same time, the effectiveness of the implementation of any technology is largely due to the degree of partnership between the state and civil society. The formation of the Russian civil nation can not be only politically initiated and governed and directed by the state – it is primarily a natural historical process.

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Алексей Михайлов ◽  
Aleksey Mikhaylov ◽  
Евгений Шишкин ◽  
Evgeniy Shishkin

The article reveals the peculiarities of patriotic education of penitentiary staff in the conditions of reforming. Conceptual aspects of the term "patriotism" of its content and direction.As part of patriotic education is the development of Russian society of high social activity, civil responsibility, spirituality, formation of citizens with positive values and qualities that can manifest them in the creative process in the interests of the Motherland, strengthening the state, ensuring its vital interests and sustainable development.The goals of patriotic education of Russian citizens through more specific objectives, taking into account the specifics of subjects and objects of education, the environment in which it is carried out, the characteristics of their solutions in the economic, social, legal, political, cultural and other spheres. The content and focus of patriotism are determined, above all, spiritual and moral climate of society, its historical roots, feeding the public life of generations. The article also discloses the most meaningful actual directions of patriotic education of employees of the penitentiary system: the spiritual and moral, historical and regional studies, civil-patriotic, social, patriotic, military, patriotic, heroic and patriotic, sports and patriotic.


Author(s):  
Richard Danakari

Introduction. The article examines the nature and essence of patriotism and friendship of peoples, their crucial role for the life of the Russian Federation. Over the past decades, radical changes have taken place in the political system of Russia, its social and ethnic structure, and a heterogeneous ethno-confessional society has been formed. The author shows that patriotism and friendship of peoples are the most important determinants, specific properties necessary for the integration of our multinational federation ensuring order and stability in the country, its sustainable and dynamic development, the gradual formation of new supra-ethnic and supra-confessional values, and general cultural identity. Methods. The combination of applying methods and approaches is the key to studying the theory and practice of patriotism, recognizing its procedural nature, unity and opposition in the activities of the state and society, the interests of the government, political parties and social groups. The use of the polyparadigmatic methodology in studying the nature and essence of patriotism, in particular, the activity and civilizational approaches, the synergetic method, dialectic categories made it possible to determine the complexity and continuity of the formation of patriotism and patriotic work, to reveal dynamism and conflict, general and special features in them. Analysis. Studying the real state of Russian society points to the weakness of systemic activities of patriotic education, preserving and strengthening the unity and friendship between nations. The lack of a common goal problematizes the search for a common patriotic idea, new foundations for Russian civilization, the common existence of nations, the construction of a welfare state and a harmonious society. Results. The article reveals inadequacy of the declared ideas of patriotism and friendship of peoples to the policy and practice of implementing neoliberal values and the priority of individualism. The author shows that the process of further fragmentation and stratification, alienation and separation of people according to racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious, confessional, generational, professional and other characteristics continues in society. The transition of already atomized individuals from the ethnic mentality and national behavioral stereotypes to a single patriotic goal – the all-Russian identity – is formal. Today, the activity on the formation of patriotism and patriotic attitudes of consciousness does not affect the deep, essential foundations of society, is of a festival and manipulative nature, and in many respects concerns only the military sphere, tourism and sports. The notes mentioned create significant difficulties in understanding the idea of the common welfare, genuine and false in patriotism, the definition of objective interests of the state, authority and society, social groups and individual elites. Modern globalization inevitably involves taking into account the national interests of Russia, the search for optimal forms of interconnection of civilizational and universal principles.


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 80-88
Author(s):  
Vladimir Kornilovitch

The Object of the Study. Strategic planning as a type of government activity for the implementation of the state’s strategic management function. The Subject of the Study. Features of forming of public attitudes to state strategic planning in the conditions of different levels of modernization of the regions. The Purpose of the Study. Identification of sociological grounds for constructing a promising model of state strategic management. The Main Provisions of the Article. Strategic management is the highest function of the state. It is implemented by the authorities through the system of state strategic planning and a specific type of management activity - the development and implementation of strategies, projects and programs. The problem in the state strategic management is manifested in the fact that targeted actions of the authorities on the implementation of strategies, national projects and long-term development programs have unforeseen consequences. The continuing growth of territorial disproportions in the socioeconomic, and sociocultural development of cities and regions of Russiya indicates that the modernization of Russian society ir a spontaneous, fragmentary, rather than a manageable process. The article presents an analysis of the results obtained in the course of the study “Civil Expertise of the Problem of Reforming the Power-Management Vertical in the Context of Socio-Cultural Modernization Processes of the Regions: From Monitoring States to Forecasting Design” (RNF, 2015-2017, Head - Dr.S. A Tikhonov). On the basis of empirical data, the author demonstrates the potential of sociological tools in studying the properties of social management systems emerging at the municipal, regional and federal levels. It is proved that when a certain level of modernization of the region is reached, there is an increase in the influence of the subjective factor in management, which, along with others, determines the ability of authorities to achieve the planned results of long-term development. Differentiation of regions according to the level of socio-economic and socio-cultural development as well as the existing set of social management systems do not allow to implementat linear dependencies in management relations. The initial condition for constructing a new model of state strategic management is a combination of institutional, normative-value management ,and developming macro-technology at the federal, regional and municipal levels. �аз�c� ���� W� муниципальном уровне – менеджмент.


Author(s):  
Jussi Lassila

The chapter discusses patriotism’s role and future prospects in Russia in relation to its principal target, Russia’s youth. Beneath the overall conformism with the Kremlin’s patriotic policies, youth’s relatively marginal engagement with any fixed patriotic identity is to be found among a variety of patriotic activists who prefer a distinct patriotic position to the state and the rest of society. In generational terms, Russia is witnessing a deepening gap between the policymakers of patriotism and the youth. On the one hand, the state repeatedly attempts to strengthen patriotism as an ideological tool in controlling societal and cultural processes, while, on the other hand, youth’s departing views from Soviet-like modes of patriotic education ignite demands to increase the role of patriotism further. Over the course of the next 10–15 years, it is very likely that an change in the balance between Soviet-era and post-Soviet cohorts of policymakers and conductors of patriotic policies will have a significant impact on the role and meaning of patriotism in Russian society.


2021 ◽  
pp. 138-153
Author(s):  
Сергей Николаевич Мартышенко

Состояние патриотического воспитания молодежи в постсоветский период нуждается в критическом анализе и осмыслении. В современном информационном пространстве многократно возросла активность по негативному влиянию на молодежь. Для разработки эффективных инструментов противодействия информационным атакам на молодежь необходимо проводить постоянный мониторинг социально-политического портрета молодежи в различных регионах страны. Цель исследования состоит в комплексном изучении процесса формирования патриотического сознания и поведения молодежи, как необходимого условия и важнейшей составляющей политической стабилизации современного российского общества. Эмпирической базой исследования послужили данные онлайн опросов студенческой молодежи Приморского края, проведенные в 2019 в 2021 году. Опросы производились с использованием Google-форм в интернет. В опросе приняли участие 1290 респондентов. Оценка состояния патриотических воззрений молодежи позволяет выявить риски и проблемные зоны в процессе реализации патриотического воспитания молодежи. Особое внимание в исследовании уделяется выявлению особенностей социально-политического портрета молодежи Приморского края на основе анализа отношения молодежи региона к некоторым устойчивым выражениям, связанным с темой патриотизма. По результатам исследования можно сделать вывод о том, что в настоящее время уровень патриотического воспитания молодежи нельзя признать вполне соответствующим современным вызовам. The state of patriotic education of young people in the post-Soviet period needs critical analysis and comprehension. In the modern information space, the activity on the negative impact on youth has increased many times over. To develop effective tools to counter information attacks on young people, it is necessary to constantly monitor the socio-political portrait of young people in various regions of the country. The aim of the research is to comprehensively study the process of forming patriotic consciousness and behavior of young people, as a necessary condition and the most important component of the political stabilization of modern Russian society. The empirical basis of the study was the data of online surveys of student youth of the Primorsky kray, conducted in 2019 in 2021. Surveys were conducted using Google forms on the Internet. 1290 respondents took part in the survey. Assessment of the state of patriotic views of young people makes it possible to identify risks and problem areas in the process of implementing patriotic education of young people. The study pays special attention to identifying the features of the socio-political portrait of young people in Primorsky kray based on the analysis of the attitude of young people in the region to some stable expressions associated with the theme of patriotism. According to the results of the study, it can be concluded that at present the level of patriotic education of young people cannot be recognized as fully consistent with modern challenges.


Author(s):  
V.A. Chernov

The destructive processes happening in the last decades in various states were preceded by demoralization of their population. As practice by an important factor of maintaining stability and sustainable development of society shows the intellectual and moral condition of citizens is. In this regard preservation and cultural development acts as the most important means of improvement of quality of life of society and strengthening of the state that it is very relevant in search of means of achievement of sustainable development and identification of destructive factors in development of society and state. It is known that Russia is exposed to the most severe information influence in geopolitics in attempts to discredit our country and to subordinate neocolonial interest, the international political forces. In this regard society needs ability to resist to this influence that will keep the state and sovereignty. In article the culture of consumption as the condition necessary for achievement of sustainable social and economic development, legal contradictions in the sociocultural environment in interrelation with national security is considered. The concept of quality of consumption determined by degree of usefulness of consumer goods for society and its sustainable development reveals. The author complements a definition of public consumption with spiritual and moral consumption and considers his role in latent technologies of information wars and also in achievement of sustainable development of society and state. Are considered destructive for the state and the right of a tendency in culture. Shocking in art and media is subdivided by the author on belonging to freedom of creativity and, introducing destructive tendencies in society and the state. Antipodes of shocking are considered on the example of theatrical performances and telecasts. The division of processes and the phenomena offered by the author in art and media on creative and destructive became result of a research. In article differences between cultural creations and the filth corrupting society and serving to his destruction as an element of latent technologies of ideological information wars reveal. Increase in culture is considered as the most important way of protection of society and state in ideological information wars.


Author(s):  
Ю. М. Оборотов

В современной методологии юриспруденции происходит переход от изучения состо­яний ее объекта, которыми выступают право и государство, к постижению этого объек­та в его изменениях и превращениях. Две подсистемы методологии юриспруденции, подсистема обращенная к состоянию права и государства; и подсистема обращенная к изменениям права и государства, — получают свое отображение в концептуальной форме, методологических подходах, методах, специфических понятиях. Показательны перемены в содержании методологии юриспруденции, где определяю­щее значение имеют методологические подходы, определяющие стратегию исследова­тельских поисков во взаимосвязи юриспруденции с правом и государством. Среди наи­более характерных подходов антропологический, аксиологический, цивилизационный, синергетический и герменевтический — определяют плюралистичность современной методологии и свидетельствуют о становлении новой парадигмы методологии юриспру­денции.   In modern methodology of jurisprudence there is a transition from the study the states of its object to its comprehension in changes and transformations. Hence the two subsystems of methodology of jurisprudence: subsystem facing the states of the law and the state as well as their components and aspects; and subsystem facing the changes of the law and the state in general and their constituents. These subsystems of methodology of jurisprudence receive its reflection in conceptual form, methodological approaches, methods, specific concepts. Methodology of jurisprudence should not be restricted to the methodology of legal theory. In this regard, it is an important methodological question about subject of jurisprudence. It is proposed to consider the subject of jurisprudence as complex, covering both the law and the state in their specificity, interaction and integrity. Indicative changes in the content methodology of jurisprudence are the usage of decisive importance methodological approaches that govern research strategy searches in conjunction with the law and the state. Among the most characteristic of modern development approaches: anthropological, axiological, civilization, synergistic and hermeneutic. Modern methodology of jurisprudence is pluralistic in nature alleging various approaches to the law and the state. Marked approaches allow the formation of a new paradigm methodology of jurisprudence.


2020 ◽  
Vol 102 ◽  
pp. 613-620
Author(s):  
Igor N. Tyapin

The author of the article uses the works of L.A. Tikhomirov as the basis when examining the problem of criticism of the conditions of the state and society in monarchic Russia during the last decade of its existence from the part of the conservative figures who not only advocated the necessity to preserve the autocracy but also substantially contributed to the working out of the main principles of Russian social development. In particular, the “creative conservators” managed to accomplish the deep philosophic conceptualization of Russian history while trying to find the previously lost ideal of social organization. Tikhomirov’s relevant concepts of the mutual conditionality of Russian national consciousness underdevelopment and state degradation, as well as of the necessity to realize the model of the moral state of justice on the basis of the national idea, were not accepted by the bureaucratic system that resulted before long in the collapse of Russian monarchic state.


Author(s):  
Akil Ibrahim Al-Zuhari

The article defines the features of the process of forming the research tradition of studying the institute of parliamentarism as a mechanism for the formation of democracy. It is established that parliamentarism acts as one of the varieties of the regime of functioning of the state, to which the independence of the representative body from the people is inherent, its actual primacy in the state mechanism, the division of functions between the legislative and executive branches of government, the responsibility and accountability of the government to the parliament. It is justified that, in addition to the regime that fully meets the stated requirements of classical parliamentarism, there are regimes that can be characterized as limited parliamentary regimes. The conclusions point out that parliamentarism does not necessarily lead to a democracy regime. At the first stage of development of statehood, it functions for a long time in the absence of many attributes of democracy, but at the present stage, without parliamentarism, democracy will be substantially limited. Modern researchers of parliamentarism recognize that this institution is undergoing changes with the development of the processes of democracy and democratization. This is what produces different approaches to its definition. However, most scientists under classical parliamentarianism understand such a system, which is based on the balance of power. This approach seeks to justify limiting the rights of parliament and strengthening executive power. Keywords: Parliamentarism, research strategy, theory of parliamentarism, types of parliamentarism


Author(s):  
Anatolii Yugov ◽  
Sergey Belykh

The Constitution, as the main universal and comprehensive legal document, establishes fundamental principles and defines the legal basis for development of public and state life in all politically significant spheres, serves as a guarantor of legitimacy and order, gives a boost to the development of society. The special political and legal nature of the constitution, the issues of its operation and the mechanism of its implementation are of great importance. In accordance to the authors’ approach, the mechanism of implementation of the Constitution of the Russian Federation includes the following components: 1) entry of the constitution into legal force; 2) its functions; 3) constitutional algorithm of unity and differentiation of public authority; 4) forms of implementation; 5) ways of implementation; 6) subjects of implementation; 7) objects of implementation; 8) institutions for modernization; 9) guarantees of implementation. The authors conclude that the modern scientific ideas of a rational mechanism of implementation of the Constitution of the Russian Federation contribute to solving the issues of economic and cultural development of the Russian society, help creating favorable conditions for proper law enforcement, strengthening legitimacy and order.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document